Post movies with hilariously bad special effects

I remember when I saw the movie in theaters. This scene is going on and a couple of girls start laughing and clapping at the oddly placed slapstick. Meanwhile, the rest of the theater was quiet as a grave. From the side of my eye, I even noticed my sister (who wanted to see the movie, so we went together) grimace. In hindsight, that should have been a bad sign about the quality of the trilogy.

Thank you, ive always thought this was horrendous editing and no one around me commented

>this is a 2019 movie

WHAT
THE
FUCK

HOW...?

Surely this isn't legit, what is it?

Attached: blade cgi closeup.jpg (470x577, 55K)

nigga the thing is great. get out of Yea Forums

but that an oh no no no no from me lmao

It's from the Hellboy movie that came out this year.

What's funny is how proud Ridley Scott sounds with that edit in the Director's commentary. Also, the destruction of the Nostromo looks like absolute shit, and the Alien getting blasted out of the escape pod doesn't look great.

At first I thought you were posting the 2011 Thing, then I realized you are a retard.

Not him but the monster at the end of the original really does look bad, not so much the effect but the design is just super lame.

Needs more cgi
Why does it explode like 3 times?

Attached: The_Thing_Alien.jpg (640x260, 18K)

>Why does it explode like 3 times?
No clue, also the explosions get more and more ridiculous looking

i will NEVER not be mad that they replaced the practical effects in 2011 thing. wasnt somebody starting a gofundme to get them to release a version with the original effects?

What the fuck were they thinking??
No wonder this was one of the worst sequels ever

This really wouldn't be that bad if they just put an insert shot of Ripley trying to prop up Ash's head inbetween the two shots, or shot the real head from a completely different angle.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 12.06.24 PM.png (520x338, 299K)

Also the ending, with the reveal that the Spaceship that crashed was an alien zoo that the thing assimilated would have been really cool to see. As the ending is just gibberish.

Anyone who's seen Replicas can vouch for the awful special effects. They're barely TV-commercial-tier

>the Spaceship that crashed was an alien zoo
Pretty interesting, I had no idea about that. acutally thats the first i have heard of anything like it but google gives me nothing. Care to gimme a link?

Attached: please dont nigger me niggertaro.gif (754x370, 2.68M)

Christ

I thought this was some tv Walking Dead shit. Damn.

monsterlegacy.net/2013/03/03/the-thing-pilot-alien-creature-deleted-fired/
Here. They were also going to show the Thing's true form, which was shown in the practical effects reel on Youtube. That parts kind of lame though, there's no way you could show the Thing's true form and have it not be underwhelming.

Attached: thing true form.jpg (278x500, 15K)

Public Enemies.

Attached: images (19).jpg (600x338, 16K)

this

Attached: titanic ps2 intro.webm (1920x1080, 2.8M)

Worse than the dragon emperor?

Attached: deepfake.webm (1422x600, 2.94M)

coming this fall to Playstation 2, Xbox, and Gamecube systems

I hate that faggot James Cameron. Michael Biehn was told for 9 months that he was going to get the role of the villain in Avatar, and then was unceremoniously replaced by Stephen Lang without being told. When asked about this James Cameron said that he would consider giving Biehn a mocap role in Avatar 4. Fuck that cunt.

LOL never noticed these before. not horrible for 1997, but seems unnecessary. James is an autist tho and will never not use CGI.

the only shit scene in an otherwise great movie...and somehow raimi still got away with it and it will go down as a classic.

how does he do it lads?

Attached: dragme.jpg (481x289, 38K)

the ending too

Attached: 456564.webm (1920x800, 2.67M)

the entire movie is absolute shit

>"no"

shit taste

has anyone here seen harbinger down? was it any good?

I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed the had not being able to stand up. Fucking horrible effects and edit.

What movie?

Alien (1979)

no

yeah

Attached: 1552526637393.jpg (890x850, 141K)

Attached: 8EDB5B78-2806-4AB8-B90B-01D4C19E2C7D.jpg (1465x824, 165K)

Based

Eat shit

That looks alright for a 20 year old movie

gotcha

youtube.com/watch?v=wH7Q2y9iKPU

Retard.

i just watched it. wow that was bad, but the effects looked great.

