Continued from >>>121314769 and >>121319936

Why do these images always have phone filenames

That's a good comic

Redditors turned this board into Yea Forums 2.0 with a slight tv/movies theme. This weird obsession millenials and zoomers have with politics prove retards should stick videogame/superhero movies/sport etc.

why isn't the government doing anything about this gross violation of free speech?

>words words words words
holy shit the left can't meme

>—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

weird how he tolerated communism
>(((hopper)))
nevermind

>liberal: tolerance and diversity is good
>me: why? having a bunch of people with opposing interests, goals and who have histories of conflict into the same space seems like a bad idea. for example, putting nazis and jews in the same space.
>liberal: HOLY SHIT THIS IS A PARADOX THAT WE CAN'T WRAP OUR HEADS AROUND
no, how about diversity is FUCKING RETARDED and you only realize it when it comes to nazis because your kike overlords programmed you to think they're evil or something.

What a shit comic

I agree, the 1st amendment is so gay.

How many memes have you created?

Just like how true freedom requires the restriction of freedom.

I created bane posting

Report and sage in all fields

is this implying gavin is a nazi?

because it's now run by faggots and women - who love public shaming and isolating people who break their predetermined decorum.

it's not normal male behavior, but it IS faggot and female behavior to censor.

But this applies to modern liberals more than anyone. Why should we tolerate liberalism when it’s the only viewpoint liberals are willing to tolerate?

Communism is about unity, not hatred.

>left
These faggots are useful idiots of the system

It's not about the quantity normie
Do you feel in charge?

So you and your parents don't get deported or gassed.

Liberalism is a fucking sickness

this is the logic Hitler used when he removed Jews from power. why should you tolerate a group that is intolerant of you?

So 0.

Sounds like a good idea b

check’d

yeah, that's never going to happen. people will always hate each other.

how /pol/ hasn't made a twisteroo of this image is mind-boggling

Just replace the nazi imagery with Israeli and/or muslim shit

A private company is incapable of censorship. The 1st amendment only applies to the government

And as we can see, the definition of what's "intolerant" will DEFINITELY stay fixed and well-defined and not be subjected to distortions so that it can be used a weapon to silence people, not at all

Tough break sucka
There’s always Gab kek

The Genie is out of the bottle now, LGBTQP are being platformed.
youtube.com/watch?v=hXxwvkb19ko

>it's a private company they can do whatever they wa-

Attached: 1549320892214.jpg (1035x1676, 292K)

Tell that to the jannies and mods on Yea Forums, then try to do that to any other company and see if it holds

Because they’re dumb and don’t realize this will squash them, too.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are better conservative commentators. They understand the game better than Gavin and David Duke

they did
I don't have it but you can probably find it if you look

>it's a private business bro, they can do what they want, society has no say

Attached: 58e0aad77d33e.image.jpg (400x432, 40K)

The American constitution is pretty much all about keeping Americans from trampling all over other Americans by enshrining their rights as sacrosanct come hell or high water (results varied but that was the intent). The founding fathers knew humans were ultimately selfish insecure faggots who'd fuck each other over given the opportunity and acted accordingly.

>it's okay to get fucked over as long as it's by a corporation
nice try, bootlicker

I hate this judging condescending prick. Good riddance

For me, it’s the Krassenstein twins

Damn I'm lgbt and those faggots are annoying as shit. I hope it works though, the only thing we need are precedents. Youtube will not be as ready to ban any type of content if they can suffer legal consequences.

There is a growing number of imbeciles who wish to throw away the Constitution, sadly.

cause trumps a con man that fooled the magatards into thinking he was actually right wing

Attached: 1559754657646.jpg (399x385, 29K)

Attached: what about Islam and intolerance.jpg (800x955, 297K)

So true

yeah unity in starvation

Unity in suffering, perhaps. Except for the people up top

>all online images are memes
Guess how I know your first website was Facebook?

nice digits

Civil rights law protect certain protected classes. Also politics and race are not the same thing. Not like you can hide your skin color and there is a belief you should be given the opportunity to make a living and participate in society regardless of how you were born.

Finally, people like Milo and Gavin are as much trolls engaging in targeted harassment as much as politics which justifies their removal more.

twitter is cancer and so is /pol/
now fuck off

Attached: trump-gif-you-have-to-go-back.gif (350x233, 348K)

That would be EPIC

based.

No! Its a different culture! You just dont understand.

you seem to dislike them, why?

Censorship and free speech are both larger principles than what is encoded in the 1st amendment. Why do so many people not understand this.

civil rights law covers politics and recreational activities in certain states like California and NY.

>The founding fathers knew humans were ultimately selfish insecure faggots who'd fuck each other over given the opportunity and acted accordingly.
Good thing they realized that and never committed faggotry like firing on their own citizens they ripped off
...oh

Attached: E6CA5BAA-CB46-4567-B1C1-0AB1CCEBAC5A.jpg (300x242, 41K)

Dislike who?

>Civil rights law protect certain protected classes. Also politics and race are not the same thing. Not like you can hide your skin color and there is a belief you should be given the opportunity to make a living and participate in society regardless of how you were born.
Wow your mind just went full "need retort, say anything" mode lmao

>"philosopher" karl shitter
tries to make sense of a paradox, laying it out in his favour, trying to justify something that is based on feelings by bringing laws into play

he is a hack.

