You Were Never Really Here

Has anyone else seen this? This was unbelievably terrible.

It's like they fell for every cancerous modern art film cliche there is and any semblance of structure just dissolves like wet tissue paper. When a movie is paced slowly and deliberately like this it invites the mind to wander and ask questions, but the more you think about it the more the movie falls apart.

And I'm glad I didn't see it in theaters because a lot of the dialogue is indecipherable without subtitles. The subtitles label the auditory hallucinations he has 'Father', inviting an entirely new element into the film you wouldn't have gotten if you watch without subtitles. This is just a trashfire.

Attached: you were never really here.jpg (310x465, 28K)

One of the strongest movies of the decade

it's a good film and has a cute cunny

Attached: 1000464_03_TTCH_02.jpg (900x900, 226K)

it has no substance whatsoever

I liked the scene where he hugs the thug as he dies

Attached: 0484c9ea5bfba0d8f748698ca7c945a0_400x400.jpg (400x400, 18K)

it's an exposition on trauma, how a man with trauma relates himself to the world, how trauma presents itself, and how relationships are still possible in the face of that.

incredible how people can be this obtuse in 2019, maybe stick to capeshit next time

Attached: 36nqbwsh16u01.png (1920x800, 647K)

yeah the "thug" that literally wore the fucking american flag pin government agents wear when protecting politicians on his way to murder some guy's mom

i'm all for movies exposing government pedo rings and shit but this movie didn't know it's ass from it's elbow

it's 'about' that, but none of that is actually investigated in any meaningful capacity in the movie, it's just wallpaper themes to make you think there's something deep about the movie.

they just gave Joe stock quirks and called him a character, it's totally shallow

it was directed by a woman

I checked the timer when he was singing next to the dead hitman because I couldn't wait for the film to be over. Not a fan of emo stuff.

this movie is completely indefensible, the scene where he gives a kid a chocolate bar in Iraq who is immediately shot by another kid who steals it from them is comical.

Look how artistic this is, OP. You were wrong about this film.

Not much is directly said, but I'd argue that the juxtaposition of intense flashbacks with the avoidance of showing violence in the present day can be taken to show how traumatic incidents primarily cause harm after the actual event has passed. I'm sure you remember the book Le Grande Voyage by Smeprun, in which the events of the Holocaust are recalled by their impact on the main character's dreams of the future and memories of the past. What cannot be said must be shown.

damn dude, guess i haven't watched enough music videos to 'get it'

If you can honest to god say you got something out of this film then good on you. I think this movie has as much to say about it's supposed themes in the first five minutes as it's sum total by the end of the film. I think we ought to be more critical of this wave of cinema, because a large part of this style of movie is abstaining from traditional structure. Unless it's actually doing something creative, and not just imitating it's peers like this movie does, then these movies are deconstructive and subtract from our film consciousness, not contribute.

For instance while I didn't like it all that much, the movie "Hereditary" actually succeeds in creating an intimacy, a relentless uncomfortability with violence in it's first 30 minutes. I can't see how anything in YWNRH could actually affect an adult audience, it's totally quaint.

The only parts in which this movie abstains from traditional structure is in the depiction of violence and the amount of down time, which again is broken by flashbacks. It's all pretty thematic. The movie still follows a 3-act structure, climax, foreshadowing, etc. I don't think it's that subversive, and when it is it's in order to provide another perspective as faithfully as possible.
If you're looking for cinema which deconstructs in a wholesome and nonsubversive manner, watch The Dancer in the Dark. It's a good synthesis between this sort of movie and what I think you're looking for in a non-mainstream movie.

It was a good short stretched out to feature length. Not sure why, it was obviously never going to be popular.

i shouldn't have used the word 'structure', i meant the style of the film in general

they chose to have almost no dialogue and the character moments they replaced it with to inform us of Joe's character are stretched really thin because of it. Like that Iraq war flashback, it was comical. If they wanted to rely on moments like that they should have made sure they had really strong ones, as is i think the only exceptional character moment for Joe was when he buried his mother in the lake. little quirks like him holding the knife above his mouth, dropping it into the linoleum floor, crushing jellybeans, suffocating himself with plastic bags, his auditory hallucinations of his father abusing him; these are novel, and they're all we get. His memories of uncovering women killed by human trafficking being triggered by taking the asian women on the street's photo is very fleeting. There's just nothing to ground all these things.

Fuck Joker. This film is the real clown prince.

>If you're looking for cinema which deconstructs in a wholesome and nonsubversive manner, watch The Dancer in the Dark.

I'll watch that, thanks for the recommendation

One of the strongest contenders for most numale comment of the month.

Why is he playing a mentally ill incel in almost every movie?

Why not?

Was it necessary to deliberately ruin the action
scenes for artistic atmosphere shit ?

>you wouldn't have gotten if you watch without subtitles
you're dumb

the action scenes weren't 'ruined' as much as they were simply incompetent

That's not what i said dipshit, several line reads are inaudibly mumbled and the subtitles label his auditory hallucinations as being spoken by 'Father' which is never stated otherwise in the film. There's nothing ambiguous about the movie at all, there's barely anything to 'get'.

(You)

It's a masterpiece you retard. Kys.

no it fucking sucks

Shutup, clown.

even if it weren't outright bad, it'd be mediocre at best

>You Were Never Really Here
>I'm Still Here
>I'm Not There
>Being There
>Here

What's your top 5 Here kino?

bonus
>Hereditary

deserves it's own thread desu

Peak kino.

FPBP

The film is a massive pleb filter, especially on reddit and the philistines on this board.

Attached: 54874cb6eab8ea75399000d36401037.jpg (640x1037, 287K)

Whoever made the movie clearly wanted to create something fucked up while at the same time not wanting that the action scenes feel rewarding or cool for the audience. a 6/10 movie but saved by Joaquin Phoenix's performance

It's a 6/10 movie with some cliches thrown in. Especially the scene where he drowns in lake and decides to resurface.

Love Ramsay style and how she focuses on the trauma caused by violent acts rather than the violent acts themselves. Her previous two are great this is her best yet.

Attached: 72532072-76B8-4155-8FF4-744727D1CAEF.jpg (900x450, 53K)

Lol why is anyone engaging at all with this fucking fag

Movie's good idiot

It's almost like you could figure that out through context if you had enough brain cells to rub together

underrated bonus

fpbp every single time

I love this movie, but recognize its flaws - I just enjoy it.

Attached: 1567454871647.jpg (397x295, 94K)

Holy fuck dude if you really needed subtitled to know that was his father I'm not surprised your take on the movie is this bad. You're a pseudo at his finest right now. It's now bad but watch more film and maybe read or something before you try to present your opinion as an authority, you're pretty clearly not informed right now

Nice post. Done your homework for today?

B R A I N L E T
u
t

seriously, never have sex.

You have no substance whatsoever.