Questions From Big Russian Writers You Aren't Meant to Know

Start with Dostoevsky:

"[Jews] maintain their own close-knit identity. If the Jews are given equal legal rights in Russia, but are allowed to keep their ‘State within a State,’ they would be more privileged than the Russians. The consequences of this situation are already clear in Europe. … What if there were only three million Russians and there were eighty million Jews? How would they treat Russians and how would they lord it over them? What rights would Jews give Russians? Wouldn’t they turn them into slaves? Worse than that, wouldn’t they skin them altogether? Wouldn’t they slaughter them to the last man, to the point of complete extermination? … When only anarchy remains, the Yid will be in command of everything. For while the Jew goes about preaching socialism, he will stick together with his own."

{and he was dead right, they got between 40 and 67 million of them before it was all over)

Attached: Dostoevsky.jpg (850x478, 59K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-pDtgWUtdUM
youtube.com/watch?v=KVkLtuigjTc
youtube.com/watch?v=l2M8mdvhJoI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Solzhenitsyn. Actually A LOT to pick from since he began publishing about "them" in Samsdat in the late 60s, but let's go w. "200 Yrs Together:"

"What would you expect from peasants in the Tambov Guberniya if, during the heat of the suppression of the great peasant uprising in this Central-Russian black-earth region, the dismal den of the Tambov Gubcom was inhabited by masterminds of grain allotments, secretaries of Gubcom P. Raivid and Pinson, and by the head of the propaganda department, Eidman? (A. G. Shlikhter, whom we remember from Kiev in 1905, was there as well, this time as the chairman of the Executive Committee of the guberniya.) Y. Goldin was the Foodstuffs Commissar of the Tambov Guberniya; it was he who triggered the uprising by exorbitant confiscations of grain, whereas one N. Margolin, commander of a grain confiscation squad, was famous for whipping the peasants who failed to provide grain. (And he murdered them too.) According to Kakurin, who was the chief of staff to Tukhachevsky, a plenipotentiary representative of the Cheka headquarters in the Tambov Guberniya during that period was Lev Levin. Of course, not only Jews were in it! However, when Moscow took the suppression of the uprising into her own hands in February 1921, the supreme command of the operation was assigned to Efraim Sklyansky, the head of “Interdepartmental Anti-Banditry Commission,”—and so the peasants, notified about that with leaflets, were able to draw their own conclusions.

And what should we say about the genocide on the river Don, when hundreds of thousands of the flower of Don Cossacks were murdered? What should we expect from the Cossack memories when we take into consideration all those unsettled accounts between a revolutionary Jew and a Don Cossack? In August 1919, the Volunteer Army took Kiev and opened several Chekas and found the bodies of those recently executed; Shulgin composed nominal lists of victims using funeral announcements published in the reopened Kievlyanin; one can’t help noticing that almost all names were Slavic. … Materials produced by the Special Investigative Commission in the South of Russia provide insights into the Kiev Cheka and its command personnel (based on the testimony of a captured Cheka interrogator): “The headcount of the ‘Cheka’ staff varied between 150 and 300. … Percentage -wise, there was 75% Jews and 25% others, and those in charge were almost exclusively Jews.” Out of twenty members of the Commission, i.e., the top brass who determined people’s destinies, fourteen were Jews."

yawn
based, redpilled, etc, etc

You wouldn't expect anyone here to read THE REST of what they have written, would you?

He's talking about followers of Judaism. Christian Jews had all the legal rights.
>they got between 40 and 67 million
Yes, Jews were over-represented in the Russian revolutionary movement. And so were Lithuanians and Poles.
When it comes to history, he's a known hack.

