So what did Yea Forums think of her apperearance on the late night show of noah?

So what are her qualifications?

She is a woman.

Attached: teehee.jpg (470x500, 39K)

shes a tard an her pushy parents are shilling/selling her worse than a whore

she looks like she has fetal alcohol syndrome

her parents are kinda famous in sweden and know people working with pr who set up her "movement" with getting papers to write about her in the beginning, then i guess it snowballed. i still don't know what her actual suggestions or concrete plans for turning global warming around.

Just listen and believe.

Its all Fake and the only good thing from there were ABBA not some tard whored out

Why don't we let children run the country? They are clearly smarter and wiser than adults.

Cringe and blue pilled

Her parents are making mad money from the doomsday cult that the left has become.

>doomsday cult that the left has become.

Honest question, what does the left have to gain from climate change awareness and green energy? I could see the right gaining from climate change denial since most of the think tanks pushing this are funded by oil companies. And even if global warming were a hoax, what's the negative to renewable energy?

GOING BY POLLUTION DATA THE ENVIRONMENTALIST FINE OLE SOLUTION IS BASICALLY GENOCIDE THE THIRD WORLD

ITS ONE OF THOSE LEFTOID DISSONANCE THINGS

HIPPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NAZIS WORSE THAN LITERALLY HITLER AND CHEETO HITLER COMBINED

Attached: 5539086.png (500x414, 84K)

why in fucks name do you keep remaking this thread. fuck off.

You're trolling right?

>preventing doomsday bad
>libs owned
I guess when youre a retard, retarded things make sense

Lemme tell you about tribalism and costly signaling, user...

One side is for individual freedom, that is the right.

The other side is for restricting that freedom for the benefit of the group, that is the left.

To be quite honest modern weather is all fecked up now ,Crazy storms and Hotter summers , very bad winters unlike growing up so there must be summat in it ,

Do you really think that the proposition is: hey man let's just use wind and solar? Take a moment to go to a "climate march" and see what is taking place. There is a lot more about trannies and communism and "i fukin love science" than actual propositions about energy.

read the article yourself if you don't believe me

Are we supposed to pretend she isn't literally retarded?

i believe more in cloud seeding/weather control than climate change
sneed

She's backed by OPEC

and whites found a solution to the issue: all white nations had achieved very high levels of prosperity, birth rates under 2, relative peace etc. Part of the "climate agenda" is literally open borders. look into it for 2 seconds.

So when are you going to stop posting the same thread everytime it autosages?

The Left isn't just pushing for renewable energy though. They are using climate change as justification for increased government regulation of the private sector. Totalitarian minded politicians have always used the threat of some boogeyman to get people to give them more control. Hitler did it with the Jews, Stalin did it with the bourgeois and now Progressives are trying to use the environment to scare people into expanding bureaucratic state powers.

Attached: scissor girl.jpg (300x399, 84K)

no one watches noah

>begs the government to do something about climate change
>camp outside the apple store to buy the latest trinket
Why are lefties such hypocrites bros?

Attached: 1569062427028.jpg (480x640, 55K)

She has none. She's just a soapbox for climate change 'scientists'

Until China ,Pakis an Russia get a grip , we heading to a horrible polluted earth .. its not a West Issue but Tard Gurl frightened going Real Polluters

Please show me a chart that shows hurricanes are getting more intense.

They're using environmentalist ngos etc. to launder tax dollars

She's hot.
Hot like the global warming.

Their world is a world of contradictions. Similar to the rights world as well but much more egregious

Rude and nasty

That all sounds incredibly anecdotal bud

>corporations
>people
This equivalency will never not be retarded.

Already one of the most important figures in the 21st century. With only 16 years old.

Attached: 324324324.png (479x768, 747K)

are you trolling or stupid ?

>she will never be your gf

;_;

Attached: greta qt2.jpg (1080x1071, 138K)

Are you calling her ugly then?

Heatwaves killing folk and freak cold weather its all over the news fren

Her vigin ass must be tite

Corporations are composed of people so regulating corporations is in fact regulating people. Regardless, many of the proposed Progressive regulations go beyond corporations and tax individuals.

How do we protect her smile?

Attached: greta qt.jpg (899x1200, 125K)

Attached: the west is the real problem.png (781x666, 476K)

>News
>Not just a collection of global anecdotes

Brando would Butter her up

>do i fit in now /pol/ guise :D

Attached: OP.jpg (645x729, 64K)

Don't worry, she has already a legion of boys to protect her.

Attached: 342234342.png (634x358, 624K)

Where I find her secret nudes?

Its fact last summer Europe had the Highest record temps ever , killing old an kids

Import 10 million Somalians into Sweden. It's the only way.

Holy fucking chad

Fake

How does she manage to look both malnourised and flabby at the same time?

You are disgusting.

MAKE AMURICA GREAT AGAIN

Don't watch.

>SERMALIA

Attached: 1553983104947.jpg (1199x685, 136K)

Not an argument

nigger lol

I don't see how fossil fuel emissions could have no effect on the environment or zero health effects on the population. Makes sense to stop in your own nation first but there should be pressure on other nations or the change would be minimal.

I love improving the earth/enviorment as much as possible, but I don't want the face of that movement to be an ogre.

Don't kinkshame you faggot. Some dudes are into ugly chicks.

this

Attached: fat swede whiteknight fag .jpg (652x367, 33K)

Attached: GlobalWarmingTruth.jpg (492x324, 46K)

>boogeyman
>Jews
But user, Jews are real

??

