Nietzsche on Islam

Nietzsche on Islam

>Christianity destroyed for us the whole harvest of
ancient civilization, and later it also destroyed for us the
whole harvest of Mohammedan civilization. The
wonderful culture of the Moors in Spain, which was
fundamentally nearer to us and appealed more to our
senses and tastes than that of Rome and Greece, was
trampled down ( I do not say by what sort of feet )
Why? Because it had to thank noble and manly instincts
for its origin because it said yes to life, even to the rare
and refined luxuriousness of Moorish life! The crusaders
later made war on something before which it would
have been more fitting for them to have grovelled in the
dust a civilization beside which even that of our
nineteenth century seems very poor and very "senile."
What they wanted, of course, was booty: the orient was
rich. Let us put aside our prejudices! The crusades were
a higher form of piracy, nothing more! The German
nobility, which is fundamentally a Viking nobility, was
in its element there: the church knew only too well how
the German nobility was to be won . The German noble,
always the "Swiss guard" of the church, always in the
service of every bad instinct of the church but well paid
. Consider the fact that it is precisely the aid of German
swords and German blood and valour that has enabled
the church to carry through its war to the death upon
everything noble on earth! At this point a host of painful
questions suggest themselves. The German nobility
stands outside the history of the higher civilization: the
reason is obvious. Christianity, alcohol the two great
means of corruption. Intrinsically there should be no
more choice between Islam and Christianity than there is
between an Arab and a Jew.

Attached: 6657ad9ea799cf35a38fabd5fcbcfab7.png (633x911, 463K)

>the whole harvest of Mohammedan civilization

so, the quran. the one book they have. this thread smells like butthurt.

In which book does he say this?

The Antichrist

Just because you haven't studied their culture doesn't mean there isn't one

>so, the quran. the one book they have
of course not a single other book in Arabic has ever been written before or since

Glad it's settled. Nietzsche a shit.

disgusting PiGslam pedos have a general for a reason. back to your containment.

name one worth reading

what makes a book worth reading according to you?
Then I'll let you know

so you cant?

there's that one book. you know the one. what's it called? that book. fuck, what is it?

not him but he's asking you a valid question

Layla and Majnun
The Epistle of Forgiveness
The Golden Ode
These are probably some the more famous examples that arn't included in the one thousand and one nights
Also poerty but it doesn't translate well

But I can't recommend anything if you don't tell me what you consider worth reading, must because you don't read.
Dumb faggot

>must because you don't read
better that than not being able to write, retard.

>let's just ignore the part where they are L I T E R A L L Y second class citizens

ssshhh you're not allowed to point out the contradiction

Attached: 1536183235232.jpg (440x440, 77K)

>Islam is the best
>fuck Christianity and fuck white people
are modern Germans just follows fin nietzsche’s footsteps?

Nietzsche is love

Islam is in its core anti-cultural and anti-intellectual. No independent school of thought can develop outside of Quranic teachings; no independent opinion can hope to challenge Muhammad's words, as he is the perfect man and gives clear instructions what to do and what not for every sphere of society; any attempt to go further than results in apostasy i.e. death. It is by no chance that Christian Europe produced countless various examples of literature, art and philosophy while Muslims got stuck where they were mentally and culturally in 7th century. Even those lik Averroes who dared produce commentaries on ancient Greeks were considered to be apostates by ullemah. Imagine what would happen if they somehow dared to produce anything of original design.

>anti-cultural
>anti-intellectual
>highly inclusive
>will resort to actual terrorism to achieve goals
They are the true destroyers feminists could ever hope to achieve.

Christisn Europe produced moral relativism and nihilism, way to go.

>n-no u!
well played user, you really showed him

Yeah there was that one guy who critiqued Aristotle so "effectively" to his 80 IQ inbred goatfucker people that they abandoned the entire literary canon of Greece.

They're racially inferior, to say nothing of culturally inferior.

>so, the quran. the one book they have
>Islam is in its core anti-cultural and anti-intellectual.

Attached: images[1].png (219x230, 6K)

Somebody didn't start with the Greeks.

Islam is closer to Plato and Aristotle than the Trinity and Incarnation are

To be fair, Aristotle was bitchmade and most of his works were easily refuted due to self-contradictions everywhere.

>Being surprised that a 19th century man had orientalist views.

>implying that soiboi bugmen aren't the only ones who would feel the need to aimlessly defend islam on Yea Forums
lmao