>Yes, Jews were over-represented in the Russian revolutionary movement. And so were Lithuanians and Poles.
Jews were "over represented?" And you bring in fuckign Lithuanians and Poles, after the KXVD murdered their entire intelligentsia and militaryy officer class at Kaytn.
As for you numbers and Jews, yeah, I'd ay 95% (!!!!(, a quote right from Putin's mouth BTW, of a population that made p less than 2% of the pop...that's a bit more than "overrepresentation ."
>When it comes to history, he's a known hack.
you can claim that all you want, butt he fa t rains he was completely CORRECT in his assessment, just based on how the Jews behaved in the gulags and set one another up wit the cushiest jobs, while working with heir fellow heebs to force the prettiest long girls to sleep with time or to risk dying on General Assignment work.
A bit OT, but I REALLY resent Juden Peterstein for "popularizing" the book, and THEN missing out on what he was trying to communicate. Or, as I feel, HE DAMN WEKK JBIWS but is afraid if the Jews pulling the plug on his crazy chain.
A fuckign CLASSIc interview Peterson dd with he Jew Ezra Levant who runs..maybe still runs "Rebel media." There's a point in the interview where he sees to accidentally suggest that maybe the pals DO have the right to live as something other than caged animals, but when he sees the expression on the face of his Jewish Mater Levant, he backtracks VERY quickly and suddenly launches a diatribe about how awful the Pals.
If he were young with a tong family and no tenure, you would MAYBE excuse some of his behavior. At this point, he has tenure alignment with 10s of millions. of dollars to his name.

Putin citing the 95% (if it's still up):

youtube.com/watch?v=-pDtgWUtdUM

(ughh...again, the scheming cocksuckers changed the translation from 90% to 95% to "80% to 85%)

>When it comes to history, he's a known hack.
Complete bullshit, and never CLAIMED to be a fucking historian. He took many of the ideas for his books right from newspaper stories.
Remind, I'm only taking about this one narrow, and VERY accurate summary of his predictions of where russia was heading in the next ~50 yts. And he was 100% correct...

You sound like a schizo meaning well

>never CLAIMED to be a fucking historian
>made grandiose historical claims all his life
Yeah, not a hack at all.

shocked this one hasn't yet been censored by your friendly local ADL group. Who seem to have NO ISSUES with leaving barely disgusting pedophelia all over YT, a-OK. But ANY video that simply tried so look at an avg German Weirhermarcht soldier in the trenches and his mindset, Verboten!
And with article 13 in the EU and with the UK police state and even that miserable shitbag Kurtz in Austria-- who is taking care to avoid the "Base" who voted him in in and were tricked into electing another Soros puppet... last semi0decent politican Austria had was Jorg Heider who the Jews murdered since he would have been vocal about (((certain issues))) the don't want discussed.
Here's another fun little fact you never will hear-- in the early 00s, the Jews were selling off a former synagogue. The workers who found them just let them them there, and the Juden, of course, claimed they had "no clue what they were.
Their story falls apart when you put it together by the Eichmann ours, which were give by the family to Irving to read and translate, since they knew he was both honest AND had a some sympathies with he Germans on most thing.
Ironically, Eichman's describes actually HELPNGthe jews, and changing the original clusteerfuck of a system to where they could hav all their papers and passport in one day. Eichman ALSO Eichman FORCD the Rich Jews in German were also made to pay for other jews who wanted to leave for Israel.

>made grandiose historical claims all his life
>Yeah, not a hack at all.
Look, Jew, when you are almost certainly the most famous living writer--- and hack that fame BEFOE TYOUR DEATH-- You can use it for the common good to hopefully expose them and their plans to stop it. :HacK???" They did EXACTLY as he predicted they would do--- AR
at EVERY LEVEL.
Would you consider Solzhenitsyn a "hack as well> You know, the REA shame of Stalin was that as soon as he FINALLY becae wise to the Jew and lans to get rid of them via "The Doctor's Plot,: he didn't have his some sort of Praetorian guard before that since the fucking Jew Lazar Kagonavich's sister ister was a doctor, she was allowed access to him and she NEVER should have been, bit the most believable theory is Stalin's guards were either threatened or bribed.
If stain HAD succeeded in cleaning house of those parasites ALL his past crimes again Russians would have been forgiven, he would have been made saint in the RussianOrthodox Church and would be remembered fondly in the hearts of all Russians and their children, and he would have a special pace in the hearts of ALL Russians so long as there a even ONE russian left in the word.