>Makes sense to stop in your own nation first
No it doesn't; it makes sense to stop it where it's most severe and most cost-effective first.

they're on land user

THIS Guy Gets it

Its China ,Pakistan .Russia who pollute .. not the West But she wont go there ?

Doesn't water gain even more mass when it freezes?

If it converts to liquid again it would have less mass right? So it will occupy less space in the ocean.

This

Wealth distribution from white countries to Africa and brown people. Leftist love to hurt whites, so it's very much something that they'd advocate on that basis.

They own the "alternative" energy sector, duh

Fair enough but history shows that state action is not the solution.

>Just turn the water off when you're brushing your teeth, bro!

She reminds me of Kony 2012

Looks more like Tarja Turunen.

Attached: 7168703.jpg (928x720, 36K)

She's autistic and became fixated with climate change as a child. She could've become obsessed with anything, but it was climate change.

I could beat that guy up

He would batter an ass rape you front of the kiddies kek

>This dense
Ice in the water of course doesn't rise the water, but it does protect the water from direct sunlight. More sunlight, hot waters, harsher weather. Also the heat is melting ice stuck on land, which in turn is flushed to lakes/oceans etc, thus rising the sea levels that way.

Volume. Mass isnt just gained. Floating object displace water equal to its weight, which is based on mass. Thus, the no change. The problem isnt the ice in the water, its the ice on land.

save envirofrens

Attached: 1569094039052.png (656x526, 15K)

Holy fuck the person who made that is a total mongo

getting intense nostalgia now

>Tarja Turunen.

Attached: fd83538e9867ee465bb9a202ed55501bf5f5cd5a3a1355969481dfc37aa85f16.jpg (771x434, 62K)

Attached: sddefault.jpg (640x480, 37K)

her cheeks are so cute

The right isn’t in favor of “freedom” it’s an oxymoron. The right wants to restrict and regulate personal behavior and speech about Christianity and Israel. They just endlessly parrot gun rights and 2nd amendment crap and give the impression they’re in favor of individual liberty when in reality the only freedoms they believe in are the right to buy guns and cheeseburgers that’s it

>save envirofrens
>*KILL ALL 3RD WORLDERS

WOW GRETA REALLY?

Attached: tl.gif (500x281, 156K)

Why is she so beautiful, bros?

Attached: buds.jpg (900x1200, 193K)

liberals are right wing capitalist supporters

>i thought the message was clear

Attached: 1569074433127.jpg (800x789, 298K)

She already wears a bra.

Attached: 9251.jpg (1280x720, 71K)

>American admitting they're third world
About damn time.

EAT BUGS
LIVE IN SHARED ACCOMMODATION
NEVER TRAVEL AGAIN

She is 16 dude

AND THATS A GOOD THING

>Murrikah dindu noffin
>nevermind the data

Greta Thunberg was born on 3 January 2003 in Sweden.[7][8] Her mother, Malena Ernman, is a Swedish opera singer, her father is actor Svante Thunberg,[9] and her grandfather is actor and director Olof Thunberg.[10]

oh you mean like has been happening forever

SHUT IT SWITZERLAND YOU LITTLE PARASITIC TOBLERONE SHITTER LMAO

Attached: 1563988472352.png (500x552, 99K)

Attached: me in the left.jpg (640x640, 51K)

Then why call them leftists

That's the US though.

Do Americans really think this? You're the second biggest emitter of CO2 in absolute terms, easily highest per capita.

Because she didn't eat properly from 11 until 15 and thus stunted her growth in a pre-pubescent cabbage-patch kid form, you sick fuck.

Literal potato.

>fights climate change
>shills rememeables instead of nuclear

Attached: 🤔🐸 _[NS-L1][x2.000000].png (1240x1240, 482K)

I actually am Swiss. What are the odds.

And what does land float on,retard?

>Instead
There's your fucking problem. It isn't one or the other.

Existing nuclear plants need to be maintained and have their contracts extended as a low-carbon power source for now.

However, new nuclear takes decades to come online and at tremendous cost, so it can't be used to transition the grid in the near-term, so renewables are needed for fast change now.

Longer term R&D investment will be needed in both advanced storage as well as next-gen nuclear to allow us to then reach fully net-zero carbon in the grid in the long term.

Anyone espousing an absolutist view of either only RE or only nukes is an idiot who doesn't understand the full system-level view of the power grid or energy markets and policies.

Conflating climate change with any form of pollution is a real issue. Some retards think littering causes climate change and other retards believe pollution can't be an issue because climate change don't be real.

lol nerd

enigami tsuj

Attached: 57.jpg (192x378, 18K)

I agree, our environment is of the utmost importance.

That's why the international community should apply all pressure possible to China, India, Indonesia, and the rest of the 3rd World.

Reminder.

Attached: globalwarming2000.jpg (750x737, 50K)

Is it a mass delusion or am I the crazy one?

I'm sure we can agree the fundamental crux in any modern problem is just how fucking stupid most humans are. Eugenics is a good idea.

Jewish cash grab and further consolidation of their power.

I REMEMBER YOU THE AMERICA HATING YUROFAG FROM THE IRRELEVANT SUB-1T GDP COUNTRY LMAO

Attached: 20 trillion.jpg (600x465, 42K)

Yes, Bolsonaro.