Attached: Air Force One.webm (1920x800, 2.98M)

That gave me a fucking headache.

>Jurassic park did it so we can do it too

Late 90s and early 2000s movies were something else

They used a fucking GoPro in a shot as well

holy shit

That movie was a decent flick. Way better than any capeshit.

And it was Sean Connery farewell to acting

That was the worst part of the entire thing, did they think people wouldn't notice? It's only a second or two but it's so obvious, I don't understand why they even needed to include that shot at all.

I guess Biehn should've got it in writing like anyone with two brain cells to rub together would have. Do you think he had some kind of "right" to have that job? No. Cameron can hire anyone he wants if there isn't a legal contract saying otherwise.

see how easy it is

Attached: Alien I.webm (970x412, 2.73M)

This, Black Panther, Thor 3, & Homecoming.

Attached: Avengers-Infinity-War-saw-Bruce-Banner-use-the-Hulkbuster-armour-on-his-own-1462578.jpg (590x350, 37K)

sppoted the cumplebbrain lmao

Why couldn't they use a real mansion for this scene...

Attached: Jurassic World 2 Lockwood Manor.png (1920x800, 2.91M)

AL, WHAT'RE YOU DOIN' UP? GET BACK IN BED

Attached: doc.jpg (474x379, 25K)

Attached: DavidByrne_HulkbusterSuit.jpg (590x350, 87K)

Attached: 34554.png (1107x806, 1.34M)

Han me bookey...

Why don't they just release a cut with practical effects and call it a "director's cut" or something? There's enough people asking for it, do they just hate money?

No one left in Hollywood that knows how to paint?

Attached: Matte_Painting_Tutorials-1000x576.jpg (1000x576, 54K)

I remember seeing this in 2004 for the 25 yr anniversary. I was convinced they'd have done something to improve it but they didn't.

Attached: IT-SCC.webm (1000x563, 1.5M)

Everyone just seems so uninterested.

I don't understand what the fuck they were doing here, it almost looks like a miniature but CGI at the same time, weird

I agree partially, I love Biehn, but if his career is any indication he clearly isn't the greatest business man. Cameron is still a fag though, and it was a dick move to jerk him around like that. Same thing happened to Biehn in regards to Alien3, but that clearly wasn't Cameron.

Attached: G-GC.webm (1280x544, 2.95M)

>Pretty much only bad effect in the entire movie.
Maybe you should take a closer look at the Aliens. You can literally tell that it's a bunch of people in cheap suits.

Yeah, this is literally all that needed to be done

iirc, much like Event Horizon that footage has been lost to time, so it would be impossible.

Alien = aliens?

This is pretty much what I heard. I imagine this is what people would have thought about the Thing prequel if it released with the original effects in tact.

>chestburster sliding across the table
youtu.be/nPQ7om598OM?t=125

I watched it for the first time early this year and that part completely took me out of the movie.

Attached: 1563132598785.jpg (1024x576, 57K)

Looks as bad as the bike chase crash scene in Gemini Man

any of those films from the 2000s that used cgi for impossible camera shots.

You say that but I think there's only a couple of bad effects shots in Aliens, like one shot of 2 or so xeno's in the final big colonial marines scene and one wide shot of the Xeno Queen running that has some terrible puppeteering. The Alien in Alien looks bad a lot more than that, from the shot where he tries to give Tom Skeritt a hug to literally any shot of it from the last 15 minutes of the film. It only looks good in closeups and the 3 quarters shot of it descending on Harry Dean Stanton.

