What are some funny kinos about clueless "experts" and nepotism?

I could sail the seas with those underpants.

The left has become what the religious right were back when i was growing up. What a time to be alive.

Based Jahns. One of the few critics I trust

Watch something like Big Brother season 4 and see how far we have fallen as a nation. Gay jokes, asian jokes, etc etc were FINE and understood for primetime network banter. I know it was already over then but it's shocking how quickly a societal PC push and take effect. far as I can tell 2008 was the end of the end i think.

>first critic review is a literal we wuz kangz

>Like dropping in on a rascally uncle who doesn't know, or doesn't care, how much he's disappointing you.
This is kino

>I couldn't help but appreciate the fact that, well, this guy will do it; he'll go there.
Who are some other guys who make you say this?

Attached: 30603422_436027613506095_5652134789252120576_n.jpg (1080x1080, 58K)

FUCK DID HE SAY ABOUT 30 YEAR OLD PUSSY?

Attached: DuPDkulVYAAH8PJ2z2xzcx.jpg (324x339, 23K)

Nice to see the social engineers once again being forced to eat a giant shit sandwich in front of everyone

/pol/ did this

WHOOOOOOOOO

Attached: DuPDkulVYAAH8PJ2z2.jpg (216x284, 21K)

you could dress a whole family of from the india with that amount of fabric.

As if there needed to be more proof about special interests controlling the media.

>rotten tomatoes

Attached: 740e8ef5a3452467b0dcc2060796b6976ac6807bff7d6ab7b0d61780508b16b0.png (718x293, 45K)

people are sickened to the extent to which our media is manipulated, bought and paid for
living in a jewish nation is vile

Jesus Christ

>17%
Only because Chappelle didn't mock white people enough and said things that were actually true which they didn't want to hear.

Based Jeremy

Good to know she's completely irrelevant now

I hope more people go this direction, just call your audience fucking idiots that are at fault for loads of our current problems. And these stupid libcucks will keep going to his shows and make him richer.

the ride never ends

Attached: 1522082094974.jpg (312x345, 21K)

>Inkoo
Is that a woman's name?

I think she's from Splatoon

is this shit mainstream now?

Attached: 1535000608812.jpg (555x526, 82K)

>irrelevance
He's a fucking FAMOUS MOVIE DIRECTOR you dumb thot. Utterly hilarious from the literal who """critic""".

This is what prime looks like.

is it weird that I don't wanna wear Calvin underwear now just for seeing her in some? I mean, what if by some freak accident I get that sample she was wearing? Yikes

>ContraPoints: I'm Embarrassed For Dave Chappelle

youtube.com/watch?v=Mflbw5-66aM

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHH

also Hasan confirms he's a retard by saying he learned about blacks from fictional TV comedy shows

Attached: contra youtube.jpg (1280x720, 77K)

why do you want to give them 'controversy'/hate clicks?

or even want them to occupy your mind?

I generally agree with your premise, but I love their spergery

i get sad watching stuff like chappelle's show or old madtv
the second we stopped being able to make fun of things like race or gender without vitriol, race and gender relations turned to shit

>I'm embarrassed for this rich and respected black man says man wearing dress and lipstick
POIGNANT

that guy is fucking gross, cant stand his tranny shit and voice

>I'm Embarrassed For Dave Chappelle

Attached: 1566972853963.png (533x562, 477K)

Which joke did you find the funniest?

do Scaruffi reviews stand-up shows?

youtube.com/watch?v=hPmJWBurnlU

What is that thing?

Should be embarrassed for himself

>I’m not mad, I’m embarrassed for them
Imagine being this condescending

How fat r u?

Von trier, Scorsese

Attached: 1534991906076.jpg (480x653, 56K)

such a lust for revenge...

>the T's hate my fuckin guts! And I don't blame em, it's not their fault, it's mine. I can't stop telling jokes about these niggers!

Justice for Juicy

well I'm just saying. What if one of the atoms in the stuff she was wearing travels back in time through quantum shit and then ends up in another one that I'm buying? know what I mean?

How did the practice of leaving it up to smug Jews and white women to tell you whether or not they like something become a part of American culture? Does any other country do stupid shit like this? I will never ever understand how rotten tomatoes is a thing.

I don't know, user. It's almost like you can choose to ignore reviews entirely and make up your own mind about shit.

All you faggots are doing posting this is making them more relevant by giving them publicity. There's no such thing as bad publicity.

What a beautiful woman

Butthurt asian mad because of his impression lmaoing at her life

Attached: 1566426230308.png (438x441, 223K)

>six "professiinals" vs thousands of amateurs

If anything they should lose their jobs just for being so far off the critical consensus. There is having an opinion and theres just being empirically wrong, nd its obvious which one this is.

Imagine the smell

>irrelevance

The irony of making this statement while writing for AV Club.

A literal YouTuber's opinions are held in the same regard as, let's say, the New York Times

Attached: maxresdefault (4).jpg (1280x720, 36K)

Political correctness and comedy are antithetical.

>Women (Female) reviewing comedy

Opinion 100% invalidated

Ignoring the slow push that led to that point in time, "Thanks, Obama" is unironically a reasonable conclusion to come to

kek they literally target fat obese niggers women like this

>there are "people" that unironically listen to this dude for political advice
LMAO

Attached: 1567544315818.png (219x216, 65K)

dude libtards are outraged let me post these 5 reviews I found literally no one cares

you should just not buy calvin klein because it's not a good brand

that's them, they're shilling on Yea Forums, this precise post has been made countless times, if you clicked on that link you just got played hard.

