Was he a good Voldemort?

Based Fiennes is a good anything

> there was a lot more to Voldemort than what was just shown in the stupid fucking movies.
Elaborate

All you need to know:
youtu.be/9FXD6rl7Tic

This. I don't know why people say that Fantastic Beasts ruined the franchise when the Prisoner of Azkaban was the last HP move that wasn't crap

Based

If this wasnt the first post id be disappointed

He's a bad Englishman.

>age 56
>no kids and wife

>He was a deh Voldemort.
ftfy

Attached: gocrazy6.jpg (412x440, 55K)

Good Voldemort
Shitty M

no voldemort was evil, how did you miss that

I mostly agree but I love HBP cause of the comfy high school shenanigans. And the pensieve sequences are kino. All the others after PoA are trash of varying degrees though

4 is like some weird parody. I liked it a lot when it first came out but so many of the character portrayals are bizarre as fuck. It gets meme'd here but Barty Crouch (& junior), Karkaroff, etc are just weird. I know it's supposed to be a kooky magic world but it didn't work a lot of the time. The Voldemort sequence in the graveyard is great though

Did he cut his nose off for the role?

>dull

Yes. Talk about dedication.

I read the books and I still don't remember or know much about voldemort. He was like short hand for hilter cuz he was racists to half wizards.. but that was just his motivation I guess. They never tell you why he is the way he is or give him enough characteristics other than evil guy to make it work.

Chad Fiennes is a good anything. It's a tragedy how much prime Fiennes kino we lost because of HP shit.

Attached: EnglishPatient-Almasy.jpg (1200x600, 325K)

Smoothbrain spotted. He was evil because he was abandoned in an unloving and abusive environment by his parents, then discovered that his muggle father left his witch mother which resulted in her death.

>being retarded

He was evil because he was conceived under the effects of a love potion which left him unable to feel or understand love.

There's a video only a few posts up which explain a bunch about him moron.

and he was conceived using a love potion so he couldnt feel love

That's something JK said later, it's not in the books

O well then we can confidently ignore it since she's crazy.

wizard made their poop disappear before toilets and hermione was black. We know

The existence of a ministry of magic, and the various titles of its members, implies the existence of wizard elections. So, these wizards must have differing political positions. Yet no character ever mentions, much less discusses, their politics.

The children of wizards are almost always wizards which suggests some genetic component to magic ability; the most successful wizards are also the most studious which suggests that effort and determination matters most; and, the final books centre on the existence of some all-powerful wand that contradicts.

Why did the "evil" wizards dislike muggles and mudbloods? Why did the other "evil" wizards follow Voldemort? Did they only recognise strength? Or did he best express a philosophical position that they all shared?

Voldemort is the Magneto of this universe except he's a little more crazy.

Positions being elected doesn't mean the proles are the ones doing the voting. The Wizarding and Muggles worlds split in the 1690s, but in the Muggle world even as late as 1780 only 214,000 people (less than 3% of the total population) had the right to vote in UK elections.

Also the Elder Wand isn't all-powerful, Dumbledore beat Grindlewald when he had the Elder Wand.

That sounds like something straight from my primary school fanfiction, did she really say that

Grindelwald was never the rightful possessor of the Elder Wand as he stole it from Gregorovitch.

I had thought this, but Muggles pose little if any threat to Wizards in the same way Man threatens Mutant.

>Grindelwald was never the rightful possessor of the Elder Wand as he stole it from Gregorovitch.
He must have been because otherwise Malfoy then Harry wouldn't have been either