Shoving gay propaganda down our throats

That's not the only thing that gets shoved down YOUR throat lmao.

You're just jealous that Eddie will never shove his socked feet into your face while you share a hammock and you'll have to pretend you're not rock hard in front of your friend group

Why is the phrase “shoved down our throats always used”. They will mock you every time. Pick other ways of saying it

Attached: B007DC3B-A98A-4746-8338-A0E76E785E84.jpg (284x284, 19K)

>Some queer on twitter is screaming because Adrian Mellon got his ass got
>Muh hate crime
To be honest, I really don't care too much that Ritchie is gay. Given who played little Rich it's not surprising
I'm still mad that Seth Green didn't get the part for adult Ritchie

Attached: 1506997722507.jpg (700x933, 74K)

>the closeted gay shit wasn't great. why the hell wouldn't he come out nowadays?

That's the unbelievable part. This is set in 2016 we all know this faggot would have incorporated it into his act because MUH ORANGE MAN BAD

>le jumpscare movie
Who the fuck cares if it has gay propaganda or not? That movie is shit

To be fair, you'd have to be retarded not to go gay for James Ransome. Fuck, David Simon spent several grand paying for multple rehab stints for the guy, because he wanted to fuck James' boy pussy.

We're sorry for hurting your feelings faggot

Attached: E1279B66-3AB8-46CA-9E34-A4A80AE98A06-1045-0000008C94F9B73B.jpg (800x450, 40K)

Threadly reminder to read the novel

Attached: 0D24BF6D-324F-4269-B192-13C0C86D5F19.jpg (322x474, 23K)

>Necks 2 fags at the beginning of the film RIGHT after they get stomped
Yeah, I'm thinking hes based

Attached: 1501685894-it-pennywise.jpg (480x479, 29K)

That was the best plot arc though.

He was shit in the first one, Eddie was best boy.

It's really not that weird or jarring if you rewatch the first movie.

>boasts about sex and fucking women all the time because he's closeted
>never had an actual arc in IT 2017 so this explains why that is
>teases Eddie all the time because he's got a crush on him and wants his attention
>still goes out of his way to touch and hold Eddie

It's all set up pretty well.

Attached: 14567865434567.webm (1280x720, 861K)

This is one of the reasons why this shit feels so forced, nobody really gives a fuck about homosexuals but they still need to feel victimised in one way or another

You misunderstand. I’m not saying it didn’t work, i’m saying its a weird choice. For a movie that is remarkably less socially concerned than the book, making Richie gay was a strange move.

Why he wasn't gay for Bill? They have almost zero chemistry with Eddie. I mean they looked like friends but that's it, they joke around and like to do stuff in party, but in first movie his friendship with Bill was established way stronger, he is his best friend. Even in this movie they used some new kid in flashback instead of it being focused on Bill or Eddie. Does he was just gay and wanted to suck dicks, but only during this movie he fall in love with Eddie or something like that? Because his gay side felt kinda underdeveloped.

They made Richie gay for the fangirls

You tell your bros to get the fuck off you because you don't like to be touched
>omg look, this guy is totally closeted, he's gay
You're chill with your bros and have a good time
>omg look this is proof that he's gay
Hey, let's play street fighter
> WOW LOOK AT THIS EMPOWERED FAGGOT

It's almost as if some people want everyone to be gay

Fujoshit shippers who misinterpreted the books and/or have a clitboner for shotas got pandered to. Easy as that.

>They have almost zero chemistry with Eddie

Yeah, that must be why everyone including normies raved about the chemistry between Richie and Eddie in the first film and why the ship became so fucking popular. Fucking idiot, you'd have to be blind to not see that Jack and Finn just had natural chemistry. There was nothing that implied Richie and Bill are particularly close other than Richie just blindly going with whatever Bill told them to do.

I, too, am upset that this shitty remake horror garbage had a shoehorned gay subplot.

