Marvel Comics Proudly Presents: IT Chapter 2

Absolutely fuck this movie

>So you know how people loved the creepy tone of the first
>Yeah!
>Ok so for the second lets have Bill Hader quip over every scary scene!

Literally LITERALLY felt like a comic book movie

Attached: it chapter 2.jpg (2000x1333, 377K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=-XKQmPH1Vms
youtube.com/watch?v=bpJJzEkIFlU
youtu.be/1RIWbCHc5mI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I didn't like it generally, but the part where Angel of the Morning played for like 7.5 seconds and then cut off and the part where Ritchie got dead lighted felt like fucking youtube video meme edits and made me hate the movie.

first movie was shit too
I'll never waste my time after being tricked into watching the first one

>loved the creepy tone of the first
>loved
>creepy tone of the first

it was fucking garbage from start to finish, you clown

It would have been better if they actually stayed as a group instead of letting 2/3s of the movie be a series of fetch quests with LE SPOOBY CGI inbetween

Very, very disappointing. The first was hardly high-art, but it was a decent teen horror flick.

Second is all over the place, the tone is shot to shit, there's far too much melodrama and comedy and the entire final battle was a mess.

>Best parts of the movie were all the scenes with the kids
>CGI was so fucking bad for an $80million flick

I felt like I typed this EXACT thing for IT Ch1.

At least we got to see mommy

Reading a brief summary of the book's second half they might as well have created a new movie

You'd hate the book. Richie can hardly go a full sentence without quipping, rhyming or breaking into a bad impression. They toned it way down for the movies. He's also definitely funnier in the movies since he's not referencing 50s TV and music.

It would be different if the movie wasn't so devoid of consequence for the adults. Up until they decide to kill IT literally 80% of the scary scenes were flashbacks

It's not bad if you went to the film for the comedies. Both Bill Hader and Finn Wolfhard Richies were very funny

OOOOOOWW WA A A A

It's basically the same as the book.

>There was no quiping in horror movies before marvel, amirite guys
>Comic book movies invented quiping
You're either braindead, underage or both

>that saggy titty grandma monster
>that paul bunyan monster
what the fuck were they thinking

test

Except Audra and Tom storylines, Eddie dying from a random attack instead of from actively fighting it, The Ritual of Chudd is competely different, Tom doesn't die, and also the fact instead of tearing its heart out they yell at it till it becomes small.

Oh and instead of Derry being destroyed its a stock happy ending

They were thinking about the book

There's a saggy old lady demon in the book?

>>So you know how people loved the creepy tone of the first

what creepy tone?

even my gf was laughing and she is easily spooked

Attached: hmmmmm.jpg (248x203, 7K)

There's literally no way to properly adapt the books second half.

The entire climax is basically them desperately trying to resist getting turned into vegetables.

Yes, Beverly goes to her dad's apartment after returning, finds out he's dead from an old woman who turns out to be another aspect of Bob Grey, claiming to be the daughter of Bob Grey and birthed out of his asshole, the apartment then turns into the candy house from Hansel and Gretel and the tea she's drinking turns into sewer shit while IT is saying how her dad wanted to suck her clit and fuck her moist cunt

I mean some people react to being scared by laughing, but more likely you are cool jock kids who ruin horror flicks by talking and shitting up the movie

the tone of the first one sucked. whoever was making it had no idea how to make a scene scary even though horror is the same shit that works the same way every time

Finn quipped a ton as well, that much was consistent, Hader just gets more laughs. I've read a couple reviews complaining about it being sillier, but frankly I was down with that. It still hit the right notes. It's a alien spider clown, how serious can it get?

God you sound like a faggot.

Richie is also the emotional part of the film, so I like that they’re adding more depth to him. The flashback scenes with young Richie work really well for the character

fortune cookie scene was unironically creepier in the mini-series
CGI baby mole cricket was stupid

When he breaks down at the end when they are swimming tore me up

this movie sucked, but Yea Forums posters are even worse
I wish a space clown would bully all of you

This movie doesnt release in my country until a couple hours should i watch it?
I dont even care if its shit if it atleast keeps me entertained

First one made me sick to my stomach
But that might be because I was high on NEP and hadn't eaten or slept in 3 days and was starting to question reality

The monster CGI scenes are so shitty it's funny

Fuck. You.

This

What the fuck was with the music when the leper vomited on Eddie

Is it scary stories to tell in the dark tier cgi monsters?
(Refering to the last one of course)

I think King had more of a say in this movie. That's why it's so weird and different from the first.

>Had a bigger say
>No orgy scene
King...

Reddie is real though and that's all that matters.

Attached: b26ba756-2bc3-4454-8e58-112d39cf5f2b.jpg (640x630, 179K)

Never, ever, fags

Attached: 6AAF1FE2-065F-4D56-B17D-D4CDC435A1BD.jpg (1494x1330, 302K)

>Be good movie
>Get shat on by incels and child molesters

This is literally me when I get stabbed in the face
m.youtube.com/watch?v=-XKQmPH1Vms

The book had an actual child gangbang in it.
Wouldn't child molesters like this movie?