I CANNOT BELIEVE that Stalin a, man noted for his paranoia, DID NOT have a sort of Praetorian Guard consisting exclusively of men from Former Christian families before he did this. The plans were already made--- the Jews would be accused, and a "spontaneous riot" would be chiregrpahed where several jews were lynched. They'd then be related to Siberia for "their own safety." He even had the details worked out!!
Why couldn't he have been more careful bro and ot this done? If he'd pulled it off, he'd be remembered fondly as one of the greatest russian leaders EVER and by EVERYONE and statues of him would still be up.
Read the book "The Natashas" and just hoe vile these Russian-Jew pimp are, who lure naive young russian girls to Israel wit the promise of a job as a nanny or maid (it's harder for the likes now but to internet obviously, although Russia, just kike Western Europe is now considering a chink level internet policy to control the flow woof ALL info.
If you think I'm a sick person for wishing Stalin had "Deakkt with" these people, let me find the video from israeli Tv of russian jew pimmps and how they abuse naive, innocent russian girl who need money.
Luckily, has gotten better since putin managed to raise real income (the woman I was talking about before was a 24 tear old physics teacher with a daughter she was trying to brig up in the equivalent of 39 dollars a day. Let me seee if still up, and ate how quickly many here will change their minds and agree w. e that it's a shame stalin did not get EVERY LAST ONE. No other people ON FUCKING EARTH, collecting 48 bill in welfare from the US, then selling the stolen the to china, THEN selling palestinian organs on the black market, the child porn ring Israel was running out of their rio de janero consul (search it, story from late 90d, they tried to buret and out the Jew diplomat ON A PLANE TO ISRAEL before he could be arrested). Whole story blew up AGAIN last year when the fucking Jews tried to post him to Australi aas a diplomat.

based schizo thread

Jesus Christ-- OF COURSE, YT and the ADL fucking deleted it. Love to know excuse they gave, Was not dirty was not...for fucks' sake it was shown on ISRAEL TV. Here part 4 and part 5 or 6. I have the entire documentary if anyone is really interested and can think a way for me to get it up. Maybe..IDK, if any has any ideas of video hosting sites ad they want it,lwt me know. It's really, really fucking gesturing how these beautiful Russian girls are forced by the russian jews to literally live inside thefucking walls of the brothel.
If you read "The Natashas," you 'll also find out lovely little things like the fact that orthodox kikes refuse to use a condom since they say it is "against their religion" so these girls end up with all kind of STD and often have to have back alley abortions if the kikes won't spend the money for them to take the pill so they then end up needing a back alley abortion a lot of the time...th whole thing just...if you don't yet jews yet, the book and this video WILL MAKE YOU.

Se slaves in israel part 4/6 (thank the ADL jews for the rest of it being gone):
youtube.com/watch?v=KVkLtuigjTc

Sex Slaves in Israel, 5/6
Here's a fun fact for you. If you are in uni and take any sort of constitutional law class, bring it up with your professor. Get this: ISRAEL DID NOT HAVE A LAW AGAINST SLAVERY UNTIL ~2011. YES, YOU READ THAT CORRECTLY.
there was always a law against "taking Jews out of the country against their will," but slavery was totally legal, up until 8 or 9 urs ago,, so long as the slaves were non-Jews.

part 5.6: youtube.com/watch?v=l2M8mdvhJoI

>based schizo thread
Dude, if you live in this fuckign society and have managed to be (((well adjusted))) as the US population in the 1980s has experienced the greatest demographic change of any nation since the Mongols invaded Russia. that includes Aztecs, Incas, and people who actuallyWERE fucking CONQUERED. Did I miss the part where the US lost a major war?
If you come back from grad school and find fucking "women" in full trash bag burka things walking down the oak-lined streets and you DO NOT have a visceral reaction and feel like you are losing your goddam mind, I'd say THAT reaction is healthier than the person who ignores it like it's the most normal thing in the world, like it's just a cow they saw in the fields and just keeps driving.