God the new hellboy was ass

This is another one of the shots in this movie that are terrible, but I don't know that there would be any other way to do this effect convincingly

Nice bait nigger

Attached: dominion.webm (1916x1080, 2.84M)

*PULL UP* *PULL UP*

TERRAIN TERRAIN, WHOOP WHOOP

TAKE A LOOK AT THESE HANDS
TAKE A LOOK AT THEEEEESE HAAAANDS

Attached: 1969-moonlanding-vin_480x360.jpg (480x360, 73K)

Attached: gotta_go_fast.webm (1920x800, 2.98M)

The same company later released a movie with the practical effects they intended to use for the Nu-Thing, something like Harbinger Down, with Lance Henriksen.
The movie's script was shit, but the visual effects...
The effects were worse. They looked like ass.
Which makes me think that maybe the producers of the new Thing were forced to hastily introduce cheap cgi at the last moment because the movie looked even worse withut them.

Attached: daddy shark doo doo.webm (1920x1080, 1.78M)

Attached: 1517291919382.gif (277x342, 1.99M)

What movie?

it's from the last xXx

Attached: cgi smile.webm (950x798, 120K)

Dear god in heaven

This one bums me out. Paul Schrader, who's never directed a bad film, had the final cut literally ripped out of his hands at the last minute. Reshoots and a shitload of post-production nonsense were done.

Although, on the other hand, the horrendous quality of the animation makes it so uncanny that it almost works.

I was hoping someone would post this, straight out of the n64 graphics, clip

someone post some stuff fomr It chapter 2, I've only seen that 2s webm of the clider

This is the most retarded shit

I almost feel bad for the actors. From the actual shoot, it looks like they'd have every reason to believe the final scene wouldn't look half bad.

Why is he so smug?

Attached: day_of_the_rope.webm (1280x720, 2.78M)

Unmitigated shit.

I remember never understanding what the big fucking deal with Avatar was.

4:53 minutes of pure cringe.

There are youtubers who make better CG for their dumb video game/movie reviews

>no chris Evan's laughing face in the suit

Please tell me an edit exists.

Yeah I'm sure the effects are what ruined the movie not the shit script....

youtube.com/watch?v=HCNfoMQsif8

kek i don't remember this ep.

>muh not-Felucia
>muh space furries
>muh suicides

Attached: furry_sigourney.jpg (900x506, 63K)

good effects would've brought it from a 2/5 to a 3/5 at least

god I remember this

I knew exactly what I was clicking on

New Power Rangers looking good!

Okay, sorry but I'm stupid and addicted to cgi.
What is wrong in these scenes?

It looks awful in motion

Attached: hobbit game1426066700305.webm (889x500, 2.77M)

unironically this

Don't quote nobody.

>the fish throw
did they really do that

And that's why you don't fire Guillermo DelTaco.
Because stupid people that don't cgi cancerify what could have been the perfect trilogy that would have made the comics just bad

>tfw you stuff so many anal beads up your ass that you die

This can not be real

christ...

this would look decent if they hadn't tried to add a breathing effect

What is wrong with this?

yes. you should watch that scene on youtube just to laugh at it. my theatre was rolling.

>seems unnecessary not to replace the faces of stunt doubles that you can clearly look at
okay nigger

What is wrong?

Jesus this is worse than fucking Reboot. How was this in an actual movie?

Attached: ckpget8cin931.jpg (640x635, 43K)

Nothing, that's the point. A nice establishing shot with a matte painting, enhanced with some cg if necessary can be more effective than a completely cgi house.

It looks so tiny too

so bizarre

an edit exists

Look very closely.

yes

youtube.com/watch?v=nM7byUTrSZA

Attached: hobbit green screen.webm (1280x720, 1.56M)

I never understood the problem with this. It looks fine
If you hadn't seen the trailer where she doesn't smile you wouldn't even have known

this is unironically great

You can watch a making of with the original creature effects people. They did great stuff.

Looks like a fucking PS2 game kek

it's the fucking initial rendering that doesn't have any detail added to it yet you faggot
it still looks shit in the fim but you're ridiculously retarded

I don't know, the chariot when it breaks?

Yeah, why am I not surprised. Marvel Studios has become the GOAT in having scenes with unnecessary CGI backgrounds, when it could’ve easily been done practically.

They couldn’t find a real building, a real room, and simply have the prop master make a double barrel handgun for this scene? Really???

Man, talk about these films being made like fast food. Don’t bother to scout locations or get props ready and taking your time in pre-production, just use green screen and VFX for a lot of it!! Quick, simple, and cheap. Just like fast food.