>expecting a woman to think logically

>practice martial arts and boxing for 5 years straight
>work out, pray, and meditate every day
>travel to shitty town
>recite one last prayer to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ
>walk into abandoned building
>beat this dumb clown faggot until his eyes can't open
>take hatchet from trunk of car
>chop his faggot head off
>place on spike, ignite with Holy Water and flame
>as I do recite a prayer through Jesus Christ rebuking any and all evils from not only this land, but this planet and greater universe at large
>faggot clown is never seen again

Attached: Ahem.png (1000x1000, 120K)

this

there were no creepy tones

georgies death was hilariously bad im surprised the woman they kept cutting to didn't look right in the camera and say "aw hell no!"

Was the part about the Native American tribe that tried to kill IT in the past from the book? Or was that there to place Turtle?

Damn, Derry being wrecked was one of the best parts of the book and a great symbolic ending. Too bad they left that out.

They still tear out the heart

>>So you know how people loved the creepy tone of the first
what creepy tone, it was fucking stupid. Literally oujia tier bad

I don't know what you faggots are talking about Hader spends the entire second half the movie scared and cries like a bitch in the end.

Do Richie and Eddie have gay sex?

>Derry doesn't get destroyed in the end
I bet they don't even have the bike ride

>quipping over every scene
It has much less quipping than any capeshit. I was decent, wouldn't call it grondbreaking. I rate a solid 7.5/10. Also bookfags is it explained why Bev marries a guy just her dad?

It was fucking great and better than the first but I agree the quips were almost unbearable

Because Bev is a slut

>Half of the movie is just a redundant retread of the first one
>The themes and character arcs are literally the exact same as the first one except for Richie
>Most formulaic jumpscares put to film
>Over an hour of the film is just characters reliving their fears that we already know instead of expanding on new ones in their adulthood
>3 hours long when it could have been 90 mins
>subplots go nowhere
>melodramatic to the point where it feels like it's written by children
>Henry Bowers does absolutely nothing and has no bearing on the plot
>Pennywise has no personality or intrigue and exists solely for jumpscares
>Edited like a TV show, they have no grasp of subtly whatsoever
>Characters just fucking narrate the themes of the movie because they think you're too stupid to understand the film otherwise

Holy fuck this movie was garbage, what happened?

D A D D Y I S S U E S

eddie stabbing bowers was comedy kino. anyone who refutes this can suck a cock

For the same reason Eddie marries a woman who's exactly like his mother, neither of them overcame their childhood abuse due to forgetting all the growth they had during the Pennywise dilemma. It's common for abuse victims to seek out the same fucked up relationships because it's comfortable and all they know.

>Henry Bowers does absolutely nothing and has no bearing on the plot

To be fair, he has none in the book either other than putting Mike out of commission.

the part where her husband lets her have a cigarette after she comes is the only thing i remember

Attached: 1517347167784.jpg (600x350, 74K)

Wait did I miss something, I went to piss but when is it ever established that Richie is gay for Eddie?

The first movie was fantastic but I hated everything about this one

>nobody speaks like human beings, the dialogue is all very stilted and the jokes feel forced
>CG was so much worse than the first movie it pulled me out of the film every time I saw it
>all the parts with the kids were essentially deleted scenes from the first movie
>they also served no purpose other than to go "OH YEAH THIS MAGUFFIN THING ACTUALLY HAPPENED THE WHOLE TIME DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT!"
>in the first movie the pharmacy girl comments on eddie's cast as if it were the first time she'd seen it and signs it
>in this movie he comes up to the counter with an unsigned cast and she doesn't even look at it
>the kids all looked like killzone 2 cutscene characters with their older voices and bodies but oddly smooth and bulbous faces
>all the gay propaganda
>validating all the pedophiles who wanted finn and the other kid to fuck

Ridiculous waste of time

Attached: 1541552101816.png (600x600, 262K)

This nigga has always been gay

Attached: A32D6F24-6C39-4757-9BC7-B1C3B4A01356.jpg (1242x663, 123K)

First one was only good in the first scene. The rest was jump scares and shite.

He carved R+E on the kissing bridge, motherfucker. Didn't you find it weird he was so distraught over his death?

Also rewatch the first one and it's easy to see that Richie teasing Eddie was basically like a boy pulling the pigtails of his crush.

Attached: 1567536040776.jpg (2048x3413, 3.02M)

IT is as scary as Stand By Me.

>he first movie was fantastic
stopped reading there

yikes

Fuck i'm a brainlet. Thanks for explaining.

>implying Reddie being canon isn't the only worthwhile thing about this movie

Their banter stole the first movie and it stole this one too. Their love is pure.

