Midsommar

This is the last time i get a movie recommendation from Yea Forums. Ive never seen such a boring pretentious wankfest in my life.

Attached: Florence-Pugh-Midsommar.jpg (1200x801, 248K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6gt-DsWO4ks
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Attached: midsommar.png (1900x932, 1.07M)

Why do you say pretentious all the time?

Stick with the MCU kiddo this ain’t for you

It insists upon itself.

Don't go see Ad Astra then, that movie blew

Pleb filter

Pretentious sllow burn art house flick

...

Sneedsommar

The cover alone puts me off the movie.
Nothing about that picture is appealing.

Wallpaper material

>WHOA BRO ITS LIKE SLOW AND BURNING THEN THEY TALK ABOUT WHATS GONNA HAPPEN OR YOU SEE IT IN ON A TAPESTRY THEN IT HAPPENS ITS LIKE WHOA LMAO SLOW BURN THE BURN IS SO SLOW!

Attached: 1503224338589.jpg (333x500, 126K)

I don’t see what was so slow burn. Disturbing shit started happening at the very start and then other wacky shit started happening as soon as they got to the cult. I don’t think you’ve seen the movie friend.

Personally, I felt a cornucopia of emotion mostly involving variants of disgust and disappointment.

>mfw my gf broke up with me because her dad died and "she needed time to be alone" and that night I saw Midsommar.

I identified too much with the shitty boyfriend and felt personally attacked

To think this all started because one user didn't like jumpscares.

who the fuck recommended it to you

Yea Forums is consistently negative on this one

A24 had an amazing start releasing kino after kino. We want their movies to be good.

Remember the early 2000 when indie films had their own, love it or hate it, flavor? Then it became just another fashion statement to capitalize on. (I.e. we need the hipster crowd).

youtube.com/watch?v=6gt-DsWO4ks

Did you watch the short version (which is not bad) or the director cut (that sucks donkey nuts)

What's wrong with the director's cut?

So what are the top ten kino horror films of the new tens?

I saw both (I do reviews for a shitty local paper, can't say which)

The first cut is a decent film, the director cut has several major issues.

1. The ratio of good scenes to okay to bad scenes in the first cut is rather good. The maypole dance and the Florence Pugh bits outweigh the shitty parts that remind you that it really just a horror film (like when christian finds the bodies)

The director cut added scenes are mostly meh to bad, so the enjoyment is less.

2. The director cut is so long that it becomes a slog to make it though.

3. The Pacing is slower

4. It gets a bit on the nose in some of the extended bits.

5. It takes too long to get to the compound/hippy commune, which is unfortunate.


TL:DR

The director cut takes a reasonably lean movie and screws up the pacing and becomes too damn long with scenes that are not great.

I'm going to skip it, then.