>mfw imagining getting the entire developed world (USA, Canada, EU + other Euro countries no one cares about, Japan, Korea, etc) to sanction China, India, Indonesia and the rest

Attached: kakihara boner.jpg (276x388, 26K)

Brown terrorists use bombs, greens use media to create their fear

when will these dumb leftists realize that its too late and our ONLY hope lies in the stars

it's a miracle that more autistic people don't end up in cults

If it was real there'd be a monumental push towards safe and clean nuclear energy.

Is this girl really 16? Seems more like the body of a 12-13 year old.

But the eath is flat and we live under a dome.

damn white women look like THAT?
Are you guys sure THAT must not perish from the earth?

Alphabet pls

Attached: 800px-Total_Emissions_CO2_for_the_period_1970_to_2017_and_2017_emissions,_by_country.svg.png (800x1067, 73K)

Her parents have probably raised her on a diet of lentils and insects

Based

I'm not sure what you think that proves or disproves. Seas have already risen and gained on Island nations.

>Cumulative

Attached: 1566779816109.png (637x599, 435K)

I'm never on this board, you're thinking of one of my based countrymen.

Why is there a child leading a political movement? I'm 19 years old, and nobody anywhere near my age should be doing fucking anything

Consolidation of power, less personal liberty, etc. etc.

Everything they push is about you being a serf to them as the ruling class. Climate change, immigration, gun control, government health care. They want a world where you have no choice but to depend on them and then they are basically your god and you have to do what they say.

Very nice of Africa not to release any CO2. It is what the Western nations must aspire to be.

Right column, champ.

False dichotomy.

Well that is the NWO plan

WHY IS THE LEFT COLUMN THERE AT ALL CHANG

Attached: 12211_b.jpg (621x443, 122K)

literally what 90% of the current hollywood slags body type consists of

boomers are from the 60s/70s. they fetishize the notion of the young generation "rising up" so they parade around these kids, have them read a script the boomers wrote and pretend their boomer opinions are the opinions of youth

Because I overestimated your attention span
>plastic
Not the topic, but concerning nonetheless.

Also look at per capita.
India and China have over a billion people each.
How much does the EU and the US got together?

She's just a puppet of course. She never actually speaks unless it's been scripted and coached. This is why she suddenly developed yet another mental illness (on top of her autism, OCD, and depression) which is called "mutism" where she cannot speak to strangers, because she's too nervous, so her father has to answer for her. No joke.

Boomers would be her grandparents, her parents are Gen X.

Americans don't like per capita because it involves maths and makes their Olympic medals tally look worse.

>mutism" where she cannot speak to strangers, because she's too nervous, so her father has to answer for her. No joke.
this cant be real

Europoors and the rest of the 3rd world have a shitty diet and don't develop properly.

>EU28
>also lists individual EU28 countries

Misleading.

>do nothing against global warming
>poor folks in india, africa, and some unlucky aussies I guess will be cooked and killed off
>anyone who can't afford newly overpriced food will die off, i. e. all poorfags and undesirables of society
>this is somehow a bad thing

wtf i love global warming now

Calling bullshit on this. There's no fucking way that's a thing

I'LL HELP YOU OUT

BECAUSE ITS CHINK PROPAGANDA
A FORM OF WHITE GUILT

WHEN WHAT MATTERS IS THE CURRENT STATS
USA HAS LOWERED ITS RATE WHILE CHINAS CONTINUES TO SKYROCKET

PLASTICS ARE JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE THIRD WORLD OCEAN DUMPING
THE VAST SHARE OF CHEMICAL AND TOXIC WASTE DUMPING COMES FROM THE THIRD WORLD, NOT THE FIRST WORLD

Attached: 1533377153075.jpg (1120x581, 104K)

>TOXIC WASTE DUMPING COMES FROM THE THIRD WORLD, NOT THE FIRST WORLD
Yeah, by first world companies you faggot

It's likely the poles will be the only inhabitable regions, which means the majority of humans will die.

Probably some mix of whites and Asians will survive, which is inherently racist. You're not racist, are you? Then you should support opposing climate change!

Ok but Hitler and Stalin (to an extent) were right, they’re boogeymen were (are) real.
Honestly, as a conservative, I don’t think the left has any real endgame, they just want to stay in office so they say whatever they’re base is saying on twatter, same as most of the right
>inb4 le ebin centrist

'NO'

BUT SOME IN PROCESS OF FULFILLING FIRST WORLD CONTRACTS

ITS THE THIRD WORLDS FAULT THEY HAVE NO ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, NOBODY ELSES

Holy shit, a real redpill. Every human grouping eventually becomes entrapped by Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy.

>the people devoted to the benefit of the group itself ALWAYS get in control and those dedicated to the goals the group is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely.

>what does the left have to gain from climate change awareness
Because literally the solution to 'climate change' is to give government greater power and control over everyone's lives. Strict controls on what you're able to do, where you live, what you buy, where you travel, what job you have, everything. Climate change will NEVER be solved either, so it's eternal control with no end in sight.

Depends on what areas will be razed by wildfires, and how much more landmass will look like India during this year's drought.

I'm not racist but a huge egoist with low-key hatred for most members of my species. The thought of millions of horrible people dying horrible deaths is quite satisfying.

>Majority of humans will die

So the problem will eventually fix itself. None of these activists are willing to say this is the only real solution to the supposed problem. You can't increase the population by billions while simultaneously reducing the pollution we put out. Sure in the west we could possibly switch over to nuclear energy without devastating effects, but that isn't going to work in the developing world.