/our eceleb/

And his opinion is better and more relevant lol, newspapers are dead, nigga

>conservatives think saying traditionally normal things is edgy

it's not really politically incorrect until everyone hates you

what hasan piker said about 911 was politically incorrect and everybody hated what he said including liberals and leftists

Attached: 300676_orig.jpg (500x336, 35K)

I take it he didn't like it? I haven't got time to watching it yet, I'm at work.

>including liberals and leftists
LOL good one user, there are faggots on here that say the same jokes everyday, lefties pretend to be outraged to save their skin

Its not that they are clueless, its that they care more about the politics of a piece than the quality of its content

He gave it a 4

look at the youngturk videos after he said that. they were overwhelmingly thumbed down which implies their liberal audience hated those comments
cenk like a cuck bent over backwards to apologize for his nephew's comments

only in your fantasy word do leftists hate america. most leftists especially the normie ones are just as jingoistic as the conservatives. my aunt for example watches msnbc and will post jingoistic crap all over her facebook

so let me get this straight: the person who was so irrelevant he changed his gender to get attention is going to accuse others of coping?
me thinks he doth protest too much

I know, it's crazy! A Youtuber's opinion should be held in greater much greater regard than the New York Times!

Well, they are both shit

is he transgender or in an 80s hair metal band? it's impossible to tell the difference.

not true

youtube.com/watch?v=x_JCBmY9NGM

Well the advertisement is not wrong, problem for them is that the truth is she is a lazy fatass

Yea, they're just getting tons of publicity from random posts on Yea Forums, because Yea Forums is so relevant, huh?
I wish you election tourists would fuck off and stop pretending that Yea Forums represents the real world, people shitpost their retarded articles here all the time and these journalists still lose money, lose clicks, and in many cases lose their jobs.
Someone shitting on them on Yea Forums ain't bringing in any publicity, especially on a board like Yea Forums, which is lucky to hit 50k posts a day, which ain't shit compared to the internet at large.

>>conservatives think saying traditionally normal things is edgy
no you do

no one thinks its amazing to say trannies are gross, except the political majority and elites browbeating the numerical majority

Just stop dude you're even more cringeworthy

Best show on Netflix

This isnt "the media".

>Upcoming kino that will get 200% on RT
>irrelevant

Where he talked about not being able to make fun of gays but could say the n word on tv

They can bombard people with propaganda all day, but everyone is born with more natural inclinations and at least so far, they haven't found a way to override that. They're fighting against human nature and that's not a battle humanity can ever win.

Yes. You mean you have a big bang theory level of humor

Transsexuals always have the most sickening takes on everything jesus christ. Why don't they just pump the brakes on always trying to be the snarkiest bitch in the room and just try being nice sometime, try being likable?

Very little good comedy is politically incorrect. Its arbitrary to draw the line, but must politically incorrect stuff is edgelords being racist without a joke.

wtf would your uncle care what you think? should be the other way around

they have to out-gay the gays
they have to out-dyke the dykes
they have to out-slut the sluts
their goals change based entirely on their mood and that mood is determined by self-inflicted hormone imbalance and natural/nurtured mania

Reviewing things is an inherently female endeavor. Men don't review shit.

Why does a youtuber get to be considered a "critic" when he doesn't even work for a reputable company or have a journalism degree?

Why dont incels? Look how bitchy your post is. No wonder everyone says incels have female brains

Imagine writing this. No politically correct comedy is remotely good.

Why only 6 reviews?

Reviewing things isnt journalism.

Most comedy is politically correct. Most jokes are. Sorry you're out of touch.

use adblock.

Imagine getting mogged by Jenny "Fetal Alcohol Syndrome" Nicholson of all people. Jenny's cute though.

>Chinkgook Kang

The thing is, there were always people who got offended by standup or sketch comedy jokes. But they were always on the sidelines. They were typically conservatives and religious types and soccer moms. Today, the offended folk are younger, hipper. They have social media which gives them a megaphone to announce their virtues. It's become en vogue to be offended on behalf of oneself and on behalf of others. Habitual victimization is rewarded in current year, whereas it was once ignored or even mocked in the past.

Why are trannies so arrogant? Shouldn't they be humble considering they are "victims"?

i only use adblock on non icognito and i dont want this shit fucking my already-fucked algorithm (or give it clicks or that gross thing living in my headspace)

Imagine thinking that if you put quotes around something it's a joke

it's a funny joke, she has a gross midwestern-genes face

Explaining it was even less funny.

get better taste in women and also stop getting offended on behalf of e-celebs

William, it's time to put away the lipstick and go back to being an effeminate twink.

This has nothing to do with women

Cringe

I get it. You're both really unfunny.

What is your height?

so it has everything to do with you tying your self-worth to the youtube channels you subscribe to? good to know, but I could already tell you weren't much of a human being

Unfunny people always think when they bomb with a lame joke, it must be because everyone is offended. You're not offensive dude. just sad

but you're clearly offended because someone insulted your lumpy cottage cheese waifu

6'2"

I dont even know who it is. Maybe you should watch YouTube videos about joke writing instead of whatever this is.

nice try

Because there aren't many different ways you can feign the same moral outrage already expressed in the existing reviews. Also the circles those reviewers travel in won't allow for anyone to provide a real look at the content if they perceive it as being completely invalidated by wrongthink in them. There's nothing new anyone can write without it being derivative. That or involuntarily taking a stand against the mob, which doesn't help the career prospects of a reviewer.