Based

Just for fun, here's a brief summary of Jung's thoughts on them and a few of his quotes. Incredible how FRAUDS like Jordan Peerson claim to "idolize" all 3 of these men, and yet all 3 of them at least had the courage of their convictions. I was REALLY done with Peterstein when I saw him shilling for Israel and "Jewish Nationalism.Jewish identity Politics," and then he literally said "the only sort of pride it's not OK to have is a Pan0Europeans pride." Really?

"In fact, Jung believed that “identity politics” was a positive that should be pursed to exclusionary lengths, and that multiculturalism would have potentially disastrous effects on Whites. For example, having spent some time examining the state of mental health in the United States, Jung attributed the “American complex” to the fact Whites were “living together with ‘lower races, especially with Negroes’.”[11] Jung undertook two trips to Africa with the express purpose of studying what he viewed as the most “primitive” human psychologies.[12] He afterwards asserted that “there is a danger in the mixture of races,” that the mulatto is “apt to be a bad character,” and that “miscegenation is the cause of many cases of insanity.”[13] Many Whites living among Blacks are confronted with a “source of temperamental and mimetic infection,” by which he means that the former will too readily begin to adopt the negative behaviors of the latter—a type of cultural contagion.

Conversely, for the astute, interacting with Africans and thoughtfully observing the deep differences between the races could provide a positive reinforcement of identity. Jung himself remarked that, while travelling through Africa, “I could not help feeling superior, as I was reminded at every step of my European nature.”[14]

This is a striking comment because it expresses the fact that the sense of racial difference is something that impresses itself on the subject from an external experience. This contrasts radically with post-modern and psychoanalytic theories of racial thought and “race prejudice,” which root the sense of racial difference in the inner world of the subject. This latter way of thinking is most radically the case in Jean-Paul Sartre’s Anti-Semite and Jew, where the French philosopher argues that the anti-Semite is not someone struck by the observation and experience of Jewish behavior, but rather someone whose inner anxieties and inadequacies drive the search for an external cause onto which to project the inner flaws. This is both pseudo-science and pseudo-psychology.

Lastly, a bit more Jung, who anticipated a snake like Peterson LONG before he ever slithered out:
ung would probably have been doubtful regarding Peterson’s claims that Jews obtain positions of influence solely on their intellectual merits and because they score high on Openness to Experience. Jung believed that Jews were incapable of operating effectively without a host society, and that they relied heavily upon grafting themselves into the systems of other peoples in order to succeed. In a 1934 essay titled ‘The state of psychotherapy today,’ Jung wrote: “The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own, and as far as we can see, never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development.” This process of group development often involved ‘aiming at the chinks in the armour of their adversary,’ along with other flexible strategies.[4]

Jung also believed (in common with a finding in Kevin MacDonald’s work) that there was a certain psychological aggressiveness in Jews, which was partly a result of the internal mechanics of Judaism. In a remarkably prescient set of observations in the 1950s, Jung expressed distaste for the behavior of Jewish women and essentially predicted the rise of feminism as a symptom of the pathological Jewess. Jung believed that Jewish men were “brides of Yahweh,” rendering Jewish women more or less obsolete within Judaism. In reaction, argued Jung, Jewish women in the early twentieth century began aggressively venting their frustrations against the male-centric nature of Judaism (and against the host society as a whole) while still conforming to the characteristic Jewish psychology and its related strategies. Writing to Martha Bernays, Freud’s wife, he once remarked of Jewish women that “so many of them are loud, aren’t they?” and later added he had treated “very many Jewish women — in all these women there is a loss of individuality, either too much or too little. But the compensation is always for the lack. That is to say, not the right attitude.”[5]