A Swedish has no right to tell any country on Earth what to do.

I'm 100% down for culling the non-white population but you can't imagine anyone publically stating that. Unironically but if WW2 had gone differently we'd never have this problem. The most problematic elements today would be gone, and the white nations would have higher IQ's due to genetics.

bros...

Attached: 1566655257974_s.jpg (236x633, 50K)

shame about the face

Liberals who care about Climate Change should fucking LOVE Trump, because his tariffs are the only thing that might wreck China's shit. His nationalistic manufacturing policy is the only thing that might actually get local businesses making things that local people use as opposed to shipping raw materials to China, having them crank out some garbage, then shipping it all the way back at enormous carbon and fuel cost.
You know what we do with chickens in the US? We kill them, freeze the dead bodies, then ship thousands of frozen, dead chicks ALLLLLL the way to China. They process them in to drumsticks and breasts, freeze them again, then ship them ALLLLLLL the way back to sell back to us. All thanks to fucking liberals who made that actually the cheaper option.
We do the same thing with lumber, we ship over all our trees to China, they peel and section them into 2x4s, then they ship them all the way back for us to buy.

Incredibly fucking wasteful? Absolutely, but that's what liberals have done. And it's what Trump is trying to stop, but for some reason Democrats just can't stop sucking Chinese dick.

Attached: Greta.png (263x445, 230K)

The same reason they champion LGBT, they like moralising and telling others how to conduct themselves.

muh

Nigga climate change theories predate China having anywhere near that influence by a couple of decades.
Nice of you to concede though.

Not if you can read.

>16yo
>fetal alcohol syndrome
>growth disorder
our new climate queen

She does. Look at her sister. She looks normal

As a matter of fact yeah, tariffs are among the things proposed to lower emissions by way of limiting overseas shipping.

You don't think letting fags bang each other legally is the right thing?

Who cares. Nobody will remember her in a few weeks

BRUH I DONT CONCEDE SHIT LMAO

CLIMATE CHANGE WAS GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAY

THE WORST ACTIVE POLLUTERS IN EVERY AREA IS THE THIRD WORLD, BY FAR
GO WHINE AT THEM GRETA YOU STUPID LITTLE BITCHLET :^)

The United States has reduced its emissions more than any other country but for some reason receives zero credit for this. Why?

>implying these are the same people
They aren't.

>There's your fucking problem. It isn't one or the other
Agreed. However they (such as the various political green parties) aren't addressing or mentioning nuclear energy as an option at all in their retarded campaigns. They seem to think that RE is the only substitute which is just as unrealistic. I suspect that they do this since nuclear energy isn't a ticket seller with their constituents (halal hippies and basedboys).
>However, new nuclear takes decades to come online and at tremendous cost
Which is why we need to push it now so we can get it up and running ASAP. But it is clear that a lot of those that push the climate debate don't want to face the fact that nuclear energy is necessary. It's a hippie movement that doesn't want to face reality. As long as they dont address the fact that nuclear energy is necessary to maintain the level of energy we consume, I'll see them as disingenuous, opportunists or just ignorant.

imagine suckling on those little teats

So how long before her whole "Campaing" gets turned into some Anti Trump message?

That isn't the thing. They now want special rights for homos. And they want them in kindergarten teaching toddlers about assfucking. Not to mention their demand that confused kids are put on all sorts of medication and have their genitals cut off.

Why do leftists try to force the "muh climate change" meme so much. Shouldn't we be trying to improve human life itself first?

they've been rising for millions of years

She looks like a Podling

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 162K)

Yeah I agree all that shit is fucked and would openly vote against it.

I think the modern world is too complicated for people desu.

They're one and the same, realistically, regardless of what any agenda says.

Based /hmm/ poster

see
It's literally part of her origin story. She first was told of and started to dig into climate change around 11 or so, and the realization of its importance contrasted with the inaction on behalf of nations to attempt to address it made here young aspie mind fall into a hopeless dread. She stopped eating regularly and began to cognitively decline and withdraw socially as well.

Her family began to change their own habits, (which meant a lot of sacrifice including her mom giving up her international operatic career to perform locally so as to avoid air travel) which made her feel that change could occur and she started to recover from her issues.

They then allowed her to start her school strike efforts as a continuation of changes that had helped raise her spirits and get her to regain her health, although the damage was already done from her malnutrition since 11 years old which has left her with many pre-pubescent features that result in how she looks now, but she's no longer depressed and actually feels purpose in life, which is why they've gone to great lengths to help her continue her mission.

People in here keep trying to act like some PR company set her up, but it's quite the opposite, they worked with PR companies and whatnot to help her stay on this mission so she feels purpose in life instead of withering away as she was which would undoubtedly have led to eventual illnesses and premature death.

Smart and advocating for a good cause, incel

You conceded that the US emit more CO2 than anyone but China by stopping to argue otherwise.

Probably because that's bullshit. Source?

Jay Inslee's platform which is being adopted by many front runners in the US including E.Warren explicitly list nuclear as a key player in a future low-carbon grid.

Yeah, the extreme orgs disagree on its use, as do some of the extreme pols like bernie (in the US), but pragmatists, actual energy experts, and climate scientists who understand what must be done all support nuclear and will be the main source of future energy policy, not the fringe groups.

What? The last glaciation ended 12000 years ago.

