Were they neo-liberals?

were they neo-liberals?

Attached: deleuze-derrida-foucault.jpg (1000x520, 117K)

Bukowski dude

Wtf is with frogs and cats, is toxplasma why they are all nutty?

Absolutely. Read Michel Clouscard who was one of the first to openly call them on their tacit pro-international finance philosophical stance.

Honestly never understood Foucault and were did he come from. Reading his wiki page doesnt help.
At first he seemed like a neo-nazi skin head judging from his apperance. But at a second glance he seems like a second coming of Nietzsche. I dont understand if people take him as a meme or some serious genius. Can anyone explain?

Attached: 1550162430213.jpg (720x395, 44K)

read deleuze's book on him it cleared a lotnof things up for me

the true patrician take is reading Foucault and Deleuze as esoteric reactionaries and realizing (((Derrida))) stole all of his good ideas from actual honest to god national socialists(Heidegger and De Man), all while neutralizing their real subversive conclusions via talmudical skepticism. Once you break through the programming, once you deconstruct 5000 years of post vedic obfuscation and tap into the black sun immanent Hitler/Kalki BwO, it all makes sense. The internet, the whole post war order in its geopolitical economic and cybernetic aspects, AKA the cathedral/spectacle/ simulacrum, what carl Schmitt would refer to as the Katehon, that which is meant to hold back the apocalypse, was constructed by the american military industrial complex during WWII as a means of containing Kalki and the end of the Kali Yuga. Everything you see around you is meant to defuse Hitler energy and counter the swastika. Hitler was but a prefiguration of Kalki, human all too human, too merciful and restrained. Charles Manson was another such prefiguration, a devolution of Dionysius. the Family= Meneads, Bachantes.

Attached: Kalki-the-Destroyer.jpg (1200x630, 79K)

STOP

Nabokov was

Deleuze was definitely not, he was a hardcore left-wing Marxist until the end.

Derrida was your run of the mill, milquetoast liberal, but definitely not a neo-liberal, he rails on Fukuyama quite a lot in spectres of Marx.

Foucault, yes he was. Fuck him.

Isnt deleuze already regarded as a retard? I've seen so much shit thrown at him in this board.

left: radical left neolib
centre: boring centrist neolib
right: archetypal left neolib

g-go on...

deleuze gets shitposted a lot on this board so a lot of people hate him reflexively, but he was a pretty big brained fella

Imagine a conspiracy theorist type guy who believes the government has no right to force you to take vaccines. That's basically Foucault, with a bunch of Nietzschean armchair history thrown in.

easy on psyopping impressionable Yea Forums zoomers, relentless black sun worship poster

>Deleuze was definitely not, he was a hardcore left-wing Marxist until the end.

Deleuze's philosophy ends up promulgating neo-liberal policies. Whenever you try to be a Marxist while insisting that Hegel is a fascist you end up a neo-liberal. D&G were a mistake.

So Negri and Hardt who were influenced by Deleuze's readings on Marx are neo-liberals? This is a pretty old piss poor accusation made by leftist dinosaurs like Badiou, who by the way isn't a Hegelian either.

Negri and Hardt are useless.

>by leftist dinosaurs like Badiou

Badiou is an anti-semite. Who cares what he thinks?

he's an accelerationist neoliberal until he switches up his position and warns against it (e.g. Postscript on Control Societies)

Please give examples from the text. I've never seen a half decent argument to back this up

retard

Christopher Lasch's culture of narcissism thesis meshes up well with the concept of the society of control and late foucaults interest in subject building.

Derrida recommenced the formation of a new International.

Do you think it's possible that Hitler was actually a degraded Kalki avatar and not a precursor? that Brahman is subject to entropy and weakens in each cycle? Or maybe that our creators didn't plan for us to tap into the power that the universe could offer to such a degree and they can no longer contain us? That we ourselves are antithetical to existence, that we are agents of entropy?

Another thing they have in common is pedophilia.