>yes people will totally buy this XD

Attached: the thing.jpg (2064x994, 112K)

Is that Ian McShane? What the fuck?

There is a visible and modern gas canister that flips the chariot.

>the GOAT
no one in history has ever used that abbreviation in a negative way
lurk moar

Since Marvel literally create the plots in editing, it makes sense for them to shoot even mundane scenes on greenscreen to give them more flexibility.
I'm sure the appearance of the dart gun was a potential committee sticking point eg. couldn't look too threatening or had to match a toy, hence generic tracking prop for filming.

That's not a bad effect, the director just knew nobody but some autists who do frame for frame would notice.
Watch any Robert Rodriguez movie with commentary, he talks about how he sometimes didn't care about continuity because nobody would notice anyway.

Do you like shaky cam, terrible lighting, and a whole lot of awful filler between your monster scenes?

I'm honored!

It looked cool in 3d though

How much is the Mouse paying ya?

WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT A JUMP SCARE DON’T YOU KNOW I EXCL

Atrocity

Attached: homecoming.gif (498x212, 1.96M)

saved me the trouble

Academy Award...

Attached: NYPWvzB.png (500x708, 500K)

They should care, if they are so called artists that care about the representation of their works. They are not insulting themselves so much as they are insulting their audience.

Attached: RE-MR-FSAP.webm (1000x542, 2.88M)

Can we talk about the CGI used for making RDJ taller?

t. some autist who does frame for frame
no one cares
you can try throwing out big speeches about how disingenuous these artists are, no one will care

what am I looking at?

The crotch bulges are shopped, right?

Film-makers have multiple awards for editing, just pointing out those who were shit at editing. It is a point of professional pride to have such awards, for film-makers, and many don't have any professional pride to clean up their own work.

She has a bite guard on the end of her flashlight she puts in here mouth, something that has no precedent in actuality.

Not cgi. Its just platform shoes to make him look taller.

That's somehow even sadder

Remember what?

the cgi hairs

There was no Academy Award. Why are you inventing shit?

I have no idea what you're talking about

Black Panther won three (3) academy awards

The thread is about special effects.

It does a passable job considering how big a ripoff it is. The actual effects start out good, then take a nosedive in the middle, then come back up again somewhat. Otherwise about what this guy said.

Attached: pastedImage_1.jpg (700x300, 51K)

Dark souls 2 intro

I don't have caps but in Bumblebee, the worst CG surprisingly wasn't on the Transformers
There's a shot of a guy cliff diving but the splash is way too soon for the perspective of the shot
And
There's a part early on with the girl looking in the rearview mirror and they didn't crop her face right so it stuck out over the edges
If this thread is still up later I'll see about caps

This is all CGI, the fuck differentiates Avatar from being labeled as “animation”

Might be shit, but effective. Genuinly did not see that coming when I saw the movie in theatres.

Honestly this was the worst creature effect in The Thing, but still not too bad

Sawthis in the theater since I read a book about John Dillinger, movie was shit

Attached: Enchantress.webm (854x480, 2.94M)

>a couple of girls start laughing and clapping at the oddly placed slapstick

Were they black

Attached: Enchantress DDR.webm (854x480, 2.89M)

Attached: Enchantress A.webm (854x480, 2.93M)

Attached: Enchantress B.webm (854x480, 2.91M)

>The Thing prequel was ruined because people are too fucking stupid to understand how the thing's biology works
Nuke the retarded cunts from orbit, Jesus Christ.

Attached: 1498421828515.webm (1200x504, 2.85M)

I saw this in theaters, and I remember thinking the effects looked pretty bad, even as a 14 year old in the 90's

Attached: 1510016816391.jpg (1742x879, 124K)

h-he is fast

Scene from Lockout (2012). Looks like a PS2 game:

youtube.com/watch?v=KTkk5aYf3PA

Attached: MV5BMjIyOTQwODI1OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjU3MjA1Nw@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,648,1000_AL_.jpg (648x1000, 183K)

Fuck, that's a dick move on Cameron's part. Michael Biehn is underrated.

hey I remember this part
Reed Richards goes off grid because of some stupid drama reason and somehow this nerdy scientist instantly becomes amazing at hiding from the entire US government and also becomes a badass fighter
apparently being stretchy makes you Bourne

this looks like ps1/ mid 90's pc game cut scene tier

this shot was a prank right?

