Movie file is over 4 GB

Why do people shit on YIFY so much? I usually watch movies from my computer hooked up to a CRT, and you don't notice the low bitrate at all

>not going to the filming location and recording the movie yourself

Attached: 534987394875.jpg (306x306, 15K)

I never used YIFI, but I use RARBG and files are typically 2GB for 1h45m movies in 1080 and they look perfectly fine on my 21" monitor.

They actually weren't that bad. Sure they sounded terrible and I would never get anything I meant to save by them but just watching a random movie on an iPad with earbuds everything was fine.

>movie is on only one film reel

That's a good thing. Feature films were a mistake

Its just bantx m8. Yify was meant for 3rd world or quick downloads no fuss. Same how everyone here seems to hate Shadman and Daiz when in fact they're well liked by the community

>he doesn’t convert to 800 by 600 with 96 Kbps audio as he doesn’t understand how much additional disc-space can be saved with no impact on replay quality.

Yify quality used to be really bad in the old days and people memed the 10/10 video 10/10 audio that people would post.
yify quality today is much better

>his 4K is only 56GB
lol? I'm downloading 1080p remuxes coming in at 40GBs

Untouched BluRay 1080p is the minimum I'll accept for any movie or TV Show.
Untouched UHD BluRay 2160p is what I'm mostly consuming at the moment. Here is what a season of what I'm currently watching looks like:
Westworld.S02.2160p.UHD.BluRay.REMUX.HDR.HEVC.Atmos-EPSiLON (198 GB)
That's not a typo, if you're not used to this. It's indeed 200 GB per season. I download it in one night on my 35 down /3 up Mbps assymetrical connection.
I subscribe to Netflix, but it's a pain to watch 1080p at 3 Mbps bitrate. To get 4K on Netflix I would need to buy a new TV and new computer due to their DRM bullshit requeriments for 4K.

Attached: Westworld_(season_1_soundtrack)_cover.jpg (316x316, 19K)

UHD releases use h.265 HEVC codec. This format deliver the same quality for significantly less data (up to 50% less) due to superior compression technology compared to an h.264 AVC encode.
Bad thing about h.265 is that is takes a fuck ton more time to encode and much more CPU resource to decode. So old and slow hardware will struggle at encoding and playback.

Attached: h265-codec-vs-h264-codec.jpg (736x508, 63K)

all the h265 videos I've watched suck compared to h264 counterparts

>RARBG_do_not_steal.exe

Attached: oyvey.jpg (194x300, 14K)

It's true. There are indeed shit releases where h.265 looks weird because of the low bitrate they chose. Now try a 2160p UHD h.265 release, even if you have an 1080p display: enjoy a balls-to-the-wall ultra sharp perfect image. On an 1080p display, an untouched BluRay 2160p release is noticeably superior to untouched BluRay 1080p release.

Attached: 1508153020_life.2017.2160p.bluray.remux-min.jpg (795x1200, 165K)

Can someone please explain to my why every show aired before 2009 only exists on the Internet as a series of .avis posted at least 11 years ago?

Attached: dogbert.png (230x230, 69K)

Cuh.

What program do hackers use to make the files smaller

>anime series is 120gb

Attached: 8.jpg (1242x1813, 147K)

Knee.

ffmpeg

Handbrake.
For real.

You are wrong, but .avi is an older format that had more supported devices than .mkv a decade ago. Still, I was downloading mp4 and mkv back then too.

>movie file is over 700mb and not XVID

Attached: 4eaSRKQ.gif (310x211, 1.44M)

The shadman hate is legit. For a long time it looked as though he was trying to be as edgy and repulsive as he could with stuff like butthole piercings and the time he decided to draw porn of his mother for mother's day.
Over the last few years he's improved a great deal though

Because most rippers dont bother ripping old shows that hardly anyone watch anymore when they can rip the lastest shows and films.

They got better shit to do and ripping shows and films take alot of time.

Unless they come out with some remaster, which is usually only for the most popular shows.

