Thoughts?

Thoughts?

Attached: mosul.jpg (1461x1552, 253K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Wb1M1wbEj0U&feature=youtu.be
twitter.com/AnonBabble

i think you are a faggot

My thought is don't give clicks to these parasites.

What is their endgame?

>woke half-gay capeshit directors
>STILL get eaten by the SJW clickbaiters
Whomstve guessed.

a/k/ino

Attached: 1566039972438.jpg (999x860, 159K)

Does it accurately depict how fucking retarded local arab militias are?

Attached: ISIS PKM gunner chilling.jpg (1199x673, 126K)

>missed the opportunity to smash the established narrative

Attached: 1432674756186.jpg (500x383, 46K)

IT'S

NEVER

FUCKING

ENOUGH

I think that by failing to get an Arab film critic to write this review a huge opportunity was missed to get an authentic and often too under represented opinion in film journalism.

This is...problematic and.....YIKES!

This but unironically

Is this article implying the Russos should've fired hemselves?

>tfw no ISIS kino about Abu Hajar
NO NO ABU HAJAR, THE ROCKET FOR PEOPLE

I thought so too but I think they were the producers and hired a whit guy to direct the film.

No, they're shown as navy seals level specops with middle-eastern accents

And what kind of logic is it? They could hire an arab director to do the exact same movie and all of a sudden it would be good? I'd like to know what this movie is about, not who directed it.

He's probably shooting at drones or helicopters.

Reread you retard

Literally unpleasable. Should have turned production over to ISIS or something and the whole thing could just be guys getting their throats slit for apostasy and getting thrown off buildings for being gay.

post your guardian screencaps where they belong reddo

>Mosul
When TF did they make this? I thought Cherry with Spiderfag was next for them, also about Iraq vet?

Lol, as if all these articles by women with names like "Hannah", criticizing 'problematic' elements in media, aren't prime examples of White Savior Syndrome.

That's all journalism is. And black and Mexicans out there generally aren't asking these white journalists for the "help".

this is normal when shooting at flying objects

Americans never did a movie about iraqis fighting american invasion but after the ISIS take over, they feel compelled making a movie about pro american kurds fighting ISIS.

Post /sg/ kino

Attached: 1568402649469.webm (320x180, 1.92M)

Cover me!
>RELOADING!

Abu Hajaar is still the GOAT.

youtube.com/watch?v=Wb1M1wbEj0U&feature=youtu.be

What's the established narrative?

Nothing is ever good enough is it. If they'd hired an Arab director then they'd be upset they didn't hire a women, if they'd hired a female Arab director then they'd be questioning why they didn't hire a transwoman instead etc etc

Well he turned himself into a convenient sandbag for his mate busy bombing up magazines so that was a useful way to die.

Wh*te = Good
Brown = Bad

No idea, but usually it's like 98% retarded militias and then a super fucking small core of "elites" that are basicly equivalent western conscripts. Though realisticly if they made such a movie it should probably star Revolutionary guard members from Iran backuping up Iraqi militias

No they are larping. I think in the battle of Hattin Muslim archers used their legs to stretch their bows with a pose like in your pic. I've seen this same way of shootings in multiple clips over the years with AKs not just lmgs.

kino

Attached: Dr. Assad, I'm Druze beast.jpg (960x647, 93K)