We did it, Yea Forums!

Frankenstein by Aquaman director
Bride of Frankenstein
Renfield
Invisible Woman by Elizabeth Banks
Dark Army by Paul Feig
Monster Mash - this one is a musical

Some will be standalone, some will be related to each other. No limits and restrictions. Frankenstein can be PG while Renfield may be R rated.

That's it? Wtf are movies dying?

>Monster Mash - this one is a musical

Whaaaaaaaast?

>It’s already done seven times its budget in one weekend

The Blumhouse model really is genius.

screenrant.com/every-dark-universe-movie-after-invisible-man/amp/

Mummyfags btfo!

rape

Everyone is white

Didn't the mummy open with over 30m in USA and 170m worldwide? It was the biggest opening weekend for all tom cruise movies.

Is this the movie about a woman who likes to be choked by the imaginary man that follows her?

Is that good?

Budget: $7m.

Little more than Dracula Untold and a bit less than The Mummy but production was much cheaper. Let's be honest, monster movies will never make capeshit numbers.

$29 million is not an impressive opening, that said with a measly $9 million production budget and $20-30 in marketing it was always going to make money in the end.

The B+ from opening audiences sounds like it won't have great legs though.

>Ends with a sequel/integration into Dark Universe 3.0 hook
>Doesn't flop

NONONONONONONONONONO

I guess that's pretty good.

With a face like that the movie should've been the invisible woman.

hehe

ew

Attached: Capture.png (406x667, 653K)

This

does she get raped in the movie? This will greatly influence whether I see this or not

I refuse to believe any of this is going to be made

Unfortunately she does not.

i genuinely didnt know this movie happened or came out.

welp, fuck that garbage then, I wont even steal the movie

This movie was pretty fun, got spooked by the ladder scene. Rain scene was cool too.

The majority of the immediate supporting cast with the most screen time is black

Oh, you!

There's nothing woke about this movie. It's like old fashioned movie straight from 80s or 90s. Black guy is useless in pre-sjw way. The bitch wins only because of his "mistake" (not even a mistake, she just finds his suit) and Invisible Man is really great in action scenes BTFOing cops.

Its about making men invisible

>There's nothing woke about this movie.

You say that now but before it was out Yea Forums kept bitching it being woke trash because it took a woman’s perspective in the story. And now people are shitting it for being a feminist movie.

In a world where the Battleships board game was given a 200 million dollar adaption nothing is off the table.

>men
>huge success at BO
you people are disgusting

Because it really felt like sjw shitshow before but actual movie is not like that. Camera work is pretty great.

>There's nothing woke about this movie.
Woman is being abused by her white rich husband. She flees and is helped by the only good man in the movie, a black guy.

Her white ex-husbands brother keeps attacking her until she kills him, she then kills her white ex-husband as well so she can finally be a free woman.

>nothing woke about this movie

kys

Is this good or bad? How much did they spend on this?

"You think I'm mad, I won't win the box office and redeem the dark universe? "Alright, I'll show you!" Ehahahahahahaha.
Seriously though I'm glad this didn't bomb, we're back

So you’re both a racist and afraid of women.

incel anonymous btfo yet again

Attached: actual incel.jpg (514x472, 41K)

Does /ourgirl/ finally show off the goods? The scene in Mad Men where she gets naked with Stan was such a tease.

CHECKMATE, ATHIESTS

>spend $7 million
>22 millions takings on opening weekend

Blumhouse can't lose.

>check cameras
>Entire movie falls flat on it's face

What cameras? The only time he could be caught on camera is during the rampage at the hospital. And at that point he’s starting to shift his goal from tormenting her through making people think she’s crazy to hurting other people she cares about.

checked
also,
>listening to Yea Forums about a movie before it comes out

ISHYGDDT

>spend $7 million
>22 millions takings on opening weekend
>Blumhouse can't lose.

So far they haven't made any money, since they only get 50% of the box office take, and the $7 million budget is only for production, not for the at the very least $20-30 million marketing spending.

That said, it WILL make a profit given this opening weekend.

$7,000,000
So pretty good profit.

>action scenes
Gay and dumb

If Mummy lost 100m despite making 400m on 125m budget (like all other mummy movies which also made 400m) then Hollywood marketing doesn't make sense anymore. Money laundering.

