Disney's Inclusion Mandate Will Likely/Has Likely Animated Projects

based op

This IS China

Like Amazon, huh.

Anyone who thinks this will fundamentally change anything is a massive retard.

Attached: 1648616374045.jpg (473x555, 31.09K)

see

Well that sure is racist

Have you seen what Chapek declared?

Starting to change genre was one of the first things Disney did with the Marvel comics
The era of teens and beautiful princesses, sexy women like Jessica Rabbit died in the 90s

Attached: 1568798387433.jpg (758x678, 473.94K)

Ngl many of the latest series these days sorta fit the bill if one counts non-human characters as non-white

this, Disney was always about raping children

Attached: FOeP7cuWUAELRjy.jpg (1818x1818, 511.68K)

So instead of a few stories that thoughtfully include diverse characters because of creators dedicated to such a thing, we're going to get a slew of stories off of an assembly line with a soulless mandate to show girls holding hands 2-3 scenes before credits?

>Have you seen what Chapek declared?
No.

I concur. They haven't been made any good cartoons in so long it's not worth watching any of their shows anyway... oh,this'll hit the Mandalorian too, won't it?
Is Baby Yoda diverse enough or will we need a new Baby Yoda. One with exaggerated swagger.

>The era of teens and beautiful princesses,
I haven't seen Disney Princesses stop.

Disney is not Blackrock. At the end of the day, they're still trying to make money, not blow it all for purely ideological reasons. For their size and scope, they can only pay lip service and make really just superficial changes, but at the end of they day, their nose follows the money.

It's just unfortunate that BR holds the leash.

Christopher F. Rufo is a right wing shill and so is OP.

Yeah I'm curious too. Please post before mods prune this thread for being "not related to animation".
Looks like they're gonna blow it with Florida.

>Christopher F. Rufo
Who?

Disney is the only thing keeping flordia afloat.

If they're doing the same song and dance, it's irrelevant whether "they really believe in it" or not if they're still behaving like psychotic groomers.

Attached: groomer pronouns.png (1414x757, 190.48K)

>who
A right wing shill who creates fake culture war bullshit.

Allowing children to know gay people exist it's not child grooming.

Christopher F. Rufo is a right wing liar.

And DeSantis is willing to revoke Disney's many privileges as political grandstanding when he runs for POTUS in 2024. He can easily campaign on how he "stomped the woke out of Disney" even though Disney's only doubled down for whatever reason.

That sounds like major abuse of political power on businesses for having their own ideas especially for republicans.If he was arguing it's in the best interests of the state because they're not actually fall in the laws or the laws are bad to begin left that would be one thing but saying they don't agree with us and making this questionable bail that's complete overly

ok groomer

Attached: predators.png (1400x1515, 590.66K)

I don't think he can actually do anything but I guess the point is that he can fake it and his constituents will believe in anything he says.

>I guess the point is that he can fake it and his constituents will believe in anything he says.
Sounds like Donald Trump saying I'm going to be declared the winner of the last selection any day now.

Calling me a groomer means nothing.

lol

Attached: FP7Z62hXsAkB1PR.jpg (795x767, 85.72K)

OP mentioned them in pic

>chuds speedrunning a word into complete irrelevancy

ok groomer

Attached: groomer exodus.png (1435x1623, 311.48K)

This is more of a burn against Republicans then anything else.
But then I guess that's the point right user? That you're bragging about your side being gullible idiots?

Encouraging children to adopt sexualities and genders is though.

What does that image have to do with either of the comments you reply to?

>uh oh i'm losing i better call them a groomer that'll show em

Attached: 1604769553236.png (645x770, 133.05K)

ok groomer

Attached: groomers on suicide watch.png (1438x1592, 1.12M)

Ok Boomer because you might as well be spamming that.

And being forced to tell highly conservative religious nut job parents if they think that's children's gay by law is not?

Attached: and they say trans people are pedos.jpg (640x533, 50.71K)

Trusting the MSM objectively makes you an idiot.
Now go get your 7th clotshot so nobody has to read your abysmal posts anymore.

>Unassigned gender from birth until you're 18

..........what are you thinking exactly?

They might as well include a pecan pie recipe because you literally can't tell anything meaningful from this.

Red flag red flag I think the child molesters might want to get this job now instead of a Catholic Priest.

>requires
>allows
imagine not even being able to pass penis inspection day

Attached: blues-clues-pride-video-today-main.jpg (760x380, 84.19K)

>Faggot parents should have more control over children's education than their own parents
Where have I heard this before?

Attached: GML 10 Point Demand_0(1).jpg (740x822, 596.04K)

If it's between the main stream media or conservative bluechecks on twitter then I'll still with CNN.

Do you not know how to read a graph?
It's saying that republicans don't trust news media as a general rule
Fox news barely gets 51%

That's because you're an idiot who is wrong about everything
lmao

Attached: FH-gdTvWQAEOkJN.jpg (827x1000, 93.45K)

The satanists are revealing themselves more and more.
They are destroying everyone's life. They are the enemy and they shall be purged in fire soon. The judgment day will take you all.

>ok groomer
ok dumb nigger

But of course there's many jews there

Being a parent means nothing when it comes to your kid's education.

>No, your children WILL learn how to have gay sex
>No, you WILL let trannies teach your children about John Money's suck and fuck experiments
>No, you WILL let gays groom your children
Why is Yea Forums invariably, always, inevitably like this?