You can be a faggot and not want to fuck your best friend.

Source, I am a faggot

It wasn’t a remake.

??? he only chomps down on the one that was drowning.

the other one just watched or something.

But you're on Yea Forums, thus you don't have any friends

I agree, the version from 1990 doesnt count.

The thing is though, Richie had a oneitis for Eddie and walking around flaunting his homosexuality would avail him nothing. He might've become a volcel instead.

Are there any BBC scenes with Jessica Chastain? I was really hoping Prince Yeshua would make a cameo.

Hader's Jabba impression was on point

damn faggot calm down

Faggot here. I've wanted to suck my best friends big Italian sausage plenty of times. Nothing more.

Women don't understand what male bonding is, you're either a toxic male or a raging fag, there is no in between.

Ransone was cute in this, I wanted to protect his smile.

Attached: 1567829765906.webm (640x296, 2.69M)

More like most insufferable. With all the dumbass quips his character made, I felt more like I was watching capeshit.

So street fighter is the game for faggots.

Nah when I'm not busy being a faggot here I'm busy being a faggot IRL

Anyone else just fucking hate fags? Why do they even exist? They ruin everything.

His character was handed very well. The gay shit in the opening felt forced, complain about that

>Richie had a oneitis for Eddie
LMAO imagine thinking gays ever only have the hots for one other dude

Scene from the book. Though its a lot more brutal.

Kino romance

Attached: 1567541287908.jpg (640x630, 179K)

Yeah same but that doesn't mean I'm in love with him, just means I'm a cock hungry faggot.

They spend money.
Average bros dont spend on anything besides video games and booze

This is a correct read.

>nobody really gives a fuck about homosexuals
Then why the mere presence of a gay character in a movie sends you people into an autistic asshurt?

Why would Richie be gay for Bill when he has the option of putting his face between Eddie's superior legs?

Attached: 14567876545678.png (748x299, 569K)

No but I'm honestly getting to that point

The moment Richie turned gay WE ALL KNOW IT

What I hate most about fags is that they ruined male intimacy. Now all physically expressed behavior between males is filtered through the hermeneutic of gay suspicion. Sometimes lads just want to hold hands without any unnatural desire to violate each others buttholes but society won't let them without interpreting it as homosexual.

Richie is canonically straight.

nigga gushed too often over Eddie being cute in the book to be 100% straight

I almost came just watching that scene don't blame Richie for turning gay

everything is going to be pozzed from now on.

Back to twitter, sweetie

If you think being close to a male friends makes you gay that that's you own problem

This is true but also have you ever held hands with a buddy of your and not wanted to violate his asshole?

>nigga
you're white...please stop

Why do gays get your panties in such a twist?

This is what happens when you cut out the sewer train.

It's not just gays, men in general are whores.

Reminder.

Attached: 1534232618402.jpg (1152x852, 749K)

Dial 8

It's the best part about being gay, we all know all of the other gays wants copious amounts of promiscuous sex

Cope

Everybody loves a straight male whore. A female whore is always a filthy disgusting creature.

Obviously not. Why do you think boys prefix any behavior that could possibly be interpreted as homoerotic with "no homo" and call each gay all the time? It comes from a fear of misinterpretation that their expression of fraternal affection might be confused with the homoerotic. This was never a problem when gays were in the closet because homosexuality was practically an impossibility in the social mind.

Does it keep you awake at night? The 90 seconds tops dedicated to reveal Trashmouth liked sucking dick? Were you horrified OP?

I'm a man who hates SJW pushing.

Totally fine with the gayness in Chapter 2. I thought it was handled well. The intro was a bit much, but still it was fine.

more like disgusted. like all normal people are by faggots.

The young Richie actor (Finn?) Is awful, or maybe it's just those fucking glasses that turned him into a cartoon.
While the Eddie kid that was in Shazam is pretty good.

Returneth from whence you came, incel!

