Toxic Masculinity of Space films

Will you watch Ad Astra?

Attached: 16BA280B-A33E-4E44-B6C1-56B32F1CCD22.jpg (750x1224, 611K)

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trust-in-media-hits-bottom-60-percent-say-sources-pay-for-stories
businessinsider.com/ap-poll-just-6-percent-of-people-say-they-trust-the-media-2016-4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I'm so fucking sick of this shit

>Stereotype of heroic men
So, accuracy and realism.

Why's the article writer being so emotional?
Spacecraft are too costly to put an emotional person in them, they need to be operated by robots with maximum self-control who won't fuck up an entire mission because someone spoke the wrong pronoun.

It's OK to be a white man.

>some shittty unknown "critic" tries to gain attention by bringing up SJW politics in his review

Just ignore them

Based. I definitely want to watch this now

>The Guardian

Who the fuck actually reads this tho?

>heroic men
>emotional women
>stereotype
i'm pretty sure that's just evolution

We ignored them for years, and look where we are. Call this stupidity out everytime you see it.

Yea Forums is truly solving problems one thread at a time.

woman bitching about men
what else is new?

Apocalypse Now and the toxic masculinity of war films

You faggots take this bait all the time. Who gives a fuck? Even normies are sick of hearing about Toxic Masculinity. The people who write and publish this shit knows it gets clicks because people enjoy being pissed off.

Attached: literallyWho.png (634x153, 37K)

Now I will.

Attached: GET WOKE GO BROKE.png (1416x1870, 2.08M)

>we ignored them for years
no we didn't. these threads never fail to grab 100+ replies. many of them actually include links directly to the article, giving them countless profits in ad revenue (you don't have to like an article for it to make money off you).
These article are specially tailored to rouse the anger of morons like yourself. You get mad at the article, start raging at it, and allow the publisher to paint you as some crazy alt-right moron, bringing hundreds of feminists and SJWs screaming in its defence. The end result is more buzz about the publisher, which is more clicks, which is more ad revenue.
This entire cycle would cease if you ignored it as the dumb shit it is

Attached: 1537627032051.jpg (500x449, 21K)

>Ignore them
>they intensifies infiltrating vidya and movie franchise industry
>engage them
>they cry as they strike you, they become famous and you commited career/social suicide
Just move to Asia, man.

>argumentum ad reditus
They aren't funded by any ads or us, they are funded by NBC piling $200 mil injections into VOX, or rather the 1% funding them, and they still fail even with that with walkouts and sacking still happening Go and an hero my uneducated friend.
The best way to deal with this shit is to ridicule it every time it appears so the domino of ridicule continues to spread and trust levels among the public stoop to ever newer lows.
washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trust-in-media-hits-bottom-60-percent-say-sources-pay-for-stories
businessinsider.com/ap-poll-just-6-percent-of-people-say-they-trust-the-media-2016-4

Attached: Screenshot-2019-9-16 Almost all Americans ’troubled’ by current state of media.png (727x683, 897K)

These investors still expect a return. They're biting their nails because it's insanely difficult to monetize things on the internet given for free, but that would be true regardless of their political leanings.
Your "ridiculing" (ie autistic fits of rage spouted on the echo chamber of Yea Forums) only serves to draw attention to the articles and allows them to scrape up a meager return on their investment. The more you fight, the more powerful they become.

>We ignored them for years
If by "ignore" you mean "constantly feed attention", then sure.

I WATCH ALL SPACESHIT, ESPECIALLY IMAX SPACESHIT

OK? ITS FUCKING BASED

INCREDIBLE PRIVILEGE, JUST THE BEST PRIVILEGE

Attached: toxic white male spaceMAN.jpg (700x700, 140K)

None of this is even remotely true you coping faggot. These sites were propped up by VC, and their numbers of clicks faked.

This shit grew because it was left in the dark to grow in peace like the mould upon the media landscape that it is, money pumped into it because the only voices the people with money heard were those of the lying, screeching lunatics writing these articles. (You)'re the reason shit's the way it is now. If you don't like the current situation, face up to that fact because otherwise it'll never improve. And if you DO like the way it is then just admit it. Stop lying.

I can't draw clicks to the article because i post screencaps of the entire article to be read here unlike the dumbshit OP. That's why EU the fake-news-cock-sucking fascist entity devised the Article 13 segment of being buttmad at people posting pictures of entire news articles instead of linking to them.
Your argument is retarded from the root.
Instead of whining about a non-issue, you should whine at OP not posting the entire article.

FULL ARTICLE BECAUSE OP IS A DUMBFAGGOT DONKEY COCK SUCKER

Attached: Screenshot-2019-9-17 Fly men to the moon Ad Astra and the toxic masculinity of space films.png (439x1737, 747K)

The only ones who fed these things any of the attention they wanted were facebook moms. They don't make money off of us mocking their articles from screenshots or wasting their bandwidth with adblocked clicks.

Did you not read my first fucking post? You're a drip in a bucket of piss. The vast majority of you morons are too stupid to use archive or to take a full screenshot. And plenty of bastards will still google the article and find it themselves even if you do.
My point is that you faggots never ignored this shit, you've raged about it loudly since pre-gamergate. That shit doesn't do shit but make their supporters support them even stronger. Your impotent rage only gives them more attention and thus more clicks.
Honestly, I don't give a fuck what you do, just don't delude yourself into thinking you're fighting the good fight when you're playing right into their hands and doing exactly what they want. Seriously, do you not understand that shit is ENGINEERED from headline to final paragraph to enrage faggots like you?

Attached: 197142170311434.jpg (400x400, 19K)

You too retarded to comprehend that you are wrong at the root?
Do you not understand that your entire whine about emotional control for profits only works so long as it's creating profits, and clearly the profits are nonexistent when every fucking publication is now sacking, losing, and selling for 10x to 100x less value than they were worth in the past?
Ragefaggots like myself sure as fuck do fight the good fight considering the lack of public support or trust in this shit and the LACK OF PROFITS for it.
YOU ARE LOSING MONEY YOU DUMB RETARD, AND IF ME RESPONDING TO YOUR RAGEBAIT RESULTS IN EVEN MORE LOSS OF MONEY FOR YOU LIKE IS THE CASE TODAY I'M MORE THAN FINE WITH IT, SUCK IT

Attached: 1567444546617.png (565x569, 278K)

Attached: 1567691882154.jpg (2118x1352, 286K)

Profit obviously isn't the primary goal. Ideological control is the goal. You're still playing into their hands. By attacking their retarded bullshit, you bring in ten normies defending it. These normies might not even particularly strongly believe what they're defending, but the companies are geniuses at creating us v. them mentalities, allowing them to control exactly what everyone is thinking (yes, even you).
Sharing their nonsense, even on Yea Forums, is exactly what they want. If you gave ignoring them a chance (you haven't and you won't) you'd be amazed at how quickly they'd crumble.

and you don't get to call me a "ragefaggot" when half your post is in all caps.

Attached: 192252586729801.jpg (890x656, 96K)