Horny movies

Tom Waits probably

Attached: FD168F58-A2C7-4379-B965-0D75A0CB37F0.jpg (484x750, 76K)

Beautiful feminine women, 100% white attractive cast, romantic settings and story, vampires, werewolf rape scene, gosh I cannot imagine why it makes you feel good.

She tried but to no avail. She scratched the hell out of me and bit my neck pretty hard though. I was lucky I didn't need stitches.
I guess for some it possibly is if they like being mutilated. lol

because of monica belluci probably

Im so frickin' horny. If i would have more flexible back and longer cock i would suck myself everyday. Tried it yesterday and i break something in neck. Will try it tommorow because today it is a day to fap to nicole aniston getting BD

Attached: 1582.jpg (960x960, 43K)

Aesthetically it's one of the best vampire movie ever made, and they made the Brides hot as hell. If you never had the desire of wanting to be bitten by a female vampire after watching this then there's something wrong with you. Monica Bellucci, enough said.

Attached: bram-stoker-brides.jpg.480x0_q71_crop-scale.jpg (480x493, 35K)

The symbolism in the book is absolutely bananas, especially for the time. It's told through diary entries and it's heavily implied that Mina's diary entries are largely inaccurate and that Dracula fucked her. Johnathon Harker's character arc has him being emasculated in the weird wilds of Transylvania and cucked repeatedly back home, only to return to Dracula's castle at the end and fuck Dracula to death with a huge, rock hark knife dick. It's fucking cash money, my nigga.

Attached: 1521862175703.gif (628x337, 1.64M)

Man someday I just want to get a retardedly flamboyant pair of sunglasses, I am not about to pay 500 for one though maybe if I get rich.

>tfw im flexible enough and have a dick big enough to fully suck it myself.
Let me tell you there is nothing better than getting real fucking horny and sucking your own dick whilst you finger/fuck your asshole. Do this like once a week for an hour at least then regret it

I don't know I never watched it

Because Sadie Frost is a diry sexy minx in it. dat voice.

Attached: sadie frost-dracula-costume.jpg (1758x2960, 1.58M)

>DUDE SEX LMAO
It's actually a massive xenophobic rant about an inhuman foreigner perverting the purity of English life, modern literary circles are unironically cumbrained fools.

I get it, you've had a freshmen English class and it made you uncomfortable. It's impossible to separate the sexual and social fears in the novel. It's a giant boiling pot of xenophobia and psychosexual repression. I mean, FFS Dracula literally transplants earth from his homeland into England! He's literally and figuratively colonizing the colonizers. Shit gets real crazy. A wealthy, powerful foreigner comes to England makes it like his home and proceeds to steal English women making them his slaves and doing depraved things to them that the straightlaced Victorians would never admit to wanted to do themselves.

The really cool thing about Dracula and vampires in general in the novel is that they act as a sort of Derridean rift that inverts and implodes everything around them. Dracula is a rupture of life and death, and his very presence perverts the world around him. Now that's some of that big dick Dracula energy.

Attached: 1559581991277s.jpg (124x125, 3K)

Sexuality, especially repressed sexuality, is the most cliched, surface level interpretation of anything. So don't throw around 'hurr u just don't like it' when that dead horse is mush. 99% of all sexual interpretation is very, very modern. Dracula is the embodiment of old world, foreign horror is relevant to the day it was written, considering the book is based off almost completely fictional accounts of eastern European folklore where that weird world beyond the forest was strange and far off. Dracula is a monster, inhuman, and a perversion of the natural, that's what vampires are. They're things that should not be, sinners and evil-doers (people against society, especially small tight knit communities) who rise from death and drink the blood of the living, a cannibal and walking paradox from beyond the mundane world (which becomes a powerful symbol in Christian eastern Europe of the mockery of Christ and the sacraments). The vampire across its many incarnations from gorged corpse Romania to hairy wolf thing in Greece, is disease, mortality and perversion of the natural order. Vampires are a spacegoat creature you find across the world from little people to djinn. It was never about sex until one horny Englishman in Geneva wrote about a handsome vampire. In my reading and study of Dracula I never picked up a hint of inherent sexuality, that's something that got thrown on way, way later.