I dont know who she is. You're missing the point and desperately trying to find reasons why you somehow are funny and it's just defending some chick. It's not. You're just really unfunny. Really really unfunny.

How broad are your shoulders?

People were calling us histrionic cunts for freaking out about ES JAY DOUBLE Us back then. Apologize.

based explains the science behind the situation
cringe too many buzzwords, seems like zero original thought put into the post

I mean she's not wrong. The rehashed joke of "What if I identified as (insert something ridiculous) that would be nuts!" is a pretty stupid comparison and lazy writing.

>I don't know who she is
so you offended by a FAS joke because you have the condition? or someone close to you does?
you understand it's not a naturally occurring phenomenon, correct?

Yeah, seriously. Chappelle used to have a show on *cable* television with skits about the Niggar family and about how if black people were given reparations, they'd spent it all on dice games and booze.

Funnily enough, most of the really good edgy/"based" comedy these days comes from the dirtbag left sphere, like Cum Town. It's because if that stuff comes from the right, it either gets deplatformed or the comedians get so mad about whatever political problems they have that their comedy turns into a rant about Jews and blacks before they get to the punchline and it turns out being awful, or both (eg.: Sam Hyde).

Accurate, and kino rebuttal. Ignore the previous response.

Just watched it. It was hilarious and a breath of fresh air

>we wuz inkoo kangz

They were never anywhere close to this insane.

>I mean she's
remainder of opinion discarded

if they were well adjusted they wouldnt be trannies

Whatever it is it's wearing a dress and has lipstick on so i'll call it a she

It was a perfect storm of "thanks Obama" and iPhones and Facebook. I was a massive fucking liberal commie fag in that era; all my friends were. Now all my friends are teetering Nazism due to how absolutely fucked things have become recently.

>Reviewing things isnt journalism.

yeah huh

If you look at reviews in the past, generally the critic score and the audience scores line up. There are some exceptions, but in those exceptions, they usually became popular later, as evidenced by poor box offices.
At a certain point, critics became completely disconnected with audiences, and I think it's because the criteria for grading movies changed for critics. For audiences, they grade based on whether they thought the movie was good or not, whether they enjoyed it. This isn't always entirely fair (they might hate a movie for being "dumb" when the movie never claimed to be smart and made it clear it was dumb from the get-go), but they're judging the movie on its own merits as a movie.
For critics, their score of a movie depends on whether or not the movie adheres to left politics or goes against it. If it steers too far from their politics, it gets a bad review. If it parrots their politics verbatim, it gets a good review. The actual movie doesn't matter. It's all political. Chappelle's current special is an example of this: the quote everyone throws around is the critic calling it "pernicious garbage." He got that word "pernicious" by looking up "toxic" in a thesaurus. Calling things "toxic garbage" is a politically left thing. Something being "toxic" just means it teaches the "wrong" kind of thing to think. It's the same sort of thing Christian conservatives were saying about popular media decades ago, that it contained "bad ideas" that would poison and corrupt the youth. This kind of talk really has no place in a movie review, the reviewer's political agenda really has no bearing on whether a movie is good or not and should only come up as a recognition of personal bias, because it's certainly easy to enjoy something that doesn't align with your world view (people do it every day), yet it's commonplace now in modern day criticism.

It's because, in a sense, trans women *are* women : whiny, annoying, hypercritical, passive-aggressive, snarky, and over-emotional.

Real women have to downplay these innate traits in order to attract men and bring them into a positive long-term relationship, the same way high-T men have to temper down their innate violent/aggressive/risk-exposed traits to attract women.

Trannies don't have any long-term relationships, and have a complete monopoly on the "shameful closeted homosexual who won't admit that he just wants to fuck men" dating market (their only dating market), so they don't have to temper down shit when their hormones make them act like women at their worst.

This doesn't imply that politically correct media is good. Reality and nature are not constrained by your ideologies.

How sexist.

Retarded take. Yes, if you're looking at a comedian who's deliberately trying to be politically incorrect for the sake of being politically incorrect, you get "le ebic 14 genderz xD amirite??" edgelords.

But watch like, literally any good comedy made before the year 2010. You will find things that would be considered "politically incorrect" in modern times.

I said that at the start. It's a bad idea, but I just turns out most good jokes are innocuous

Astute observation. There's something in it to offend everybody which is what makes it likely true.

Yeah but you're gonna have to cherry pick to find it which is exactly my point.

No I'm just pointing out you aren't funny. I'm not offended by you.

no
maybe the most broadly appealing jokes are innocuous Seinfeld-tier "airplane food!" jokes
but the shit that people with taste like is typical weirder, edgier, harder shit

Yup, millions of them. Meanwhile, you have 0 listeners.

LMAO

Medium? How do people normally answer that? You're kinda creepy.

keep telling me how not offended you are, maybe I'll believe it after the 10th reply

How prominent is your adam's apple?

One buzzword?

It's still socially acceptable edgy. Sorry man, you're mainstream.

>Yeah but you're gonna have to cherry pick to find it which is exactly my point.
What. Chappelle's being attacked right now for content that's significantly more mild than what aired on the Chappelle show, and that was a prime-time network show.

Does no-one in this thread fucking understand simple statistics? A sample size of 6 doesn't mean much. Wait until more critic reviews are up before evaluating.

what is this weird projection thing you're doing in every single post? take your meds

Good reply. I think you're offended if you have to keep projecting. You're not funny and that's a statement of fact. Everything else is your desperate spin.

