Find a flaw
Eyes Wide Shut
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
amazon.com
imdb.com
youtube.com
amazon.com
twitter.com
The ending where he stays with the cheating whore
Every frame in this film
The entire third act of the movie has been edited by you know who.
Oooooooooooh MORIA *Druuuuuuuuum Druuuuuuuuum druuuuuuuum*
the ending for starters
It's boring as fuck
Is there an existing conspiracy theory about Traumnovelle not existing and just being made up? Kubrick supposedly bought every existing copy
samefagging
I think the same thing about Anastasius Nordenholz's supposed book "Scientologie"
I'm sure these are easily-disproven stupid thoughts but I want to craft conspiracy theories around them
Zoom Zoom
amazon.com
it's really easy to find tho
Elaborate
Is there evidence it existed before the movie? How hard would it be to create a fake history?
Like I said, I'm being stupid, but we could brainstorm...
I'm doing it, bros. I'm making up a conspiracy theory and I'm going to seed it in a few months. It started here.
It did exist before the movie but like everything Kubrick does it's only loosely based on Traumnovelle. He may have stole a lot of the themes from it but the majority of it he reinvented for his film.
I mean there's a fucking TV Movie made in 1969 based on the book.
>imdb.com
Quit believing every stupid conspiracy theory you read or hear about. At least do some research first before you buy in.
Nice. I proposed creating this theory, though, I didn't believe it. Still going to go forward with it.
I hope this doesn't turn out like Foucault's Pendulum!
>Find a flaw
It's cult status among the waterheads and schitzos on Yea Forums.
actually it's basically a remake just a better version of it
you can watch the tv movie here:
youtube.com
Kubrik was killed because the studio wanted to edit out a third of the movie... and they did.
You're a BAD BAD THING
Everything.
"Herrr, I'm going to make up a conspiracy about a book even though records and mentions of the book existing before a movie are easy to find and well documented, reeeeeeeee"
Get a fucking hobby.
I guess the thrust of this theory is that history can be munged, but in any case, writing to suit my fancies is my hobby.
F I L T E R E D
No, the thrust of this is you're a spastic.
I'm really not sure why you're being so aggressive, but, fair point, it was a ridiculous premise. Which I identified, but hey, let's just leave it there. You are the victor in this interchange.
She was involved in the cult the whole time. He was in denial and his guilt also kept him from seeing it.
where to find the third act of the movie?
asking for a friend's friend.
>mfw Kubrick never managed to film Napoleon
>he was going to include the little red man who talked to Napoleon
>probably including references to the egyptian origin of Paris
Based rational poster