Animation is objectively superior to live action
Prove me wrong
Animation is objectively superior to live action
Prove me wrong
For children's content? Sure.
Live action is technically still animation
>All animation is for kids
>Anything that isn't rated PG-13 or above can't be art
Retarded tranny
No it's not
Yeah it is. Animation is a method in which pictures are manipulated to appear as moving images. That's literally movies and technically applies to real life as well since there is such a thing as planck time and therefore we are living through discrete frames of existence and not a continuous stream.
Yeah, you're gay. Filtered
Live action will always be superior
Ha suck it. You got PWNSIZZLED
You're right because animation allows you to do more with characters and settings, as well as showing things off (like feats of strength). Additionally, it's a superior way to adapt properties because of the reasons that I've already listed, as well as the fact that you can properly translate a characters appearance to the big screen, and can also have a proper voice for characters, no matter what the voice actor/actress looks like in real life.
You're right.
The real problem is that the medium's often misused for (and associated) with blockbuster trash or kiddie shit.
You’re right
Kys manchildren
>takes about 100 times longer to show anything
>objectively superior
based retard
Based Karen poster
Partially true for me. So far, Wall-E has been the only theatrical movie to make me emotional. However, Hallmark's Christmas TV movies are the only movies that can soften me up for the Christmas Spirit.
>Something that takes genuine effort and care
>Not superior to "do the same thing 100 times so the editor has more choice"
>So far, Wall-E has been the only theatrical movie to make me emotional.
>theatrical movie
Why the emphasis on "theatrical"?
No
I can not