reminder philosophy was just baby tier until the 19th century
Reminder philosophy was just baby tier until the 19th century
Other urls found in this thread:
I'm gay btw
based
Not true, the Indians basically said all you could say by 3000 BC
This, "western thought" is only the aborted step-child of the Hyperborean and Atlantid-Egyptian traditions. Nietzsche is basically just a bunch of cope dealing with the fallout a few thousand years later
Indian philosophy was far too mystical, even if it had touched upon the concepts first, it didn't formulate them properly.
how did that work out for them? sanitation wise?
>he hasn't read the Indian logician and epistemological schools, or even the very logical commentaries on the mystic works
lmao
>dude everything is One lmao
Must not be a coincidence then that they stopped progressing culturally and scientifically around that time too.
>was just
I agree, but unironically. Reading any philosophical texts from before the 19th century just feels like watching brainlets shout at each other. As far as I'm concerned, philosophy began with Schopenhauer, who rightfully called everyone before him (except Kant) fucking retarded.
based
Why did schoppy dislike hegel? Was this german thing?
every day you retards make me question how I can be addicted to this awful website
am i spoiling myself then by reading his novels first?
He (among others) accused him of writing deep-sounding, but ultimately hollow, word salads. "I can't understand a word he's saying, he must be saying something profound" is what he accused Hegel-lovers of.
>But for so thoroughly pitiable a creature as Hegel, whose whole pseudo-philosophy is but a monstrous amplification of the Ontological Proof, to have undertaken its defence against Kant, is indeed an alliance of which the Ontological Proof itself might be ashamed, however little it may in general be given to blushing. How can I be expected to speak with deference of men, who have brought philosophy into contempt?
Schopp accused Hegel of the same thing he accused the majority of post-Anselm philosophers - confusing reason and cause.
(13:35)
youtu.be
you don't understand me and my trans am
you always put me down cause I only look good
in orange orange orange
Im quite new at philosophy but isnt kant and schopp describing intuition?
*ahem*
is that nick mullen?
>that epic post-industrial cope
>that epic pre-industrial cope
I mean, it literally is though no matter how complicated it gets. Retard.
*cough cough*
You can't derive an Is without Oughts for doing so. I don't agree that is a that over there.