Why are /pol/tards such huge sensitive crybitches? Nobody cares about any of this shit. Grow up.

>getting banned from a website is same and an entire industry not allowing you to work

It's only a violation of free speech if its perpetrated by the Government, retard.

Remember that time Gavin McInnes created a gang, and explicitly told the gang member to commit acts of violence, and then they did commit acts of violence, got sentenced jail time, so McInnes claimed he had nothing to do with the gang?

Funny stuff.

Attached: 1567017474009.jpg (759x560, 80K)

Most blacks are Democrat. Banning Democrats basically means banning blacks. Politics and race often go hand in hand.

Because guys like you then ask the government to do something about it which the makes you guilty of the same ignorance you accuse others of.

Censorship and free speech are abstractions that are foundational of Western culture outside of the Constitution which is true. It's people like you who then muddy the idea by asking the government to do something about a retard getting banned from twitter. That's when people have to remind you in that case it's not a law breaking issue.

>any movement that preaches intolerance and persecution MUST BE OUTSIDE OF THE LAW
So open season on Intolerant Lefties it is then!

the precedent was set when they deplatformed, Alex Jones, but nobody cared because they weren't alex jones, and pulling the it's a private platform and therefore doesn't have to provide free speach, is a bit disingenuous when the platform has become so monolithic that when someone is de platformed, your basically deleting them from the internet.

You ever think there might be a reason why they slapped restraints on their own power?

>Retard can't grift his way into the comfortable life by making fun of transgenders and minorities
>This is an attack on western civilization

Anyway go back to Yea Forums i don't come here for this stuff

Ask a commy how they feel about capitalists, see how much love and unity you get

seethe tranny

it was a butt plug, not a dildo

Yeah take that argument to court. Good luck.

Mostly because free speech warriors would rather focus on making edgy bombastic statements and jokes in "defiance" to PC culture rather than follow legal and formal paths to making sure Free Speech is adapted to the internet age and that its violation is punished. That's what happens when the neoliberal Left has 99% of the real activists, causes as stupid as fat acceptance become mainstream and fucking free speech becomes an empty statement.

Another problem is, most people who want Free Speech don't reaaaally want it, as they'd be more than happy to be the ones banning content from the media, internet, and above all universities, so taking the necessary steps to adapting it legally could easily backfire, and the people wanting you to fight perpetual culture wars over clickbaits know this.

Sounds like you're putting words in my mouth, oh Lord of the Straw.

>is a bit disingenuous when the platform has become so monolithic that when someone is de platformed, your basically deleting them from the internet.
Damn so sad for alex jones. Have to sub to his zine since he’s been erased from the net

Attached: can you.jpg (460x215, 32K)

McInnes is a brainlet faggot anyway. I mean a literal, dildo fucking, piss drinking faggot. There's nothing really conservative about him.

Typical liberal with the white savior complex

>oh please, Mr. Liberal, save me from le ebil Nazis so you can feel like le civil rights hero you were brainwashed with throughout your entire life without realizing it

>Another problem is, most people who want Free Speech don't reaaaally want it, as they'd be more than happy to be the ones banning content from the media, internet, and above all universities,

lmao

Your argument was stupid and you should feel ashamed for trying to sidestep it.

God you retards are sad, you just repeat platitudes you've heard before like some kind of parrot. You have no conceptualisation of the issues at hand or even what these values mean. You deserve to be ruled, which is what you so desperately beg for and enable.

>Conservative Commentator

Isn't it quicker and easier to just say 'racist'?

Attached: 1564603505071.jpg (1600x1066, 313K)

Every website has rules that you either follow or get banned for breaking. Racism and promoting violence is something that gets you banned from many places, as Gavin Mcinnes has learned. Even here, the place you'd point to as your example of a "free speech" site, has that policy. If you were to make a thread about western films on some place like Yea Forums you'd immediately get banned and "censored" by the definition of that word that you're using. And that's a less severe thing to get kicked off a site for than what someone like Gain Mcinnes does too

To everyone complaining ITT:
Why not let the Free Market sort it out and start your own company? The Free Market could easily fix it

He only shoved that dildo up his ass (on camera) to prove how sensitive liberals are. Looks like it worked.

For a lot of people these websites *are* work or a vital part of it, including 99% of the sour-faced journalists that write the VICE headlines that get you all worked up against le alt-right or le incels or whatever else you're angry at. Stop being cynical and understand the point that private organizations should submit to overall society demands, instead of retreating to "it's just private business bro" when this isn't a standard you really preach or believe in.

Not a federal issue however that justifies federal involvement

Only these groups are protected.

>Under federal law, employers cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability.

How so? What he said is reasonable and true. See above.

>Gavin Mcinnes
>Conservative

Attached: 1393963048872.jpg (351x376, 40K)

Attached: tolerance popper.png (800x1000, 401K)

he is an utter moron and an old demented shit breather.
you can apply his very own take on this paradox (which is ironic, since paradoxes are not solvable by any known approach, otherwise they wouldn't be paradoxes in the first place), to any fucking group of people like suggested by other anons.
in the end you can even use it against this old pants shitting shit breather himself and his cohorts.
fuck nazis, fuck pisslam, fuck communism but above all things FUCK KARL POPPER that old low IQ fuck.