Attached: 1559199556536.jpg (546x700, 136K)

Agreed. I think it added some much needed development to Richie and I can see why Eddie specifically was his oneitis considering their unique bantering in the first film. It also made his death more painful.

*upvoted*

Does granny scene supposed to be funny? That scene had the serious and scart tension, but that granny also do some weird moves in the background several times. First time it was kidna creepy but when she run naked in the background I even laugh a little, not to mentiong about when the CGI monster appeared, that was just hilarious.

>The intro was a bit much, but still it was fine.
Please, the intro should have been a couple of faggots faking a hate crime against themselves, then on of them gets eaten and the other one freaks out

Would have been way better

It’s pretty cringe, but I bet King still supported it. He supported the Dark Tower MC being black also.

I didn't even notice this in the movie at all until people started talking about it.

>all these booklets thinking they are people

Lmao. No opinions for you, honey.

The same can be said that it's unfair thinking that homoerotic affection is wrong. It's a pretty simple thing I don't understand why you're overthinking this.

>While the Eddie kid that was in Shazam is pretty good
>that part where he bumps into some crates and flips out

Comedy gold desu

Attached: 13456787654678.jpg (252x240, 7K)

Derry is supposed to be an over the top backwoods redneck town because King can't be subtle, turbosperg. What happened to Adrian makes sense.

dude... they literally call him a faggot in the middle of the movie

>hey guys here's a dumb thing
That's pretty dumb
>Good I meant it to be dumb
ok...

eyyy that was the same kid

The book is set in the 80’s. This wasn’t out of the ordinary.

A bully calling someone a faggot doesn't make me think that the character actually is gay.

This.

what a huge faggotbrain

>Faggot character at the start complains that the people making fun of him at the start have small penises.
Do gays always have dick on their minds? I mean what the fuck?

When it came to bullying everyone was called a faggot back in the 80s, it doesn't really mean anything to most people

Really funny how pieces of shit like yourself will blame white people for fucking up peoples lives yet when someone points out that Jews are running companies and large organizations you lose your shit you hypocrite.

Attached: the blonde nigger.png (1232x2974, 203K)

>turning an IT thread into a rent free /pol/ boogieman thread
Ritchie is not gay in the books. It was an unnecessary change.

>not noticing the looks Richie gave the arcade kid and the unusually hesitant/shy tone he used when he asked him for another round
>not noticing the crying after Henry calls him a faggot

Why is this board full of brainlets?

How the fuck did he manage to play Vs mode in SF1 with Joe instead of Ken? The game only allows the second player to be Ken and player 1 is required to play Ryu, there's literally only two playable characters in the entire game. Character select wasn't added until SF2.

Attached: Street_Fighter_Ryu_Ken_Spar--article_image.jpg (418x314, 43K)

The character is a fucking comedian you limp wrist autist. He literally fucking does that in the books.

They called the other kids faggots in the last movie as well but they didn’t turn out to be gay.

>not noticing the looks Richie gave the arcade kid and the unusually hesitant/shy tone he used when he asked him for another round
So being shy and awkward= gay? How is this out of the ordinary behavior?
>not noticing the crying after Henry calls him a faggot
Yeah, I'd be pretty sad if I just got humiliated infront of everyone and called a faggot too as a kid.
retard.

>Changed to be a comedian.
Fixed that for you.

In the original Fukunaga script the gay thing is much more fleshed out in the kid's timeline.

So the weirdos on fuckin Yea Forums of all places aren't the same? Eat shit pedo.

>So being shy and awkward= gay? How is this out of the ordinary behavior?

It is for Richie.

>calling others retard when he can't even grasp basic fucking subtlety

Richie is not the type to care about being bullied or let it affect him in any way, they established that in the first fucking movie, he lets it roll off his back or makes jokes about it. But it affected him this time because the boy he clearly had a little crush on called him a fairy. Holy fuck, you people can't be this retarded.