Attached: casino dummy.jpg (600x371, 72K)

Why did they do this? Is she incapable of smiling?

Somebody got images?

They didn't do anything you idiot

Did they ever release this on consoles/pc? I played the first two games.

didn't expect that from a new deadwood movie.

how can he use deepfake???

My download just finished, gimme a sec

Working on a webm of the dive

Attached: Screenshot_20190910-180426~01.jpg (1920x1080, 137K)

It's not really deepfake, it's just poor masking

Worst shit ever

youtube.com/watch?v=j972H8SnZRs

it's stylised

You guys always exaggerate when you say something looks like PS2 graphics. That's more like PS3 tier.

Dumbest shit I've ever seen

He isnt even posed like the armor as he gets out. He's mid step inside this bodysuit mech.

Attached: 1568135095391.png (570x480, 342K)

Attached: 1543120647430.gif (346x255, 1.68M)

Jesus Christ. Give the nigger an actual prop gun, ffs.

>0:58
>1:05
>1:51
>2:07
>2:32
>2:58

autism

Biehn was on track to become a huge star, but he declined the lead in Near Dark for The Seventh Sign and Rampage, both bombed and it killed a lot of his careers momentum. Biehn's quote about getting shafted over Avatar was "I've been disappointed enough in my life that it didn't depress me for more than 24 hours", and that coupled with his chance to star in an Aliens sequel continuing to get fucked up (the original Alien3, Blomkamp's Alien 5) really makes me feel sorry for the guy.

it's not good enough to be animation, simple as

Attached: binocular boy.jpg (600x300, 58K)

undisputably the greatest scene in all of cinema

isn't it just a colony of cells?

This movie was absolute shit when it came to CGI. It was basically a Netflix anime. How anybody liked this shit is beyond me.

why would anyone want to live on such a shitty planet anyway?

It's more of a fuck up than a cringey effect.

Remember all the articles that came out when Avatar released about how fans would get depressed after the film ended and tgey had to leave the virtual world of avatar, so they would see it time and time again?
What the fuck was the appeal

He's talking about how the Thing's transformations work. The TL;DR is that the original climax of the Prequel featured the Thing perfectly replicating the alien species that piloted the Ship it was passenger to. Test audiences didn't understand that The Thing could perfectly replicate a creature (even though that's the whole premise), and not have it be a sickening abomination so it was CG'd over with digital blocks.

Ian is pure kino but once in a while he'll go 'yeah, put me in this obviously garbage project I don't give a shit just give me money'
Dude could be regarded as one of the contemporary greats

Looks like the feet of the pilot were designed to look like the hands of the half transformed Bennings-Thing, Implying that the Thing was shuffling through past assimilation as it consumed Bennings.

a cute

jesus christ what a soulless movie

youtube.com/watch?v=D01mdGW9-Zg

That shot was supposed to be “innovative” hahahahah

Lmao, this is some shitty bait if I do say so myself

Who the fuck would build a place like that and just have a dirt front yard

Not even the movie in development but Avatar 4
what the fuck

Yeah, James Cameron legitimately comes off as nueroatypical in that interview, and is really dismissive of how he treated Biehn.

No wars to get out the bloodlust and it turns into weird behaviour

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 11K)

He's coming to get you

Flashlight mouth grips exist in real life as an electrician/mechanic tool, so you can see what you're doing and have both hands free. To be fair I just now looked it up and saw it was a thing.

good for 1994

Holy shit that was cringe
Also why didn't he just stop himself after Van Damme pushed him, he had like 10 feet

>You can literally tell

as opposed to figuratively tell, right? fucking faggot redditor

maybe... all actors are just people in cheap suits... woah...