Fuck off dan

Pretend Eddie is a girl the next time you watch IT and you'll see, brainlet.

Attached: 1514210176746.webm (1920x1080, 2.2M)

oh yes
i remember the time i splashed shitwater at the girl i liked to show my affection

Thats how pennywise is in the book. A quip machine

I actually enjoyed the comedy, you guys don't know what "forced" comedy and quips in horror really means until you've seen shit like Ready or Not. It chapter 2 is actually pretty fun most of the way, it drags a bit noticeably when they're all out searching for their memories but this act also contains the best scene (Bev goes back to her old apartment). I'd give it a soft 4/5, probably an outlier on here but I admire that they had the balls to stick to King's cocaine-fueled insanity for the most part. I like that this movie feels messy as fuck and just like It chapter 1 on bath salts. Some of the CGI is iffy and Chastain's performance is noticeably flat compared to everyone else in the cast.

>he never bullied his crush

yikes

>Chastain's performance is noticeably flat
So are her tits

I’m pretty sure Bevs younger actress has bigger boobs than Chastain does

>horror movie
>cum slerping retard thinks it being "fun" is a good thing

You sound like a faggot. King wrote the novel so fucking coked up he probably doesn't remind writing it. Ridiculous is the right tone to adapt it.

They’re really good aren’t they? Haven’t got around to watch it but I’ve heard praises for them

Attached: Richie.jpg (1080x810, 168K)

Richie also went out of his way to protect, touch, and hold Eddie in the movie as well.

Attached: REDDIE.gif (500x222, 1.16M)

the leper looked like a rubber mask and I couldn't stop laughing at the granny monster

it be like that sometimes

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 199K)

IT has always been more about the characters and a coming of age story than a horror. Nobody would read a million page book if it was just around the retarded clown, nigger.

How do you mean?

The book is entirely different from the film adaptions in that it spends the entire novel cutting in between the past and present each chapter, they’re not separated into their own parts at all. Which is entirely annoying by the end since you basically read the same scene twice for the last five chapters.

Honestly, the miniseries did it the best by showing them as adults freaking out about It coming back then flashing back to show them as kids and what happened before going back to the future to wrap it up. They managed to turn a not very scary at all book into an actually creepy experience.

Did they at lesser get the It origin scene right? That part was actually really badass I’m the book and was written perfectly to be adapted to film.

My man i'm not sure what you were expecting from this movie. You seemed to have missed the entire point of it though and have the audacity to call other people on a cantonese basket weaving board retards.

For all the talk in the movie about Bill not being able to write a good ending, you'd think King would have been able to see the irony
But noooooo
Stephen King may actually be one of the worst creative writers to have ever lived
There has only ever been ONE good interpretation of his work, and it took Stanley Fucking Kubrick to make it happen.

>Stan monster appears
>Richie's first concern is seeing if Eddie's okay

The beauty is it's not even a retcon to have his priority be Eddie as he was the same in the first movie too.

Attached: 1514206751925.webm (1920x1080, 695K)

movies can't be scary so it has to do something else

>b-but it's NOT SUPPOSED to be scary!

THE TURTLE IS FUCKING DEAD
HEY WE'RE GONNA PUT ALL THESE TURTLES IN BOTH MOVIES TO REFERENCE IT
BUT WE'RE NEVER GONNA SHOW WHY

They are, collectively, the best part of the film, and the only one with a meaningful flashback scene

>miniseries
>creepy

People who unironically praise that campy mess of cheese that isn't remotely creepy or even entertaining need to be shot.

In the scene where the restroom stall fills with blood the dad says "little girl" JUST LIKE THIS youtube.com/watch?v=bpJJzEkIFlU and I couldn't stop laughing

Do you faggots honestly think the director told Finn Wolfhard to pepper his movements with subtle gay insinuations?

it's not you retard. It's not that difficult fffs. It's literally "the real clown were the friends we made along the way" or some shit

It's supposed to be scary for the characters. The reader/audience fear comes from worrying about the characters. This is how King writes all of his stories.

It's really not. The clown has always been the weakest part of IT. The only creepy part in the book is Patrick's chapter.

No, that was incidental and probably a result of him and Jack hitting it off.

Attached: 1514176584745.gif (250x300, 1.89M)

“My Fadder was also my modder.”

Why couldn’t King just write like a human being in this book?

>Also bookfags is it explained why Bev marries a guy just her dad?
The guy found her working as a designer in a bad company and funded her to be a big fashion designer.

Good to hear that. V team 2 when?

When is chastain flat?

No. Richie is gay, not a faggot, it doesn’t show in the way he acts

Because he was doing Tony Montana levels of coke while writing it. There's a section early in the book which is literally like 5 pages straight of Bill sperging out about his bike and screaming HIGH-HO SILVER. Though in Bill's defense, Silver is one of the few genuinely magical artifacts in the King universe outside of the Dark Tower series.

cause it was the 80s and King was on a shit load of drugs throughout the decade, he barely remembers making Maximum Overdrive

Really, the fact that they stuck to the book and made a presentable movie is a amazing feat.