Nigga that shit is longer than the bible.

did eddie love him back?

Found the faggot cum brain

That could easily be interpreted as Richie lacking confidence and that he just wants to be liked

Eddie just anted to fugg his own mother. It's the same actress

>saying this on a board that's populated with cunnyfags and straight pedos

Attached: 1345676543567.jpg (209x328, 24K)

And?

>boasts about sex and fucking women all the time because he's closeted
Or he's a typical cumbrain. Maybe if you've not got any stories you should have sex?
>never had an actual arc in IT 2017 so this explains why that is
Shit writing?
>teases Eddie all the time because he's got a crush on him and wants his attention
Yeah it's unheard for males to have banter
>still goes out of his way to touch and hold Eddie
Comforting your dying friend is gay? Who knew?

There's a reason why faggots have been "persecuted" for millenia. You're insufferable.

Anyone else not care/secretly enjoy seeing the fags get the shit beat out of them at the beginning?

Not really
Well not in the romantic sense these fangirls are trying to push anyway

>Comforting your dying friend is gay? Who knew?

I'm referring to the first movie, brainlet.

That's what it meant for this character. Why the mental gymnastics and crying over a gay character? Did you want him to be prancing around to beat you over the head that he's gay?

I dont want to read Stephen kings crack fueled ramblings for a month

fags procreate by molesting children

If you're fucking retarded and can't into subtlety, then yes. But the movie intended it to be gay.

Your massive loss.

Propaganda from the right and left is tiresome

but it looks to me it was reciprocal, eddie literally died saving richie

>It is for Richie.
Richie never faced a situation like that in the original movie, if you saw him being shy as sign he's a faggot then that's your interpretation
.

>calling others retard when he can't even grasp basic fucking subtlety
It can be seen as Richie lacking confidence and wanting to be liked, not being gay.
if the character is gay then he's gay, those two things you listed don't show a fucking thing.

My boomer dad groaned in disgust when they kissed and perked up and mumbled “gettim!” when they started attacking them.

I don't know why you're digging your heels in and intentionally being a moron who can't grasp 7th grade tier subtle writing, but all the things I mentioned can add credence to Richie being gay in this movie, which he is. It's confirmed, so deal with it.

All the gay quipping made me very apathetic towards his death 2bh

Based boomer

>Too much of a pussy to show the gangbang
>Character ends up gay as fuck
It's like poetry
Fuck this pointless inclusion, if filmmakers are consistently going to just shove romance in completely out of context then SHOCKER, people are going to find romance in general less interesting.
It's an insult to injury that it's some faggot shit, because they're special and have to be protected, according to these Hollywood nolifes. Maybe someday one of these fucking retards will accidentally stumble into the real world for a quick minute and meet a human instead of whatever the flying fuck the mimics in Orange County are.

>those two things you listed don't show a fucking thing.

They obviously do since that's why they put those scenes in. Most people who aren't brainlets understood that. Sorry if anything short of Richie full on making out with Eddie is too subtle for your tiny brain to catch on.

>gay character: *exists*
>REEEEEE STOP SHOVING PROPAGANDA DOWN OUR THROATS

>the gay romance is shoved yet the Bev/Bill?Ben romance thing is not

Nope. He’s a comedian in the book

>REEEEEEE STOP SHOVING GAY CHARACTERS DOWN OUR THROATS
>REEEEEEE I COULDN'T EVEN TELL THIS GAY CHARACTER WAS GAY THE WRITING SHOULD'VE MADE IT MORE EXPLICIT

This board is a joke.

Why? It's the redeeming scene

More like:
>book character: *isn’t gay*
>Jewish movie producer: imma bout to end this nigga’s whole career

Show me where it says that's the exact reasoning for them to put those scenes in, that's just your interpretation. Maybe you just picked up on those things as you've experienced it before, you huge faggot.

