Ok groomer

Is groomer the new buzzword that rightoids use now?

That's not what grooming is.

Attached: 0.jpg (500x1125, 108.63K)

surprise

Attached: 1648768447044.png (590x700, 394.92K)

>new
seeThey have always accused anyone they hate of being pedophiles.

OP is a leftist false flag trying to make you side with Disney

I don't see anything wrong with this picture.

As a right winger, i can say no.
Do we think these lgbt types are making these laws to diddle our kids yes, but seems op os the only one using groomer. Or maybe /pol/ are

Exactly, grooming is having sex with people over the age of 20. Just ask warren ellis.

Kill yourself spammping hick

ok groomer

Attached: trannylodeon.png (1438x1584, 1.71M)

Everything the rightoid accuses you of, he sercretly holds in his heart.

Attached: file.png (720x655, 328.99K)

As if you don't think that will the demise of the company.

Ok Groomer

Attached: 20220330_151514.jpg (1080x915, 95.11K)

Yeah the same week Liberals say they are upset about not teaching 5 year olds about gay sex, they push an abortion bill that allows for post birth abortions over a week after the child is born.

Congrats you fags are still worse.

Attached: 1649240357699.jpg (1080x443, 45.41K)

politifact.com/factchecks/2022/apr/06/facebook-posts/no-california-bill-wouldnt-allow-mothers-kill-thei/

Attached: meter-false.jpg (438x392, 35.94K)

Remember the Constable see about kneeling? What kind of controversy is the Republican Party going to make next?

SNEED FEED & SEED

Attached: 668250.jpg (640x480, 49.83K)

>politifact
>the same site that lies about Biden's covid death numbers being less than Trump's
Yeah no, read the damn bill yourself. It specifically says knowingly killing a child a week after birth will not be punishable. So yes it legally allows for post birth abortions a week after.

One would assume a president who's taking it seriously and not telling people to drink bleach would have less people dying of covid long with the fact that the vaccine has been available more under his presidency than the other one.

>marxists won't stop sexually grooming children
>"look what rethuglicans are mad about"
ok groomer

Attached: groomer exodus.png (1435x1623, 311.48K)

How is that grooming?

The actual content of the law is not about stopping grooming.

The Florida law has nothing to do with grooming. Literally, a democratic state senator tried to introduce an amendment to the bill to make it explicitly about grooming and it was shot down by Republicans.

>Grooming isn't sexualizing children and then telling them to not tell their parents about it.
OK, Groomer.

Attached: Channel Hatred.png (220x270, 118.93K)

>It specifically says knowingly killing a child a week after birth will not be punishable.
It does not.

>Literally, a democratic state senator tried to introduce an amendment to the bill to make it explicitly about grooming and it was shot down by Republicans.
Go on?

Being gay isn't sexualizing anymore than being straight is.

There have been nearly 600,000 deaths under Biden, over 200,000 more than under Trump you stupid retard

I for one am shocked, shocked, that the party of Roy Moore and Matt Gaetz don't actually care about child grooming.
Maybe if I call out their obvious hypocrisy enough they'll magically stop being pedophiles. That'll definitely show 'em.

ok groomer

Attached: FPB3lYPWQAQp1FE.png (1500x1500, 55.52K)

Are the people actually doing Pauper testing now ?

>20+
>CAN'T consent to sex with older men

>10-
>CAN consent to new-age lobotomy thru legalized castration (both chemical and literal)

Good thing it's not secret sex talk to begin with, then.

okay groomer

"Gay" doesn't apply to little kids, as children are non-sexual. They don't know anything about that, as their hormones haven't come in. Also, the law doesn't allow teachers to talk to them about being straight, either, so you can stop lying Mouse-cuck.

Attached: Achievement Unlocked Went Full Retard.jpg (488x305, 16.19K)

Grooming is the act of teaching a child how to fuck the person teaching them or someone else. Parents can be and have been groomers selling their children for to old men for money.

Teaching someone gay people exists isn't grooming.

>"These actions include not only abortion in any stage of pregnancy but also ‘perinatal death.’ Perinatal death is defined as the death of a newborn up to seven days or more."
>"Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death."
I don't know about him, but being allowed to murder your baby near the end of the third trimester is just as ghoulish and I don't see any wording of the bill that prevents what he described from happening. If your baby dies nobody is allowed to find out why and if it was criminal if it was within 7 days of birth. That's fucked up.