I don't get it, so do you have a 4K TV/monitor to watch 4K on or not?

fuck off daiz no one likes you but your discordie orbiters

Ah, 700 MB Xvid were the days. Strange to think we used to be savages.

>Westworld.S02.2160p.UHD.BluRay.REMUX.HDR.HEVC.Atmos-EPSiLON (198 GB)
Bad show, not worth the quality.

So this is what advanced autism looks like.

it's always how this kind of people always end downloing the shitty stuff no worth the time let alone all that size

AV1 encodes when? I know they finally freezed it a while back and latest ffmpeg builds have implemented it. I'm guessing it still hasn't quite matured enough to be worth using. Hevc is still slow as fuck.

>movie file is either less than 5gb, or bigger than 25
why is this keep happening

>watch hooked up to my dogshit 20 year old monitor
>looks fine to me

Attached: 1556966874766.png (583x482, 119K)

>mfw i just downloaded 9 gigs of the Disaster Artist movie because it was the only available version in English and I really wanted to hear James Franco’s Tommy Wiseau impression even tho the 1.5 gig dubbed version (which I thought was in English before I downloaded it) had a really great quality

>AV1 encodes when?
When the encoder is production ready and fast. When dav1d is 1.0.

advanced autism would be the guy on here who refuses to watch shows and films on anything but VHS because he's stuck in nostalgia land.

For me it's 20-30GB h265, the perfect compromise between quality and size.

every movie i download has about 750MB because the actresses nowadays are 5/10 with a make up on and they’re ultra fuckin ugly in 4K i don’t need to see that shit
i hope the 2020’s actresses will be beautiful again like in the 90’s and 80’s

50gb x265 10bit color atmos..

Attached: mmmmmm.jpg (792x750, 62K)

>i hope the 2020’s actresses will be beautiful again like in the 90’s and 80’s
You need to get out into the real world buddy.

If that is your biggest issue, just slap a soft focus filter on your player you pleb.

Attached: 14134095831673565.jpg (336x302, 50K)

Same

>movie is split into two 700 MB files so it can fit on CDs.

Attached: comfy frog.jpg (253x229, 48K)

>movie is split into two 700 MB files
and put into folders CD1 and CD2

>part1.xvid
>part2.xvid

Attached: HELP.jpg (775x1263, 71K)

You do not need a 4K display. You can watch 4K content on a 1080p display. The 4K source content will be resized (downscaled) to 1080p. This downscaling process still yields a noticeably better image than a untouched, native 1080p BluRay image, especially if your screen is big and you sit close to it.

Netflix is a different story. Netflix's DRM anti-piracy protection and hardware compliance checks for secure display protocol (HDMI HDCP 2.2) as an attempt to block screen rippers and also requires modern CPU architectures (latest CPU generations) to assure playback performance in order to enable higher bitrates and resolution.

Meaning you're much more likely to get 4K on pirated sources than official streaming sources. 4K streaming is just way too demanding with artificial DRM demands (buy a new TV, goy; also buy a new CPU/mobo/RAM combo, goy), where many people get stuck at low bitrate 1080p on Netflix because they lack the hardware.

The only logical way up to 4K is piracy, not three thousand dollars on hardware upgrades.

Attached: MV5BZmUzMThjOTItZGY4ZS00ODcwLTliNTMtYjVkM2JmY2QxNmRhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzgxODM4NjM@._V1_UY1200_CR93,0,6 (630x1200, 86K)

If a 2 hour movie isn't at least 9GB you're doing something wrong

Attached: IMG-20150902-WA0019.jpg (1600x916, 101K)

>he fell for the "yify rips are shit" meme

>tfw downloaded 80GB remux of 2001 odyssey
>hype it to friends and say we can watch it on get together
>all the popcorn and soda ready, friends are eager to see the acclaimed kubrick film
>take out my portable hdd, connect it to the computer
>as the film starts, artifacts appear, it's choppy
>the computer fans are going full blast on the other room
>task manager says CPU is at 100%
Felt so embarrassing. We watched REC instead, in hindsight it was good, fit the current mood better.