Cocaine co-wrote it, and was the primary writer of the Tommyknockers.

Whose tom?

Bev's husband

That hug he gave to Eddie before being pulled away was what got me.

The only thing I felt during the whole movie was sad for the little girl with the birthmark

>he hasn't seen Stand By Me

Attached: 1385778417504.jpg (375x375, 34K)

Yeah, reading the book I was thinking "how the hell can this be 1200 pages long" and was originally off put by how fucking weird some of the scenes were but after reading it I totally get why. There's so many weird scenes that seem stupid but work in the context of the book. One of my favorites is Stan's birding adventure and initial run in at the standpipe. It gives really good insight into how exactly fighting IT works and the power of belief but it'd be really awkward to adapt to film.

Chapter 2 was pretty good but in terms of the horror/scare factor sucks with its overuse of extremely telegraphed jumpscares. Movie is mostly about the characters though and everyone is pretty interesting beside mike who feels like mostly a plot device than a character. Richie and Bill in particular are really good.

Eddie is the true faggot in Reddie, but it's okay because he's the bottom.

Attached: 145678765678.jpg (640x326, 28K)

You're insufferable.

I honestly liked the Hader dead face in the lights. Wish they would have hit more people with it like in the books.

Movie was shit though.

The CGIed faces of the kids were horrible, especially Richie and Ben's. Young Eddie also sounded like he was dubbed.

Yeah unfortunately Mike's lighthouse keeper role kind of requires him to be more of a POV character.

>Bev and Eddie marry their parents
>Ben and Richie pine for them
>Ben and Bev get the happy end while Richie and Eddie get the bad end

It's not fair, bros.

Attached: 14567865435678.png (412x351, 78K)

I liked skarsgard acting a bit like Tim curry in this one
You know how he acted like a fucking child predator, we got a bit of that here
Although I thought what he talked about with Ben was fucking weird
>you’re just a fat fatty fat loser and you’re going to die alone

blessed and holypilled

I liked that bc it made the humans look stupid again, which they should look in the face of this near-omnipotent cosmic monster
I hate the whole "power of belief" angle, though I understand that that's entirely King's fault

Yep, the kid section is actually a very easily to make into a movie/tv miniseries. The adult section has all sorts of issues.

1. They actually do not do much
2. for a while it is "one of the six goes out, meets it and a fear,
3. Coked out scenes like the moon talking

Perhaps I am a bookfag (even if I generally do not like stephen King, I thought It was okay and the shining was good and the rest I read I hated or just put it down) but The adult section of it is loopy, and really the entire book is loopy.

Why was it weird? He was directly targeting Ben's fear of loneliness

Why didn't Pennywise just laserbeam all the adults with the lights and kill them once they started giving him trouble?

Is it worth watching in the theater? I’m thinking if I thinks watch this or The Goldfinch for more Finn for buck

Coyotes are pretty scary

I’d be fine with the 90 jump scares if they all didn’t come in the exact same way
>character enters unfamiliar area
>scary music
>quiet
>quiet
>quiet
>obnoxious blaring music and pennywise running at the screen

Its preying on his fear. Hell I had that when I was 25 before I met my wife.

The moral is that fags always get what they deserve: misery and STDs

>the little girl with the birthmark
:(

IT feeds off fear, IT also doesn't actually understand how humans work IT just has telepathic powers and reacts to people's instincts. Most adults aren't even on IT's radar because they don't believe in IT.

The characters in the Goldfinch are shit, watch IT for true gay kino.

Attached: tumblr_pme21uInHL1y2o89eo6_540.gif (540x350, 2.59M)

I wish he DID do more stuff like that; having this murder crazy space clown be so weak in the face of "I'm not afraid of you!" is fucking lame
I think the initial intention of the book was probably to give King an excuse to just do every crazy set piece he felt like coming up with, but then he eventually felt like he had to justify those scenes with plot, and it makes the story overall childish; it's just clapping for Tinkerbell to live in reverse

The first movie has the same jumpscare issue.

Removing the jumpscares would make a better film, but the jumpscares put butts in the seats.

>CLOWN
>CLOWN
>CLOWN
>CLOWN
>CLOWN
>CLOWN

It's literally magic

it's more because adults sense of fear is different than a kids and harder to exploit, there's one part of the book where IT has a POV chapter and explains while it could feed off adults their fear doesn't "taste" nearly as good as kids because their fears tend to be less literal, like a kid is terrified of the Wolfman while his dad is terrified of having to pay the mortgage

Almost all of stephen king is patently ridiculous material that is presented in a way that’s oddly compelling

In that way, It chapter 2 might be the best transfer of King to the screen.