Because Lucy, Mina, and the Brides are all pure, unbridled sex. I have never wanted to fuck a woman more than Lucy in that garden wearing the red nightie. I have dreams about it to this day.

If you're seriously trying to argue that Dracula(or I guess supernatural shit in general?) doesn't contain psychosexual shit, you're not only a shit scholar, you're being willfully ignorant.

because winona

Attached: 740full-winona-ryder.jpg (500x694, 54K)

Because peak Monica, Sadie & Winona. Great visuals, blood, sex, operistic sets, adventure, exotic places, death and madness.

The Victorian vampire is our legacy. Of course the vampire movies are about sexuality. Also, you didn't mention previous books, as Carmille.

>supplies nothing to back up his statement
Modern academia are cumbrained fools like the man youre replying to said

>Sexuality, especially repressed sexuality, is the most cliched, surface level interpretation of anything
>sex
>one of the fundamental driving forces of the species
>clichéd and surface level
Yeah no, you're full of shit.

i get that you can rationalize a lot of dracula's motives with sex but your assumption seems kind of forced. It's easy to tie everything into sex but i seriously didn't get any of that when i read the book.
It was just bros looking out after one another

>>one of the fundamental driving forces of the species
As far as evolution is concerned, it's THE driving forces. It's why if someone were to throw a baseball at your face and your balls your fucking big nuts monkey brain will automatically use both hands to protect your balls before you even realize what's happening. It's why nobody in the history of the world has ever stopped fucking before achieving orgasm to go get a fucking sandwich. When we're aroused our brains shutdown most of the other really important systems to drive us to continue our species.

>but i seriously didn't get any of that when i read the book
How old were you when you read it? It's important to note that Dracula himself isn't necessarily motivated by sex, rather he is an inversion of the Victorian ideal. Sex becomes a consequence of this. He's ugly, ravenous with his physical appetites, and represents the supernatural over the scientific. Repression is largely predicated upon fear. The animalism of Dracula is indicative of Darwin the Victorian fear that man might just be nothing more than dust. So Dracula becomes a symbol of indulgence.

Brainlet.

i know it's babby's first fan theory but van helsing was an idiot who killed lucy with his incompetence, blood transfusions were stone age back then and getting them from the first four random people who walked through the door would kill almost anyone

When is it implied that Dracula fucked Mina?

Chapter 21 I think. It's where they find Dracula "drinking blood from her breast." In Mina's diary entries she writes about a growing passion for Dracula that builds until he visits her, then she writes that even though they found her in a very compromising position she was able to resist his advances.

Basically, it's Victorian England and the cultural convention at the time would have been to lie about the encounter, even in your personal diary, especially if your husband was going to be reading it.

dracula.fandom.com/wiki/Chapter_21
Her letters and diary pages are unreliable as well, but in this chapter she seems to be straight up lying to Dr. Seward when he finds her with Dracula. It's at the end of the chapter.

>Aesthetically it's one of the best vampire movie ever made,
i just wanna say the costuming plays huge part and its absolutely stellar in this movie, eiko ishidas work is great
she also worked on the fall and the cell, another two movies with very strong aesthetic directions

Here's where that fan theory falls apart: it's a work of fiction. Nothing happens in the novel that Bram Stoker, the Victorian, wouldn't be aware of. That means that if Bram Stoker didn't know that blood transfusions like that would be fatal, then they aren't fatal in his story. In the real world, yeah, that shit would fuck her up. But in Stoker's Victorian world, nope, they're fine.

Isn't she the one drinking from his breast?

Watch the making of videos about it. It pays homage to literally every major vampire movie made before it. Including Nosferatu, and a dozen or so different Dracula movies made before. It's an amazing film.

>eiko ishidas work is great
She was such a visionary. Dracula's armor is still stunning.

Shit, you're right. It's still pretty incriminating.

