Uh oh

Whatever happened to Monique?

There are no choices in biology, xy and xx. That's the science.

Slick got turned into a demon, Monique became a lesbian.

If you're asking about the politics of the comic, Tats seems to be in favor of the bill in Florida prohibiting sex education to children ages 8 and under.

That seems to be his position, anyway. I don't know him but that seems in line with his current politics.

I miss when God would troll people in this comic or the devil getting out smarted by two angels in a Looney Tunes style gag.

Gender is sociology, not biology. Biology doesn't shape how you function in society unless you're literally a dumb insect or a robot with no higher functioning and only a directive to serve the hive/your masters.

Man I fucking love science!

>Tats seems to be in favor of the bill in Florida prohibiting sex education to children ages 8 and under.
The law doesn't mention sex-ed. At all. It's about orientation and gender identity. You could freely still teach kids that pOnOs gets jammed in vagOOO under it.

do you have the strip they appear in?

>You could freely still teach kids that pOnOs gets jammed in vagOOO under it.
My assumption was that would fall under orientation.

Transexuals fucked up and let their movement be taken over by tucutes and white women that want to feel special. The moment they said "you don't need dysphoria to be trans" is the moment the term lost all meaning.

No, it's literally been years since they last appeared.

Genderclown faggotry was made up by a degenerate kike as an excuse to rape boys, and you will never be a real woman.

>My assumption was that would fall under orientation.
Why would it? Orientation is about who you're attracted to. You can fucking is a purely mechanical process. You couldn't discuss why someone would or would not want to fuck beyond physical release, but you could 100% discuss fucking.

The text of the law is very clear. There's no fucking mention about intercourse.

I would think if Florida didn't want people to teach kids how to fuck, they'd actually mention fucking in their bill banning that shit. Clearly Florida wants that shit legal. Which makes sense given who they vote for.

>Is...is Tats demonizing teaching kids to exercise personal choice?
There's no such thing as a "trans child", only grooming victims.

Based

What is Tats view? I found his mind hard to understand

>Why would it? Orientation is about who you're attracted to. You can fucking is a purely mechanical process
That would be discussing heterosexuality as an orientation, wouldn't it?

If you think sociological debates factor into rape you probably don't have a firm grasp on what rape is.

I know who John Money is, so your tranny lies don't work here.

Last october was the 10th year anniversary of Sinfest turbojumping the shark and I don't think Yea Forums observed it.

I remember thinking it was a setup for a punchline that never came I stuck with the webcomic ~2 more years till I gave up.

Attached: 2011-10-03.gif (740x250, 115.93K)

christopherrufo.com/radical-gender-lessons-for-young-children/

>The Evanston–Skokie School District has adopted a radical gender curriculum that teaches pre-kindergarten through third-grade students to celebrate the transgender flag, break the “gender binary” established by white “colonizers,” and experiment with neo-pronouns such as “ze,” “zir,” and “tree.”

1970s-80's gender essentialist feminist, around Andrea Dworkin's direction. The key pivot is that he's a TERF, that he sees MTFs as a threat to feminisim, and the systems' defense of that as an attack on feminisim.

>That would be discussing heterosexuality as an orientation, wouldn't it?
No? Do you know if a person is bi or straight if they engage in heterosexual sex? You fucking don't. Sex is a mechanical process. Social processes factor into partner selection, but fucking gives no fucks.

What's the issue

>What is Tats view?
Gender as a concept doesn't exist and anyone that thinks otherwise was brainwashed into doing so by society.

Tats got woke but for pussy.
Unfortunately he got woke in the early 10s and never made any progress from his initial attempt.

So he comes off as if he never got woke now but he's also not fun because he won't ever make fun of women. It's literally the worst of both worlds where no one likes you but the actual femnazis who want to dominate anyone with a penis

Its so weird watching Tats circle back around to being based.
Then again, it's weird standing on the same side of an issue as the rad fems.
Guess politics really does make strange bedfellows.

Monique's last appearance was March 4th.
Slick's last appearance was April 1st.
and Squigley last appearance was April 15th.

Attached: Sinfest.jpg (740x772, 228.72K)

A transgender kid is like a vegan cat. There is no personal choice involved.

The issue is that their parents are going to beat you to death for sexually abusing their children

Attached: 1649368059119.jpg (701x1024, 251.06K)

They can try I guess

>Social processes factor into partner selection
So does orientation. But I have to admit and cede that the actual discussion of sex as a biological function unto itself? That's not orientation or gender identity specifically.