I'll always laugh at this dude

Attached: 1555186577069.png (382x452, 163K)

just use the real actors dumbfuck

screwed themselves over by making the car brushed metal, reflective surfaces like that are like twice as hard to render realistically in CG.

My background is combat arms, and I've known a treasure trove of folks in PMCs.

That shit doesn't exist in practical use, at all in military or PMC. You never do that or just suck it up. If a uncomfortable mouth piece is a problem, you have a lot of higher priority problems. Anyone who believes this shit is practical in combat is a retard.

It was 1995, you see it in the theatres you don't notice it. You watch it on VHS and do you know how hard it was to get a VCR to stop on a specific frame?

Attached: green guy fucking batmobile.webm (1280x720, 1.88M)

This isn't as bad as I remember it looking but it still looks off

Attached: dive.webm (853x480, 2.49M)

What the fuck is wrong with his hands?

Either prospective or cgi side effect

Who is that cunt and why is the god emperor there?

Attached: 400px-Lord_of_Mankind.jpg (400x518, 77K)

It's a resident evil movie you spastic.

You...........think the God Emperor is black?

I was about to say it might have had something to do with providing space for the dinosaur animatronics, but they were mostly crappy CG in this, weren't they?

Attached: auschawiotz.png (1600x680, 313K)

he obviously is

He suffers from Black Hand.

apparently he was from anatolia where civilization began so he'd be quite swarthy

why didn't just open his eyes?

Attached: FILE019.gif (199x197, 155K)

He was being a bitch

well for starters the the right wheel on the chariot is inexplicably jutting a foot away from the body just so it could clip the wall and you can see the break-away mechanism underneath, then a blanket covering a compressed air tank falls off as the chariot flips on its side and the tank and valves are plainly visible, then the wall explodes into dust the instant the fluff from the gladiator's helmet touches it

jej

the 'guy' in the chariot has herculean arm and forearm strength.

aome motherfucker's always trying to ice-skate uphill

So it shouldn't be good? That we should expect utter nonsense in lieu of a decent movie? If that is the total measure of what makes any movie good, I'm glad not to know you.

Just one of many. I'll never understand the shoulder pads. Are they supposed to be extra strong or is it just to make them look broader?

Why the fuck do they listen to test audiences? 90% of viewers don't even see what's going on anyway, they just see pretty moving shapes and actors that they like making facial expressions. Any time test audiences are taken seriously, a movie is ruined.

It's still acted in real time by actual actors. The CG is all dependent on motion capture, of course animation techniques are used to fill the gaps, but there are still real performances being recorded on physical sets. It's advanced digital puppetry. Plus not all of the movie was focused on the nekked furries. You wouldn't call Who Framed Roger Rabbit an animated film, but neither were simply live action either.

Attached: av.jpg (640x314, 44K)

Attached: t2 2.webm (1704x720, 1.03M)

So basically they couldn't comprehend the alien being disguised as another alien? It was either humans or tentacle-fleshfuck for them?

Attached: tombstonerain.webm (1280x532, 2.77M)

Who is going to play him in the inevitable biopic?

Attached: 1948.jpg (750x750, 78K)

Yeah

>Alternate Diego's death

I really don't see how the mouth piece is nonsense. Just because you don't have one doesn't mean it isn't a good idea.

I've seen rain like that irl

All of them. CGI was a mistake

Attached: DimpledFeistyGalapagostortoise.webm (1845x991, 578K)

That running part reminds me of those "gonna get you" gifs of the TGWTG guys

God I fucking hate the High Voltage Arc. The final fight with Valentine was the perfect ending. If SBR ended with Johnny killing Valentine and then one issue of him finishing the race, making amends with his father, and then getting on the boat for the hontou ni hontou ni arigatou Gyro scene it would have been perfect. High Voltage was only in there either for fanservice or because Araki thought killing Diego with his own head was clever enoguh to warrant the arc.

This is extremely depressing because it shows every detail of this piece of shit scene was meticulously planned out. Makes George Lucas look like a fucking saint.