>Chappelle's being attacked right now for content that's significantly more mild than what aired on the Chappelle show, and that was a prime-time network show.
it all went to shit so fast

Attached: h6ct0ab8znb31.jpg (960x983, 151K)

Dave Chappelle is not most comedy. You're still cherry picking.

>I'm not offended and I need you to know that
>I swear I'm not offended you're just not funny
>No really, I'm not, but ... you are, you're clearly offended, yeah, that's it, you are...

The chad Jeremy

(((critics)))
Imagine telling your mom youre a critic on RT. She runs to her room crying that her child is being gangbanged every night by people in mouse costumes, and she has failed.

K but you were the first one to bring up offended. You should have thought that through better.

Interesting post, if I can expand on it. Since trannies aren't real women, they're forced to adopt and exaggerate every female trait available to them in order to differentiate from their true biological male selves. They have no choice but to shoot for the extremes because not doing so will inevitably pull them back towards their non-feminine male starting point. Real women don't share the same compulsion to shoot for the absolute extremes (at least intentionally) because their starting point is already feminine, and so falling back on their innate state of being will never feel like an existential threat. They have the freedom to rein in the negatives in an effort to exist in the real world. Trannies on the other hand can only afford to ease up on their act while in private, but must amplify all feminine traits at the moments it's most destructive. The situation is inverted, much like their genitals.

What about South Park? Mel Brooks is cited as being an influential comedy writer, and he had constant holocaust and greedy jew jokes in his content, not to mention numerous drops of the word nigger. Hell, Simpsons has a few episodes making fun of gays, transexuals, minorities, essentially everyone really, and it's among the most watched shows on the planet. Is that still cherry picking, or do I need to point out every single show that's been politically incorrect prior to 2010?

>you first the one
maybe because you replied like a chick on twitter to someone calling a nerd girl e-celeb ugly

>it all went to shit so fast
It was your fault all along

t. Millennial who wasn't alive during the Satanic Panic.

Yea, that's why people always talk about how Brian Regan is an amazing comedian and no one ever says anything about people like George Carlin, Bill Burr, or the guy that this very thread is about, Dave Chappelle.
That's why people remember Eddie Murphy for Daddy Day Care as opposed to Beverly Hills Cop.
Because all the really good jokes are actually innocuous.
Yep.

Politics is a fair criteria to judge a movie or comedy special by, because it's hard to laugh and enjoy a movie when it's offending you. It's entirely fair to say you don't like or like a movie or show as long as you're honest and upfront with your reasons. The issue isn't with criticism but how people view criticism: instead of reading the article and finding out what the author didn't like about the movie or show, and then determining whether or not those issue will also be an issue for them, readers just look at a score on RT, which doesn't really tell you anything. They just look at scores and headlines. Then they get upset when they like something that critics didn't like because they ignore that tastes aren't objective, and that while you might like something, it doesn't mean the rest of the world will.
I'd say bigger real issue is that so many critics lean left. There's not a lot of diversity of point of view within professional criticism. When every thought professional critics opine is the same thought and critics are almost entirely indistinguishable from one another, it shows how stagnate the profession is. And it really is a dead profession thanks for the internet giving non-professional critics a platform for discuss movies and be heard on a large scale.

They were and still are that insane. Just go check out any average boomer right-wing forum. They act just like the liberal caricatures of them - buying into bullshit like QAnon and Birtherism, gullibly swallowing every conspiracy theory someone manages to put into a coherent sentence, etc. And that's not even to mention the Christcuck fundamentalists.

Given the direction things inevitably took, they weren't wrong.

Attached: Drag-Queen-Story-Hour-6-1024x727.jpg (1024x727, 144K)

Difference is that I could probably count the boomer right-wing forums that anyone cares about on the internet on 2 hands.
Back in the 80s/90s that shit was mainstream, it's not anymore.
Now the liberal version of it is mainstream.

The satanic panic people believed in a lot more specific things than just "there are many elite pedophiles" (a claim that is obviously true just given statistics). They were wrong about specifics.

Maybe there aren't many separate forums but there aren't really many separate liberal forums that anyone cares about either - it's mainly Reddit and the comments sections of a few big journalistic organizations. Lots and lots of people go to the right-wing boomer forums. They're almost as mainstream as the liberal ones.

Name 10 right wing boomer forums please.

Not to mention they clutched their pearls at any bit of nudity and to a lesser extent violence. Literally the original "won't SOMEONE think of the children???" assholes.

comparing lgbt to a roadtrip

Bitch looks likes Biggie with dreads.

But his point does bear truth in the real world. These people were nothing until they had an audience. Ignore them, put them out of your mind, and you'll realize just how outnumbered they are. Seeking them out and confronting them only fuels them. They want to be seen. They want to be heard. And anything you say will be twisted to promote their cause. Look at what they do to our dumb-ass president.

I can't think of 10, but Free Republic, Breitbart comment sections, and Fox News comment sections are all big. And obviously there are lots of conservative boomers out there, otherwise Trump would have lost.

nice

>These people were nothing until they had an audience.
And if you think they got that audience because of Yea Forums then you're even more delusional than he is.
Again, Yea Forums is generally irrelevant, the only times that wasn't the case was during the Fappening/Gamergate and Chanology.

