Whatever happened to vampire movies?

By that I mean women in latex and trench coats kicking things.

Attached: 310540_UNDERWORLD (2003)_1400x2100_English_2.jpg (560x840, 69K)

Another Underworld is coming though.

Attached: Underworld Evolution (2006).mkv_20200106_141040.010.jpg (1920x1080, 278K)

>In 2017, Wiseman revealed that a sixth film is also in development with Beckinsale reprising her role as Selene.[14] On September 13, 2018, Beckinsale confirmed she will not appear in the sixth film, stating: "I wouldn't return. I've done plenty of those."
She's the entire movie, though.

Vampire: The Masquerade invented it, Blade and Underworld ripped it off.

Just pass the mantle to Lilly Mo.
There will never be a hornier vampire.

I love this fucking movie, to me it was the apex of of the leather/latex slo mo gunfu industrial metal era of the late 90s/00s. Beckinsale at peak sex appeal, great action scenes, simple but interesting storyline, fantastic mix of practical and computer generated effects that still hold up, and Billy Nighy chewing scenery. Prequel was decent, but the actual sequels are hot garbage

Oh actually didn't know she dropped it. And looking it up now, it's not even a movie anymore but a Tv show. hmm... hmmm

Attached: 1460026220534.jpg (97x125, 3K)

its funny how well she worked in the movies, but IRL shes actually smol

Yeah bro. The first Underworld movie is fucking bomb yo.

the wall

Michael Sheen was underrated, as was the guy who played Raze. But like you said, Kate in latex is the main draw.

Attached: 1539047051109.jpg (1187x1800, 297K)

Kinda sad though that Kate was cucking Michael Sheen with the director while making this film.

Too sexy for this woke era.

I don't understand the whole "male gaze" thing, don't lesbians also like looking at hot girls?

It all makes sense when you realize all the women that say the terms "sexual objectification", "male gaze", and other such words are just expressing their female insecurity. That's exactly what it is, it's just a big movement against males because a few women that lead this movement feel insecure about the stuff men create and their fantasies.

This. Too sexy and too dark. Zoomers want colored soft gay transgender nigger sjw george soros movies.

So why did they drop Michael after 2 movies of being another protagonist? I still don't know after all these years.

I think you mean millennials. Gen Z is the most conservative generation since WW2. It's rebellion against their hyper-liberal Gen X/Y parents

Isn't Michael still frozen? Did they ever resolve that?

Come on dude, that's just some stupid plot thing to excuse they don't want to work with the character anymore. It's just slightly better than ignoring he ever existed.

wait so did the one where we find out she has a daughter take place in the future? It's been a while since I've seen them