The editing sucks

Dilate. Why would you bring it up in a thread that doesn't even mention it? That's the epitome of rent free. You faggots brought it up because that's all you wanna talk about.

Taken 3?

What the fuck is the point of threads like these if you're not willing to delve into specifics? Afraid of being held accountable for your arguments? Dumb frogposter.

Fucking moron. The point of the thread is clear. Stop sperging out just because you don't understand.
>Editfags never explain themselves.
Is that simple enough for you, pseud?

>wahh they don't explain themselves
>I'm not going to explain myself by being specific. R-rent free!
Sad.

What am I not being specific about? What is so hard to understand for you?

>The editing sucks and I never noticed until I watched a youtube video telling me it sucks.

OP is a massive faggot. Anyway, did anyone else here see the The Possession of Hannah Grace? There’s a really jarring cut near the climax of the movie that’s easily one of the sloppiest bits of editing I’ve seen in a theatrically released film lately.

Finally someone fucking gets it. Holy shit.

The actual fucking discussions taking place. What movies are they saying have bad editing?
FYI by not talking about actual movies you're being off-topic.

Quick rundown on taken 3?

youtube.com/watch?v=gCKhktcbfQM

>That film had good cinematography bro

youtube.com/watch?v=gCKhktcbfQM

What film?

>TLJ is shit
>Why is it shit?
>Everything about it is bad
>How so?
>It's just terrible you braindead mouse shill cuck

>it's an autists getting confused thread

>movie has a shot of a landscape with a full moon or a city with bright colors
>KINO!!!! MASTERPIECE OF CINEMATOGRAPHY!!!!!

I, for one, love this thread

OP didn't mention cinmetography, user

YouTubers were the worst thing to happen to film discussion.

this. browntable is probably the worst offender

>This thread sucks
>"What do you mean?"
>I mean it's a shitpost
>"How?"
>Because OP is a faggot

Attached: 1550184764014.png (444x554, 108K)

>""bad pacing""

Attached: image.png (255x198, 6K)

OP here. I like your style

Attached: 1546312008621.jpg (1280x1270, 73K)

yeah but he was complaining about faggots on Yea Forums which i am also doing

good point

I’ll see your Taken 3 and raise you this:
youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ

>what did you like about that movie?
>the aesthetics

Attached: 1495899738596.png (362x358, 8K)

Pacing is unironically a serious issue in movies

based

I personally don't have a problem with people saying this. It's really just a quick way of saying you like everything about it. However, simpletons use it all too often to avoid conversation.

Go to bed, HiTop.

epic

Agreed. Superhero movies in particular have gotten crazy bloated. Aquaman felt like it went on forever.

I check

Honestly, the editing sucks in both TFA & TLJ. There's practically zero sense of time in them, is it taking place over the course of a day, weeks, months, or what? You don't know... nobody knows. There no way to glean that exclusively from the films.

youtu.be/iMkRL5m3YIc

I don't care about your bias, user.

ah yes let me write 1000 words explaining film editing theory to you uneducated faggots right here, in a cambodian basket weaving forum
or rather not because you don't want to learn and you'll just post your frogs and buzzwords in response

>I COULD come up with an something to prove my point, but nahhhh
Leafy-tier non-argument

it's a waste to try to explain something complicated to brainlets

He has a point. Well thought out posts often get ignored in favor of blatant trolling.

excuses don't outweigh the lack of effort

You can only try for so long before you realize that Yea Forums is overall a board that invites stupid people. You have some gems here and there but most of the time the catalog consists of on-topic threads with 12 replies sitting next to /pol/ bait hitting 250.

>I don't have to prove that I know what I'm talking about! Everybody is a dummy anyways!

This but unironically

I posted this earlier and got nothing. You guys just seem to want easily digestible, snarky greentext.

>jarring
>sloppy
buzzwords make grug smarter than OP

post a webm of the scene, I doubt most people have watched this movie

Exactly. You faggots have proven multiple times that you are unable and unwilling have a discussion. This is a shitposting board and any attempt to say something intelligible regarding cinema is wasted.

Tried to find it on YouTube but that specific scene isn’t there. Anyway, how difficult is it to say "No I haven’t seen that movie but I did see X and there’s this really bad cut that I noticed."? Instead people make low effort posts like this

>he can think in nothing but memes

>The editing doesn't suck
>"What do you mean?"
>I mean the editing doesn't suck
>"How?"
>Because it doesn't

there's a difference between liking/disliking and implying your opinions are in any way objective. usually, the people who dislike choose to take the latter route.

this goes for pretty much any topic though

>the movie is good
>how?
>i-it's just good okay i like it and that's all that matters everybody likes something differentjustbecauseskfo-

Attached: 14c2af8efbbd446efbb3b10cce595b43.jpg (640x633, 42K)

it is good because it's not bad or average or great

Low effort shitposting for (you)s is less work than a sincere post.

Describing any movie with subjective, opinionated and normative words automatically filters out any critique whatsoever that you have because you show you lack objectivity and knowledge.

Words or terms like
>Kino
>Soul
>Good
>Bad
>Sucks
>Culturally important
makes you seem like an armchair critic without anything worthwhile to say.

>this fucking thread

Attached: 38DF6101-C599-45CD-BDFF-271BE6306521.jpg (1132x996, 118K)

Why yes i decipher and analyze every movie I watch in preperations for the foreseen conversation I will have about on my favorite image board

Attached: wat.jpg (320x376, 97K)

>makes you seem like an armchair critic

Yeah unlike all the professional critics paid to post here on 4channel dot org.