For me, it's Heraclitus, the deepest thinker in Ancient Greece

For me, it's Heraclitus, the deepest thinker in Ancient Greece.

Attached: Heraclitus.jpg (450x609, 43K)

deep dicking > deep thinking

Fag

Attached: Parmenides.jpg (220x288, 20K)

Was he the Mark Fisher of his time? He suffered from depression caused by his process philosophy and died by feeding himself to dogs.

>*blocks your path*

Attached: 203707.jpg (200x239, 10K)

heraCLITus

Attached: cry.jpg (400x388, 21K)

Nice!

Kys

Good one, butterfly. You've shown us you're an empowered lesbian, knowing where the clitoris is! Wow. I just wish I had as much knowledge as you do!

>when you realize Aristotelianism is just a synthesis between Heraclitus and Parmenides

Attached: 1538869028656.png (537x727, 623K)

Artistotle was the Kant to Heraclitus' Descartes and Parmenides' Hume

Heh
Clit

>hegel's triad is real
*gulp*

No reasoning, no deductions, no logical rigor that takes him from point A to point B. Just a bunch of statements that titillate the college crowd looking for something profound to go "hmmm yeah he's just like me." Heraclitus is a brainlet's philosopher. Try Parmenides.

Deep as a river of piss

Heraclitus was our Lao Tzu

Attached: DZ4mC2OVwAAiJuq.jpg (752x485, 112K)

What are you afraid?

Attached: http___1.bp.blogspot.com_-r4nK6XmYYFE_U26YxFVBRpI_AAAAAAAAX14_zpsfSxeq1Sk_s1600_Georg+Wilhelm+Friedr (390x390, 28K)

Better would be to say that Heraclitus and Parmenides compliment each other a la :

>Scholars have generally believed that either Parmenides was responding to Heraclitus, or Heraclitus to Parmenides

They form the yin and yang of Pre Socratic philosophy

No it's not, and no he wasn't. We barely have any extant philosophy from him.

honestly all of this muh presocratics larping is super cringy. like I get that you’re all too cool to read “mainstream” philosophers like all those dweebs in your Phil 102 classes but all we have from this guy is less than a twitter account’s worth of discombobulated sentence fragments. no one thinks you’re “deep” for pretending to have unlocked the secrets of all things within them. we’re all just shaking our heads and chuckling every time you open your mouths (or rather hit post because none of you actually have a coherent enough framework to discuss it out loud for more than 20 seconds)

Parmenides is a bitch

kek

I feel like this goes for a lot of philosophy, but yes in particular the mystical everything is one and nothing side.

>Knowing not how to listen, they do not know how to speak.

4/10 bait. Just kind of low energy and easy to see through.

The effort seemed fitting for the posts I responded to.