How do Jacksonfags cope with there being a superior LOTRs movie?

how do Jacksonfags cope with there being a superior LOTRs movie?

Attached: 1543348614502.png (630x1200, 1.34M)

Superior in what way?

every

t. 17 year old who just found out Baskshi movies exist and falls over himself to be contrarian about it even though everybody already knew about these movies for ages when the Jackson movies came out and still widely considered the Jackson movies better

This bait thread is bad and you should feel bad

It was more ambitious and captured the spirit of the books more closely, I'll give it that, but the low budget is a big drawback. That rotoscoped bits don't mesh well at all with the traditional animation.

The rotoscoping looks like shit in that movie.

/thread

he doesn't like coonskin

Pic related is superior animation for that era.

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 15K)

By being born before 9/11.

Lego Lord of the Rings cutscenes are better than this. Are you thinking yet?

giv sword and sorcery kino

Attached: 1567376457444.png (220x345, 155K)

By theirs being completed.

It doesn't show Galadriel's feet, though.

Actually, the animated version was so much better in every possible way. It's sad you zoomers and millenials will never get to experience growing up with magic like this and the original star wars and all those great movies from the 80s and instead grow up CGI soulless monkies flying around and garbage like the new LOTR and Marvel shit, holy shiT.

uhm sweaty?

Attached: 1552155358993.png (542x560, 301K)

Ugliest elf ever depicted? I'm good with no baboon feet.

op on suicide watch

Jackson stole tons of material from this movie. Even he knew he couldn't compete, so he just stole. Typical Hackson. When left on his own, he makes The Hobbit trilogy and exposes his shameful self.

Why did Anglo anime go away after the 70s?

>Actually, the animated version was so much better in every possible way
Said nobody born before 1995 who was able to watch LotR in theaters.