Tfw you BTFO David Hume for all eternity
Tfw you BTFO David Hume for all eternity
Landon Carter
Chase Reyes
>her dur he refuted a man no longer alive who couldn’t argue back
>I’m so clever I used the benefit of hindsight to develop upon a theory of a man who load the previous foundation
Wew
Alexander Rodriguez
Only to get BTFO by based Einstein
Angel Long
like how?
if your argument includes misunderstanding relativity then please save your breath though.
Zachary Martin
Philosophy isn't a zero-sum game, you idiot. Even philosophers who are completely "wrong" (as if that were possible) are an addition by virtue of being wrong very precisely so as to be responded to with equal precision.
Philosophy isn't politics, go back to /pol/ you small-minded petty twat.
Henry Davis
Kant was a fucking idiot
Samuel Diaz
>tfw you btfo Kant for all eternity
Ian Sanders
Kant is probably the most boring philosopher
Carson Smith
what?
Juan Gray
You only think you have beaten David Hume in your sense experiences.
Hunter Richardson
>when you're discredited for all eternity
Christian Harris
Robert Bell
redpill me on kant and hume
i will not read them. too boring, too long, etc. just give me a quick rundown
Grayson Johnson
>brings up /pol/ out of fucking nowhere as if philosophy threads havent always been this kind of shitflinging
Hello redd!t. Can you post the message of your friend telling you to bitch about /pol/ and whatever else when you don't like something to try and fit in? I need a good laugh before bed
Nicholas Torres
except he didn't, because there's no such thing as a difference between analytic and synthetic propositions. to believe so is to fall into dogma
Brandon Ortiz
youtube.com
39 to 41, onwards to the rest of Kant if you care to.
Zachary Johnson
Don’t worry, it’s just some dumb shit that guy saw off Yea Forums from some equally dumb shit and now parrots that opinion like gospel
Evan Wood
They're both cunts.
Kayden Myers
The doctrine of transcendental aesthetic claims that time and space are precognitions, not objects, and cannot be analyzed since they're given to mind a priori. Relativity shows that space and time compose a singular entity which definitively has form and properties.
Mason Young
Yeah I weep at her misreading of Kant and philosophy in general
Also
>rebirth of reason
Yikes
Logan Mitchell
Space and time are not a singular entity nor an object which could be observed. The notion of "time being just another dimension" is simply confusing mathematical formalism with reality.
All special relativity says is that the measured time of systems in relative motion must be different in order to account for the constant speed of light such that electro-magnetism works the same way in all such systems. This concerns only measured time in regard of simultaneity, the experience of time is exactly the same. In no way this affects Kant's argument of time being a necessary prerequisite for experience.
All general relativity says is that gravity cannot be described by a force but by geometrical considerations connected with the masses (or energies) which of course also affects measured time blabla... I don't want to write my ass off here but the sheer fact that we are able to describe space-time (it's only a notion/formalism) geometrically as curved and not flat necessarlily needs the abstract notion of space as a form of experience. There would be no geometry without the precondition of space.
Gabriel Rogers
Me again:
After thinking about it, Einstein's theory even reinforces Kant's point of view since it ensures experience being the same for all observers in intertial systems.
Chase Martin
holy shit - you really don't understand anything, do you ? you realise hume's ideas, and empiricism in general, didn't die when hume did? People are still defending him to this day. Do you also realise that Kant's criticism of empiricism has nothing to do with hindsight ? I don't even know where to start here - hindsight has nothing to do with it
Christian Edwards
How the FUCK do I read Kant ? I tried to read this moron and I don't UNDERSTAND A SINGLE LINE !!!!. What the FUCK IS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE? WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN ? SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN IT TO ME, I FEEL LIKE A TOTAL BRAINLET. FUVK AAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FUCK KANT FUCK JANNIES FUCK NIGGERS
Hunter Rivera
read up on the question he set out to answer first (the dualism started by Descartes).
Caleb Brown
He didn't disprove his argument about causality and induction
Jace Campbell
Why the fuck are you starting with the third critique?
Alexander Jones
he got btfo by noneuclidean geometry
Levi Taylor
I'd be surprised if Kant BTFOd anyone in his entire life. Hume is the guy who walked into the playground of Western Philosophy and just pissed on everyone's sandcastle. Kant was an autstic dweeb who solved nothing.
Jackson James
>What the FUCK IS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE?
categorical = absolute, unconditional
imperative = what ought to be done
It's not that hard.
Jordan Rivera
I understood time as only being able to be understood objectively as during the viewing (Anschauung) within the subject, and impossible from with out. Space though being possible objective outside of the subject though also necessary for anschauung. I assumed that what Einstein wrote only supported, or elaborated further, on what Kant stated.
Jose Perry
Every. Single. Thread. Almost verbatim. How many times have the same handful of holdouts been soundly, resoundingly btfo'd only to just try again some other day in the hopes that old lies look truer to new eyes? And when will they figure out that this board doesn't have a high enough turnover for that shit to work?