>Kierkegaard was definitely not without fault, for though cristianity the anxiety of death, it has not provided adequate treatment for sexual impulses. This expresses itself in Kierkegaard in a basic primal fetish. He announces it on a letter to his friend E. Boesen, concerning a Spanish woman: "For her feet belongs to that kind of delicate white feather, hand drawn by god himself. One can not, and should not repress himself at such sight. It's unchristian to do so. For God is beauty and beauty is truth and not recognizing beauty is not recognizing truth, thus it's the same as rejecting God. A man must give all of himself to worship it. He must approach it with delicacy and not be so eager to finish the work. He must be careful. But at one such point, beauty overthrows reason and he must undress the feet immediately. He must bury himself within the continents, the undiscovered countries, that lay between toes. He must smell it and drown in her feet scents. He must tickle it and watch the appropriate crimson red expression in her face. He must go mad in the delicacies and mathematicalities of the carefully sculpted lines and gently protuding green veins that innundates the white plain like immaculate rivers. She must play accordingly, and happyfully do her part, oh lucky man! She must do her part and come forth upon him and give him the final blow: a round of face stepping, for he is a sinner, a beast, an unworthy man, and should be punished to death by feet asfixiation!". Later, Kierkegaard shows typical christian shame and regret:"To masturbate is to enter in degeneracy. It's a sinful, wretched act and the saint dotcrine states that he who may commit such acts shall not enter upon heaven. I shall not enter upon heaven."
- Kierkegaard: A Biography
Are there any books on writers and philosophers sexual practices?
Kierkegaard was definitely not without fault, for though cristianity the anxiety of death...
Is every great writer a degenerate? Why are there so many footfags?
It seems so. Dante, Chaucer, Virgil and Milton all dedicated lengthy passages to feet in their works.
Culture of Critique
All great geniuses are footfags. Footfag hate on Yea Forums is absolute cope by neurotypicals who will never accomplish anything of note.
Another example of classic christcuck daily mental gymnastics.
I hope your personal Yahoo email gets flooded to death with hat pictures
This.
To appreciate feet is to cast away the unholy desires of the primal flesh found on other apes. Boobs transcend apes to even the lowly dog that is covered in worms and fleas. Pussy can be found even on a cow who swats flies from their ass with a tail.
Yet, the perfect foot is a human thing and a human thing only, exclusive to only the most evolutionarily advanced human with primmed and proper toes and curvaceous arches that curls effortlessly onto any surface that requires tension for its owner. It is our most important part, for a woman can live without breast and pussy, but without feet, they are left helpless and weak.
>im so zainy and different because I find the nonerrogenous weight-bearing portion of the human leg sexy
your on the same tier as whores who think that traveling makes them interesting
False equivalence from another seething neurotypical.
But why not worhsip hand then ? Or buttocks, humans are the only one with proper developped buttock, and without them ou can't stand up let alone walk.
>misspells zany
Point proven, you lowly ape.
I'm actually a hand fetisher as well.
>misuses logical fallacies like a r*dditor
>dont your mispell words on MY Yea Forums
dont know what I expected from a bunch of double-digit iq 35yo-woman-tier footfags
my first Love had spiderling hands like that. i miss my sister.
Explain how I've misused the fallacy.
>the final blow: a round of facestepping
>death by feet asfixiation
This is bait until a proper link to the source is posted.
Kierkegaard is well known to struggle with sexual impulses.
That i can believe, but this quote sounds like something you'd expect on Yea Forums. Though, I dont think it is that much of a stretch to suggest that Kierkegaard would have posted here had he been alive.
He would have rightfully derided foot fetishists and their neurodegenerative condition.
>She must do her part and come forth upon him and give him the final blow: a round of face stepping, for he is a sinner, a beast, an unworthy man, and should be punished to death by feet asfixiation!". Later, Kierkegaard shows typical christian shame and regret:"To masturbate is to enter in degeneracy. It's a sinful, wretched act and the saint dotcrine states that he who may commit such acts shall not enter upon heaven. I shall not enter upon heaven.
Catholicism is an abomination, even worse than footfaggotry.
He was a degenerate hedonist that felt shame. His tripartite system is actually him oscillating between lust and shame.
I don't know why would anyone take Either-Or seriously. Some other texts are great though
He was non-denominational, you spastic. Denmark wasn't even a Catholic country.
I can relate to this and am on a quest for NoFap.
Kierkegaard had one of the worst cases of oneitis in human history. He also had mommy issues. Now, seeing he is a footfag, we can safely discount his entire body of work.
Composer Percy Grainger's sexual fetishes were pretty well documented. He was really into spanking/whips/BDSM.
Yeah, i mean, nothing good can come out of a guy who's whole philosophy is "just believe in it bro!". Degenerate footfag.
I never got the Christian ideal that attraction is bad. Isn't indulging just appreciating the beauty of god (as god of course is all, because he has to contain that which he created)?
Yeah, Kierkegaard at least understood that and went on to be a footfag, but Christian doctrine is strong and he feels shame and guilt for such a pathetic human expression that you can only think christianity is bullshit.
You spelled asphyxiation wrong, and also Christianity, and also your writing is generally bad and ungrammatical, but apart from all that this is a very good post. I'll give it an 8/10.
You’re attack of the argument was a fallacy. The straw man. You attacked the character instead of the argument itself. Then concluded the argument disproven
Attraction isn't bad. Lust is. It's agape vs eros. When you allow your passions to control your rational intellect, you lower your spiritual potential. This type of thought is not unique to Christianity.
I've learned the hard way Christian's were right tall along.
Almost everyone loved based Soren on this board for years, and yet in the last few days I've seen an absurd amount of anti-kierk propaganda. Is this because of the epic Swedish YouTube man saying he was bad? Have we really fallen so low?
It's not my fault the man was such a degenerate footfag.
Fat >>> feet
Just so we're clear
>Yeah, I'm into *specific paraphilia*
lmao who wrote this
Kierkegaard, in a letter to his friend.
It's just ironic shitposting, probably Kierk would be making the same threads under pseudonyms were I here
this, I post a lot of ironic threads about philosophers I adore and sometimes even praise ones I despise
pewdiepie can suck a cock
how does one reconcile presbytarian ideas of election and Kierkegaards philosphy? i know he touches on it in fear and trembling but he isnt saying man can save himself is he?
There's no way he wrote that, it's too shit to be his writing
If this is real, thanks for reminding me there's still so much about Kierkegaard I have yet to learn. Real geniuses do talk about that kind of shit.
the fedora meme is past peak, now becoming synonymous with low effort, low IQ christian cope.
no amount of hat jokes will change the fact that kierkegaard was unwholesomely weird.
As a meme, it will die soonish. As a reality it will stay: another religion with celibate clergy that wears weird hats.