What went wrong with IT chapter 2?

What?

Not enough of the little redhead boy

Not enough Sophia.

Attached: 1567409918530.jpg (1200x1200, 1.33M)

All the good parts of the book were already in the first one.

That's better.
She is a really bland actress

She's great.

Attached: 1564103888614.jpg (1080x1350, 108K)

She's distractingly attractive. Makes it hard to get into the movie.

the worst part is this thread will get hundreds of replies about cgi,scare factor,actors etc and steven king will still be rich not even caring

it was pretty good thoug, you're just blinded by nostalgia googles and don't remember that the miniseries is absolute shit except for tim curry

What the fuck are you smoking?
She is bland, like a cardboard bland.
She has nothing that mad her different from a generic Jennifer Lawrence and a generic nickelodeon child actress.
She is just an ctress that leave you nothing.
lifewithmak2005 is her but better

Attached: makieee.jpg (1200x983, 208K)

>it was pretty good thoug, you're just blinded by nostalgia googles and don't remember that the miniseries is absolute shit except for tim curry
.............................................
Did I ever said I liked the IT miniseries?
Did I ever implied that?
Did you saw me praising it?
Did you saw me saying it was good?
Did you saw me comparing it to this one?
Did you saw me mentioning it?

Nothing, the people who like the kids stuff better just like to pretend they had friends as a kid. Same as everything else pathetic gen x'ers like. Just friend simulators.

the source material is a mess

Wow, that image. Perfect example of "If I fall for an ugly girl I don't have to compete" trope.

I liked It chapter 2. But it wasn't nearly as good as the first. The spider form looked retarded again, until It turned very alien-looking while It was mesmerizing Richie. Also the whole gay defense force thing at the beginning was pretty heavy handed

Attached: 1416094587382.gif (350x196, 1.61M)

>whole gay defense force thing at the beginning was pretty heavy handed

Well it happened in the book and King was inspired by a true life story. Really makes you think.

IS YOUR REFRIGERATOR RUNNING?
IT IS?
WELL YOU BETTER GO CATCH IT
WA HAH WA HAH WA HAH

didnt manage to watch first one
i assume 2nd movie is similar

i think its succesful because its horror movie yet not too hardcore horror movie

well-done softcore horror movies seem to do well nowdays

now that I think about it...Why was this Horror...funny?

Do you feel better by making this joke?

no child sewer orgy, no ticket

Sophia is too pure for that.

Attached: 1565039783856.jpg (970x1200, 74K)

I didn’t even know it was out. Poor marketing I guess. Why didn’t they wait until October?

Excuse me, Sir! Do you have Prince Albert in a can?!

>Howdy, Nigger!

Attached: 5C50CE48-38F9-46C7-98A4-3B7FDAA94600.jpg (259x194, 9K)

It turned out not to be an LGBTQ ally

>turned out not to be an LGBTQ ally
I know this exact statement has been said many times, but that headline may be the actual funniest thing I’ve seen in all of 2019

>Sophia
>pure

Mate...

Attached: 1533939220877[1].webm (720x405, 2.34M)

the kids have more to prove and they want a career after this movie so they actually give a shit. Adult actors are already established (mostly) and will not really have a problem finding more work.

It chapter 1

Im confused. Is the story complete or is there going be more movies?

i only seen the original for tv movie

lmao what a cuck

I don't know but my mum who's in her 60's just finished chapter 1 and said it was a pile of shite, not scary in the slightest and it's a film for 12yos and wont even bother watching chapter 2

your mom is a filthy ass slut, bitch

learn to write btw, it's mOm not mum you fucking aborted retard

You are now aware that the original 2014 Fukunaga script obliquely referenced the sewer gangbang scene.

Attached: it2014script.png (616x1314, 107K)

They're making a supercut that'll basically be a tv show. I imagine they'll make some prequels too because the IP sells gangbusters

both parts feel like a gigantic waste of potential because of the cast they had and the sequel even more so

Just imagine if this was an actual 18+ movie from some actually good director with no studio clowns mouthbreathing down their necks for mass appeal. It would have been genuine kino if it focused on Pennywise tormenting Bill with his fear of little kids being killed by Pennywise. Right now its 3 hours of no story, bad script and sometimes spooky playstation 1 cutscenes come on screen

who fucking cares, retard

nobody gives a fuck about that crap

I literally thought Pennywise would eventually drop the N word on Mike... but it never happened. Not edgy enough I guess to handle the responsibility.