The law allows parents to give a lawsuit against the teachers were mentioned in being married to someone of the same gender.

floridapolitics.com/archives/501572-democrat-carlos-smith-endorses-jeff-brandes-amendment-to-sex-ed-bill/
Dude tried to make the bill explicitly about human sexual activity instead of about orientation or identity, but it was shot down by Republicans. Makes you wonder why.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2223

Attached: perinatal.png (1704x99, 23.43K)

>taking it seriously
Biden gave up on tackling Covid as soon as his vax mandate was shot down and said there's nothing he can do. He's defaulted back to Trump's plan of letting the states handle it.

or it could be that they're grooming kids into mutilating their bodies because they played with a barbie instead of a gi joe that one time

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2223

>Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, rights under this article, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.

It literally states if you baby dies do to any circumstances then you are not legally liable. That would include post birth abortion as the perinatal period is defined by the cdc as 7 days after birth. Yes it does legalize killing babies

ok groomer

Attached: img_1_1648995578340.jpg (1425x1425, 167.8K)

why do you want to have secret conversation with children about sex so badly?

God, you fucking idiotic American “conservatives” are so easy to manipulate.

What’s the next buzzword you “right-wing” pieces of shit will cling onto? Is the manufactured CRT panic finally over?

>Grooming is the act of teaching a child how to fuck the person teaching them or someone else.
Grooming is any kind of indoctrination in order to force the child to think and act a certain way, usually sexually. The Left is grooming children to be trannies. You can't escape this fact, especially since they turn around and confirm that that's what's happening behind closed doors.

>Also, the law doesn't allow teachers to talk to them about being straight
If that's what the law says then it's very bad law. Every teacher I ever had would be breaking it because they would sometimes talk about their spouse. In 3rd grade my teacher was pregnant, that would be a big fucking no-no under this law.

No, it's all morphed into one single big bogeyman.

Point out the part that legalizes murder

>It literally states if you baby dies do to any circumstances then you are not legally liable.
because otherwise you would risk throwing women in prison for having a miscarriage.
>Grooming is any kind of indoctrination in order to force the child to think and act a certain way, usually sexually.
I agree we should make christianity illegal.

>Grooming is any kind of indoctrination in order to force the child to think and act a certain way, usually sexually.
So any time you take a child to a movie with a heterosexual romance, you are grooming them.

That's not what grooming is. You're literally misusing the word. At worst it's indoctrination. Which isn't good but it's not grooming. Grooming is the new Tennessee law, that lets old men marry 12 year olds because the law considers a "man" and a "woman" anyone at or over the age of 12 who's hit puberty.

>If that's what the law says then it's very bad law.
No, that's called being "fair". Little kids don't need ANY sexual instruction, period.

Attached: Beavis and Butthead vs Leftists.jpg (1500x889, 129.29K)

See

What part of
>a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty
Do you not understand?
Simply put if your child dies of any circumstance including negligence or malice then you as the parent are not liable to any penalty of law. It is a literal loophole that allows foe post birth abortion.

negligence or malice aren't covered.

nah, it's still grooming. pedos and troons get the rope, no matter if it's a red state or a blue state

>because otherwise you would risk throwing women in prison for having a miscarriage.
Women don't got to jail due to miscarriage anyways. The law literally opens the door to a complete lack of responsibility for the parent after the child has been born and is independent of the parent's body.

>So any time you take a child to a movie with a heterosexual romance, you are grooming them.
Nah, romance isn't explicitly sexual in nature. They see it from their parents routinely, anyway. The Left, on the other hand, is teaching kids of about faggotry, butt plugs, and how to get castrated.

Making it illegal for teachers telling children about fundamental aspects of human society is a bad law.

How the fuck is a social studies teacher supposed to discuss the President and First Lady without addressing the fact that they are in a heterosexual marriage?

>The Left, on the other hand, is teaching kids of about faggotry, butt plugs, and how to get castrated.
Where exactly?

>Women don't got to jail due to miscarriage anyways
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59214544
In America they do

It falls under the definitions of "any action" come on user, why else would they use that language in the bill?

why is american media and entertainment so fixated on people of color and gender?

Attached: 1603087507.jpg (720x540, 39.29K)

>Nah, romance isn't explicitly sexual in nature.
That is objectively what you're saying when you accuse teachers of grooming children via mentioning that gay people exist. Because to you, being gay is explicitly sexual, and romance has absolutely nothing to do with it.