Attached: m.jpg (279x326, 10K)

Attached: F0C5E918-D88B-4AF8-9650-D75899E2F532.jpg (1000x1000, 84K)

It's difficult to grasp it in the begining, but really good at the end of season 1 and onwards. Lots of mind fucks. I like it.

I don't chose quality based on how good a title is rated. That sounds retarded to me. So you would watch a title you deem a 5/10 at 720p, making the experience even worse? I select quality based on the value of my time. If I'm spending time on it, it should be the absolute highest quality I can get. I actually give more shits to the content when it's in a higher quality. It becomes more valuable to me. Eats more disk space too. Gives me more motivation to consume it and dispose of it faster so I can move on to download and watch the next UHD shit.

Attached: 1492446530206.jpg (529x480, 64K)

That's what you get for trying to play h.265 on a potato. Try a different player, like Kodi. If it doesn't work, buy a new CPU.

Attached: 2 THUMBS UP.jpg (515x589, 70K)

> AML-S905X-CC (Le Potato)
> H.265
> HDMI 2.0 with 4K HDR support

libre.computer/products/boards/aml-s905x-cc/#tabs_desc_684_1

Attached: PoE-hack-diy.jpg (559x282, 28K)

nigga, do realise that not everyone has direct access to the deflated bouncy castle that is your mind. I dont get what the fuck you're trying to say.

Attached: 1287551791124.jpg (960x1800, 257K)

I am aware of it, the 4:4:4 color information is still active for 4k->1080p so pretty good increase in image quality over regular 1080p, but I just found it interesting that you are this interested in quality but not willing to upgrade to a 4K display.

Also I stay away from people who use such terms like goy, so unfortunately our correspondence must end here.

>.wmv

>Bitching about aa 4B file size

Nigga try playing vidya in 2019. I just downloaded Gears 5 and it was 55GB, and that isn't even that big. Halo 5 is sitting on my HDD at 100+GB. Fuck you.

Yea Forums doesn't understand that not everyone went out and bought dogshit $200 flat panel tvs and some of us still have superior 1080i wide screen crts from 2006

thanks yify

Attached: 430.jpg (699x485, 60K)

>ideal for 4K digital signage
that thing is made for displaying a static image for a billboard not watching pirated kinos at your fancy homosexual home theater screening soirées

I understand your decision to end our correspondences.

I still use 1080p because I'm having a hard time letting go of my Sony 3D 47" screen. Yes, I still watch 3D, and you won't find a single model sellinf online in my country that has 3D whatsoever. I know 3D is "dead", but BluRay 3D releases are still coming out in torrents quite frequently and there is a ton of it to watch.

One day I'll buy a 4K model, but not yet.

Attached: 1491396145031.jpg (300x250, 30K)

>file

yeah flickering crts are great
i love having a migraine 20 minutes into a movie

Attached: 1523080556064.png (330x319, 178K)

you dont see the flicker zoomer thats what cameras pick up if not synced

I want everyone to know that not all zoomers are this retarded

>don't understand anything ITT
free streaming sites 4 lyfe

Attached: frencopter.jpg (742x430, 53K)

> file ends in .exe

Attached: lol_Frieza.jpg (502x586, 36K)

yify is a team of like 20 people

unironically is this loss?

we didn't have streaming back in the day my zoomer friend.
We had to download movies on p2p softwares, the 700MB movies looked like shit, sometimes movies were split in two 700MB files (still looked like shit) that we had to burn on 2 CDs if we wanted to keep them or give to a friend etc...
I used to buy pack of 50 blanc CDs like pic related .. I still have my big cd sleeve holder (if that's the real name)
it was hell

Attached: 71Xv6xYw15L._SL1500_.jpg (1500x1500, 195K)

A few of my "movies" are chopped-up 10 minute segments that I downloaded from YouTube years ago as .flv files.

Attached: 132406046790.png (232x197, 67K)

> He didn't downsize them further to make vcd movies to play on the DVD player.

It was a comfy time.