Soul | Soulless
Soul | Soulless
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Ridley is a master of making beautiful but bland movies.
This, he’s entirely style over substance
There was mucho symbolism in Ridley's version.
For me, it's Sword of Sherwood Forest (1960).
I think you'll find that the 1938 Erol Flynn version is the only one to have soul
taste, you have it
it got so fucking ridiculous when the kids joined the fight against the french
what a fucking shit movie
Question is did Robin Hood really need an entire prequel movie?
I like almost all of Ridley's films but Robin Hood was fucking trash.
For me, it’s Robin and Marian
I actually quite enjoyed Ridley Scott's rendition
Irrelevant.
It doesn't impact the movie
No movie ever needed a prequel.
Prequels are 100% shit 120% of the times
NO MORE MERCIFUL BEHEADINGS!
AND CANCEL CHRISTMAS
SOULLESS
Peak Alan Rickman
Did anyone watch this at all?
We need to go back
Even that wine movie is a better Ridley/Crowe team up
back off right there, that was a comfy movie
don't worry they'll remake it soon
>Supervillain origin is getting cucked the fuck out
Other than that, I pretty much forgot everything about that movie the second the credits rolled out
Alan Rickman made that film and no other Robin Hood film will ever be as good because of that. I am still not sure if he thought that it was meant to be a comedy, or if he just didn’t give a shit, but his performance was beautiful.
I watched the directors cut of the one on the right. The Russel Crowe one.
It's SO FUCKING LONG and nothing happens and then they're repelling an amphibious assault on a beach?
Literally one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Directionless. Meandering. Bloated. Pointless. Terrible.
I can get behind this. We need more furry movies. Zootopia 2 when?
Rewatch the Russel Crowe version.
It's actually pretty comfy with all the adventuring through the lush landscape.
Patrician taste
It was wine kino user
>Did anyone watch this at all?
The action scenes were okay and the movie was fun when it didn't give a shit and became a balls-to-the-walls medieval-set cheesy action movie with crossbow snipers and "catapult support". When it tried to be a serious allegory for modern politics it fell flat.
He just didn't give a fuck. It was a cheesy adventure movie Kevin Costner vehicle so he went full ham.
I loved it. No furry.
Of course you'd only remember something about cucks. The f is wrong with this board all you losers ever talk avout are trannies, cucks, jews, and black people. So tiresome....
>1970s Disney movie
>hamsterdance plays
>30 replies
>no mention of Men in Tights
There was another Robin Hood movie released in 1991 and it was better than the Kevin Costner version
Rickman camped it up perfectly, his Nottingham was pure pantomime villain but with just enough menace to put the fear in the audience when he needed to.
>Jurgen Prochnow
kino
This right here.
came here to post about men in tights
here's your soul
What is it about Robin Hood that makes it such a popular story for film adaptations?
>no one posting the kinoest robin hood
the maid marian bath scenes and her metal panties made me pre cum as a kid.
Alien? Thelma & Louise?
I agree with the rest.
This actress always has the same expression on her face.
I'm not saying he doesn't have good movies.
Several years ago I marathoned all this filmography and most of his movies are indeed bland. If they were directed by someone with less visual talent they would have been considered pretty bad movies.
Thelma and Louise is bloody awful
I still want a sequel.
FUCK you dude. Blade runner and alien kick you in the open fucking mouth.
>This never would have happened if your father was alive.
>He's dead?
>Yes.
>And my mother?
>She died of pneumonia while - oh, you were away!
>My three brothers?
>Died of the plague.
>My dog Pogo?
>Run over by a carriage.
>My goldfish Goldie?
>Eaten by the cat.
>My cat?
>Choked on the goldfish. Oh, it's good to be home, ain't it, Master Robin?