She's not American why should she have anything to do with DRUMPFHT

>Which is why we need to push it now
That's a bad take. It takes such tremendous amounts of investment that spending it now on existing generation nuclear tech eliminates other pathways to de-carbonize that can be brought online now and leaves us with sub-standard nuclear plants for ages. Instead of deployment, advanced nuclear R&D needs to be invested in in parallel to deployment of near term renewable technologies or else you're screwing the pooch by not abating emissions as soon as possible, locking in more catastrophic degrees of change and making the costs of later mitigation rise which further squanders funding available for later advanced nuclear development. A phased approach allows the best late-gen nuclear tech to be readied properly for deployment at a time when 1st gen plants will start to need to be replaced. A much wiser implementation then just blowing your load on nuclear prematurely.

Attached: Nuclear_for_Kids.jpg (260x263, 13K)

the lunatics are the only ones that get media coverage unfortunately.

USA HAS DONE THE LARGEST REDUCTION IN CO2, OUTPACING EVEN THE TOFU VEGAN FAGS IN YUROP
CO2, WHICH AGAIN IS ONLY A SMALL PART OF GLOBAL POLLUTION, AND ONE OF THE MORE BENIGN SUBSTANCES

CHINA IS A PIECE OF SHIT
AND CURRENTLY LEADING EVERY AREA OF POLLUTION, ESPECIALLY TOXIC OCEAN DUMPING, AND BY A VERY WIDE MARGIN
OKAY XI? :^)

Attached: bpco2.png (700x499, 24K)

Anyone with a brain and not in denial knows there is no future. Who fucking cares

Attached: 1564598075147.jpg (620x372, 115K)

are those sum anti bum spikes

... but are also responsible for the largest portion of the total increase in atmospheric CO2 by far, and not the largest "RELATIVE" reduction. It's easy to make a larger reduction than anyone else when you emit orders of magnitude more than almost anyone else to begin with, so don't get too self-righteous.

Attached: cumulative_emissions.png (900x564, 170K)

google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2017/10/24/yes-the-u-s-leads-all-countries-in-reducing-carbon-emissions/amp/

>since 1750
china has been around longer than that

>CUMULATIVE
GOING BACK TO YOUR ALREADY REFUTED ARGUMENT? WHITE GUILT DOESNT WORK HERE, ACTIVE POLLUTION IS WHATS ACTIONABLE
ARENT YOU SUPPOSED TO HAVE RELATIVELY HIGH IQ CHING PINGPONG?
DID YOU CHEAT ON YOUR TESTS LIKE YOU CHEAT ON EVERYTHING ELSE LMAO

Attached: 1559072926781.jpg (1000x642, 619K)

yes

China has 4x the population of America...

see
It's not really impressive when you make a slight adjustment of your gushing hose of CO2 emissions then wave it around like some major success while still out-emitting everyone but india and china and being responsible for most of what has already been released.

Besides, emissions from the US have risen again since 2017. Y'all aren't leading the way in decarbonization, sorry to say.

Based realist. USA, leading the way, once again.

Good old American ingenuity will win yet again and you all know it.

Yeah as I said, you conceded.

She's dreamy.

Attached: IMG_1882.jpg (1792x2000, 792K)

... but hasn't been making any significant co2 emissions before then. No-one was. Until society industrialized emissions were moot and generally from biomass which is carbon-neutral.

POLAND STRONG

NO, MORAN

THERE IS NOT AN OUNCE OF CONCESSION

Attached: index.jfif.jpg (272x185, 7K)

burning trees isn't carbon neutral. fuckoff

>>CUMULATIVE
>GOING BACK TO YOUR ALREADY REFUTED ARGUMENT?
Huh?

Imagine her proudly stating she's dating you...

Attached: IMG_1884.jpg (600x800, 110K)

>thun(((berg)))
it's all so tiring

HERE'S YOUR HUH

CUMULATIVE IS DIVERSIONARY CHINK PROPAGANDA

TAKE IT AGAIN, SINCE YOU KEEP ASKING FOR IT
RIGHT IN THE ASS LMAO
>WHITE GUILT DOESNT WORK HERE, ACTIVE POLLUTION IS WHATS ACTIONABLE

>fatso eats 8 burgers a day
>reduces it to 7
>wants to be treated as a fitness hero
Pottery.

Land-use change isn't, but sustainable biomass consumption is, which a good number of societies implemented. Even so, at the population levels of the time, the extent of deforestation and burning associated with non-sustainable biomass use for all of human history prior to 1750 accounts for less than 0.01% of the change in atmospheric CO2 since then.

That year was chosen for a reason. You aren't smarter than the researchers who use that datum. Stop being a "I need to be technically right" pedant and move on.

Attached: stop.jpg (630x473, 45K)

The total amount of CO2 is what influences climate change, not the current rate of emissions release. We're responsible for most of this, so stop acting like it's everyone else's fault. It's childish and easily seen as such by everyone watching you flail and caps-argue on here.

it's not fossil fuels lmao we're burning "biomass". stfu I already know that trick.

I wonder if the parents have to participate in the normal trains the politicians run on her in exchange for all this money and fake publicity.

Attached: Greta.jpg (980x986, 110K)

I for one think she needs more awards, have her tour the coastal cities and no less than 2 awards per state ending in California with a photo on the Times (as you do) with a blank background nothing imaginative just greta looking at the reader maybe arms crossed with the word H E R O or some variation of it

I'm not that guy but clearly it's a question of what happens NOW.

Americans are still easily the biggest active polluters by capita though. If only active pollution matters, why should anyone care you're reducing in a way that doesn't change your position as active polluters? You can't have it both ways where you both ignore and acknowledge the past when it suits you.

