Houellebecq on modern girls

Is he right that western women are undateable since they got jobs and rights?

Attached: 1508548668238.jpg (400x546, 43K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick
twitter.com/25bravofox2/status/1093838465513353216
nytimes.com/2017/08/12/opinion/why-women-had-better-sex-under-socialism.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

nobody has any rights, especially not women

>jobs and rights
and cellphones
yes.

He never said nor implied that at all.

1: If hollebeq was right, then women with jobs would be undateable.
2: But women with jobs date frequently.
3: Therefor, he's wrong.

He's right. Women should be stripped of their rights.

based logicposter

He absolutely did in Platform.

The protagonist fucks Thai whores because Western women don't take pleasure in giving pleasure to men.

He only stops when he finds Valerie who gives him blowjobs on demand.

literally how will huebeck ever recover

>Western women don't take pleasure in giving pleasure to men

This is what actual loser men believe

>Wanting to date when you could be fostering revolution with weaponized anarcho-feminists

Never gonna make it

What the protagonist thinks doesnt mean its what the author thinks dingus.
In my opinion, he simply hates the age he is living in where the materialism and science wins over the religious and the only cure he sees for it is going socialist and ending the consumerist capitalism that we live in.
Also this, rights are spooks.

Slightly off-topic, but I just bought Soumission, what am I in for? Is it a good book to start Houellebecq with?

yes senpai, just read it

>the only cure he sees for it is going socialist and ending the consumerist capitalism that we live in.
so replacing it with more materialism, more science, and more decadence?

What can bring more materialism than capitalism itself?
Im not the one to judge, i've never read or know anything about socialism and communism, this is simply what i got from reading some of his works. Bringing back religion and spirituality at this point of age is absurd.
I honestly dont think socialism can bring more "decandence". Care to explain why do you think this happens?

Based North Korean

incel

>Western women don't take pleasure in giving pleasure to men.

Attached: 1538730893014.gif (229x176, 987K)

>Western women don't take pleasure in giving pleasure to men

want to know how i know you're an incel?

In Platform, he states this quite bluntly a few times in the book.

Just because men date them, doesn't mean they're dateable

everyone is going after you for this, but 1. it's pretty spot-on with what Houellbecq says. basically, his idea is that western women now have great careers, have their own money, little pressure from family to get married. they can live in the city and just try to fuck a hot guy, the same as men. and this isn't appealing for the majority of men, as the majority of men aren't the hot social great dancing well dressed guy. so for most men, houellebecq argues, third world whores are way more appealing.

houellebecq also isn't actually wrong about that.

>Just because men date them, doesn't mean they're dateable
Dateable: the ability to be dated
If dated, then it is proved they are dateable

Also that user was being sarcastic

If you think women before suffrage were dying to please the poor, dirty men they ended up with then you're mistaken. They got married because they had to and they fucked their husbands because they had to. You weren't getting morning BJs and rimjobs you were getting passionless missionary.

hi i live in russia and this isn't true. it's a cultural expectation that women's salaries are lower here, and they prioritise family over career. they do things like cook and give blowjobs every night and it's not passionless.

sorry you lost pierre.

During the 1920's there was a big drive for women to act like giant whores and the typical girl power "im stronk too" bullshit.

Then the 1930's happened. and they put on their make up and dresses and came crawling back to any man who would give them food and money.

The feminist project is most indeed a capitalist project. Although the feminism that is promoted is to the benifit of capitalism. we speak of immigrants being a source of cheap labour, but so are women. Ted kacynski explains how capitalism pushes these sort of things in his lesser known essay "the systems neatest trick"

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick

Every human in existence is "dateable" by your moronic definition. That's obviously not what he meant and your inability to pick up on that leads me the believe you're autistic.

>Western women don't take pleasure in giving pleasure to men.
you've literally never had sex

he's describing the thought process of a fictional character from a book you knuckledragger. whats with these impulsive retards who dont even read?

> calling me out autistic
> when you're blatantly missing the joke this hard

Attached: db0.jpg (349x642, 29K)

I'll just leave this here:

twitter.com/25bravofox2/status/1093838465513353216

Gross. Women have no place to be touching weapons of any sort unless she's handing it off to her husband.

Based and factual

>Soviet modernism
What were you trying to prove with this post

*wellbeck

He says that they don't like it, not that they don't do it.

What did he mean then? This is the problem with rigthists, you use vague definition of common words and then back of when someone exposes the idiocy hidden there.

fuck women

Attached: 1541338093399s.jpg (250x250, 8K)

>This is the problem with rigthists
Houellebecq is more leftist that people think. He claims in various books to hate the current state of capitalism and the consumerism it brings shaping the generations. He just doesnt bit off the "sexual liberation" and other social manias they have.

no

>not wanting your qt waifu to defend the Homefront so you don't need to babysit her all the time
How can one man be such a pleb?

