I keep writing short stories which are too abstract, and I don't think publishers understand what I'm getting at. Most of the feedback I get is always them not understanding purposeful choices in symbolism, allegory, ect. they basically say: "it was well written, but we don't get it".
I keep writing short stories which are too abstract, and I don't think publishers understand what I'm getting at...
Sebastian Baker
Grayson Reed
T. Schizo
Luis Kelly
Why did you make this thread without giving an excerpt of your work?
Thomas Harris
Yea gib a slice of your work you stupid bitch.
Christopher Edwards
because I don't care whether you guys get it either. they are well written, I get that feedback a lot, so should I give up and just write some trite shit for publication or keep trying to be Borges and continue shotgun submissioning and hoping for the best?
Benjamin Foster
What's the op picture?
Bentley Ramirez
according to Google arts and culture, that's what I look like
Kayden Morgan
Then why should we care if your submissions get rejected or not? If you don’t post an excerpt there’s nothing to ground the discussion.
Brandon Taylor
post it FAGGOT so fucking tired of y'all cowards
Aiden Ramirez
I'm not looking for feedback on any specific work, and I'm trying to get them published so the less they get posted the safer it is. last time I posted in a critique thread I got an unusual amount of positive comments for what it's worth. All I want to know is if I should write more conventional fiction to get something published or keep writing weird shit. If I get more rejections I'll self publish and post them here, how's that.