Abrahamic religion

>abrahamic religion
>objective morality
>substance metaphysics
>traditionalism
>cartesian philosophy
>lacanian analysis
these are the most cringeworthy things

Attached: 1542244192410.jpg (680x680, 85K)

>anime posting

>doesnt watch anime yet posts on an anime site
I am mistaken, THIS is the most cringeworthy thing

And
>Fascism

Cringe

unbased & bluepilled

Based

op here yeah I will add that to the list
>Fascism
>Nationalism
>Capitalism
>Neo-Liberalism
fucking cringe desu

madotsuki isn't an anime character faggot

True though

How do you argue against moral relativism? Assuming you don't believe in god

>Capitalism
>Communism
>Christianity
>Anti Fascism
>Freudian Psychoanalysis
>The Shoah
>Marx
>Ignorant materialism
>Liberalism
>Rousseau
>Anti Nationalism
>Document worship
>Anti racism
>LGBT
>Conservatism
>Incels
>French people who think they’re smart
>Jewish people who think they’re smart
>Anarchism
>Mainstream historians
>Other things I disagree with
All cringe

Attached: D18CB054-D662-43F9-AE28-F11C6DEDEE72.jpg (236x344, 22K)

That morality should concise with the biological directive to procreate and continue the survival of the group, and your genes. And the things that inhibit that directive “which is the reason you are here in the first place” are immoral. Though you can argue this in itself could be a form of moral relativism, but at least things are much more clear.

Post is 5/10 bait
9/10 cringe

Your post made me visibly cringe.

>you
The most cringeworthy faggot to ever walk this planet.

He who proclaimeth the truthiness of the doctrine of moral relativism on account of the absence of the possibility of truth's obtainment refuteth himself for to proposeth such presupposeth the existence not only of truth, as the statement "moral relativism is true" is paradoxical if it be correct, but also the ethical imperative that truth should be accepted hence we cannot accept such unsense. We find through the impossibility of the contrary the transcendental reality of universally true propositions.

>That morality should concise with the biological directive to procreate and continue the survival of the grou
why?

cringe/10

>Objective morality
Do whatever you want senpai see how it works out

The issue with subjectivists is humans constantly do, objectively. Even more humans either a. Defend, retreat (backward) or b. Attack, enthrall themselves in (forward). The implication of do is that they always want to do one or the other in the best way possible, objectively. You can't get rid of objectivity you mong and christianity implies objectivity and rationalism

Attached: FB_IMG_1550625046965.jpg (702x960, 95K)

he is a polfag, you think he will give you a satisfactory answer?

this, but also
>social democracy
>democratic socialism
>basically anything that isn't full blown gommunism shooting borgies in the head

It's self contradictory.