Is he right?

Is he right?

Attached: 51oEjGD+juL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (324x499, 43K)

He was undiagnosed schizophrenic, very sad

No, he's not.

Attached: giphy (1).gif (500x400, 489K)

Depends what you mean. Is he right when he's pretending to be Derrida, or when he's pretending to be Deleuze (pretending to be Nietzsche), or when he's pretending to be Zizek?

all of it

Wall-E

In a sense that people thought when the book came out that capitalism is the end of history? Certainly. His mental illness analogies to capitalism are kinda braindead. The movie references are reddit-tier.

aessential read for Marxist to understand how blackpilled they should be it's a cliche now to point out how un-creative it is to be a revolutionary, MarK Fisher came to this analysis over 10 years ago it's to a large extent embarrassing, it's obvious by critically reading this book that he knew that the new left we're nothing but a emotional reaction towards a system they'll never reform.

''Witness, for instance, the estab-lishment of settled 'alternative' or 'independent' cultural zones, which endlessly repeat older gestures of rebellion and contes-tation as if for the first time. 'Alternative' and 'independent' don't designate something outside mainstream culture; rather, they are styles, in fact the dominant styles, within the mainstream. No-one embodied (and struggled with) this deadlock more than Kurt Cobain and Nirvana. In his dreadful lassitude and objectless rage, Cobain seemed to give wearied voice to the despondency of the generation that had come after history, whose every move was anticipated, tracked, bought and sold before it had even happened. Cobain knew that he was just another piece of spectacle, that nothing runs better on MTV than a protest against MTV; knew that his every move was a cliche scripted in advance, knew that even realizing it is a cliche. The impasse that paralyzed Cobain is precisely the one that Jameson described: like postmodern culture in general, Cobain found himself in 'a world in which stylistic innovation is no longer possible, [where] all that is left is to imitate dead styles, to speak through the masks and with the voices of the styles in the imaginary museum'. Here, even success meant failure, since to succeed would only mean that you were the new meat on which the system could feed. But the high existential angst of Nirvana and Cobain belongs to an older moment; what succeeded them was a pastiche-rock which reproduced the forms of the past without anxiety. ''
-Mark Fisher-

Attached: 10 10.png (272x367, 61K)

Pigette

must read for all of Yea Forums