This episode did not age well

1 You're talking like people might get it for medical reasons makes it bad?
2, Depending on your point of view on how you look at things that could do that. Might be the reason jews started doing it.
Number three. I'm pretty sure Medical professionals what make it manageable considering a adult man can get it and don't complain about a constant leave for years on end.

I still say "ouchybooboo" whenever I hurt myself lol

And you're going to remember that every single time?

A quick Google search will prove you wrong
Yes I'm sure all those babies were snipped for medical problems

How often do people want a faucet conversation about circumcised in from Jews boys as evil compared to how often we have a serious talk about the global effects of female circumcision you know which spreads diseases like crazy especially sexual transmitted diseases and affects them extremely negative for life?And forces them to take weeks of recovery?
How do I know what websites you looked up as facts? You could have went straight to Neo-Nazi website on Google for all I know .

bruh if was so quick you could've just said it in the thread

Stop defending male genital mutilation

As a Euro I was perplexed when I learned that circumcision was so widespread in America. It's really something you only hear from Jews here. And more recently, Muslims, since they moved here.

If you were arguing in good faith you be arguing they should not do it to men until they're old enough to consent but you're arguing that it's pure evil to do whatsoever. Arguments like that stem from antisemitism about it being pure evil mainly because it's done by Jews if it was not done by juice it would not be considered genital mutilation to people

You're not arguing in good faith since the vast majority of circumcisions are preformed without consent

So we need to outlaw it so nobody can be circumcised? Circumcision is not genital mutilation whatsoever. I's something that is so minor a doctor will prescribe it for non extreme medical reasoning.There's also the argument that babies get baptized without consent so why should circumcision be treated so extremely differently.

Yes, yes you are

>Circumcision is not genital mutilation whatsoever
The pilbul is strong with you yid

Circumcision is only necessary in a very small handful of cases.

>cut off part of genitals
>not genital mutilation

>The pilbul is strong with you yid
What?

It's a scam to charge parents for an unnecessary surgery and to sell the severed foreskins to cosmetics companies.

It's older than Christianity.

You mean the annoying part that some people would rather not have.It's like saying popping a pimple on any part of your body is mutilated that piece of the body.

>baptism is the same as cutting off part of a baby's penis

There's no point arguing with you. You're retarded. Or a woman.

>yet ANOTHER circumsision thread

Do you check in pornography to see if every guy circumcised or do you not even notice that?The point of the episode of Southpark it was nowhere near as big a deal as the outrage Fanatics would have you believe.

Different user:
>It's older than Christianity.
The length the practice has been going on does not change how (un)necessary circumcision is.
>You mean the annoying part that some people would rather not have
Whether or not you'd rather have it or not does not change the definition of what is or isn't genital mutilation. Whether it's for medical purposes, a legitimate one, or cosmetic these all fall under the term genital mutilation.

Just keeping things honest here.

>they should not do it to men until they're old enough to consent
Getting your dick razored as a baby who can't remember it is preferable to getting it razored as a 12 year old who will remember the agony for the rest of their lives.

That said I think the "benefits" of circumcision are dumb pseudoscience and don't plan on subjecting my sons to it. It doesn't have any purpose whatsoever unless you're a jew and the ritual done today isn't even the same as the one done in Old Testament times (the one done today is even more invasive/pleasure-destroying).

>You mean the annoying part that some people would rather not have.
Damn bro, you didn't have to out the fact that you got the snip as a baby that hard.

You're using the technical terms without any of the contacts to it. you sound like a person saying I support Palestinians therefore I am not at the anti-Semitic because I consider Palestinian Semitic and Jews not.Arguably if you want this not to be forced individuals until they are old enough the Jews have an argument that you have to do the same with Christianity children also. It's a completely legitimate argument because if it was so horrible for all Jewish man going forward to everyone who it happens to than the Jewish Community what is stop did Generations before now.

Cleanliness or health benefits aside, it's wrong to do this to a person before they are able to consent to it.

>That said I think the "benefits" of circumcision are dumb pseudoscience and don't plan on subjecting my sons to it. It doesn't have any purpose whatsoever unless you're a jew and the ritual done today isn't even the same as the one done in Old Testament times

The fact that you used to the Old Testament times tells me Christianity has a major impact on saying being done accurately or not on what the Jews are doing.And considering the medical community accepted as valid it sounds to me like you're the one listening to pseudoscience in favour of what the actual science says especially with your dismiss medical professionals about its benefits.