Well first of all, Trump lost the popular vote.
Secondly, Free Republic is not what I would call big, and Breitbart is hardly mainstream.
In fact, Breitbart has similar traffic history to Yea Forums.
rank2traffic.com/Yea Forums.org
rank2traffic.com/breitbart.com
Look dude, I'm not sure what your point here is, I'm not even white and even I can admit that conservative boomers are irrelevant to the mainstream pop culture zeitgeist as a whole at the moment.
They have their little cliques, but they're not part of literally every aspect of mainstream culture like liberals are.

>popular vote

Attached: 1567529395460.png (3920x2356, 1.96M)

And where we're at now is the end result of the permissiveness that really got moving in the '60s. Conservative reactions are always rooted a worry about the consequences of a negative change that newer generations are too in the middle of to recognize for themselves. You might not give a shit now but, so as long as you're not some massive degenerate, you'll fall into the exact same pattern eventually.

Yes user, popular vote.
Do you not know how to follow a reply chain?

Nah, he'll plug his ears and ignore it, do you think people actually change beyond age 26?

do you not understand how irrelevant the popular vote is? even without considering the part where it literally doesn't matter, it's a fucked idea

Again, do you not know how to follow a reply chain?

unironically upvoted

>lefties pretend to be outraged to save their skin
This, I have no respect for lefty libtards that pretend to be offended. They need to man up and stop being cucks.

>otherwise trump would have lost
>but trump lost the popular vote!

People lost their jobs after being accused of being satanists. A guy's family was killed in a fire, and they used the fact that he listened to heavy metal music as evidence he was an evil satanist who must have started the fire, and put him on death row for it. Fucking D&D was banned in tons of places, and a decade later the same people were making bonfires of Pokemon cards and Harry Potter books. Don't act like they were sane or right.

Sure, I agree that liberals (in the burger sense of the word) now dominate mainstream discourse in the US. My original point was that conservative puritans "were and still are that insane". Which, based on what what you've said, I don't think you would disagree with.

Okay, so since you seem to be brain damaged let me walk you through.
The argument is about mainstream culture, talking about the electoral college in regards to which political beliefs are mainstream in American culture is a moronic move, since the popular vote, by definition, more accurately reflects the popular position.
I am positing that right wing beliefs are not popular in the American mainstream, because they're not, you'd have to be retarded or a woman who doesn't understand what the word "popular" means to believe that they are.

I never disagreed, I just stated that the insane conservatives are irrelevant in the modern era, unlike the insane liberals.
Hence why I generally don't care about the conservatives REEEEEEEing on the internet.

I get your point, but I do care. They're relatively irrelevant now, but these things have changed in the past and will probably change again. So while I focus most of my attention on the liberal puritans, I make sure to keep an eye on the conservative ones too.

they needed an entire building because the image is actual size

Attached: 1559357624123.png (297x299, 217K)

They were, there just wasn't any internet so you didnt get a nonstop stream of literally all of their opinions.
They still are crazy too, look at antivax and pro life and flat earth groups.

Well, what do you want CK to do, not advertise to fat people in a country that's chock-full of fat people? That'd be bad business, user-a-roonie.

You really need to dilate, Breitbart is only the second most visited Boomer site behind Drudge, my 64 year old parents go there. The Hill comments are like the Breitbart of liberal comments.

That's not even remotely implied in that post.

I never cared about Tool. Prog metal and industrial metal are shit genres.

The only way they'd become relevant again is if the liberals aren't kept in check and don't piss off the majority of those of us who are moderates so we end up voting right.
I'm honestly inclined to believe that neo-libs are genuine controlled opposition, since it'd be extremely easy for Democrats to win every single election for years to come if they just dropped all their retarded LGBTQIAPZH92SFH and "everything is racist and sexist" shit and focused on shit that people actually care about, like healthcare, public services, and education.

Yep. And the extremists on each sides seek out and amplify the content of the extremists on the other side and repost it all over the Internet, so while most of the country is actually probably pretty moderate you wouldn't think it surfing the web.

Sure, let's run our society entirely based on the extreme avoidance of outlier situations like those ones, to the point where adopting the polar opposite solution is seen as the only reasonable solution. There'll never be any negative consequences from that.

Uhhghh baybee bayybaaah!
I was a terror since the public school era !

Face it buddy your team lost and is about to lose again in 2020.

Wtf

Attached: 1567305560003.png (343x343, 146K)

>the popular vote, by definition, more accurately reflects the popular position
No.
You can have a state with massive cities, where people think basically the same due to mob rule. You can then pack these cities more and more, until it wins you the popular vote.
Its nigh impossible to this in rural areas, where people think more for themselves, due to less peer influence. A popular vote would be an absolutely horrid idea, which is why we dont have it.
"Mainstream culture" mostly comes from a small subset of people in specific places. Allowing them to dictate what happens politically is plain retarded.

You understand that if you thought it wasn't funny and weren't offended by it, the proper response would be to ignore it, right?

people need to stop spamming this embarrassment of a human shell.

What's it like having the reading comprehension of a 7 year old?
Where they live is irrelevant you mongoloid, the point is that when talking about mainstream culture the popular vote will always be a better indicator than the electoral college.
This conversation isn't about whether the popular vote is a good way to determine government (it's not), it's about whether the popular vote determines what is a popular position, and it absolutely does.
Jesus christ, I get that this is Yea Forums and the average IQ here is room temperature, but this is just ridiculous.

