The best analysis of the bourgeoisie class comes from right-wing writers The best works regarding the so-called ''working class and their destiny" is written by anti-communists
After spending 15 years reading marxist literature I only discovered that every marxist is a semi-illiterate who only repeat what others say. Even the "most intelligent" marxist like György Lukács and Gramsci are dumb compared to the lowest kind of right-wing writer (I'll name Hermann Rauschning and Charles Maurras just so you can get the idea. Even though they were low tier thinkers they are still way above the highest of what marxist literature has ever produced)
And where does this pointless posturing lead us? A return to monarchy? The rightwing is the end of the beach that gets swallowed up by the ocean of time. Now they’re market fundies and fascists. NOT critical of the bourgeoisie and NOT on the side of working people What’s this “best”?
Jason Peterson
Another good example: even this self-hating jew who died very young produced superior social analysis compared to everything you can find on the left side (that includes socialists, anarchists and all the revolutionary trash)
>The rightwing is the end of the beach that gets swallowed up by the ocean of time. empty rhetoric
Jace Reed
imagine actually believing this though... lmao
Blake Martinez
you're basically trying to create hivemind with your comment therefore what you wrote is insignificant. Go spread your cheap agitation somewhere else
Carter Stewart
It not empty. It’s an opinionated metaphor and demonstrably true. Can you demonstrate this “best” or not?
Jason Barnes
>t. 100 iq
Samuel Davis
I think it's because those Marxists are mainly entertaining a social game, where ideology and posturing are paramount, whereas those right-wingers aren't really in one that is pervasive and sort of stand outside of it all.
Noah Evans
Half an hour in and you still have nothing to even ponder.
Hudson Peterson
the aestheticization of ideology do not apply to exclusively to Marxists or leftists. that's naive to think.
Ryan Perry
Go to church and you won't need online strangers to give you obvious answers.
Jonathan Scott
the reality is I discovered only those anti-communists and/or very traditional can describe in words what is happening in our world. The marxist writers don't live in the same reality as other human beings therefore what they write is meant for social/political action. It is not by coincidence the libertarians (the "right-wing" sect split from anarchists/fabian socialists in the late 19th century) never succeeded in philosophy
Hudson Hughes
Are you going to list some right-wing intellectual works for us to examine?
Adrian Cooper
ponder this dick nigga
Benjamin Rodriguez
Weiningers metaphysical misogyny is exquisite
Cameron Parker
EMPTY THREAD
PUFF AND NONSENSE
OP HASN’T READ A THING
Blake Moore
>Charles Maurras >lowest kind of right-wing writer
you have a very specific idea of "right-wing writer"
>self-hating jew That doesn't count, self hating jews are supernaturally good at criticism
Michael Rivera
am i supposed to bash libtards with this, I assume a marxist is a libtard shit i aint even know what these words mean but ima more of right wing typa guy you fee
Hunter Taylor
Typical Pseud cringe
Isaac Johnson
marxism is just an extremely potent marketing scheme for simcularaism.
lol no nothing written by a reactionary could come close to something like The Making of the English Working Class by E.P.Thompson.
Mason Myers
True reactionaries do not write, for there is nothing to tell. What we lost cannot be described. Words corrupt all knowledge.
Jose Wood
>market fundies Only in the US and the US realistically has a market-left and a Progressive-left that's closer to Racial Maoism in practice
Chase Anderson
>The best analysis of the bourgeoisie class comes from right-wing writers Marx was a right wing writer? also rudely saging this pitiful idpol wanking
Lincoln Walker
The assumptions of Marxism as it actually existed (Whig history, determinism, liberal theory of property, labor theory of value, perfectibility of man, hierarchy-free society, etc.) are flawed and predictably produce garbage theory. If you ask N Marxists for their view on some issue you will get N+1 mutually incompatible answers. It's like scholasticism for a liberal, materialist, post-religious society except scholasticism was good. Communists will often cite the continuity of their work with Adam Smith and David Ricardo, perhaps it's time we more carefully assessed the quality of their thought instead of stopping at "beard man bad."
Xavier Ross
Marxism and leftism has always been more in vogue among the upper classes and the elite, so it will always be more susceptible to pseudism