Hahaha all of these sound horrible!
And how many of them will be “updated” to include diversity and powerful lesbians?

people don't understand how much money goes to marketing, huge blockbusters have to make months of market in over 100 countries, that shit is not cheap

>The Blumhouse model really is genius.
Budget bloat was never necessary and is just Hollywood cronyism and kike accounting. One million to me one to you oy vey movies make no geld goyim.

I don't think they will do it. Universal Monsters fanbase is mostly made of boomers who hate this sjw bullshit. Look at Star Wars. Universal probably won't do similar mistakes. They will just update them to modern era but keep them as original monsters.

is $29 million good?
i dont know shit about box office numbers

It’s basically recovered its entire budget back already.

Its okay for a horror movie opening, and I'm assuming this one wasn't particularly expensive. If the budget is under 50 million its a huge success.

nice quads.
oh cool, that didnt sound like a good opening to me, guess i really dont know shit about BO numbers. im not gonna see it anyway. but thanks

Attached: 1570052100748.jpg (384x384, 18K)

she has a huge brain.

Attached: bXef76cC_o.jpg (1984x2944, 1.1M)

How many times have people said it’s stupid for studios to continue doing Woke bullshit and yet they continue making Woke bullshit? And the movies continuously and predictably bomb.
They’ve got Paul Feig (Ghostbusters 2016) saying his ideas are inspired by Bride of Frankenstein, Elizabeth Banks (Charlie’s Angles 2019) writing The Invisible Woman which she says is a one woman show that is much different than The Invisible Man, and Monster Mash which will have all those classic spooky monsters singing and dancing. Maybe it will be as good as Cats. That’s only half of the planned movies showing some level of being Woke garbage.

But oh no, the arrogance of the Hollywood elites has been squashed by the recent lessons of their movies bombing. In no way will they continue to make movies that only cater to the loudest Twitter users.

>powerful lesbians
lesbians arent allowed to exist anymore. theyre given HRT and told to become men

>And the movies continuously and predictably bomb.

Except for all the times they don’t.

>Let's be honest, monster movies will never make capeshit numbe
well, not with that attitude they wont

>the only good man in the movie, a black guy.
i hate to be the one to tell you this but, some black people are good people and not violent gangbangers, just like how some white people are bad people and are violent gangbangers. dont freak out too much pls

i never saw it, but did someone say "you sunk my battleship!" at any point in the film?

>i hate to be the one to tell you this but, some black people are good people and not violent gangbangers
I hate to be the one to tell you this but, some white men are good people and not violent wife abusers

Non-woke movies don't have a problem making back their money even with big budgets.

>i hate to be the one to tell you this but, some black people are good people and not violent gangbangers

13

50

>some
no shit genius.
some are and some arent. that was my whole point.
both are allowed and do not denote an insidious agenda.

i didnt say they werent more prone to violence, because data obviously indicates that they are. but SOME of them arent violent and are perfectly normal people.
are movies not allowed to ever show a single black person who is good?

She’s really not all that bad other than her bulbous cranium

>some are and some arent. that was my whole point.
Not in this movie, which is what we were discussing.

Also not in Blumhouse's prior movie, 'Black Christmas', where again every white guy was evil, and the only good guy was a black dude.

It's such a clear agenda, and it's tiresome.

Nobody who paid to see this did so because it's "woke," brainlet.

Yeah, white male victimhood is truly tiresome.

This is first week. The word of mouth will kill this movie very fast.

embarrassing

Samefag

I like Elizabeth Moss because I like Peggy Olsen
I don't care about the rest of her career, but I don't mind her doing well

there's two ways of looking at it though; simply from a financial standpoint (I understand it was a cheap movie to make so I'm sure it'll make a profit), but also as a gauge of interest in further 'Universal Monster' movies. I don't think this was enough of a hit to justify any 'cinematic universe' nonsense, but maybe it'll convince them to make more horror movies out of their old character IPs instead of 'epic' action shit

embarrassing

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-01 (0) tv - We did it, tv - Television Film - 4chan.png (346x115, 3K)

Or noticed that the husband read a scientist researching how to turn invisible, presumably had several other people assisting him, and literally had a second invisibility suit that anyone could have walked on and taken.

why does she look like she’s a bit touched in the head

The spit in her mouth makes me diamonds

But how would they find the suit if they can't see it

How do I get into the Universal Monsters, bros?