It wasn't that funny desu

Oh look, its that one white incel who went berserk on Yea Forums with bruce posting LMAO

Yeah, I think the SJW media is possibly one of the Democrats' worst enemies at the moment. The Dem candidates are probably terrified of saying the "wrong thing" for fear of being torn apart in the press. But it's even worse than that. Not only do you have to not say the "wrong thing", you have to make sure to say enough of the "right thing".
Meanwhile 90% of the Republicans are perfectly fine with supporting a shady adulterous con artist ex-Democrat president simply because he is carrying out policies that are more in line with what they want than what they would get from a Democrat.
Many of the Dem constituencies are also fickle and it's hard to actually get them out to vote on election day.

>Where they live is irrelevant you mongoloid
No it isnt.
Its easier to control a dense population in a city with fear and ridicule.
Have you gone to school at all? I learned this in elementary school ffs.
And no, the popular vote does NOT determine what is a more popular position.
Cities
>can more easily fake votes due to the sheer number of them
>control what people think they can say because of the fear of the masses
>are more able to influence people via visual propaganda due to more people being in a smaller place
Its not even that hard a concept to grasp, you just cant (or more likely wont).
You simply cant propagandize rural communities as easily as a dense population. Cities are a godsend to those pushing both propaganda and false polling/voting.

Alright, you're clearly an idiot who's fundamentally misunderstanding the crux of the argument to begin with.
It doesn't matter HOW populations arrive at the most popular position, only that said position is popular in mainstream culture.
This isn't an argument about what's wrong or right you fucking moron, it's about what positions the public at large (most of whom live in cities and suburbs) hold (at least in their public life).
The fact that you don't understand this is extremely telling, and I wouldn't be surprised if you're a literal high schooler.

I find their arrogance fascinating. A literal nobody stating such big sentences...impending irrelevance, wow

>controlled opposition
really wouldn't be surprised. It only takes a few dedicated people to get the ball rolling, just find the most imbalanced members of the community and wind them up. The left is too polite, they will sit there and let anyone with an "outsider" view talk even if that person is batshit.

>It doesn't matter HOW populations arrive at the most popular position, only that said position is popular in mainstream culture
Its you who doesnt understand.
A fake opinion isnt a real opinion.
I'll say it again, in a different way.
Any opinion expressed out of fear is not real. Any opinion that is manufactured out of thin air and written on paper, pretending its from an actual person is not real.
These things happen most in large cities. Large cities tend to have hivemind opinions. A popular opinion on anything is just relying mostly on big city opinion, because that has the most population.
You are very bad at reading comprehension, or else you just want to argue.

Reminder that everyone outside of liberal hugboxes hates trannies, pedophiles, fags, and the like.

>It doesn't matter HOW populations arrive at the most popular position, only that said position is popular in mainstream culture.
Again, you clearly have the reading comprehension of a high schooler.

>total count: 6

A fake opinion that may or may not be someones actual opinion makes something popular?
Only on paper. Anyone who states they love X because theyll get the shit kicked out of them from fans of X has the popular opinion that anyone who likes X is an asshole. But youre saying that the popularity lies with people liking X, because thats what they said, which is hilarious.

Most 4channers don't understand basic statistics.

Yes, the popular position is the position that people express in their public lives that is the most common, glad to see you finally understand (kind of).
No shit people are influenced by fear, it doesn't matter, because so long as people are afraid to say what they might truly believe, mainstream culture will remain the same and the popular opinion (AKA the opinion that's the most commonly-expressed in public discourse) will remain that; popular opinion.

These hyper-faggots aren't worth the Zyklon-B it would take to remove them from this mortal coil. Surely there is a green energy method of extermination; I am thinking something along the lines of a giant oxygen-fed furnace connected to a steam turbine.

Still only like 8 "professional" reviews. Seems like the real story is no real reviewer wants to get involved.

Just dump them in the fucking ocean.

i’m chinese hands down

user, it's from the AV club.

based Jeremy

Attached: lluz93gizcl21[1].jpg (1280x720, 30K)

>Well first of all, Trump lost the popular vote.
so did Obama to Hillary. Oops.

>t. slate reader

this is a joke right?

Why the fuck is there even a rotten tomatoes page for a stand up routine?
And if you can't handle edgy humor, why are you watching a Dave Chappelle stand up routine?

Attached: 1565987966750.gif (640x572, 2.49M)

>so long as people are afraid to say what they might truly believe, mainstream culture will remain the same
This is why there are more views on YouTube videos than mainstream outlets, right? Manufactured (made up) opinions that people dont have, as well as forcing people to not dissent is a short-term strategy that always ends in the destruction of the product.
The "popular position" is as simple as being the most popular. Popularity is a show of numbers. Numbers can be faked. Easily.
Popularity in...what? Polls? What people admit to anonymously? To their friends? To their family?
If you took what is popular in a city, you would get groupthink, "I dont want backlash" answers, if you did this in rural areas, (even though there are more areas but less people) you would get completely different answers.
So, going by popularity is basically saying "I want to know what people in these few places say they think" instead of saying "I want to know what the actual popular opinions are."
If youre selling tickets to a movie, or a politician, what people say to not make waves is not opinion, because youll get something you think is "popular" that no one buys (even though they said they would), and some genius not understanding.

>This is why there are more views on YouTube videos than mainstream outlets, right?
Okay, since you're an idiot, let's take a look at the most viewed YT videos of the past few weeks.
Which of these is espousing conservative views and opinions or is created by people who do?

Attached: Trending trash.jpg (1315x5949, 2.79M)

Has there ever been a more based normie than Jeremy?

>most viewed YT videos
The trending tab on YT is not representative of the most watched. You know this. I know this. My 8yo fan-of-pewdiepie nephew knows this. Thats disingenuous.