>gay people exist
>stop with all this propaganda
okay

He’s a radio DJ that does voices.

I'm amazed at your inability to understand such a simple concept

Probably from the fact that everyone involved in the movie has said Richie gay and in love with Eddie.

Just stop, accept the fact that you're a brainlet, you're only embarrassing yourself.

Obviously not, I was talking about how the general viewers may preceive that particular scene especially if they're not aware that they wanted to make Richie explicitly bi in this film.

Richie isn’t gay though. Movie Richie was gaywashing.

>I do not know what strength is in my blood, but I swear to you I will eat your ass out
I mean, I respect artistic freedom, but this was a pretty strange choice by P.J.

Attached: EE253A38-FE62-46EC-9954-C78FF836ADF7.jpg (720x301, 32K)

>queer mafia and their foot soldiers

Attached: 1b0.jpg (680x499, 48K)

That's not what the data says.

Stephen King himself approved of the change.

So still nothing, your restricted mind can't even comprehend the fact that different interpretations exist and that the average viewer would perceive those scenes differently without prior knowledge. You had prior knowledge the character was gay, thus morphing your opinion on it. God you fucking retards don't get it at all.

You hypocrites are same people who bitch about "heteronormativity", fuck off

>Richie had several long last relations with women and talks exclusively about being with women

But yeah because he witnessed one of his best friends dying and comforted said friend in his last moments he's a total fag.

>gaywashing
What does that even mean?

>I'm retarded and can't interpret subtlety, b-but no, I actually have high IQ and people I made up agree with me!!

Why do you think this fucking thread even exists, retard? Because OP thinks Richie is straight after watching the movie?

No, it completely is, in the films anyway.
Again, they left out Bev feeling Ben's thick cock, so what the fuck?
Shit makes no sense.
Either adapt a book or just write your own story, lazy ass screenwriters.

He's a queer pedophile living in 2019
Of course he would approve the change

And? Death of the author, different time different person. George Lucas special editions, etc etc.

It’s a reference to the term “whitewash” or to make an ethnic character white for marketability. In this case they turned a straight character into a gay one.

>queer pedophile
>all his pedophilia involves sexualizing Bev

Nice try, pedoshit.

>I want a child orgy on camera but the presence of a gay character is too much

Attached: 1564842480790.gif (390x293, 3.21M)

Yeah, one is in the book and one isn’t. How is this difficult?

You're an absolute retard if you don't know what that means

>seething cocksucker
Pink triangles soon, don't worry.

There are countless changes and omissions from the book and the inclusion of gay Richie is just too much?

Right, only giga brain House like chads hang out in message boards all day trading lukewarm spins on sjw terms. My bad, chief.
Why can't a character just be gay?

Get Dresden'd

>Pink triangles soon
>Pennywise appears with pink triangle balloons in front of Eddie and then later with Richie in Chapter 2

What did he mean by this?

Attached: 0f796f26-0fef-4b6d-a01c-7292feb693d6-screen-shot-2017-09-08-at-10739-pm.png (970x546, 986K)

Back to plebbit, shit sticker

Changing the core essence and motivation of a major character is a much bigger deal than omitting and truncating scenes. Yes. I have no problem with how gays were incorporated into the original novel. The scene at the beginning I had no problem with. Richie is straight.

>wrote a very detailed scene about a young boy getting raped by an older man
>Has written many other homoerotic scenes
>he's not queer I swear!!
Goddamn donkey

Why can’t a character just be adapted properly? Why did he have to be gay?

Back to your country, Ahmed

>thinking that homoerotic affection is wrong
It is though? The reasons why are well documented throughout history.

>the one time Seth Green was taller than the rest of his peers on cast

Are you one of those tards that thinks that gays killed Rome?

>Changing the core essence and motivation of a major character

How does it really change his core essence or motivation though? Richie is still basically the same. His character is fundamentally about being scared to be his true self so he hides it behind voices and comedy. It's the same in the novel. He has no romantic ties or anything, his straightness is not relevant at all in the book. It doesn't change much at all.

