Is cinematography the most important thing?

Is it that gross hairy lesbian?

My cock in her ass is the most important thing right now

Probably the actresses feet

liararoux.com

this, but unironically
with the very same footage you can make either formulaic hollywood trash or a timeless master piece

sound

shitty sound makes any kino visual shit

this. story is the most important thing.

>coalburner
Sasuga, Yea Forums.

narrative is the most important
film is a story telling medium, nice visuals are just a bonus

>film is a story telling medium
you're a retard

you cant do film without story
you can do film without cinematography

elaborate please lol

you should watch more movies buddy
have you even heard of koyaanisqatsi?

fpbp

Editing can make or break a movie.

Saw the trailer looks boring as shit

where the fuck do i find her porn, everything is behind a paywall

tubetorrent.net/214416-liara-roux-4-rolika-feat-mickey-mod-emily-bloom-riley-nixon-nenetl-avril.html
only because im feeling generous today

>tubetorrent.net/214416-liara-roux-4-rolika-feat-mickey-mod-emily-bloom-riley-nixon-nenetl-avril.html
damn user thank you, mega based

>majority of her shit is getting blacked
lol. can't wait until this whore dies of aids.

the fuck? it's the exact other way around, user. "no cinematography" just means bad cinematography. there's no such thing as a film with no cinematography, whereas you can easily make a storyless film

someone post that webm of alice wiggling her nose please

Not that non, but Koyaanisqatsi has a story, or a through line, anyway.

there is only one vid of her fucking a black guy tho

Editing, Composition and Performances are the most important things
Without effective imagery, pacing and believability in the characters the movie falls apart

Attached: 1535738193777.png (497x429, 64K)

Koyaanisqatsi has a pretty explicit narrative
I'd more use Baraka or Samsara as an example of "no story" docs

>you cant do film without story

Attached: 003.jpg (500x274, 28K)

I remember when everyone was all over her.

Literally everyone wanted to meet with her, and pay her thousand of dollars to fuck her. People were worshiping her like a queen.

And then, they saw the video where she fucks a black guy. Literally everyone started dropping her after that. Men were furious. It was fucking hilarious. Her popularity dropped ever since that. I think she even complained about it.

It's a whore that you pay 3000$ + plane tickets to come for a weekend.
But if she don't feel like having sex with you then she won't do it and keep the money

>there's no such thing as a film with no cinematography

Attached: 1563390559718.jpg (276x360, 21K)

lol, sometimes im kinda ashamed of being a man knowing that some of us are ready to fund some stupid whore's life just to stick their peepees in them. sick

Unironically this. Bad editing can more easily ruin my experience.

What a strange and sexy thread.

This. Along with writing, It makes or breaks a film. Then your actors also have to perform well. Early noir is a great example on what are the essentials on making a movie. Best example is Edgar G. Ulmer and Robert Siodmak who uses has beens and literally who actors and actresses to great effect.

but you need something to edit in the first place

>tfw you were one of those who dropped all subs I had on her once the nigger shit came out
i have a fetish for hot hairy women and there aren't many really :/
but nigger shit and tattoos physically stop me from having a boner

No, story is. A poorly shot film can be saved by a good script, but a beautifully shot film can’t be saved by a shit script

If we are talking about a single aspect then yes, it is 100% this.