Okay, so post some of the most-viewed conservative videos and we'll see if they can compete with the dozens, possibly hundreds of extremely popular music videos posted to YT made by professed liberals.

OH, HE WENT THERE!

>post boring political videos and compare them to music videos aimed at children and teens with higher replayability value
how high are you right now?
Post a video of the latest MSNBC opinion show, and compare it to LOL BEN SHAPIRO REKS LIBTARDS.

You dumbfuck, this isn't about political opinions alone, this is about pop culture, and pop culture is EXTREMELY liberal, which was my fucking point.
People conform to what they see in movies and music because that's how the general population of idiots functions.
How fucking stupid are you? Genuine question.

youtube.com/watch?v=mKEZ38nHyv4

based jeremy as always

>I'm not a pedophile. But if I was, Macaulay Culkin is the first kid I'm fuckin
You can't tell me that whole bit wasn't good comedy

based Muslims

>You dumbfuck, this isn't about political opinions alone, this is about pop culture, and pop culture is EXTREMELY liberal, which was my fucking point
Yet you dismiss the fact that the entertainment industry makes more overseas than here now, because people simply arent buying into the mass propaganda that is happening in current year.
You try to explain it away in youtube videos by using music videos, which are looped endlessly and played in the background, instead of things people are watching for a purpose, which is either to be informed, or to make fun of "whats popular."
Liberal pop culture has taken a hit. A BIG hit. Why do you think the RIAA is going after everyone and their brother now? Why do you think movies are marketing to China? Why do you think TV networks are losing their shit and going after people?
How boomer are you that you think the Jew is going on strong like its 1985?
What you would call "unpopular" has become very lucrative.

That review has nothing to do with the movie, it's just "white man bad".

>Yet you dismiss the fact that the entertainment industry makes more overseas than here now, because people simply arent buying into the mass propaganda that is happening in current year.
You'd have a point if many of these films weren't still making millions of dollars here in the US.
Making more overseas because of chinks doesn't mean that the movies aren't still popular here.
>Why do you think movies are marketing to China?
Because they want more money.
>Why do you think TV networks are losing their shit and going after people?
Because everyone and their mother is releasing a streaming service, and one of the biggest has an extremely liberal viewpoint.
You seem to think that a few right wing youtubers becoming somewhat popular is going to mean anything to your average Netflix-watching normalfag.
It doesn't, because their opinions aren't allowed to come from randos on YT.
Sorry user, but this is pointless, you seem to be delusional about the state of conservative/liberal media relations in America and seem to think that Ben Shapiro has the same mainstream appeal as Netflix.
As such, this conversation won't be going anywhere (not that it has to begin with).

>People conform to what they see in movies and music
Remember when some black girl simply put on a MAGA hat (o noes unpopular) and got thousands of dollars?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You mean the BASED NIGGRESS who literally scammed a bunch of idiots?
Yea, I remember.

he was right tho, and only liberals hated what he said because they're a bunch of pearl-clutching pansies

>dave, you can't say faggot, because.... you're not gay
>I'm not a nigger either
I thought this would get more attention when I heard it, it's a perfect criticism of the double standard

This nigga talking about the RIAA in 2019. You're on another planet if you think any of these points are indicative of anything other than some crazy delusion.

>a few right wing youtubers
Name any of the people who repost Tucker Carlson vids or any of the "rekt" videos.
No one even knows who they are, there are a ton of them, and they get millions of views.
Youre not delusional, Id say, just either drastically out of touch or blackpilled. Youtube has to actively hide right wing videos to promote Media conglomerates, and people still find them.
Its not even right wing, its just anything that isnt massively left wing. I see it with my nephew and his friends all the time. If you tell kids they cant say faggot and nigger, theyre gonna say it 10x as much. And hate you for it.
No one said the "Mainstream Media" isnt historically liberal. Its just that their reach has taken a huge hit, and continues to take huge hits, and youre trying to handwave it all away.
How much money do you think Dave Chappelle would make with a video he sold himself making fun of trannies? If the answer isnt "a ton," then youre kidding yourself.

I'm wearing 4XL Calvin Kleins right now, suck my fat belly Yea Forums

>I thought this would get more attention when I heard it
Well they're not exactly clamoring to publish that kinda thing in Variety are they.

Yeah, its so lucrative people even use it to scam people now. But unpopular!

INKOO KANG WA?
WAS THAT?
HEY CHARLIE, I ORDERED THE KUNG POW CHICKEN
NOW GET OUTTA HEA YOU FILTY ANIMAL BEFORE I GIVE YOU MY DUCK SAUUUUCE
AGUUUUSH
AGUUUUUSH
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: 1551632744921.jpg (212x249, 9K)

>This nigga talking about the RIAA in 2019
How many YouTube videos got copystriked because of the RIAA? MILLIONS.

What you are describing is counter-culture, which is literally exactly my point throughout this entire conversation.
Liberalism is mainstream, I wouldn't even say that conservatism is counter-culture because I doubt that most of these kids believe in conservative ideals like avoiding pornography, not having sex before marriage, observing the sabbath, working hard for your lot in life, etc. etc.
It's more anti-liberalism, which makes sense since modern neo-liberalism is a joke of an ideology.
You seem to think that having an audience is the same thing as having a mainstream audience.
see directly above
Having an audience willing to give you money isn't the same thing as appealing to the mainstream.
By that logic, Chapo Trap House and Summertime Saga are both mainstream and popular because they're making tens of thousands of dollars a month from their patreons.