Where is her philtrum?
It's uncanny

Attached: 1562417049747.png (647x644, 110K)

She will be astonishingly beautiful when she turns 18, mark my words.

Attached: IMG_1883.jpg (600x800, 109K)

>not the current rate of emissions release
IMAGINE BEING THIS MUCH OF A CHINK SHILL

USA IS ALREADY CUTTING BEYOND EVERYONE ELSE, USA IS THE GOOD GUY CHINA IS INCREASING POLLUTION FAR BEYOND EVERYONE ELSE, CHINA = S C U M B A G

AND CO2 IS THE LEAST OF THE POLLUTANTS, CHINA IS A TOXIC WASTE DUMPING PLANET DESTROYING PIECE OF SHIT :^)

PER CAPITA MEANS NOTHING TO THE PLANET, YOUR FIRST DIVERSIONARY IRRELEVANCY
THE PAST HAS NO BEARING ON ANYTHING, THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS PRESENT POLICY
OF WHICH USA IS THE HERO AND CHINA IS BY FAR THE VILLAIN

>what does the left have to gain from climate change awareness and green energy
The "left" doesn't gain anything other than a way to act sanctimonious, unless you're referring to politicians, in which case they get votes and policy cover by provoking doomsday fears. They even use this as an excuse for "climate refugees" these days. The international capitalists are able to further their reach globally by hobbling the developed world economically where only a few giant corporations can exist while building up emerging markets for cheap labor and eventually expanded markets. Global production will be controlled by a small political class representing different regions of the world united under the financial and productive controls of a few megacorporations. Individual citizens will no longer have any control in the market or a national identity. Simply numbers to be moved around for what is required by the international oligarchs.

Attached: 1512791358951.png (352x315, 260K)

Yup, and everyone needs to act, but pretending that the whole problem is china and india and that we're no longer a concern is wrong. All emitters need to act, but we can't control other nations energy policies, only our own, and then use international pressure to get them to change (which we won't have leverage to do if we don't act.)

He's an idiot. You don't need to defend him.

she looks like a fucking potato and is literally retarded. she has the body of a 10 year old and a head big enough for entire tribe in new guinea. she'll always be gross. she'll always be stupid.

Until the US emits less per person than another nation, it doesn't get to act superior to other nations. Your people are making the biggest mess, there's no way around it. Clean up your act before pretending we're so much worse.

she already hit the wall and that isn't saying much since she already has an ugly face

>she has the body of a 10 year old

Attached: 1257916004338.jpg (550x845, 97K)

>leftists still trying to claim her as their own
She is a right wing authoritarian. Liberal super mega corporations are the ones destroying the enviroment

YOUR GOALPOSTS ARE RETARDED

USA EMISSIONS ARE ON A DRASTIC DOWNTREND, ITS THE CLEANIEST ACT CLEANUP IN THE WORLD WHILE CHINA IS ON A DRASTIC UPTREND, WITH NO END IN SIGHT
CHINA IS THE ACTIVE THREAT

AND ALL THIS IGNORES THE MUCH WORSE POLLUTANTS THAT CHINA SPEWS
CO2 ITSELF AS AN ARGUMENT IS A DISTRACTION

CHINK SHILLS NEED BETTER TACTICS YOU HAVE NO LEGS TO STAND ON

>jannies deleted my "we've had this thread reposted six times recently" post from work
sad, guess i can't point out how new they are, in retrospect

keep posting bait, OP
also
>any discussion in this thread relating to tv
lmao

>Liberal super mega corporations are the ones destroying the enviroment

No its the fucking 3rd worlders burning down forests for firewood.

if it's about a little girl it's Yea Forums related you stupid little redditor

nevermind, it was the last thread i posted my shit
WE'VE HAD THE EXACT SAME THREAD THREE TIMES IN ONE DAY

god so many fucking facebook tier faggots here

theguardian.com/world/2019/may/23/china-factories-releasing-thousands-of-tonnes-of-illegal-cfc-gases-study-finds

Industrialization is a natural part of a modernizing nation

Of course per capita is meaningful you retard. If China polluted as much per capita as the US they'd pollute 2x more. It's not because you're not #1 that your contributions are meaningless. It's like arguing it's not genocide if you don't beat Mao's score.
Note that nobody is saying China shouldn't curb their emissions too.

>Industrialization is a natural part of a modernizing nation
not being a fucktard and doing shortcuts is not modernizing
this isnt the late 1800s/early 1900s again
but who cares, lets take the short route - all third world countries

Again, an obese man eating slightly less junk food isn't a fitness hero.

dilate

The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race

>Thinly veiled leftypol thread keeps getting reposted
>Mods leave it up and jannies delete descending opinions

for real tho why is a little retarded girl the face of global heating?

Attached: 1566210688904.jpg (620x695, 127K)

I really want to molest her

leftists hate her

>trannies are somehow related to pointing out newfaggots, facebook tier bait, and literal offtopic shit that is not even an iota close to television
get fucked, newfriendo
confident in keeping my dick at 29 here, been here since Yea Forums was created

fucking faggots in this thread
next one ill just post the links to the last (four) discussions
saved you all time shitposting the same garbage over and over
also let me save you all time
FUCK _______
FUCK THIRD WORLDERS
FUCK LIBERALS
there, solved, because really, fuck them and their shortcuts and projections

Attached: 1391736564008.gif (400x400, 573K)

YOU THINK THIS IS AN ARGUMENT
THAT COMPARES AT ALL TO THE POST YOU REPLIED TO

YOU LOSE :^)

TOO?