*welbeek
he's dutch.

>why doesn't the right play semantic word games instead of focusing on the concepts behind those words like the left does

Define detable then

If he was right, why are people still dating a century later?

They aren't. I don't have any friends in relationships. I have a lot of friends that fuck more than once a week as well though.

>They aren't
I literally know like 18 dating couples.

Anti capitalism is now a rightwing position

That is simply untrue unless we are talking about some serious nac soc shit.
Whatever floats your boat user.

Attached: 181959.jpg (183x200, 8K)

he literally never said that. most of his novels are full of exquisitely detailed fucking. in Submission the professor's modern jewish girlfriend eats his ass and i can't see Houellebecq treating that as a bad thing

what country am i moving to here?

Good old Kazakhstan.

Left:
>Woke capital talking points from all Fortune 500 companies
>Open borders to give employers cheap labor and undermine unions
>Histrionics over anti-globalist trade wars
>Explicit hatred towards blue-collar workers among those who ape as leftist politicians
>Academics utterly obsessed with intersectionality, "experience" and identity politics while wholesale abandoning anti-capitalist projects like the frankfurt school

Right:
>Just wants traditional societies, with many being explicitly anti-industrial
>Promote working class policies like strict immigration to keep wages high
>Religious, with all religions besides Protestantism being anti-materialist
>Frequnt blog posts about learning from and adapting writings from Frankfurt school, especially those who criticize the degeneracy of modern capitalism

What you are describing here is simply american tier meek left/right politics
A true "left" leaning party is always much more in favour of the nationalization of companies and services. While a right wing can go from tradicionalists to non-tradicionalists but normally want to privatize most stuff.

You're describing American politics far more than I am.

Are European women different than American women? Of course we can assume that the average American woman weighs like 300lbs more or whatever. Personality wise though, are they similar?

>where the materialism and science wins over the religious
It is called nihilism
>the only cure he sees for it is going socialist
Not sure where you get this except for possibly out of your own ass.

>what am I in for?
global jihad

why can't Yea Forums admit andrew anglins article about keeping women in cages was correct

I ain’t no Houellebecq girl

Attached: 23E30DF5-7276-4403-B3CE-6B8A54DB39F3.jpg (908x680, 54K)

I abandoned the left because I had determined it was not anticapitalist in practice but actually a pool of ideas which capitalism could recuperate to sustain itself and ameliorate its own contradictions.

>Not sure where you get this except for possibly out of your own ass
Cant quite recall if it was in Whatever or atomized, but he indeed says that "capitalism" is the "natural" and worst state of society and people already have enough tools and comprehension to handle it, but dont apply it, there are also some other remarks about this. If this isnt advocating for some "high" tier left leaning economic politics then idk.
I also dont know for sure his opinion on the whole "materialistic" society, since the characters cry so much about it but at the same time seem to be all in for it when the chance arrives.

To unmake a table

BTFO

He's Frutch.

they date frequently BECAUSE they are undateable

Attached: orangutan-10.jpg (532x664, 106K)

based and ultra-pilled

Attached: big c.png (446x409, 218K)

aaaaaagh

fpbp

don't believe everything you read

Nah.

Food can be declared unfit for (human) consumption and still be eaten out of necessity.

Apply edible food = dateable women.

Women need to know how to disassemble a rifle so they can clean it for you

lets face it the greatest societies ever know subjugated women

Few times I've been around that track
So it's not just gonna happen like that
'Cause I ain't no Houellebecq girl

Attached: ADD38BDE81124143941B4011FE58CF65.png (657x527, 55K)

>uses a formal logical argument
>includes numbers in his argument
>gets btfo when someone notes a mistake
>i-i-its just a joke! i wasn't making a serious argument
lmao

I'd be ok with this, better than where I am now.

nytimes.com/2017/08/12/opinion/why-women-had-better-sex-under-socialism.html

tiddies

>dating
Exactly. How many are married? How many have divorced or broken long term relations?

Based and blackpilled

Marriage is not inherently more legitimate than dating.

Marriage=/=a happy marriage. This is part of the reason why fewer people choose to get married.

>opinion
discarded

>tfw no idealistic, extremest gf who brings your apathetic and cynical self into a bizarre underworld of revolutionary international politics, foreign spies, sleeper cells and rival cliques in a dangerous game being played right under the surface of everyday life

Attached: 1535231219483.gif (354x192, 1.79M)

AHHHH

You literally never had a serious relationship

he meant dateworthy, you fucking autist

sounds heretical but ok

getting deenpilled
islam is the true redpill for the west

First and only one I bought too, and a good read, very accessible but not basic bitch lit. Gonna order a couple more when I clear a backlog