What's the AV club and how does that make this ironic? I'm guessing they were shut down?

Dude you come across as being one step removed from a q-boomer. Calm down. Anyone who wants to hear these kinds of frenetic simple observations all get linked to a warped interpretation of the current state of affairs can just go listen to Owen Benjamin or someone else retarded like that.

See also: Ghostbusters 2016 and The Last Jedi for "expert" analysis in action.

>You seem to think that having an audience is the same thing as having a mainstream audience.
You seem to think that popularity is the same thing as availability.
Its easier to see yesterdays culture everywhere, its just that its being ignored. Not only by the people saying theyre ignoring it, but by many of the people saying theyre not. Some dont even care enough about the conversation to go out of their way to say it either way.
Calling something counter culture (which is probably correct to a degree) doesnt diminish its popularity, it speaks more to its origin. Modern liberalism was immensely popular when it was called counter culture, and was obviously enormously influential.

My 68 year old mother watched this at my brother's house. She thought it was hilarious. The corporate media is poison.

>This
That whole bit was pure comedy gold!

>Dude you come across as being one step removed from a q-boomer. Calm down
What an excellent rebuttal. No one ever uses insults instead of rationality on the internets in current year.

I don't want to live in a viral reality. A reality where the Earth is flat. Where My Little Pony is the best show ever created. A reality where the white and blue dress is black and gold. Can't you see? The internet is substituting your senses for those of an actual, literal schizophrenic. We can't go on living like this. I won't even touch on which "side" is more affected, because they are both equally affected.

>Modern liberalism was immensely popular
Mainstream propagated culture today flatly disallows the stigmatization of queers and outright champions immigrants. Tranny acceptance literally didn't exist except on the extreme fringes until the last FIVE years. There are pride parades all over small town america. You're a fucking moron if you think liberalism has diminished at all in the past 10 years. That or you're so retarded you have no functional conception of what liberalism actually entails.

Fucking clownworld

What happens when you can't even tell where something's chest ends and pelvis begins?

Attached: 076Golem.png (834x834, 566K)

>dirtbag left
>cumtown
HoohohohohoahahahahahahahaHAHAHAAAAAAAAAHHHH AH AH. AH. AH… AHHHHhahahaa huuuuhhahahahaha … bruh

>le clownworld
Yea Forums
a place where braindead npcs parrot the same old clownwords

Yeah, we should all be parroting what CNN and MSNBC tells us instead. Give me a fucking break

WHAT IF
everything cnn says is propaganda
AND
everything fox says is propaganda
*GASP*
who can you trust in such a world?
GUESS WHAT?
trust no1

Attached: trust no 1.jpg (400x306, 15K)

Im more inclined to side with the pearl clutchers. Especially on violence. A PG-13 movie released today will have excessively more gore and killing than one released even 10 years ago. Feels like any action movie I watch on netflix today features at least a few dozen gruesome murders of white well-dressed henchmen who always look suspiciously german or russian.

Good, because I don't take Fox as the voice of god either, I don't really know where you're going with this

The difference in the popular vote amounts to less than the voting population of one district in NYC

You must be really really stupid, then. Because everything everyone says on /pol/ comes direct from Fox. If you are an exception, I really don't care.

You're telling me Hannity and Tucker are advocating for ethnostates and genocide and nobody somehow noticed?
Dilate you freakazoid

subtlety is lost on the right, as always

Aren't you supposed to advertise to what people want to be, not to what they are? Nobody wants to be an obese nigress. They want to be hot and sexy.

Everything I know about the holohoax I learned from The Five

Yeah, like the left would know anything about subtlety, look at the OP and tell me unless you think Chappelle is secretly a fascist

why is it always the most big framed tall dudes that want to be trannies, the narrow shoulder manlet trannies you don't see many of

>mainstream culture
This word gets missused a lot. People use it to refer to liberal media, which can appear to dominate. But to refer to what at least 50% of the country consumes is something else. Fox news is the biggest channel on cable news. Drudge report gets more online traffic than CNN or MSNBC. Facebook's population is aging and is becoming boomer territory with younger generations choosing not to sign up. A single PewDiePie video gets more views than the entire site activity of Vox or Buzzfeed. The biggest subrebbit by traffic is /r/theDonald/. Not to mention that communications in private groups and encrypted messaging recently surpassed social media in network traffic , Who knows whats being said there.

Attached: GenZyklon.jpg (1047x988, 483K)

I have this creeping suspicion that Trump will blow out his competitors even more than last time in 2020. What will the media do then?

You know the interesting thing about trannies, gays, blacks, [insert hated group] is that their existence offends to the point of an unrelenting and ironic fixation whereas they could live their lives without the slightest interest in the daily, personal affects, habits, and sexual proclivities of people who aren't like them. I've never understood why haters require that they, themselves, place so much unnecessary attention to the function of people and processes that tend to be vastly irrelevant to their lives. It's like you're the snowflake who feels threatened by something potentially more interesting than yourselves.

Im from New York and fuck The New York Times. Yes i would trust a fucking autist with 89 subs and horrible quality videos over most giant TV shit

>trusting (((critics)))

It's been almost a decade since I even read a review.

>New York Times

Attached: 7E9.jpg (477x535, 101K)

When the left legit says fucking MILK is racist and Farmers Markets are nazi meeting places....fuck. Geee. I wonder why people would like hearing fucking low tier offensive shit

its really lame how critics take this "im not mad, just disappointed" approach. like who are they fooling here.

nobody actually thinks this. milk does have a ton of estrogen though :^)