Is there really a "gay agenda" in American comics and cartoons?

Senpai, most people involved in the anime and manga industries are nonces.

Dude traps are gay. You are getting off to a man. Deal the fuck with it and accept your sexuality.

Traps are 100% gay. Wanting to fuck a dude is gay no matter how you slice it. Only traps who get off on fucking straight dudes or guys who are way in denial would.

Some are, for sure. Like the Rurouni Kenshin dude.

That's.... that's a penis!

Dunno this user has a compromise on it It's like if you see a person that's attractive but didn't know it was a dude. Then you're not gay, cause you're complimenting and being attracted to the beauty of the person.

Now if you know the person's a dude, and you're still attracted to said person. Then you're gay.

If you have to ask the answer is probably yes.

Attached: 422d03ee07784522255673f58c08b264.jpg (500x534, 38.15K)

But what if you're just attracted to the female form? Being attracted to a male who has assumed that form isn't different than being attracted to a drawing of the female form. It doesn't mean you're sexually attracted to paper. You're attracted to women, and this paper has a woman on it. Likewise, if a man looks like a woman, and you're attracted to that, it's because you're attracted to women.

The guy who started this argument specifically said “I wish Yea Forums had more traps”, that’s an innate desire for specifically males.

Yes by the media to create a divide in general opinions to feed the media machine and stir drama in the news by people that care too much and with trans its to fallow a desperate acceptance pushing fad by some ill people that need help, not positive reinforcement.

>Yum yum I love penis
ur gay

If you’re attracted to women, why would you seek out traps instead of, you know, women?

Would Bridget actually fly these days if GGX2 was released now?

There's a "people who can't write" agenda using gays as a shield.

Bridget is 18 now.

But he also worked on that infamous anime series Boku no Pico

It's not using gays as a shield. It's worse then that. It's making their lazy work look like art by saying it 's about "DEEP" issues that gets to soapbox for an issue because that's what being deep really means to these people. You can have hard hitting commentary in a good book or you can just go the way that fucking Star trek picard is, and making a lazy as fuck political issue, with no nuance or anything more then a surface level X is bad argument.

So did a lot of people who are now mainstream.

The director was a big director before he worked on Boku no Pico. He worked on a few of the Brave shows.

traps are gay otherwise you would jack off to women

The same guy who wrote Boko no Pico wrote tons of super mainstream 2000s/2010s anime, his resume genuinely incredible.
he even wrote some Fullmetal Alchemist episodes.

What if I jack off to traps and women, but never regular men?

Slightly bi.

traps are men, you are bisexual.
Also, real traps do not exist, you can clock a trap easily by looking at their adam apple, weird long hands, lack of ass, lack of waist, ugly voice, massive chin, etc

Lead writer on Aldnoah;Zero, which is the most popular mecha anime with normies.

It's weird, surely you'd at least use a pseudonym if you were a guy with a legit career and wanted to write underage gay porno stories as a side hussle.

The Japanese don't have as many hangups about making the jump from smut to mainstream. Or even going back and forth. Masami Obari, for instance, directed a lot of hentai *after* he was mainstream. Not to mention how many mangaka got their start doing hentai.

it's japan, they don't care about that stuff unlike retarded amerimutts

Goes to show how normalized pedo shit is over there.

UK and north america still have more actual pedophilia than some anime about friendship and brotherhood

Yeah you got to remember that Japan didn't even have actual real flesh and blood cp banned until 1990. And ever afterward getting arrested for it dosn't negatively effect your reputation.

Now WEED, on the other hand, oh boy. ohhhhhhh boy.

Eh, they have cracked down on IRL pedo shit like the junior gravure shoots. Cartoons aren't real girls though, and your efforts are better spent worrying about actual abuses of minors than crying about drawings.

>pedo shit
>dude's been drawing shota for years
>has never gotten into a legal problem
meanwhile in America
>john k openly grooms underage girls
>the woman that made twelve forever openly lusts after little boys
>all of pedowood

>Love Hina
>Mirai Nikki
>Negima

The real uncomfortable truth is that pedophilia is a lot more common than most want to admit.

It's uncomfortable to admit that kids are harmed in their own backyard, or behind the scenes of any TV show or movie with a kid in it.

at least japs turn their degeneracy into art while harming no one

Attached: 6.jpg (1280x1807, 867.48K)

>Cartoons aren't real girls though, and your efforts are better spent worrying about actual abuses of minors than crying about drawings.
Who’s to say those drawings weren’t referenced from real kids?

>accusing someone without proof

I’d much rather arrest the guy who makes child porn than the guy who owns child porn.