I mean this in the most respectful way possible user:
I am having difficulty parsing what you said. Your English is not great.

That said, I think you said that a circumcision is similar to baptizing a child without their consent. It's not. One is a medical procedure with permanent irreversible effect on the body. The other is a religious ceremony.

>Cleanliness or health benefits aside
There aren't any.

I'm the guy saying it's not in Humane or genital mutilation but I do agree this individual has a point not the other ones of you complaining about circumstance.

>dismiss medical professionals about its benefits.
Circumcision is only beneficial in a small handful of cases where it's medically necessary. Otherwise it is both unnecessary and has no medical benefits.

The medical community disagrees.

But circumcision is a religious thing and also a communal thing among Jews.

>humans live on earth something like 60,000 years
>get by without genital mutilation for the vast majority of that time
>in the past 4000 years or so we develop a culture of sexual shame and repression to control the populace
>start cutting dickskins and clits off of babies

If we followed the logic of circumcision to its conclusion we would still be sacrificing bulls to Sky Dad. Organized religion is organized psychosis.

blame the guy who invented kelloggs cereal for convincing millions of burgers that circumcision was the best way to stop people from jerking off

>The medical community disagrees.
It does not. The burden of proof is on you making the claim that it provides any benefit outside the rare situations where it's necessary.

>practically every faggot in this thread.
Only nignogs and hillbilly trash are uncircumcised. Which one are you?

A quick youtube search will prove you wrong

The medical community is divided on the issue.

>The medical community disagrees.
No it doesn't. This is a purely religious procedure. It's not like we are born with a tumor that needs to be cut out, this foreskin serves a function as a sheath for the glans that protects it.

We no longer live in biblical times.
Any argument that it might have been necessary then does not apply today.

That's not even remotely true. Hillbillies and blacks are just as circumcised, if not more

Only Jews, Muslims and stupid Americans are circumcised.

>But circumcision is a religious thing and also a communal thing among Jews.
Then let them practice it if they wish on their children. There's no argument for it outside of that though except in the few cases where it's medically necessary (I believe the condition is where the foreskin becomes fused shut at the tip but I'm not certain. Some kind of phimosis I believe.)

Ironic that Christianity may have died out if the Pro-Circumcision factions had their way on the question about if Gentile converts had to cut their foreskin.

Definitely does not say there is no benefits to circumcision the guy who said it's mixed might be correct but this Google search queries cells get it's not no it's does not find circumcision healthy.

Attached: Web capture_14-4-2022_182215_www.google.ca.jpg (1353x501, 102.77K)

Ok? No one is forced to cut their foreskin in the 1st World, Americans are just dickheads who cut their sons dicks because their dicks got cut. Plus doctors pushing for dick cutting to get more $$$

>>start cutting dickskins and clits off of babies
Extremely different even recognized by American wall one is completely against the law the other one you cannot argue can be made in legal without them we bought all you need to make Christian babies become old enough to decide to get baptized to which would be a legitimate argument.

Attached: 1557956460325[1].png (555x557, 144.12K)

Well, let's take any American sources with a grain of salt. Circumcision culture is deeply ingrained there and it's also obviously a very powerful group of certain chosen who lobby very hard for the reputation of the practice.
If it really were beneficial enough to warrant surgical procedures on newborns it would surely have been adopted universally, and not just by Abrahamite fanatics.

You linked a screencap of the google search. Not the study. Nevertheless, I can actually refute the study they're referring to.

The study was controversial and is still not conclusive to this day for the following reasons: It was performed on an EXTREMELY small sample size, in Africa in an area with EXTREMELY limited sexual education and access to that information. Of that small sample size, half were given circumcisions and sexual education on how to avoid STIs. The other half were given circumcisions NOR ANY INFORMATION ABOUT SAFE SEX PRACTICES. In addition to this, very few of the original people they contacted came back and followed up afterwards for those conducting the "study" for collection of data.

So no. Still no known medical benefits or proof of it.