Not sure if sex ed today encompasses more than just the mechanical and biological process. It's been a long time and a lot of things have changed since I was. Greater topics of orientation and gender identity were omitted when I was in school, but I suspect the district did so intentionally and encouraged kids to ask their parents where possible to avoid stepping on anyone's toes.

Yeah, and gender was a concept developed by a pedophile who wanted to try and turn a young boy into a girl by grooming and castrating him. I'll stick with he hard science concept that doesn't require the abuse of children thank you

>Gender is sociology, not biology.
This concept was coined by a pervert who used it to fuel his own fetishes.

Weird how hard the woke crowd seems to be trying to prove those old adages about the alphabet crew correct--that they're subversive and degenerate.

I'd argue that we're only in space because of Nazi Scientists but we still use rockets but I don't think you're the types who care how bad faith your argument is lmao

>I'd argue that we're only in space because of Nazi Scientists
Nazi scientists didn't require the molestation and castration of children to make rockets fly, you incredibly disingenuous fuck.

Attached: 1576967183770.png (255x400, 188.11K)

>rad fem
>believes sexual expression, especially by women, should be repressed and there are inherent social roles for the sexes which should not be strayed from and aren't naturally without societal interference.
>denies the existence of privilege
>rad fem
He's full con and at this point doesn't espouse a single fucking feminist value beyond that women should not literally be subservient to their husbands.

Attached: tumblr_d6820cac73aed85afe29efbfe4220daf_82316723_1280.jpg (739x247, 71.7K)

thank you. every-time the subject comes up I am consider strongly of adapting these characters.

>comparing rocket technology with objective and verifiable principles and effects that can be measured and proven versus some emotional feelings bullshit
ROFL

You got sex ed? I'm 32 and from Indiana and didn't get that shit. Too progressive for my school district's midwestern sensibilities.

Attached: fetchimage.png (700x394, 105.74K)

And Freud was a hack by modern standards,but we still have psychology.
>The text of the law is very clear
Just the fact thet it mentions "age apropriate" without defining it makes it vague as hell.
Sure thing, buddy.
Based gender abolitionist.
That's just regular TERF package.

>Some people just can't escape their programming, I swear to fuck.
You hypocritical fucking retard.

Attached: 1622133929517.jpg (490x333, 34.49K)

>Nazi scientists didn't require the molestation and castration of children to make rockets fly, you incredibly disingenuous fuck.
Right. They did that shit for funsies. And sociologists don't require that shit to teach about gender. What the fuck do you think goes on in sociology?

Apples to oranges groomer. Rockets didn't require the abuse of children and they have a positive impact on civilization. Your fetishes do require the abuse of children and only serve to weaken society.
I'd tell you to shove it up your ass you preening sophist, but you'd probably enjoy that.

>priviluge
I loled

Attached: 1603914779658.jpg (347x301, 19.29K)

Yeah, just the eradication of any non German straight person as a unifying factor to maintain their society.

Cringe more, if the evil actions of any scientist can devalue any advance in scientific thought then we shouldn't have progressed past apes. Science progresses through blood and degeneracy to change the status quo. Your ethics are reactionary and do nothing for the big picture. You act like you care about child abuse but do nothing about it in the world besides try and erase the idea that little Timmy can decide he wants to be little Jenny instead. Your self righteous masturbation is boring. Find an actual cause to crusade for if you feel so strongly.

Though you probably love Elon Musk because he makes trannies seethe despite him frequenting pedobait island lmao

Midwestern as well, but further north. It was pretty basic though, as I said.
They basically gave us really REALLY broad strokes of how girl get pragnent and how babby is formed.
This was in an absolutely tiny town.

A bunch of self indulgence and wasting of tax payer funded money.

>Right. They did that shit for funsies.
Nice and off-topic redirection.
>And sociologists don't require that shit to teach about gender.
You're deliberately missing the point, but I'll reiterate anyways so you can't pretend I wasn't nice about it:

The man who came up with "Gender Science" had no roots in actual science when coming up with it; it was just devised so he could pick apart children for his own sexual desires.

There is no scientific basis for "Gender Science."

Money seemed like a soulless careerist and glory hound, not a pedophile. Likely some stripe of pervert but more of a psychopath by far.

>Yeah, just the eradication of any non German straight person as a unifying factor to maintain their society.
Do you faggots take a course of bad-faith arguments? Rocket scientists dealt in genuine sciences; not pseudo-science made up to prey on children.

>You hypocritical fucking retard.
You're literally bitching about teaching kids that personal identity should be up to them, you fucking dipshit.

If you want to scaremonger correctly, you have the teacher brainwash the kids into BEING TRANS. Having them teach that it should be up to the kids implies you think it shouldn't be, ie that you're fucking pro programming. Or grooming in other words.

