It 2

What exactly was so bad about this film?

Attached: MV5BYTJlNjlkZTktNjEwOS00NzI5LTlkNDAtZmEwZDFmYmM2MjU2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjg2NjQwMDQ@._V1_.jpg (1382x2048, 234K)

Nothing. People expected more than they should have. Suffered from the same thing that ruins most things, overhype.

Was thinking of seeing in in theaters and skimming through some threads most people didn't like it here. Apparently beginning of film is the best part

I liked the movie. I don't know why other people think it's bad.

my friend asked me to go with him to avoid the no singles policy, so I did despite never seeing or caring about the first one. It's too fucking long for a horror film, for one. Why does It toy with them so much and just let them go? There's a huge chunk of the film that's a setup just so each character can have spooky clown stuff happen to them and it should have been cut out completely. It takes 3 hours for them to get to a point that took them 20 minutes.

It wasn't terrible, but it was ridiculously tonally inconsistent. Most of the CGI was laughable. Granted, in a very meta move, they were telling you it was going to suck the entire time.

Not enough Sophia.

Attached: 1568224031466.jpg (639x629, 76K)

It was hilarious. A failure of a horror movie but a damn good thriller-comedy, entertaining beginning to end.

Fine film, the fault is with the source material.
The second book just isn't as good.

>The second book

Attached: 1377215358061.jpg (400x422, 41K)