GRETA TROLLBERG NEEDS TO GO ON CHINESE TALK SHOWS

OH WAIT ITS A POLICE STATE WHERE SHE'D BE MURDERED LMAO FUCK CHINA

Beats me, what did she say?
Ok so what would you do to prevent humanity walking head first into a ecological disaster?

stop feeding third worlders and letting them populate rabbits

how to solve even more climate change:
a) less fucking people
b) go nuclear
it's literally that simple. period. oil will never go away, we need fucking plastic. and don't give me plant based plastic, that shit warps at the slightest bit of fucking sun UV. go get a compostable plastic cup, leave it in the sun for 6 hours, and come back to me.

lol nice reddit spacing

What in the fuck is that?

>Ok so what would you do to prevent humanity walking head first into a ecological disaster?
Kill yourself and take as many people with you as possible. Then when the climate continues to change as it has throughout all of its history no one will be around to cry about pop science peddled by a retard girl.

Attached: 1525061809272.jpg (400x522, 44K)

>stopping the thirld world from industrializing , whould lead to a redistribution from white countries to africa and brown people.
imbecile

prove that there's a disaster coming

In all honesty we should wipe out the populations of third world countries, they are worthless subhumans.

Attached: 1560072080429.jpg (525x477, 46K)

based

wiow thisproofede me wrong thakns 4 showing prrofs

>right wing dstroeyd
look im sicck of yuu climate change DENIARS and SCEiNCE HA8RS goiing on about how climMate change doesn't real

ANd don'tt say
>oh tha'ts sircumstantical evidence because news saying that some1ne die of cold or hot is proff

if news says it it not becaz more coverage of deaths and death number stay same it because global warm make more dEADTH ok so stopWIT WITH THe anti science bullshipts adn start belive truth taht I REads in FIrefox (unbiased by the btw) reccomended section

i saw graph that show temprture rise by science climate guy (his job is to show thatt climmate change exist so he know what he talk about and don't lie because thats put him out of job) and he sayss that carbon in ground that got trapped there from atmossphr is go backi to atmosphere and make HOTTER THAN EVER BEFORE when it go back in atmosphere from ice AND THAT MEAN DIE and all right wingrr say is BUT THE ARCTIC WAS ONEC A JUNGLE but we are not in paloezoic arra anymore so that isn''t what is trusth it doont'snt' matter because dinosaurs daed and also small childrne

to quoot board favorite bad right man

"nothing more important than political opinion of children"
samm hyed
sorry for englighs not first languaj

King Cold has a point here

>Ok so what would you do to prevent humanity walking head first into a ecological disaster?

Promote one-child policies worldwide.

But it's a global issue and the west consumes far more resources then the third world. Why are you so sure that we don't have to do anything? I don't even think that we "feed them" anymore
>go nuclear
On that we can agree
So you don't mind a future where harvest failures will become more common?
It's already been proven, so what would you do?

[citation needed]

>It's already been proven, so what would you do
It actually hasn't

On what part

Well yes you retard, way to destroy your own "argument".

By the way climate change theories emanated in the West in the late 70s, at a time when China was struggling to influence Cambodia despite having no opposition. There's no fucking way it's Chinese propaganda.

>way to destroy your own "argument"
EXPLAIN YOUR LEAP OF RETARDATION

YOU LOST SO FAR BACK, ITS JUST REPETITION NOW >NOOOOOOOOO I CANT LOSE EVEN THOUGH I GOT BLOWN THE FUCK OUT ON 12 DIFFERENT GROUNDS

CHINA, YOUR GONNA HAVE A HARD TIME IF THIS IS YOUR BEST :^)

Attached: 9fa00511a5962785a9603592d4cab693.jpg (741x402, 36K)

>only 16 years old.
And with millions of dollars!

Attached: PicsArt_09-22-02.23.35.png (479x768, 429K)

Both look like Dana Hill
>Audrey Griswold in Worst Vacation

magma.

imagine slipping and falling face first into one of those spikes and then suing the city for 2.5 mil

Jesus, why the fuck couldn't the parents just get her counseling to deal with her issues? Who the duck gives up their job cause thier daughter says 'it's bad for the environment '. The fucken parents need a smack upside the head!

Here's how
>if it's not bullshit why doesn't this irrelevant bitch go to China instead
>because she would be killed

>No reply to China being an irrelevant podunk back when climate change theories started
Oh. Oh you were trolling. Well that makes sense.

And what would would that do to help? If the writing is on the wall that shit is fucked unless something is done

The greatest trick by jews is convincing conservatives that conserving nature is liberal.

ITS LIKE UR ARGUING THINGS THAT WERE NEVER IN DEBATE
WHAT IS "NOT BULLSHIT"

WHERE ARE YOUR GOALPOSTS NOW?
THE ORIGIN OF CLIMATE CHANGE THEORIES?
ITS IRRELEVANT
WHATS RELEVANT TO US IN 2019, WHERE THIS IS POLICY THAT CAN BE CHANGED
IS WHO IS VASTLY CREATING POLLUTION RIGHT NOW

CONCEDE EVERYTHING WRITTEN HERE SAY IT

CHINA IS BY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE THE WORST ACTIVE POLLUTER CURRENTLY DESTROYING THE PLANET
AND CO2 IS JUST THE TIP OF THEIR SHITBERG
CHINA DUMPS ABSURD AMOUNTS OF PLASTICS AND TOXIC WASTE INTO THE OCEANS
CHINA IS OBJECTIVELY SHIT, CHANG :^)

not qualifications, tranny

she's their best and brightest

>And what would would that do to help?
It might have given an autistic girl a relatively normal life?

name our band

Attached: 1566655257974.jpg (2048x1466, 568K)

>she's their best and brightest
Those poor bastards...