Why not arrest both

I mean can and want to then by all means go for it but I consider the producer to be commuting a much worse crime.

Where do you stop though? Do you arrest every weirdo who draws weird shit? Probably the most well-adjusted lady I know is a married mother who draws really fucked up guro porn.

can we get back to talking about cute traps now

>Is there really a "gay agenda" in American comics and cartoons?
At least 500% overrepresentation. I would say, yeah, quite likely.

That's boring, this is much more interesting.

That's different, that sounds like a creative outlet
Pedophilia is not a creative outlet

arresting someone for loli makes no sense, what stops you from saying ''she's a 40 year old midget'' and getting away with it? there would be a lot of waste of state resources if we tried to arrest every wrong-thinker.

i see, you are in favor of murder

Attached: born to kill.png (1000x722, 519.86K)

How is it different? Killing someone and molesting someone are both equally illegal. Why is one fictional, artistic depiction considered to be less amoral than the other?

I don't think anyone should be arrested for drawings. Especially when actual criminals and abusers go unpunished.

but imagine if it turned out an extremely popular Yea Forums character was trans

Attached: herbutwithaDICK.jpg (1024x683, 128.71K)

Several countries have the stipulation that if it looks like a child then it is a child. Likely for your "im a sovereign citizen" tier bullshit but also if you're slappin it to a midget that looks like a child whats to say you wont just look at children because theres not enough childlike midgets.

Sounds boring as shit, I probably wouldn't even click on the thread.

but you clicked on this thread

>whats to say you wont just look at children because theres not enough childlike midgets.
so we are arresting people for thought crimes now?

Attributing guro to murder is like saying all the incels who watch gore are the same as being a terrorist or psychopath.

Not interested unless she has a bulge in her costume. Plus no artist at the big 2 can draw cute shemales. Hard pass.

This thread isn't about boring shit though.

...Much like saying everyone who draws or looks at loli is a pedo.

>oh so we're arresting people just because they might do a crime?
We stop people who might commit suicide
Thought policing already exists. Everyone is probably on someones list being watched for something they might do based on prior actions

The only gay agenda is from the faggot OP

Not really, no
Most people are desensitized to violence in media, they'd probably freak the fuck out if they saw it meters from their person.
Children are taboo, if you're looking at pictures of them, what's your ulterior motive? Some loner weirdo who lives alone or with parents, no wife or expartner looking at little girls?
Probably some sick fuck

>Everyone is probably on someones list being watched for something they might do based on prior actions
not true, otherwise faggots like the tranny phantom dude would have been stopped a long time ago considering how open he was about wanting to shoot people and turn into a tranny ghost

>somebody said something on the internet therefore it must be true
>nobody is stopping him from exercising free speech reee

friendly reminder that there have been multiple cases of people being inspired by horror films and violent videogames yet no cases inspired by cute and funny Chinese cartoons

Death is taboo. Gore is dark and depraved. Are you some weird sicko who looks at people dying?

It's a peak American mindset. All the violence and death you could wanna see is A-okay. But, a little sexuality and it's haram.

Do we have definitive proof of that. Im willing to accept some shit like the girls who killed in the name of slenderman but all the school shooters and shit blamed on edgy cartoons and shooter games? Nah.

>It's a peak American mindset
I assume seeing in the news there have been 10 middle school shootings in the time it takes you to heat your frozen pizza must desensitize you

I've also seen a lot of news stories about grooming lately. Should I be desensitized about that too?

>Do we have definitive proof of that
youtube.com/watch?v=u432T_cDgQs
youtube.com/watch?v=VMYGZm1ac8Q
also the 2 or 3 joker inspired kilers

>death is taboo
Except not really? To die hard christians maybe ut america is the country making most of the wars, interfering in foreign countries and such. Closer to home, people die in the streets because of poverty and homelessness.
>a little sexuality
Imagine calling pedophilia a sexuality
Beyond that yes its haram, look how the supreme court had to enforce gay marriage in all states.

i am not the one talking about how people is desensitized to murder. Even in my shithole country we get chills everytime there is a new murder

>death is okay to fetishize because burgers kill people
>loli is bad because it is okay?

In the context of a drawing, they're both as fake as could be. Either all eroticized depictions of illegal acts are bad or they're all okay. No in-betweens.

Both Japan and America have, if it's traced from the real thing/looks like an actual person, it counts. So even countries that allow it have limitations.

>if it's traced from the real thing/looks like an actual person, it counts
but we aren't talking about traced cp here. I swear antiloli fags will change the goal point to try and win an argument everytime