The real way to do it (which will never happen):
>20-ish episode miniseries that follows the book's general structure of interlacing both timelines
>Periodic Derry interlude episodes with Mike's interviews
>Original time periods
>Retain the book's sense of humor but lose the 'quip every thirty seconds' model

Too funny. I laughed alot but it might be because of who I went with.
The finale was way too long. Could have easily cut it to 2 hours.

Question: what was the horror for Ben (in the book)? I remember Mike had the bird, Eddie the leper, Richie the werewolf, Bev the blood, etc. But I can't recall Ben's?

Yeah it was a lot funnier than I thought it would be and that might be why it wasn't that great.
It was a solid 5/10 imo so not terrible but I'm likely never going to watch it again. Also the length was ridiculous indeed, way too long.

The mummy?

t. not a pedo

Nothing. It's gay kino

That sounds familiar. Richie also had the Eye, now that I think about it. Stanley had the dead kids in the water tower.

>lmao what a cuck
why?

It's really the final battle that needs the trimming, I could handle the rest. The battle is twice the necessary length.

Please stop with that bland ginger girl.
She has nothing that makes you believe she is not a cardboard with written the word "actress"

She has:
>beautiful eyes
>a beautiful smile
>fair skin
>cute freckles
>tomboy hair
>a big heart

Attached: 1568582354391.jpg (809x630, 99K)

Internet confirmed

The biggest missed opportunity was setting the remake in the 80's and not updating It's movie monster forms to some of the iconic stuff from that decade. I know rights and stuff can be a clusterfuck, but New Line has Nightmare on Elm Street and Critters and I think they bought the rights to Texas Chainsaw at some point too.

No, the adult stuff is way more interesting.

This is what she looks like.

Attached: 2001.53_o2.jpg (1406x2000, 488K)

No she looks like this.

Attached: 1565831181385.jpg (750x931, 148K)

>>beautiful eyes
Steve Buscemi's eyes and pupils
>>a beautiful smile
big gingiva that cover her teeth
>>fair skin
And? how does that makes her something else than someone else with fair skin?
>>cute freckles
You mean tattoos
>>tomboy hair
That aren't even natural since she is a gingerfake that gingerface!
>>a big heart
Wow! Don't you know she is an actress?! She could be a jerk in real life

seething

Attached: 1565395146259.png (604x630, 334K)

The kids were likeable and more endearing in a story about a Spooky Clown than adults

Hm, it works either way but yea, they could have. They did do a Shining joke though

Shouldn't been so long. Same goes for the book.
>they already know where and how to beat the clown
>hurrr let's wander around the town to waste time
Just go and kill it for Christ's sake.

Should've been 1 movie in fact. Kids kill the clown, it dies, the end.

That's actually a pretty clever way to reference the book scene and even improve it.

fpbp

Is the full script floating around out there? Got a link?

She is not a redhead!

Attached: sophislillis.png (439x329, 232K)

screenplaysandscripts.com/script_files/I/IT-by-Chase-Palmer-Cary-Fukanaga.pdf

Aside from some small quibbles like the changed names, I actually really like the 2014 version. The 2015 or 2016 draft is where the wheels fell off. It has stupid shit like combining Richie and Stan into one character and a subplot where Beverly's dad was spared by It as a child so he could grow up to abuse her or something retarded like that.

youtu.be/RBPSAx-EHMQ

>didnt include the scene where IT has bev trapped and is going into explicit detail about how its going to literally eat out her pussy

dropped

Thanks

Attached: 1566756343575m.jpg (1024x576, 54K)

>Aside from some small quibbles like the changed names, I actually really like the 2014 version. The 2015 or 2016 draft is where the wheels fell off. It has stupid shit like combining Richie and Stan into one character and a subplot where Beverly's dad was spared by It as a child so he could grow up to abuse her or something retarded like that.
What happened?!
Why wasn't it (pun included) produced?

noooo she's ruined

Attached: 1562897402985.png (960x960, 1.21M)

still perfect

Attached: 1566251040309.jpg (1080x1080, 98K)

Enjoy loving fakery!
Enjoy loving fake silicone boobs!
Enjoy loving fake red hairs that will not please you as natural red hairs!

what's her natural hair color then

bron

Attached: b3b73a11bcbbf8c256f094749791003b1ae8cb99f78d83b09fe99f0787a74159.jpg (666x654, 59K)

Faggots

So much annoying slo-mo shots. Retarded films with retarded directors think that makes an impressive shot when you get some ugly actors walking slowly down the road

spooky clowns scare me