>Why did he have to be gay?
He didn't have to be gay. You haven't answered my question. Why can't a character be gay? Why can't you be like, this shit is not canon, 1 star and not give them money? Why does it bother you a gay adaptation exists?
>Why can’t a character just be adapted properly?
No one is stopping you from doing that?

The era of blackwashing and genderswapping is over, the era of gaywashing has just begun.

>not realizing Richie was gay the moment he says that Ben is hot as brazilian soccer players

Its like you werent paying attention

>dude just ignore it you have no right to be excited about an adaptation of a book you love
>dude just make your own multi million dollar movie nobody is stopping you
Drown in your own vomit.

Making his “dirty secret” his homosexual urges colors his ENTIRE character and his relationship with Eddie. It is NOT the same friendship group dynamic and it is NOT the same Richie.

That seemed weird to me when it's clear Richie has a preference for twinky bottoms.

Attached: 145678976545.jpg (640x353, 15K)

How the fuck do you get from "Hey, tell me why you think this way" to "LOL why the fuck would you have feelings" What the fuck is going on in your head?

Why is it even that egregious to you what his sexuality is?

I never asked for a film adaptation of the book.
I just think if you're gonna do it, you need to fucking do it. It's not like it had to be visually explicit or anything, just descriptive. The audience can connect the dots.
Instead there's NOTHING. A pivotal sequence, as graphically unnecessary, albeit functional as it is, there's nothing to replace it, so it completely misses the point King was going for at that specific moment.
So as far as I'm concerned you're not even adapting anything anymore, just bastardizing it for monetary gain, because fuck you if you're gonna try and convince me anything about this cash grab was creative.
Having Richie and Eddie suck dicks is as artistic as this PG-13 retard bait went.

And the fujoshits coming here to shill their fan service pairing are an even bigger joke

>why can’t you be like one star not canon and ignore it
WHY should I have to ignore an adaptation of something I love? What precludes me from voicing my negative opinion on how it was handled? Why can’t a character just be themselves instead of a manipulated social talking point. If they wanted to speak towards the plight of gays they should have focused more on Adrian Melon and leaved Ritchie alone.

Then just don't watch it? You're intentionally making yourself angry over nothing

Because it's a thing, you fucking edgelord. Sorry to hurt your fee fees but some people are different and that's great! Also, there are way more of them than you think and you might occasionally have to see/hear about them. Awwwwww...

His relationship with Eddie in the book is weirdly flirtatious too though, it doesn't really change much in relation to him.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Tozier

I won’t insult you because I haven’t read the book either. I just read cliff notes of it.

Attached: B4BC6F77-B2B3-453F-960B-2214B31040C2.png (1334x750, 162K)

Because the movie made his whole arc a sexuality he doesn’t even have in the book. They did alright with everybody else in the time allotted and for some reason they couldn’t do the same for Ritchie.

And yet his arc was the best one in the movie.

It’s a deep bond that has enough subtle subtext where you COULD read into it if you want. NOT the same as Pennywise calling Ritchie gay and Ritchie carving his name next to Eddies on a post.

Characters that are supposed to be funny make on the nose remarks and jokes all the time though

And? It’s not the character. If you want to write something original that don’t do adaptations.

>WHY should I have to ignore an adaptation of something I love?
Why the fuck not? It's an adaptation of something you love that didn't come out the exact same way you pictured it in your head. Welcome to life, what the fuck?
>What precludes me from voicing my negative opinion on how it was handled?
Nothing. I was asking why are you doing this? And, "because I can" is a shit take on my question because it explains nothing.
>Why can’t a character just be themselves instead of a manipulated social talking point.
They can and are. Just not this one in this adaptation.
>f they wanted to speak towards the plight of gays they should have focused more on Adrian Melon and leaved Ritchie alone.
And that would be your take, and that's fine too. If someone was giving you shit about your adaptation I'd defend you as well.