My point is it's impossible for it to be a Chinese psyop, which has been part of your argument from the start
>Who is creating pollution
China, India, the US and Europe, mostly.

I understand you said you think per capita or literally anyone who isn't the biggest polluter is irrelevant, but both of those are wrong.
You're again arguing against yourself by acknowledging the past to pat yourself on the back about progress while saying the past doesn't matter when it doesn't suit you.

but why deny her the chance of a great life?

Goddamn dude second from the right is mogging their head game hard

my sister's boyfriend's husband's bull's adopted step-child (zim/zoom)

ITS NOT A PSYOP, ITS CHINESE TALKING POINTS
THEY APPROPRIATE WHATEVER IS CONVENIENT FOR THEIR AGENDA, ORIGIN IS IRRELEVANT
THIS IS YOUR ARGUMENT, AND YOU HAVE JUST LOST IT
I DONT WANT TO HEAR IT AGAIN

NOW
ALL THAT MATTERS TO THE CONDITION OF THE ENVIRONMENT IS RAW POLLUTION
PER CAPITA IS IRRELEVANT EXCUSE MAKING AKA C O P E

CHINA IS THE ONE DESTROYING THE EARTH, RIGHT NOW, THIS SECOND
OKAY CHANG :^)

But it's a talking point in the West first and foremost, it has been for decades. That China suddenly started agreeing 5 years ago doesn't make it otherwise just because you just started following the news.

It's not irrelevant. You can't tell the insect chink to lower their standards of living as individuals to stop CO2 emissions when we have much higher standards and emit more as individuals. That's a fucking joke.

China is part of the people destroying the world, literally nobody itt has argued otherwise, thinking they're the only ones is retarded.

What exactly does she and her fear mongering movement want?

Just a heads up a majority of the left who believe in climate change are doing fuck all about it. I'm talking about the reddit onions types, and it's clearly just a way for them to act morally superior.

Attached: 1568873793452.jpg (800x535, 181K)

Attached: 56197342_850376128633210_6781017917269228196_n.jpg (1080x1350, 210K)

CO2 IS NOTHING COMPARED TO THE TOXIC SHIT CHINA DUMPS EVERYWHERE

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INDIVIDUAL STANDARD OF LIVING

IT HAS TO DO WITH CHINA BEING A SCUMBAG WHO DOESNT WANT TO FILTER OR REPROCESS ITS INDUSTRIAL WASTE

ITS A LOCUST COUNTRY WITH NO MORALS, ENVIRONMENTAL OR OTHERWISE, THAT IS CURRENTLY DESTROYING THE EARTH
AND WILL CONTINUE TO DESTROY IT MORE AND MORE AS ALL THE DATA TRENDS SHOW

Some retarded kid the left is abusing to push their climate change agenda.

She’s mildly retarded and can be used as a magnet to call everyone who criticizes her politics a bigot.
Kind of annoying that the Americans are now propping her up when we got tired of her but I guess the jewish PR firm behind her have better contacts abroad than here in Sweden.

>CO2 is nothing
It's a lot more relevant to climate change than polluting waters, which is the topic.

They're destroying the Earth, you are too.

Shut the fuck up, boomer

DO YOU KNOW WHAT ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE ARE
DO YOU CONCEDE AMERICA IS SHARPLY CUTTING YOUR PRECIOUS CO2 WHILE CHINA IS SHARPLY INCREASING
DO YOU REALIZE PAST POLLUTION IS WHOLLY IRRELEVANT TO PRESENT POLICY

THE MAJORITY OF CHINA'S CO2 IS DUE TO ITS COAL PLANTS, ITS AGAIN INDUSTRIAL
CLIMATE CHANGE INCLUDES THE WATERWAYS OF THE PLANET BECOMING TOXIC BECAUSE OF ONE SCUMBAG COUNTRY DECIDING TO POLLUTE ITS FUCKING ASS OFF
THATS A CHANGE TO CLIMATE HAPPENING RIGHT NOW

Never underestimate the stupidity of the left.

theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/11/greta-thunberg-schoolgirl-climate-change-warrior-some-people-can-let-things-go-i-cant

>Her parents were reluctant. Knowing Thunberg had been so reticent that she had previously been diagnosed with selective mutism, they tried to talk her out of it. But the teenager was determined. “In some cases where I am really passionate, I will not change my mind,” she says.

Yes, and times 2 is hardly an order of magnitude.
Jesus Christ dude, learn to argue consistently. Does the past matter or not? To use your argument: it doesn't matter how much you're lowering, what matters is how much you emit.
No, climate change does not include that, that's another form of pollution that is also a concerning issue.

ITS ORDERS ON POLLUTION, CO2 EMISSIONS ARE A SUBSET OF POLLUTION

WHAT MATTERS IS EXACTLY HOW MUCH YOU EMIT, IN THE PRESENT, NOT THE PAST

USA IS CUTTING IN THE PRESENT, CHINA IS INCREASING IN THE PRESENT