I can think of some others. Stand by Me, Creepshow, and Misery for starters.

So in the book he was supposed to die? Did bev kill him or something? He was just in that one scene in the movie and that's it.

Who will they cast in the third movie set in their 60s?

this mist and storm of the century

I think King's cameo and going on about Bill's endings suck, was a bit too on the nose with what was to come with the third act.
It's like they didn't realize that foreshadowing they created. Or they did it initially, had that lil scene as an apology and made King support it

>ONE good interpretation of his work, and it took Stanley Fucking Kubrick to make it happen.
Shawshank, stand by me, Mist (which did change the ending), and so on are all good to great.

>Richie actually goes through with his initial plan to run away
>enters his home, all seems normal
>sits on his couch
>loud thumping sound
>a shadowed four enters the room, upon closer look he looks almost like a zombie
>TOOOOOZERRRRRR
>WHERES THE RENT

Attached: 01F081A7-41D1-44B6-B8C3-5F1653D12081.png (400x400, 289K)

Why the fuck did they make it a goddamn comedy

Shawshank Redemption

The best scene in the movie was then the teenagers btfo of those two faggots and then the one fag gets eaten alive
Too bad it went downhill after that

In the book, It realizes the kids are back and he is genuinely worried since the kids were able to defeat him last time. So he tries to use them to stop the kids (now adults).

Tom is used to kidnap Bills wife, and IIRC, dies when he sees It true form, and It eats him.

The first one was a comedy too. It's all character driven, not spook driven.

IT has never been a good story. The original movie was garbage. Part 1 was garbage. This will be garbage.

The King cameo was so awkward

It almost felt like Needful Things for a second

And the first one wasn't?

The first one was a adventure movie more then a horror film.

This really; even fucking Friday the 13th's were quipfests & the antagonist is fucking mute.
Don't even get into the Nightmare series.

For those let down by the comedic nature of the IT movies, just wait for Doctor Sleep if you want serious King kino

Attached: DS-11206r-e1560441816998.jpg (1200x800, 90K)

I liked the first 1. I liked this one too but it was too long.

So many scenes could have been cut. It going after the new children was a waste of time. The bully returning was a waste of time, I know it's in the books but he didn't do anything of real substance so he could have been cut.

It took too long to get into the final act and by then you're exposed to all the scary shit that a giant fucking spider pennywise isn't as scary in comparison.

No, Mr. King, I don't think I will.

It really looks like they're changing that book and they're using stuff from Kubrick's movie
Which is actually a really good move.

Just got out. I am amazed to say since I did not have high hopes for this but I think I like it more than the first part.

>I know it's in the books but he didn't do anything of real substance so he could have been cut.

He didn't do anything of substance in the book either, for that matter. Never understood why King had to handicap Mike, all that did was take away the already devastating blow of not having Stan there.

Fuck off Stephen I know it's you

>that bathroom scene with Eddie and Bowers
>Eddies fucking comment on Bowers mullet.
I'll be honest. That was a good fucking laugh.

Eddie and Richie are objectively the best characters.

Spinoff movie when?

Attached: 1435678645678.jpg (640x360, 40K)

I like at least that the reference to him in this part was a lot more direct and creative than the one in part 1

Maybe V team 2 will come out soon
youtu.be/1RIWbCHc5mI

7/10 I'd watch it once, then almost completely forget it and not think about it until someone decides it should be a full fledged TV series that will flopdead in it's first or second season

This looks like kino, why all the hate ITT?

tfw Castle Rock somehow got a second season

Looking forward to more King fanfic kino

Attached: Jackie Torrance.jpg (1400x700, 350K)

Is the second season going to have Richie and Eddie stand-ins who actually get a happy ending together? ;_;

It will probably be a let down just like the sequel

The Shining reference kind of similarly took me out of the movie as much as King did, at least the King cameo was in a better placing but the Shining one was in the middle of such an intense and important high octane scene

Entirely possible, it has no problems bringing characters in from other stories and making new characters related to established characters.

Attached: dead and breakfast.jpg (900x600, 125K)

>So you know how people loved the creepy tone of the first
no we/they don't. the original one was much better, faggot. We only loved it because of Lillis.

Man I wish some madman would fund an IT series that would actually cover all the fucked up and weird shit in the book
>bullies giving blowjobs to each other
>that bully who killed his baby sister and left dog to die in a fridge, only to have him die a horrible death too
>all the fucked up Derry incidents caused by Pennywise like the blackspot burning, the shooting in the middle of the street and bar massacre
>actually showing IT's origin, from his arrival to earth from murdering the natives and establishing Derry as his own personal butchery
>climax with Derry getting completely destroyed

Don't forget a teenage orgy. Mmm....

>horror movie
here's your mistake

Might work as a Netflix series.

Idiot

And then you go to jahannam for not following the one true faith. Sorry habibi.