Next time you have absolutely nothing to respond with, you can just reply with nothing, it won't hurt my feelings.
It does mildly offend me when asshats go on forums and tell people not to discuss the subject topics.
Like, did you fucking attend classes? Why do you think people have discussions about arbitrary shit? We're not goddamn ants, well, maybe in a grand scheme, but that's beside the point just like the Macroverse and its absence in this abhorrent film that spits on everything psychological horror, despite being a fucking story about psychological horror.

Honestly this is one case where I'm okay with this choice, because of how he was in chapter 1. Also, I can't remember the details of their friendship in the book, but I know they were really close in the TV special to the point where Ritchie got a show partner that looked like Eddie.

>you pictured in your head
You mean as it was written, and nobody asked for perfection, I’m just asking for an ADAPTATION, not fanfiction and radical changes for no reason.

>because I can
Because I SHOULD. Fans of the actual material deserve to voice their opinions when what they love gets butchered.

>just not this one
Then I get to complain about it. Why wasn’t he?

>and that would be your take
No, it would be the take of the book.

I can tell you really think you’re intelligent and moderate. I can feel the psud vibes from here. Not all adaptations are made equal and if you can’t get the 1 in a million that improves the source material you better respect it. If you don’t, expect a negative reaction. This isn’t difficult.

I thought the change was a strange choice but it was ok, since Ritchie was one of the weaker characters in the first movie, and like some other user said it gave more weight to Eddie's death. I agree Ritchie was a weird choice tho. The real problem with this movie is that it drags on WAY too long, which is kind of understandable I guess, and that the cgi is fucking laughable. Otherwise p good nd surprisingly faithful besides y'know the Ritchie thing

They were really close friends. Nothing more nothing less.

I can guarantee you'd be the first to complain about pedo jews if there was even a whiff of the gangbang scene in either of these movies

Because it’s all so forced. This character can’t come out in 2016? You fail to realize that although there are many spergs here there are also many who just want good art. It’s like Will and Grace. It was one of my favorite shows when it was on tv. Before 2016 I would have been excited it was going to re-air. When it did though I didn’t bother watching it because it’s going to be same tired old ORANGE MAN BAD shit. And behold... Grace gets a job decorating the Oval Office? Are you fucking seriously going to tell me this some serious shoe horning bullshit.

Address the struggle of being gay. Fine. Address the black American experience. Fine. Force the shit into every facet of media to the point where virtue signaling is more important than the storyline?.....

An all girl “Ghostbusters” is as dogshit as an all male “Steel Magnolias”.

He might, but I’ll be the one to say I won’t. The train scene is absolutely essential but it is essentially unfilmable. Even an attempt would have my respect.

> I’m just asking for an ADAPTATION
No. You're asking for your version of the adaptation. While you might meme about intelligence and moderate pseuds the notion of your head being up your ass doesn't even seem to enter your head which is a big red flag, my guy.
>not fanfiction and radical changes for no reason.
There is a reason, you don't just like it.
>Because I SHOULD. Fans of the actual material deserve to voice their opinions when what they love gets butchered.
Principled moral stance, Check. We're half way there to suburban white girl bingo. Are you excited?
>Then I get to complain about it. Why wasn’t he?
Because the guy who was financed multiple millions of dollars to do it didn't it want it to be done that way. I am so confused. Do you honestly believe bitching on the internet forums is an effective strategy of getting what you want or are you just venting looking for people to start a circle jerk?
>No, it would be the take of the book.
As you understood it, a point you seem to not understand.

I mean there was that + pennywise mentioning a secret.

>illegally invading
as opposed to legally invading?

You could argue that the quarry scene could serve that purpose. There was a thread complaining about pedo jews specifically about that scene earlier though

Why can't a straight character just be straight?
Seething

Back to brighton, biohazard.