Why do you think teachers should be telling kids who to fuck?

The nazi science actually works, a lot less kids die thanks to that science
Money's patients killed themselves, not sure why we're giving him a pass for his shit

>teaching kids that personal identity should be up to them
No, kids are being taught:
>"If you aren't the exact archetype of an Adonis or a Helen of Troy, you'll never be a real man or woman; you're actually 'non-binary'!"

>Is…is
>I just can't
>It's called being a decent human being

Attached: 20220322_175224.jpg (1080x1430, 239K)

I'm just going to ignore the preening faggotry and get straight o the meat of this.
Rockets are good, with practical benefits. Gender studies is hog shit and has no practical applications beyond self masterbation.
Suck shit through a sour punch straw, you phenomenally disingenuous grooming piece of shit.

Attached: 1603114083520.jpg (1024x1024, 86.74K)

He could easily be both.

>Nice and off-topic redirection.
Child abuse and mutilation isn't really off topic from Nazi scientists, m8. You failed history badly if you think that.
>There is no scientific basis for "Gender Science."
Except that it has held up? You're essentially attacking the messenger, not the message. Gender identity is obviously a thing because society is a social construct and it is employed to effect in society. You might as well say language isn't real because it has no scientific basis and was created by violent cavemen. The actual dumbshittery are you talking about?

except if a little boy comes up to you and says he wants to be a fire truck, I know 100% you're gonna tell him he can't be one

The rockets specifically or the biomedical stuff? Because that latter data was largely useless (the Imperial Japanese were way better at it)

Telling kids they can choose their sex is not only objectively wrong, but it's utterly insane, and the only possible reason you would tell them this is to set them on the self destructive path of agreeing to chemical castration and mutilating genital surgeries, because you're a sick groomer fuck who deserves the rope.

if you are against the florida bill you are g roomer. Stfu G roomer.

>Child abuse and mutilation isn't really off topic from Nazi scientists, m8.
It is when it had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the development of rocket sciences.
>Except that it has held up?
No, it hasn't.
>Gender identity is obviously a thing because society is a social construct and it is employed to effect in society. You might as well say language isn't real
If they invented language just to rape and mutilate children, I might just be so inclined to say so.

Masterful

Attached: Anatomyofafishhook.jpg (626x700, 79.95K)

>"If you aren't the exact archetype of an Adonis or a Helen of Troy, you'll never be a real man or woman; you're actually 'non-binary'!"
Uh...
>You can be any gender you want to be
isn't
>You can't be a man unless you're Adonis or a woman unless you're Helen of Troy
Like, for actual fuck's sake dude your own fearmonger strawman is in the fucking OP, you can't just try to change it up at this point.

I'm just giving my impression after reading about him. He didn't seem to get his rocks off with the boys but enthusiastically exploited them in every other way for his personal advancement.

>>You can't be a man unless you're Adonis or a woman unless you're Helen of Troy
That's what the logical conclusion of "non-binary" is, user.

It's literally just normal people, of which are insecure about the fact that they're not manly/feminine enough, trying to feel special by labeling themselves as some "other."

Attached: 1494260916535.png (324x271, 5.22K)

>Telling kids they can choose their sex
Gender. Not sex. Sex is a biological condition. Gender is a social identity. How you describe and express yourself to society is fundamentally up to you as an individual.

Cis people can be born with a odd amount of x's and y's though, science never said the binary was the norm

user you do realize that engaging with these guys isn't actually achieving anything right?

>Gender.
A synonym for sex, you mean? And the only precedent for it NOT being a synonym for sex was set by the guy who's "gender studies research" was the aforementioned mutilation and castration of young boys, you mean?

>If they invented language just to rape and mutilate children, I might just be so inclined to say so.
I can personally guarantee you rape, mutilation, and even cannibalism went into the development of language, as evidenced by us having words for rape, mutilation, and cannibalism.

No, that just makes you a pervert in a dress.

Attached: 1615134037037.jpg (581x1024, 98.73K)

>I can personally guarantee you rape, mutilation, and even cannibalism went into the development of language
That's not at all the same thing as what I said at all, but shit--y'gotta move those fuckin' goalposts somehow, eh?

>That's what the logical conclusion of "non-binary" is, user.
no not really.

>That's what the logical conclusion of "non-binary" is, user.
How is the logical conclusion of "you can be who you want" supposed to be "you can't be who you want"?

That non-binary as an identity exists doesn't mean you have to fucking use it. The only people trying to shoehorn people into identities they don't want is you dumb fucks.

>no not really.
>>no further argument
Concession accepted; thanks!

I like how that faggot cant answer your reply