KINO

KINO

Attached: EAC84A65-32F1-4BD1-901D-1459B0D4397E.jpg (746x855, 326K)

>No consensus yet
Dropped.

>21 pre-release reviews
Have you learned nothing? All of these reviewers were invited to pre-release screenings by the fucking producers. It’s the culturally acceptable equivalent of paid reviews.

>85% for part 2 of an 80s fellating nostalgia-fest.
I'm guessing the true score is sub-50%.

Retard

>only 85% with 21 reviews
yikes looks like WB's year of bombs will continue

Joker has the same reviews and this board is calling it kino

the first one was alright but I really don't give a shit about adults fighting that gay clown

I'd rather take a 85% WB movie than a 99% Disney movie desu. At this point, I feel like WB is the only studio that gives creative freedom to their directors

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHY IS JUMPSCARE DOING GOOD, ITS A CHEAP HORROR METHOD ONLY CHUCKLEFUCK LOSERS LIKE

Attached: 1563474663679.jpg (785x1100, 62K)

this board called Bright "kino" usually if the movie is a huge piece of shit Yea Forums will call it kino

I liked the first one so i'll probably watch this one too
>inb4 gang bang
>inb4 book fags
>inb4 SophiaFags
>inb4 Minions

>taking RT seriously

Attached: 1567350187378.jpg (900x1200, 241K)

>A24
>sony pictures classics

>still using rotten tomatoes

>C+ grades
>rotten
What. A 7 is a rotten for the page?

>it’s going up
Joker bros....

Rotten Tomatoes critic rating score is based on if a critic loved or hated a movie. A critic could give a movie 10/10 but still declare their review rotten because they hated the movie. Or give a movie 2/5 but give it fresh because of a political agenda.

Basically the system is stupid.

Heh

De hig

Soi 24 only gives freedom to leftie mouthpieces

Just use Metacritic

What was the appeal of the first one ?
It really feels like it's much better off as a book.

don't they show the rating anymore?