He can, just not in this adaptation.

I’m not playing weasel words with a pretentious relativist who almost certainly didn’t read the book because he wants to defend the honor of gay people. Fuck off, you won’t be rid of me. You change my book for no reason (yes, no good reason) then I will voice dissent. Ignored.

>You could argue that the quarry scene could serve that purpose.
How did the quarry scene depict the need for an essential, primal connection and the transition of children to adults?

Why can’t this adaptation just be faithful?

I didn't even notice he was gay

have sex

I fucking love this take.
>LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU
Well done.

>BROOOO ITS ALL RELATIVE MAAAAAAN THEY JUST ADAPTED THEIR OWN INTERPRETATION WORDS ARE MEANINGLESS ITS ABOUT HOW THE BOOK MADE THEM FEEEEEEL!
>FAITHFULNESS IS NOT A VALUABLE METRIC FOR AN ADAPTATION JUST IGNORE IT BROOOO NOBODY CARES JUST MOVE ON LOVE IS LOVE MAAAAAN

More like all men. Every man I’ve met will mention dicks at least once a day

Your definitions are at odds with the director of this one. Just not in sync, my guy.

user are you having a stroke?

@120719913
That’s exactly what you just did. You played pretend to misinterpret what I said so you could be the big weasel with your retarded relativism. There is no point in arguing with something incapable of basic conversation.

Not an argument.

Do you know what it means to “adapt” ?

This sexual tension is getting out of hand. Just kiss already and get it over with

>Awwwww
Christ you tumblrinas are so effortlessly cringe

Alright so you're one of those morons that has allowed social media to distort your vision of the world, no there are not a lot of gays amongst the human race/society, we are still overwhelmingly straight. When you bitch about heteronormativity you're basically whining about normalcy and want the rest of society to bend over backwards for a significantly small portion of society, its as simple as that.

>life is like a great big rashoman maaaan you can’t like, say anything is objectively one thing or the other
>words on a page? They could mean anything. In my mind IT was actually the tale of barney the dinosaur taking a shit, and it’s perfectly valid

Are you of those tards that think gays have a role in society?
youtube.com/watch?v=I8BRdwgPChQ
youtube.com/watch?v=2u3hmZCsXoE

You've conjured a philosophical beef out of your ass and I am the one incapable of basic conversation? You might want to take a minute and calm down so all the blood can return to your head first before you take another stab at this.
>That’s exactly what you just did.
Alright.
Who the fuck cares about the honor of gay people? I've asked you a simple question. "Hey why do you feel angry about the gay and not a guy who is in charge?" A question that lead us into a million different fucking rabbit holes of abstract bullshit.

Must be so harrowing for you to have to see a gay person in media every once in a while

I know. Who is arguing?

>holding hands with your lads
Yeah you lost me there.

Not really, but I'm sure it's very difficult for you to watch a movie with a completely straight cast of characters without ranting about it on your twitter account

Willing to talk like a person now? We’ll see.
>why are you made at the gay and not the maker
Because a bad decision and a bad decision maker are both things worthy of negative feelings. If someone throws in a scene where Bev looks at the camera and complains about the patriarchy for 5 minutes, I can both be mad AT that decision and the person RESPONSIBLE for that decision.

Get it?

>we criticize people for being normal!
>no! you can't complain about degenerate fetishes being shoehorned into every facet of entertainment. Bigot!
Are you triggered, petal?

>every once in a while
I’m guessing you just woke from a coma circa 1989

You brought up the term heteronormativity though. I don't complain about movies with all straight casts.

So you wouldn’t complain about a remake of the “Birdcage” with an all straight storyline?

> bad decision
Here is the core. Why is it a bad decision for a character to be gay and why would you then push it further into meme territory of gay propaganda? If a blonde character was casted by a brown hair guy would you then make anti brown hair threads? Like, who the fuck cares, right?