>The moonlight was so bright that through the thick yellow blind the room was light enough to see. On the bed beside the window lay Jonathan Harker, his face flushed and breathing heavily as though in a stupor. Kneeling on the near edge of the bed facing outwards was the white-clad figure of his wife. By her side stood a tall, thin man, clad in black. His face was turned from us, but the instant we saw we all recognized the Count, in every way, even to the scar on his forehead. With his left hand he held both Mrs. Harker's hands, keeping them away with her arms at full tension. His right hand gripped her by the back of the neck, forcing her face down on his bosom. Her white nightdress was smeared with blood, and a thin stream trickled down the man's bare chest which was shown by his torn-open dress. The attitude of the two had a terrible resemblance to a child forcing a kitten's nose into a saucer of milk to compel it to drink. As we burst into the room, the Count turned his face, and the hellish look that I had heard described seemed to leap into it. His eyes flamed red with devilish passion.

Though there are clear allegorical allusions to adultery, I don't think the two ever fucked in the literal sense. The story has strong metaphors implying cuckoldry without actually being literal.

Once you realize that everything is told via 3rd person in letters and diary entries it gets harder and harder to believe that every entry is reliable. The book never explicitly states that they fuck, but it's pretty heavily implied.

>The waxen face, the high aquiline nose, on which the light fell in a thin white line, the parted red lips, with the sharp white teeth showing between, and the red eyes that I had seemed to see in the sunset on the windows of St. Mary's Church at Witby. I knew, too, the red scar on his forehead where Jonathan had struck him. For an instant my heart stood still, and I would have screamed out, only that I was paralyzed. In the pause he spoke in a sort of keen, cutting whisper, pointing as he spoke to Jonathan.

"`Silence! If you make a sound I shall take him and dash his brains out before your very eyes.' I was appalled and was too bewildered to do or say anything. With a mocking smile, he placed one hand upon my shoulder and, holding me tight, bared my throat with the other, saying as he did so, `First, a little refreshment to reward my exertions. You may as well be quiet. It is not the first time, or the second, that your veins have appeased my thirst!' I was bewildered, and strangely enough, I did not want to hinder him. I suppose it is a part of the horrible curse that such is, when his touch is on his victim. And oh, my God, my God, pity me! He placed his reeking lips upon my throat!" Her husband groaned again. She clasped his hand harder, and looked at him pityingly, as if he were the injured one, and went on.

"I felt my strength fading away, and I was in a half swoon. How long this horrible thing lasted I know not, but it seemed that a long time must have passed before he took his foul, awful, sneering mouth away. I saw it drip with the fresh blood!"The remembrance seemed for a while to overpower her, and she drooped and would have sunk down but for her husband's sustaining arm.

>You will never drink that water
Why even live?

Mike Mignola worked on the movie and did a comic adaptation that's gorgeous as well.

Attached: mm dracula.jpg (1290x2048, 348K)

It's that one vertebrae, I swear to God!!!!!!

youtu.be/51xEHzC-rjQ

Against all the odds this is actually a good thread
More Dracula trivia please

because it's sexually charge as fuck, all the time?

The innuendo is very strong but again I think it's a metaphor. It's too on-the-nose to be literal.

Dracula is all about sex but also not about sex at all. It's entirely allegorical. Dracula doesn't have sex in the literal sense. He procreates by biting people. Biting is a metaphor for sex.

i was in my 30s or late 20s when i read it.
I guess if i "studied" the book i could infer all of that, but to me dracula was just an embodiment of evil that took different forms to advance the plot

Why did his hair turn white?

Attached: image.jpg (900x474, 235K)

bleh

In the book it's because Dracula's women gave him the suc.

My nigga

Attached: whoresofsatan.gif (500x271, 1.98M)

Can this man get an F?

Attached: quincybigdickmorris.jpg (516x400, 29K)

Coppola was anti-cgi at the time, and requested that the SFX department found a practical way to do all of the effects in script. As written, it was deemed impossible by all the FX houses they talked to.
IIRC his son(?) took over and delivered all the practical effects. The manipulation of Dracula's shadow alone is incredible for that reason.

How would you cast this movie today? We're due for another adaptation

Idris Elba as Dracula