People are reading it

It's an underrated gem. Very cool. Hopefully it can remain a secret on this board ;)

No they're not, Kevin. Stop trying already.

>People are reading it
That sentence brings me back to r/mde r/chadright, Summer 2018. God I miss those places

I tried reading this but it's more of an inside look at social sciences in the academy than anything. Kinda boring. If you're already hip to the JQ there's no reason to read.

>nostalgia for something less than a year old
I keep forgetting Yea Forums is comprised of literal underage b&

>Jews are bad, mmmkay?
There, throw in a dash of vaguely Darwin-y words like "haplogroup" and you've read it.

>nostalgia for subreddits

You fucking disgust me

some swedish alt right web zine posted an english pdf a few months ago, if you make a thread on /pol/ someone might know the site

Ur funny

its a waste of time

Essential Yea Forums

fucking discord tranny counter-counter psy-op fucks

I heard about the book a month ago. It is an intresting view of the Jew, through the lens of evolutionary perspective that a group dont have too adapt via nature and become stronger or smarter. Instead the jews have developed a social stratergy of cooperation which is both monetary and political for the greater goal of survival of the tribe.
While this stratergy is not considered moral or ethical by our western standard it is there "culture" of survival

Attached: P90224-125457.jpg (2448x3264, 1.48M)

interesting

Jews sound like a real jerk.

A very good overview of the JQ. Once I had read it I started to look for critiques of it online and the sheer lack of any hard, direct critique of the content is astonishing. Of course there are plenty of knee-jerk calls of antisemitism which ignore all content from the book itself, but scholarly contesting of it is virtually nonexistent. Of the critiques that I did encounter I noticed a particular trend. The book can be thought of as describing two different aspects of the JQ - the actual descriptive parts that deal with the day-to-day behaviours of jewish organisations and individuals that push society towards certain ends. These are undeniable and demonstrable effects that HAVE happened and are continuing to happen and the main proponents of them are jewish (and certainly the political, social and economic agitation for them derives from jewish actors). Then there is the second part, the explanation as to WHY they act this way. This is obviously the less concrete section as behavioural/evolutionary/group psychology is a difficult subject to make definitive claims for as it is, much less for a particular subsection of humanity in a particular social sphere. Now, while I think there is some degree of validity to this argument, I myself have issue with some points here and there that I think could be explained better or are missing the point. However, the critiques online almost invariably focus on this aspect and try to tear it up, thinking that if they discredit the (much smaller and less significant) section of the book describing this theory, then all the previous points like the top-down social effects jews have had simply didn't happen. Total nonsense and purely done for obfuscation. The fact that nobody can truly refute any of the actual actions that jews are undertaking almost says far more than any book can.

People are reading it and that's a good thing.

oops, got carried away and forgot my pic to show I'm not just memeing

Attached: IMG_0304.jpg (2448x3264, 1.36M)

so much this

Why is it called The Culture of Critique? What does that mean?

The absolute state of Yea Forums in 2019

Jews have a culture of critique.

People who liked MacDonald should also check out Werner Sombart's book on the Jews:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Sombart#Late_career_and_National_Socialism
socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/sombart/jews.pdf

Pretty good post user.