Attached: 1518198705724.webm (1264x526, 759K)

The Star Wars prequels always gave the whimsical impression of a very rich child playing with his lifesized toys, and I thought that was actually kind of charming.
It's clear with the Hobbit that I'm not meant to get that from this, that I'm supposed to take this totally seriously and think it's the most badass shit.

That was terrible. The new one also has some outrageous CGI. Why not simply get a double and film the actual thing

Based & PS2pilled.

This still looks good to me.

Attached: 1559873445816.webm (1024x426, 2.83M)

wtf

Attached: 23535.jpg (625x446, 54K)

It was kinda ok until the slowmo bullshit

>She has a bite guard on the end of her flashlight she puts in here mouth, something that has no precedent in actuality.
You're a fucking sperg, man. When I see a unique accessory on a character, I go, 'oh cool she has a custom piece so she can do this thing she's doing in this scene right now', but you talk about something that's literally there as if it were a bug

>background is combat arms
>he can't enjoy movies with any hint of opur8n'
>has to autistically critique their kit and tactics because they are always shit
iktfb

Looks quite phallic
I may just jack off to this scene

Cringe

Attached: alita face.webm (1124x1050, 2.99M)

Nice toybox

Her bug eyes are the reason I decided not to watch this

I think they worked extra-hard on the first one because they had something to prove / had to sell the concept of realistic robots.
But then they got everyone would keep buying it and stop to work for it to be good

Attached: transfroemrs.jpg (292x172, 12K)

>The Canyons
>Dying of the Light
>Dog Eat Dog
He's a hack

Attached: Paul+Schrader+James+Deen+Canyons+Premieres+eCL9P4GgKVWl.jpg (594x448, 67K)

as bad as this is i have come to expect this in Vin Diesel movies. So to me its exactly what i came to see

youtube.com/watch?v=Yxk_A4Y-9hI

Attached: ctrl c ctrl v.jpg (800x500, 82K)

Michael Bay cgi gringefests is my reason to be on Yea Forums

You know what determines being the guys that spot IEDs, and those who don't?

not thinking you are better than the IED. We never are, so never presume you are.

Stupidity screams at you when you see it. If you think you will survive carrying such stupidity, then enjoy your grave.
>being a sperg is half of the job
>there are plenty of people that take their job more serious than you.

The answer is in the question.

If anyone has ever tried to kill seriously kill you, you wouldn't enjoy it either. Tell me of your own tour(s), Why do you think you know any better?

i was shocked when i saw it and i was like 13. its the only thing i remember from the movie.

how are you old enough to post on Yea Forums

In Bay's defense, he lobotomized an extra, so they lost a couple days of filming and just had to reuse old footage.

Actually Fallen Kingdom utilized more animatronics than any of the JP movies besides the first one, out of all the sequels it has the most amount of them. It's utilized in up close and personal scenes like Blue's blood transfusion with the T-Rex and that entire T-Rex in the cage scene used one too. I remember a Stegosaurus one as well, and the Indoraptor was a lot of animatronics.

However, I don't think a single scene of Dinosaurs that took place in the exterior shots of the Lockwood mansion used animatronics so there's no excuse for that god awful cgi house

Attached: Rex.png (1280x1648, 3.17M)

Thor ragnarok shows that in action. Cate Blanchett attacks thor in a city in the trailer. Unlike what happens in the movie.

Don't see what's so bad about this.
Low budget B-Movie. Great effects for a movie which has mostly LL cool J talking to his parrot in it
It's so bad that I like it again. At least you can see what's happening. Such a crazy CGI thing to animate with no money or ideas. Still fine imo.

>If anyone has ever tried to kill seriously kill you, you wouldn't enjoy it either
took me a few years to enjoy shooty movies again and i still won't watch iraq war films
hard to watch anything about afghanistan too even though i haven't been
>Why do you think you know any better?
injured in OIF 7, infantry

>legolas being elf combat jesus
>the autistic barrel spin
>the complete disregard for physics of any sort
>the shoddy console-tier CG
that's not even half of it. i was retarded before but now i'm retardeder from watching that

Attached: 1501087323752.jpg (568x479, 46K)