I'm in Canada and I was having a problem with my man junk one day in the public school and they couldn't even look at it for me when I asked him to . Adults in school should not be allowed to look at Children's genitals to inspect them that should be in Regal and talent show date and it's acceptable is what's going to make actual child grooming easier

>Supporting Disney shit ever

Everything on that page is nonsense. And its so-called proof isn't even any good evidence .

>It's saying that republicans don't trust news media as a general rule
Which just means they're more gulliable.

>"other people exist and that's okay"
>see?! they're trying to show your kid their dicks!
I just don't get how you get from point A to B

Do you honestly think "sex ed" is about teaching how to perform sex?

It's called a physical, you weirdo.

You can't tell someone is Jewish just by their name. Did you notice how White they are compared to the average u.s. population? Oh wait you don't consider that a problem in comparison to be in Jewish.

Was there ever actually any evidence that schools in Florida were teaching kids explicitly how to have gay sex

Attached: King Toad.jpg (466x337, 49.06K)

All americans btw

Not for minors under 10. If children are declaring their sexuality and gender before then, something is seriously wrong. How can children have a sexual orientation when they don't have any sexual desires at that age?
Sex is assigned, and that to everybody outside of extreme left sees gender as synonymous to sex.

Can we please keep it on-topic? How are these executives distinguishing what characters are of a racial minority or not heterosexual?

I trust Disney more then I trust the Republican party which says a lot about the Republican party.

They teach you the functions of your reproductive organs in sex ed. Do you think sex ed is about urinating, nigger?

>I can't argue the point so I'll resort to whatabouthism

It's just the latest mindless rightoid craze to resurrect nonsense from 70 years ago and pretend anything remotely lgbt related is grooming and pedophilia. Report them and don't engage.

ok groomer

Attached: FPy_HcIVEAEttzX.jpg (828x1581, 261.46K)

>How can children have a sexual orientation when they don't have any sexual desires at that age?
I had sexual desires since Kindergarten.

>He can't spot jewish features
Will never make it.

it says you're a groomer

Attached: 1649378905474m.jpg (1024x924, 78.29K)

>Can we please keep it on-topic? How are these executives distinguishing what characters are of a racial minority or not heterosexual?
At this point the metric seems to be "if it pisses off conservatives it's probably good enough".

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Why are you people only calling them groomers? Call them by what they truly are too: PEDOPHILES.

No, since that isn't happening and it would be retarded. Sex ed follows a curriculum that school boards would have to acquire materials for and approve first.

>is watching porn normal?
Yes.

But he just said he wasn't a republican.

Honestly criticising Republicans for calling everyone that criticizes the Florida Bill Groomers by using the "Everyone who Is a Republican Is a ****phile" school of thought Is just trying to stop a dumpster fire with gasoline, nobody wins.

Schools used to require students to have their parents sign off on sexual education in the early grades like with girls in fifth grade learning about the menstrual cycle and boys in middle school learning about their body.

The funny thing is I remember six months ago we were all angry at the left for being prudes that censored sexy women from cartoons and comics because Black Cat not having cleavage down to her crotch like she did at one point in the nineties is a bad thing.

>t. pedophile groomer

Better a groomer then a boomer using dead memes.

>You seem to be obsessed about trans people destroying your life.

Yeah, /pol/-tards suck. Having queer stories isn't the problem. The tracker is the problem because it makes decent and believable stories with realistic characters unlikely. But /pol/-tards never talk about that.

forced diversity is pretty much always a bad thing as it doesnt make the inclusions come from the heart. It'd be like if you were forced to have Mickey be a main supporting character in every Disney cartoon, sure some people could get creative with it but overall tit just feel tacked on and pointless.

That was another state.

the right doesn't want to isolate their base

I just want to say I like that picture. It makes me smile. Thank you for posting it.

It's almost like the internet right is composed entirely of absolute morons who can't maintain a consistent ethical position to save their lives.

Uh huh. What region?

Attached: 36[1].png (500x256, 145.66K)

I really don't think trannies belong anywhere in fiction unless they're the butt of some joke. There's a gigantic elephant in the room in the way of physical reality for them that just isn't there for normal men and women

>bergman
>horn
>cohen
>iger
>catz
>schwarz

really gets your noggin joggin

But that's exactly what they are, Gullible.

>women being sensual and people straight up having explicit sex is the same thing and totally okay for children to see it. All of the animations have the same age requirement btw
You groomer retard.

King Toad is a good man

Set a their to catch a thief.

What does this have to do with anything?

You telling me you don't watch Porn ever?

I believe the stated purpose (not that this is actually a real thing that's going to happen) was to create a situation in which such characters could have stories that were typical narratives instead of stories that are just about them being minorities. It would be nice to reach that stage.

Yes because the internet left very coherent and logical. Or maybe just the internet part.

What do you mean, pedophile?

because the act of grooming is being performed, perhaps?

Trans people don't exist. Even if you stretch the definition to the absolute limit and scrape the bottom of the barrel, all the trans people in America couldn't fill 1/5th of a stadium. There are almost twice as many immigrant Uruguays in America than the blatantly inflated trans estimate.

Everything, are the left afraid of sex or are they oversexed? Can't be both.

No, it just means the left loses, because they're all groomers.
Because when push comes to shove, they're the ones fighting against curriculum transparency and anti-grooming laws in public schools.
Democrat and Republican voters both overwhelmingly support these laws, it's only radical leftists continuing to marginalize themselves because they want to abuse children, as normal, healthy children do not grow up to be leftists.

Attached: img_1_1648995578340.jpg (1425x1425, 167.8K)