Was the ending real or all in his head?

Was the ending real or all in his head?

Attached: king-of-comedy.jpg (640x360, 79K)

In his head obviously

Real obviously

Form your own opinion you waste of fucking life. You're the nigger that goes online after seeing a movie to figure out what it was about. You're void of thought.

decide for yourself.
if it's real, the movie is a commentary on the entertainment industry and how shallow it is
if it's all in his head, it's a character study of a man consumed by his delusions.

It doesn’t matter. Rupert decided to “be a king for a day” instead of “a schmuck for a lifetime”. Whether or not the aftermath was real, that decision to do something with his life made him feel real happiness - regardless of whether the events are fake.

>all in his head
Why the fuck would it be all in his head? He wasn't even particularly disturbed, just incredibly adamant.

Former is kino

>Waßßup everybody, Big Herc 9-1-6, getting down fresh out. I'm here with the homie Rupert Pupkin to provide you guys a different perspective. Rupert man, what's some of the things...

Was he really in the wrong? Jerry Lewis did make him a promise in a way that seemed sincere

Saw this for the first time last night. There are only two scenes in the movie where Rupert is fantasizing/delusional, being in Langford's office about being in the business and marrying the woman on his show live. Both scenes have an old school television fuzz overlay that signify that he is fantasizing/delusional. The scene where he goes back to the bar and shows that he was in fact king for a day doesn't have any overlay. The following scene does ending him as a television host. I think it could be seen as either or, but would've been cool if they did hard cuts after his delusions in his everyday life

>He wasn't even particularly disturbed, just incredibly adamant.
Wasn't he talking alone when he was talking with his mother? Or was his mother real?

>Why the fuck would it be all in his head? He wasn't even particularly disturbed, just incredibly adamant.
Have you seen the movie? There are numerous scenes he's imaging whole sequences.
>Wasn't he talking alone when he was talking with his mother? Or was his mother real?
They never show her, but I believe she was real

it's just taxi driver again

Why? I thought it was a reference to Psycho.

I never really thought about it user, you might be right

Attached: 1565602549777.jpg (237x212, 11K)

What a great movie, I like how his actual stand up is pretty decent, but then you realize he probably spent 15 years practicing this single set and its still incredibly mediocre.

The only scene in the movie that confused me was the scene where he goes to the summer house.
I thought it was a fantasy scene at first because his GF was wearing a Marylin Manson dress, which seemed like something his fantasy version of her would wear.

Anyway though, I think the ending was real.

That was A wonderful remark

This movie is fucking KINO.

Why do Scorcese and critics pretend it doesn't exist?

Normies don't know any Scorcese movie pre-Goodfellas

Eighties Scorsese seems to never get discussed.

Scorsese talks about it in his video with Don Rickles and De Niro

>There are only two scenes in the movie where Rupert is fantasizing/delusional
There's also the scene where Langford and Rupert are at dinner. Also Rita acts very different in the scene where her and Rupert break into Jerry's mansion. Rita could be fake here, but Jerry seems to acknowledge her. In the scene just before Rita and Rupert are going to the mansion; Masha says she'll go with Rupert. Masha also mentions when Jerry's tied up that she "wants to be black" and acts like she's dancing. So I bet "Rita" in the mansion scene is actually Masha, but Rupert is imagining she's Rita and Masha is playing along.

Rupert says his mother had been dead for a while during his performance