Would he be a good fit for the Avengers?

Why do X-fags always want to isolate mutants and not have them interact with anyone else?

I don't really care for X-Men on the Avengers.

X-Fags are autistic and can't understand normal human behavior or emotions, none of them had actual friends growing up (or as adults)

If it's another property that doesn't have their favorites front-and-center, the focus of the plot, or the most instrumental to the resolution of the matter, then they hate it, which basically means anyone who isn't a mutant or on the X-Men. At this point, I'd say let them stay in their own self-made ghetto. I don't want their usual bullshit making the shitty state of Marvel even worse by tainting everything else, let them keep their drama and politics on their side of the tracks.

Because the entire original point of the X-men was to integrate themselves into humanity by setting a good example. The fact that they've become human hating, isolationist professional victims is just tragic.

>X-Men is an analogy for Israel
Makes sense given Magneto

Kurt looks like he belongs to a perpetual 90s limbo. No clue why people consider him so iconic.

As a 90s X-fag, I didn't even know Nightcrawler existed

Yep.

Better question - would Cap America make a good X-Man?

Why anyone else doesn't join the x-men? Why the muties always have to be the ones who share their characters?

Because the Avengers have always been more inclusive than the X-Men. Plus, it's you X-fags that argue that only mutants should be members of the X-Men.

Yes, a moral person who has special abilities and could help out Scott with strategies and tactics.

>Avengers
>inclusive
they are literally a vip club (as per Stan Lee's words, before some newfag attacks me). they are also government lapdogs. Back in the day, Carol Danvers and Jessica Drew were honorary x-men. I miss these times

Yup.
Probably a better fit than Wolverine was.

There is this thing called Avengers taint. Any mutie that got touched by it got ruined. Beast, Wolverine, Rogue, but also Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. Do we really want another character to be ruined forever?

They took in Wanda and Pietro when the X-Men wanted nothing to do with them (the X-Men had no problem taking in their abusive dad though). The Avengers have had more mutants as members than the X-Men have had humans as members. You know there's multiple stories of how the Avengers break away from Gyrich or the government or S.H.I.E.L.D.? X-fags have no right to complain about cops when their favorite character are currently sucking off Mags, Sinister, Apocalypse, and Selene.

>They took in Wanda and Pietro when the X-Men wanted nothing to do with them
these are fictional characters you know? if you want to talk about editorial reasons, fine, but don't use the pseudo-narrative talk

bitches love a good catholic boy

you can thank nicieza for that. claremont was fine and dandy letting them interact

>90s
how? kurt was pretty much out of the x-men in the 90s, he got moved to that unsalvageable excalibur comic

Then why are you criticizing the Avengers for being a vip club or government lapdogs, they're not real people right?

Most people who don't read comics refer to Clairmont era X-men as "90s X-men" because that's primarily where the entire art style was derived from even though he started in the 70s.

>because that's primarily where the entire art style was derived
what?
how?
like half of claremont's tenure is partnered a dude who got famous for drawing hot chicks in the mid 80s and was gone by 89.

Pretty sure most people who don't read comics do this is because TAS aired in the 90s, which featured mostly Claremont inspired stories and adaptations.

cause Yea Forums likes men

Attached: nightcrawler sexy.jpg (640x640, 53.04K)

>that unsalvageable excalibur comic
fuck you, Excalibur is amazing

Attached: meggan courtney brian braddock.jpg (664x1026, 260.46K)

cyclops should be on the avengers as the leader who everyone begrudgingly respects for his heroism and decision making while also reconciling with him being a mutant supremacist (who still has committed far far less crimes than any other avenger)

Depends on the team but yeah if they went to back to basics team formation made up of a bunch of rando superheroes brought together by being in the right place at the wrong time

Because Xfags see themselves as actual minorities and think one of their kind helping the Avengers is the same as a black man joining the KKK.

yeah nah it was shabby with peter davis and went to utter shitte after he left.

only good thing was uuh waht's his name handling kitty

>peter davis
who? It's pretty clear you haven't actually read it

True, although the Avengers are less morally grey than the X-Men imo, have been for a while. If he can be best friends with Wolverine, then he can be friends with heroes who usually only resort to killing in extreme circumstances, if ever.

read it all the way, unfortunately. Strange mix of fantasy and kiddie shit that mixed terrible with the original cast followed by over 5 different types of lack of direction after the original artist left. also nightcrawler with a goatee courtesy of ellis.

Of all 5 main x-books in the crash era it second only to fucking x-factor in how bad it was

Excalibur was, is and always will be lame, only losers like it

Disney wouldn't allow it because he's a Christian and they can't have that on the trannyvengers

You forgot Havok

Attached: 5d4fa643c87054de698b076274ac9ffd.jpg (1050x566, 159.48K)

He's my favorite x-men as a comic casual who knows him for X Men Evolution. Can I have some reccomented stories?

>All these hateful X-fags
AvX irreparably fucked things up didn't it

They already have two to four house muggas why would they want 5

That honestly a big deal with all the super medical science and magic that exist. All Havok needs to do is call some up and ask them to fix his scarring for him.

Because the X-Men don't fit in the greater Marvel universe and should exist in their own bubble

Lets be honest here, mutants being in a shared universe with the rest of the Marvel characters is a determent to themselves and others.

Attached: krakoa totally safe.jpg (1988x3056, 1.49M)

>kidnap
Shit, was that the only incident of that happening? Fuck diplomatic immunity or extradition privilege, reports of forcefully kidnapping citizens is enough to cause an entire country to go into an uproar.

>Then why are you criticizing the Avengers for being a vip club or government lapdogs, they're not real people right?
Because that's what X-fans do. Just like genosha.

>cyclops should be on the avengers as the leader who everyone begrudgingly respects
He's a literal cuck now, there's nothing to respect.

Wasn't Kurt a pirate?
Was he a morally righteous pirate?

He was a pirate in the way Luffy is a pirate, purely aesthetically

Muties aren't allowed out of their lane.

Luffy totally robbed those people who wanted to give him more gold-

Part of it is pure tribe mentality. Can't have an "us" without a "them." Another overlooked issue is internal company politics, if a character from Book A gets used by Book B and Book B takes off in popularity then Book A is going to lose control of that character. It's what happened with Dick Grayson during the heyday of Teen Titans. The Bat-line didn't want or care about the character so he was shoved into TT, then TT became the most popular DC book from the late 70s through the early 90s and were basically able to call the shots regarding Dick for 15 years, something the Bat-line is still incredibly salty about.