Ever since Egypt, it’s the same old tune. Cheers! The crashing tightrope-walker, preposterous, the Cyclops whom everyone can’t stop talking about, day and night, with no hope of remission, the Jew at the forefront par excellence, universal, essential, admirable, against our nervous system, a grinding weapon which is vulnerable to submission, to total disintegration, perfect for exhausting us. The brazen tam-tam, the joy, the jubilant boastfulness, obscene, the feverish lies, this slimy charlatanism is what the Jews love (nerves of zinc). They find themselves in their natural state, Bacchanalian Hebrews, the souk in madness, the very same ape-like regime of exhibitionism degrades us, swallows us, knocks us out, leaves us to the mercy of the Jew by reducing us to exhausted anxiety, annihilating us! The Jew gains from noise everything which we lose in silence. The Jewish intimidation! The yelling conflicts! Politics! Anguish for gold, for gold! Dithyrambic propaganda, constant revolutions, constant disappointments, imposed ecstasies, Aryan hatred under every pretext, electoral, religious, sport etc… rekindling catastrophes with frenzied cadences, paradoxical relapses, suspense, of other even more tragic crises, epilepsy for everyone! The Goyim dancing to this rhythm, aided by cheap wine, wobbling, derailing, flunking, dripping away, renouncing.
After a few years of this detrimental regime, the Goyim are no more: just an imbecilic echo of all the pleasures of the Jew, brainwashed by chaos of these famous cackles. All he can do is cling to whatever the rotten Jew tells him to do. Nothing more disgusts him. He grabs onto everything he believes to have found out, with very little pleasure. For the drowned man, everything which floats is a miracle, the poor knackered old dog. The Goyim, plunged into the prodigious, torrential, hard-hitting Jewish carnival which has lost all judgement and even any vague desire of judgement. He reacts no more. He doesn’t doubt it anymore because he no longer exists. He’s brainwashed in school, and then in college and then monopolised, mechanized and inexorably worn down from the cradle to the grave. As soon as he opens an eye, as soon as his ears pick up the faintest echo, he doesn’t hear anything but Jewish lies, Jewish words, Jewish colours, Jewish rhythms, Jewish trances, Jewish gibberish, Jewish crusades, he’s like a fish in a frying pan. Whoever isn’t Jewish and tries to rebel against it ends up just becoming Jewish anyway. Everything that he experiences is just infallibly, inexorably and indisputably Jewish. He’s just sleepwalking among the Jews. He’s lost everything in the Jewish void, just as he gets a little desire to find himself, his identity and his soul; the Jew leads him wherever he wants him to go.

Democracies are simply dominions in the massive Jewish Empire, phenomenal, stratospheric drumming to accompany our torture devices and servitude. Absolutely irresistible. Who are the lords of this nightmare? Jewish banks, the Rabbi conspirators, (with or without heroin) the Secret Service, the English Judeocracy, the City, everything belongs to the Jews.

And FINALLY-- the is all the defense you'll ever need against peterson shills or, if you can ever get to him, Peterson himself. Wld lv to ask him: "you talk about jews having a higher IQ and thus indiectly claim they should be running everything. Since Whites have an IQ over TWO SDs above blacks, should Whites be riling in South Africa still?" then you sit back & watch his fucking brain explode The other one, of course, is "dr. peterson, why would you say identity politics is Ok and good for Israel--both the Israel knesset And the Us congress have passed bills affirming Israel's right to be a "Jewish State" despite the fact that they stole the land from its actual owner in living memory, and with absolutely no compensation of ant sort.
Also, do you agree with Israel's decision not to lt Palestina Christians go to Jerusalem for Church for the firs tie since the intifada? Were you for apartheid in South Africa, and not, why are you for it in Israel? The Book " Said vs. Goliahl Fear and Loathing in Greater Israel" by Max Blumenthal lays out the case that SIsrael is a lot WORSE than apartheid south Africa for a number of reasons."
Af, if only to have the chance to ask "le buster man" a few "real" questions and thus expose ghi as the gatekeeper fraud he is...