I don't give a shit, they were the best characters and they deserved a happier ending.

Attached: 1563762211055.jpg (511x604, 63K)

What does Discworld have to do with IT?

BASED

Attached: F50E6216-62DA-4347-8C27-313441E751E0.png (160x160, 15K)

>climax with Derry getting completely destroyed

I don't remember this happening, I thought it just ended with Bill riding his bike with his wife while IN Derry.

Soon

Attached: snraets yelir.jpg (700x450, 163K)

I could probably fit her entire foot into my mouth

I think it's the closest image to the idea
I thought the turtle threw up the galaxy and IT came through the macroverse and choked and suffocated the turtle to death
The last half of it is a mind trip on what the fuck is really going on

Nope the sewers flood, collapsing the place under the bridge and the whole fucking town just sink into itself.

The whole town doesn't get destroyed (like the hospital where Mike was) but a good chunk of it gets flooded IIRC

He quite literally doesn't remember Cujo. He wasn't aware the book existed until someone else brought it up to him.

You're probably remembering the miniseries which cut it out. In the book a huge storm takes out most of the downtown area. It's not the whole town just the area around the standpipe basically.

First of all, Cujo was alcohol and opium. Second he doesn't remember writing most of it. The fuck do you think he just blacked out completely for the entire period of writing, rewriting, sending it in, getting response, signing shit? Also have none of you tried cocaine? It's not exactly something that fucks too much with memory nor creativity.

There is an epilogue ending in the book with Bill and his wife, like in the mini series
It was all of them, finally leaving all that bad behind them with IT being finally finished. And their memories fade forever of all of it ever happening, but not the feelings and connections for one another
Honestly, I thought the ending for IT has been one of King's best endings
And it's so fucking unironical how Bill having shit endings, which is mirrored at King. And they even have a fucking sidequest with King, going on about this subject. And they literally do the same fucking thing that the tv lifetime edition movie did, only with hi tech computer graphics and gore
It's even campier and zanier than the first one

Why did the monsters look so bad here? That scene at the chinese bar was almost laughable

The first trailer for this even had superhero type music, I was confused

>Finally get to see ITs true form
>At least we'll get a cool monster
>...
>It's just giant Pennywise with 8 legs

Anyone else feel horribly cheated?

You literally cannot see IT's true form, the deadlights are the closest representation.

Thats in the macroverse or whatever it is where Bill meditates to in the ritual.

Its true physical form on earth is a monstrous spider, as that's closest to it's true energy form. It certainly wasn't an 8 legged clown.

Yet in the book we got a giant horrific spider creature and one hell of a final showdown. Honestly so fucking sick of Hollywood taking the easy and safe route. You want to make an actual scary movie? Have the balls to make something grotesque and monstrous like the book. Seriously fuck them for making that choice.

Honestly the Chinese food monsters were the best ones to me, they were creative and silly and didn't look bad it was the other ones like the cartoon Leper which somehow looks worse than the last movie and the ridiculous grandma who had my theater laughing their asses off that really looked the worst. Seriously she showed up twice and never seemed to illicit any scares, it didn't help that she was the twist from what was shown in the trailers though. At least in the last movie the twist from the trailer scene had a much better payoff with the goofy giant Pennywise face with the big smile coming out of the projector. The lanky naked grandma was just awful

The turtle's dead guys
Let's just kick the can down the road and see if they'll get it right the next time

>being afraid of a big spider

>the cartoon Leper
He was one of the highlights of the first movie to me, but they did him dirty here, like what the fuck was that music that played when he vomited

Thematically and as an all around answer to fear, It being a giant spider down in the sewer is pretty much the perfect choice. Tapping into one of the most common fears, having a creature that really looks evil and alien, and having the correlation between floating with balloons and being stuck in cobwebs. Pretty fucking good solution I'd say.

I really liked him in that one too, I was astounded how differently he was utilized in this one. Treated like a damn gag, and it's weird because he was actually pretty interesting with the set-up of him attacking the Mom while chained. Once freed though it was just a comedy skit and went way too far. The cgi on him looked so much worse than the first movie too

>the lucky stoner didn't get his part when the water tower exploded
Or whatever one it was, that was Stan's fear.

you actually thought they would show the gangbang?

Was the negro character as pointless as he was in the first? He actually did shit in the book

Redpill me.

Read it

>Eddie gets stabbed in the fucking face
>starts laughing

almost like that's his coping mechanism or something

Why did Pennywise kill that gay dude in the beginning? Did he only kill kids

Kids are easier/tastier but he'll kill adults if he wants. He needs some tragedy to start his new cycle, the cycle the losers club originally deal with started from the black spot being burnt down. The one they deal with as adults is started by one of the few people who genuinely love Derry being the target of a hate crime.

I might read a book over 1000 pages, but only if I get a good rundown.