>Making it illegal for teachers telling children about fundamental aspects of human society is a bad law.
Why do children need to know about how Steve plows Adam in the butt, unless it's grooming?

Attached: Arthas's solution to Taco Bell.png (518x700, 272.57K)

What about gay Romance?

Attached: 1623661353937.jpg (540x531, 51.62K)

>Grooming is any kind of indoctrination in order to force the child to think and act a certain way, usually sexually.
What the law ban is not indoctrination.

>"Gay" doesn't apply to little kids, as children are non-sexual.
Talking about a kid having two mommies is no more sexual that tlaking about a kid having a daddy and a mommy, or having divorcing parent.

A male teacher talking about his wife is no more sexual than a male teacher tlaking about his husband.

Having a talk about one of the kid's sibling transitioning is no more sexual than having a talk about one of the kid's sibling getting an appendix ablation.

They can explain why some one's allowed to have two dads without telling them about sex.

Grooming is not just sexual. You can groom kids into cults or politics. The point is to separate kids from parents and abuse them, which is what's happening.

Why is saying that Adam and Steve are married implies that you have to go into detail about their sexual activity?

>Prosecutors argued her methamphetamine use contributed to the miscarriage

So she used a narcotive to induce miscarriage essentially inducing manslaughter. Okay, so?

No. it's not retard. Teaching kids gay people and trans people exist isn't grooming. You are changing the word to mean teaching kids anything you don't like.

You can talk to kids about same-sex relationships without detailing sexual acts. It's the "Don't say gay" bill, "not the don't say gay sex acts" bill

The problem with you is you don't think of being gay as an orientation, you think of it as being a kink. Notice, that your reply doesn't address the second sentence in my post.

why is it that when someone mentions homosexuality you automatically assume they're talking about them having sex?

You haven't established he was a groomer, though.

>Why do children need to know about how Steve plows Adam in the butt, unless it's grooming?
Because abusing children is the only way to create more marxists.
Healthy, normal children don't grow up to be marxists.

Attached: antifa.jpg (4044x2500, 2.61M)

The kids can always ask their own parents but god forbid any faggot let a parent explain faggotry to their children.

The law still isn't about grooming, it's about not mentioning something that is part of everyone's live and whose heterosexual aspect (like a man being married to a woman) have been commonly exposed to kids since almost ever.

Because every time he thinks about gay people the thinks about graphic gay sex.

Have you read it? I have and it couldn't be more explicit aside from directly using the term.

Why did faggots all automatically assume that an anti-grooming bill was all about them?

Which is incredibly ironic since that's a word Twitter 25 year olds abuse when their fairly tale romance with a 40 year

that's fucking cop logic and you know it. If someone with a drug problem ends up pregnant and miscarries you can't assume they were acting with malicious intent.

By that standard any single lesson that goes against the belief system of the parents counts as grooming. If they teach a child that the earth wasn't created 5000 years ago and that dinosaur fossils aren't actually the work of Satan, does that count as separating the child from their parents?

Ever been to a pride parade?
That's why.

Actually, talking about having two dads is exactly what the law prohibit.

Do teachers regularly go into graphic detail about the sex life of straight couples?

I know I probably would have found out about this on The Daily Show but it's been off for a few weeks coming back next week I wonder what kind of joke Trevor Noah will make?

Usually because they are

Secret sex talk is outlawed. Teachers are crying foul. Why?
That's exactly how bills prohibiting racial discrimination are called anti-CRT laws. What's CRT then?

pushing them to identify as gay and trans is grooming. kids are impressionable and these goons know this which is why they're angry they can't target kids anymore. really sick people

If the parents of an entire school district want their children to learn that the earth was created 5,000 years ago, and instead you would rather teach them how to have anal sex, then you should be in prison, and the parents should raise their children however they want.

The law prohbit teachers about talking about same-sex marriage.

>but it's labeled as this, so clearly it must do exactly what its proponents say it does!

>Ever been to a pride parade?
I have. It's mostly people in bright colours dancing to Diana Ross

The bill says absolutely nothing about same-sex marriage.
You just want to rape kids.

>Secret sex talk is outlawed.
That's not what is outlawed.

>THE LEFT
>THE RIGHT
>THE LEFT
>THE RIGHT
Holy shit, election tourists coupled with almost a decade of phoneposting has made every fucking board unbearable.

Attached: what in the fuck.png (575x484, 457.23K)

cool how you forget the mention the preteens in drag dancing for the pleasure of grown men