It is likely that Jung would also have taken issue with the spirit of Peterson’s brief essay; namely, that it takes the form of a smug defense of Jews against alleged anti-Semitism. Peterson clearly locates Kevin MacDonald’s analysis of Jewish group behavior through history in the realm of “reactionary conspiracy theories.” Jung, meanwhile, was cautious about accusations of anti-Semitism, and he was “critical of the oversensitivity of Jews to anti-Semitism,” believing “one cannot criticise an individual Jew without it immediately becoming an anti-Semitic attack.”[6] It is certainly difficult to believe that Jung, who basically argued that Jews had a unique psychological profile and had developed a unique method for getting on in the world, would have disagreed with the almost identical foundational premise of Kevin MacDonald’s trilogy. In fact, Jung believed that playing the victim and utilizing accusations of anti-Semitism as a sword against their critics were simply parts of the Jewish strategy—a useful cover for concerted ethnocentric action in “aiming at the chinks in the armour of their adversary.” For example, after the war, in a 1945 letter to Mary Mellon, he wrote, “It is however difficult to mention the anti-Christianism of the Jews after the horrible things that have happened in Germany. But Jews are not so damned innocent after all—the role played by the intellectual Jews in pre-war Germany would be an interesting object of investigation”[7] Indeed, MacDonald notes:

a prominent feature of anti-Semitism among the Social Conservatives and racial anti-Semites in Germany from 1870 to 1933 was their belief that Jews were instrumental in developing ideas that subverted traditional German attitudes and beliefs. Jews were vastly overrepresented as editors and writers during the 1920s in Germany, and “a more general cause of increased anti-Semitism was the very strong and unfortunate propensity of dissident Jews to attack national institutions and customs in both socialist and non-socialist publications” (Gordon 1984, 51).[i] This “media violence” directed at German culture by Jewish writers such as Kurt Tucholsky—who “wore his subversive heart on his sleeve” (Pulzer 1979, 97)—was publicized widely by the anti-Semitic press (Johnson 1988, 476–477).

Jews were not simply overrepresented among radical journalists, intellectuals, and “producers of culture” in Weimar Germany, they essentially created these movements. “They violently attacked everything about German society. They despised the military, the judiciary, and the middle class in general” (Rothman & Lichter 1982, 85). Massing (1949, 84) notes the perception of the anti-Semite Adolf Stoecker of Jewish “lack of reverence for the Christian-conservative world.” (The Culture of Critique, Ch. 1)

Truly last post on Peterson. BTW, it's quite telling the the only time he has eve reacted angrily to Any FM comment was when someone addressed him as "Juden Peterson." Since ehe dan well knows its completely true, Just watch how he acts early in his career with he Jew Exta Levant, who his boss then and a bigtime Jew Zionist.
Now, I can't say 'WHO' gave him the name of 'Juden Peteterstein", but when watching AH's speeches, I used to wonder about who the dude was who got paid to jail out "JUDEN!" at certain points in his speeches, since in always sound like the same guy.
By the way. it triggered my autism so badly in the Murdoch Murdoch episode when she had him in her scp and pronounced his name as "JEW-den" rather than" UDEN!" as in the German, since that is where the idea came from, AH's Seimen's speech...
Maybe almost no one will read this thread, but those who do and actually understand his hypocrisy will BTFO any Peterson shill....

>to jail out "JUDEN!"
Eish, to YELL OUT JUDEN!!!

I have read everything. Thank you for tour insight.

Thanks for the thread, genuinely.

>And you bring in fuckign Lithuanians and Poles, after the KXVD murdered their entire intelligentsia and militaryy officer class at Kaytn.
Amogst those murdered were Jews as well.

>quote right from Putin's mouth BTW
Fuck off with your quotes, stupid shizo. Post actual statistics instead, it's not hard to find composition of Soviet gov.

>he was completely CORRECT
No he wasn't. For example the 75% number comes from hearsay from supposed interrogation of some captured Soviet agent. It´s pretty much worthless as a source on anything else than source on white propaganda. Just as with the "Commission", assuming he was talking about the 10th comittee, had 4 Jews (Trotski, Kamenev, Zinoyev and Radek) out of 19 members.

>ughh...again, the scheming cocksuckers changed the translation from 90% to 95% to "80% to 85%
Znayesh po Ruski, debil? Vosemdesat = 80

tl;dr: Substance of your arguments is worthless and implies you are an American uncapable of critically examining sources, while the form implies mental health problems.