>adrenaline
>panic
>stuck with a psycho who's laughing
>laugh in shock along with him to maybe appease him long enough to get the upper hand

>Richie's hand on Eddie's leg

Attached: 145678765678.png (640x360, 311K)

Marvel quips have destroyed cinema. Star Wars used to have humor and comical situation, nu-wars was full of quick and yo mama jokes because Marvel! every character is RDJ now, even Thor morphed into a quipping machine.

yeah it was quite jarring when Richi whipped out his cock mid battle with Pennywise and started fucking Eddie's chest wound. really took me out of the moment

Agreed.

How does this make you feel, Yea Forums?

Attached: tumblr_cca368330e08049902fbb1ff57e7e9b3_23ed84aa_640.png (640x360, 211K)

seriously. She's rocking some fantastic cleavage throughout the entire movie.

fuck this film, thought it wasnt scary at all I enjoyed the first film but this one is awful all the jokes are fucking forced and remove all seriousness
too much jumpscares and shitty cgi scenes I hate it

Says a lot when the 90's movie with all its goofy effects and drider nonsense actually is scarier if only by strangeness. How did they manage to fuck it up that bad?

>actually is scarier if only by strangeness

Take off your nostalgia goggles, faggot.

Probably the best scene of the movie and my favourite between chapter 1 and 2.

The point went right above your head. It was an insult to the new one, not a compliment to the old.

Attached: 439573240943.jpg (600x623, 33K)

Why did you pay to see this movie when you knew what you were in for?

give me a quick rundown on the turtle bros, why is it such a relevant character mentioned by all the fans of stephen king?

There's talk of a prequel so who knows what they'll delve into

GET DOWN WITH THE SICKNESS

yeah Alien and The thing are immortals because of their well done traditional effects but this shitty movie will be obsolete in less than a decade because of cgi abuse and forced marvel tier jokes
I will read the book only because this piece of crap disappointed me so much that I left the cinema angry

The IT miniseries did not age well, shitty stop motion spider included.

I haven't seen that series but I quite enjoy old shitty effects like Jason and the Argonauts so I wouldnt mind probably

It's well below Jason and the Argonauts level stop motion. It was shitty even at its time.

This movie really needed to cut out a lot of the flashbacks. We didn't need all of the kids individually confronting It a second time, that was already addressed in Chapter One. These scenes just added a ridiculous runtime and weird CGI pubescent faces.

this.

the opening scene was pure garbage.

>Georgie chases the newspaper ship down the street gutter
>*CUE LETTERBOXING*
>CGI RAINSTORM
>ZOOMS IN DIRECTLY INTO NEWSPAPER SHIP
>TRACKS NEWSPAPER SHIP PERFECTLY AS IT FLOATS DOWN THE GUTTER
>"HEY MILLENNIALS! PUT YOUR PHONES DOWN AND PAY ATTENTION! THIS IS IMPORTANT!"
What a piece of shit

>Also bookfags is it explained why Bev marries a guy just her dad?
Most women do

The first one was a solid 4/10 shitfest
What did you expect?

>Age well
It looked like shit when it came out. It was a low budget tv movie. The fact that it is still remembered today is a feat in itself

does the movie have bevs husband abusing her or flashbacks of her dad giving her the abuse?

Imagine if Bev had an incest babby. The entire town already thinks she is a whore and they see her running around with a bunch of boys one of which is black. She would be a 13 year old drop out. probably would have went into porn

The actual jokes were pretty funny but the fucking quips ruined it

>Only really care about how they did the spider
>It's just some gay centaur-looking thing according to most people

Say it ain't so anons

Please

Is Richie a fag in the books too?

Eddie's the fag in the book, but Richie does frequently call him cute and reacts the worst to Eddie's death.

>all of them grew up to have successful careers
Most unrealistic thing in the movie

After fucking bullying him to death
Just because they do the same weak shit from the book doesn't make it ok because you recognise it nostalgiacuck

It's from the book, it's because of the Pennywise curse. They all become successful (barring Mike because he stays in Derry), but the price is that they are all infertile.

He doesn't even get to do that here tho, he just dicks around for a bit like a slapstick villain and dies

Unironically though - If you thought the movie would be anything other than "alright" I don't know what's wrong with you.

>ITS BACK... Now we gotta stop it.. for real this time.. by doing the same thing as before
What can you really expect?

Can any bookfags explain why the space demon took on the persona of pennywise/the old lady's dad?

I don't understand what you are complaining about? Are you saying they shouldn't have focused on the paper boat?

what kind of dumbfuck curse is that

that's cute desu

the originals were shit to begin with. they were mediocre television films and the new ones are a cash grab exploring your nostalgia. what did you expect?

Is the turtle in this?

The old lady was another glamor. IT just found it convenient/"fun"

The "Stephen-King-at-the-absolute-peak-of-his-cocaine-binge-phase" kind of curse

>instead of tearing its heart out they yell at it till it becomes small
This fucking can't be real

Is this bait?

