Between this and Harry Potter, is there a book series that has damaged western popular thought and literature harder?

Why is capitalism a problem?

unironically The Bible

>inb4 pic related

Attached: 1547198560747.jpg (336x400, 46K)

What is wrong with George rr Martin books?

This.

Greateat friend

>anything by Robert Graves
What about The Greek Myths?

Harry potter and asoiaf are fucking dog shit, sorry faggots

Why?

something about sunset finding her.

Attached: ulysses.jpg (585x750, 136K)

Harry potter and asoiaf are fucking dog shit

Based and r*dpilled

Marxism

Attached: 36621368z.jpg (385x600, 37K)

This

Hemingway

Faith alone doctrine has destroyed western thought desu

Attached: Freemason Faggot.jpg (1200x1200, 447K)

I never put desu !? lol

>Harry Potter,
these books inspired tons of kids to read though, which is an objectively good thing.

>It's not bad for that.
Martin's characters have mono dimensional and random behavioral patterns, their actions are not prepared in the script, they delve into erratic petty politics and schemes to provoke and impress the reader in a world that dragons existed and exist and in a world that shadows kill people from afar and magical frost themed outsiders threaten the lands. How can that make sense? Why would you care about taxes and who your psychopath son will marry in his reign when there are priests who raise the dead and assassins who take whatever form they want in order to kill whomever they want, etc? This is an "art" that poses as pseudo realistic, but in truth is an undecided mix of high fantasy, medieval pseudo realism, porn, epic parody and Martin's personal complex about how cruel the world is. The problem with his art is, that it does not make sense and it does not have cohesion and a robust core like Tolkiens art did. He fails because he has not decided on what the core of his work is. Hell, he doesn't even have a main story. Oh, and by the way, he needs to lose the RR's from his middle name. It's embarrassing.

Fuck off Peterson-babbies

>Between this and H.P, is there a book series that has damaged western popular thought and literature harder?
>>The state of your grammar.
How does any book do any harm if it teaches the reader comprehension, vocabulary and selflessness? You just think you're better than these writers but the sad and awful truth you aren't admitting to yourself when you look at the mirror for that half second before you leave for your shitty menial job is you aren't. They are better than you.

I dislike Peterson and hate cultural Marxism, come at me.

Of course Tolkien is better, but that is not in question. For me, I think Gurm's characters are motivated by what they know is real; they mostly don't know all of those things you mentioned are really real. So they only act from their own point of view. Only the reader has all the confirmation of reality, about the dragons , others, faceless men, shadow babies etc. Anyway it's fine if you don't like asoiaf but how has it damaged western thought and literature in your estimation? Again, I'm not arguing that it has or has not, just curious about what other people think.

anything aristotle

being this new desu

Attached: 51685628_1206843872811012_4178028457655009280_n.jpg (936x940, 72K)

Jewish degeneracy in all its forms (marxism, pornography, communism etc.)

The Lord of the Rings.

Still a symptom

Macintyre is Sadlercore, not Petershit.

Television

We all know the answer.

>marxism, pornography, communism etc.
That and general cultural decadence.

We are living in a post-shame world, what good can come of that?

Merely a symptom of late stage capitalism.