CITATION:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364150/

"Among other issues, critics have pointed out that the bulk of the data used to justify the AAP/CDC policies was derived from studies of adult circumcision carried out in sub-Saharan Africa – a geographic region whose epidemiological environments and patterns of disease transmission are dissimilar, along numerous dimensions, to those elsewhere in the world (13–16). This is important, because the spread of disease, including sexually transmitted infections, is determined much more by socio-behavioral and situational factors than by strictly anatomical-biological factors, such as the presence or absence of a foreskin (17, 18). In other words, the apparent findings from these studies cannot be simply mapped on to non-analogous public health environments (15), nor to circumcisions performed earlier in life, i.e., before an age of sexual debut (19). As Bossio et al. (20) argue in a recent comprehensive review, not referenced by the CDC, “At present … the majority of the literature on circumcision is based on research that is not necessarily applicable to North American populations” (p. 2847)."

>ITT people think being circumcised is the same as sterilization.

Attached: flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg (750x1000, 62.04K)

Oh my God double standards got Jews have too much power. Jews do not have them half the magical power you think they do anywhere in the world except Israel where they are majority. And the United States has just as strong a anti-circumcision because of the strength of Christianity which has way more followers than Judaism in America.
Multiple pages and your supposed to be infallible compared to Google search engine why?

>Less risk of UTI’s
There is also research which shows it creates more UTI’s
>Reduced risk of STI’s
Wear a condom? All the research about lowering HIV has been completely debunked
>Penile cancer
So statiscally low it’s laughable. We don’t remove womens breasts automatically even though the chances of cancer are astronomically higher
>Lower risk of cervical cancer
Being eliminated thanks to Gardasil

Attached: 8F0E4276-E54A-4EA2-A107-4A3A41D3E23B.jpg (370x258, 25.37K)

Citing a medical document will always be better than a google screenshot.

jews are literally just arabs with a persecution complex so no, it's not different, they just want to present one as different so they can vilify a culture they share 99% of their dna with.

Jewish political groups have massively disproportionate influence and of course "I'm a Jew" as a deflection against criticism, even Ben Shapiro uses that one. I'm going to safely assume you're circumcised, I guess one of the problems with arguing with people who are is that you're going to be extremely bias, if someone is not circumcised they have a choice, you do not, you want to convince yourself that it's a good thing.

>Multiple pages and your supposed to be infallible compared to Google search engine why?
I made no such claim to infallibility. I provided proof of the flaws in the claims. That's an actual link to an actual study.

Multiple pages of google search results exist debunking the myth that there are medical benefits to the removal of the foreskin.

>There is also research which shows it creates more UTI’s
Specifically the tip of the penis can more easily become irritated and infected after the procedure and cause an infection that requires a more invasive surgery to correct, even when the circumcision is performed perfectly.

There's also no body of evidence I've seen to show any increase in the risk of cancer of uncircumcised individuals.

The only reasons it’s protected in America are 1) Jews and 2) it’s a multimillion dollar business, estimates of around 200 million a year. It can cause just as many physical and sexual problems and deformities, and comparing them does no one any favours. There are women who have been mutilated who speak out against male circumcision as well.

Attached: 1AA27205-C4F4-4A38-90C5-E36CBF2D7FE9.jpg (1125x1002, 222.45K)

>ITT user defends his parents mutilating him

This is a literal strawman argument at best.

>The medical community disagrees
Is that why NO medical professional suggests it in the entirety of Europe, Asia, and South America?

Automatically assuming anyone who disagrees with you is something you hate And thinking circumcise people unable be extremely voice if someone is not circumcised they have a choice you do not I may know to have a legitimate conversation again Circle season compared to those who are be and more capable of having an argument against it. Do you think people who get raped can't argue against late because they have no choice and we're already late?Actually living with the effects your entire life. You better informed than the people going on and on about know the Jews are too powerful they can't have a voice in this .
Estimated by who gives people millions of dollars the Ku Klux Klan .Jews have been a persecuted minority all longer than they had any benefits for being Jewish in America. And I wouldn't be surprised that here most of those women who complain against male circumcision actually are not allowed in the family's to complain about being getting there there clits cut off themselves.

Lmao. Denmark, Iceland and Germany have each tried to ban circumcision in their own country and each time Israel has kvetched and shut it down. Denmark and Iceland have an insignificant Jewish population and still were threatened with international boycotts and even letters from the fucking ADL!

Or Canada and Australia