Does the fat one still like New Kids on the Block?

There's more than one way to make him small ;^)

I want to grind my pussy with Finn’s

>not wanting to grind against Eddie's smooth legs

Its a decent monkeys paw, but modern people want to live decadently and kill off their linage so it doesn't translate well.

What was the point of It using Henry in chapter 2? The point where It releases Henry It could just kill the adults off one by one if It actually wanted to, but it's still in the messing around stage so why the fuck did It get Henry involved.

Here's a fairly accurate summary of the final confrontation
>you're just a clown
>I'm not just a clown I'm the eater of worlds :( (the movie doesn't allude to what the fuck this means either so it feels extremely out of place)
>no you're just a clown
>repeat above line about 10 times
>pennywise shrinks down to a tiny old spider clown thing
>'you're so scared we can hear your heart beating'
>this makes pennywise have a beating heart
>they gently pull the heart out of baby-pennywise while he looks very sad and then squish it
overall very garbage

why is it a monkey's paw at all though, why not make them both unsuccessful and infertile, or just infertile?

I'm glad im not the only one who noticed Eddie's cute soft legs

If you achieve something in your life it can make whatever you can't stand out more, if you achieve nothing you can still be happy about having no real pressure to do anything see: the neetlife.

I’m fine with either ones

Attached: 43F96CDB-7F22-4FB3-8EDE-690DC67B4F8C.jpg (1600x902, 130K)

I can see why Eddie became Richie's gay awakening and oneitis.

Attached: c82460c8-f2be-4acf-8144-0d5bc1187c02.png (540x540, 638K)

It really is.

Attached: 15678976545678.gif (245x145, 751K)

sticc

Fack thread?

Attached: 9016CFA5-2DE0-4978-9ED8-045D40AE4A81.jpg (633x633, 73K)

Shipping real people is weird, just ship Reddie.

Attached: tumblr_ox12ewCRBG1wu1chfo1_400.gif (268x300, 1.97M)

>So you know how people loved the creepy tone of the first
lmao
you fucking wish

>ywn know what prime shota thighs smell like

Attached: Ryan reeeing .png (1242x761, 1.43M)

based and Christianpilled.
Amen brother.

fuck off raghead.

There’s not much reddie content until the HD rip of chapter 2 is released

Attached: 406CFDF9-AB12-4116-9863-4C9E723BA535.jpg (638x637, 97K)

>He carved R+E on the kissing bridge, motherfucker
Why are you degenerate roasties always so mad?

y-yes

>why not make them both unsuccessful and infertile, or just infertile?
King's a great storyteller but a shitty writer, he loves his characters and won't execute them if the story needs it. That's what got me over him finally. He got me through some teen times tho.

Yes you do, think back to your childhood

Nothing to be mad about here, my ship is canon.

Attached: 6db03f6a-9f71-4185-aaa7-ea6d20220fec.jpg (800x370, 70K)

god i wish that were me

Holy shit they actually went with the shota foot fetish route?

>my fan-service ship is canon
Wow user we're all so very happy for you

No, it is the Turtle that made them infertile, because then they dont’t have any extra package (children) when the it is time for the final confrontation with It, and as an apology the Turtle made them successfull

Yes, Eddie slaps Richie with his feet

>he loves his characters and won't execute them if the story needs it. That's what got me over him finally.
Exactly how many of his books did you read? Because it couldn't have been many if you think he's afraid of killing off characters....

So does Richie have a foot fetish now?

>Richie
>Caring about being infertile
fag made out like a bandit.

>bullying Pennywise into becoming a baby
What did Andrew Muschietti mean by this?

Attached: 2CAC8310-9C44-496F-9BB3-82E84D4E87B4.jpg (1734x624, 1005K)

First film was garbage

>oh no it seems there's too much plot in here
>better throw in a pointless jump scare scene to keep the normie's attention

Can anybody who’s seen the movie explain what that crazy shot of Pennywise rubbing off his makeup in the trailers was?

It’s just an unexplained jumpscare, the entire scene was in the trailers bar Pennywise’s usual schtick of “Boo! You’ll float”

Amen.

God I wish that foot was me

I can't believe no one said it before. Old Bev looks like shit

she looked fine. you just have no taste

I'm so happy that Reddie is real :3

>all of the loserclub are very successful except the only black in the cast
really get my noggins joggins

So are the gay guys that get attacked, flamers like in the novel?

Jack looks like he's 'bouta getting JUST'd, is he okay?

idk that sounds completely out of Eddie's character. It's something Jack would do not Eddie. Richie should be the one doing that

It's not something 2017 Eddie wouldn't do. The character from the first movie was already different from the book

The first one was also shit bro

Can't wait to see it tonight so I can read the thread. From what I've read in the first few posts, it's probably not worth my money. What are you guys paying btw? 11€ pp. here. Sounds ok