Just found that Dave Chappelle's new special has 0% on rotten tomatoes. What's going on here?
Dave Chapelle Rotten Tomatoes
Jacob Johnson
Oliver Nelson
>5 seething trannies
>no other critics
>no audience score
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Gabriel Wood
He was regurgitating a Ricky Gervais joke from 2015. People liked Dave because his humor was ahead of the curve. Not anymore it would seem
Wyatt Gray
Have you read their full reviews? They sound like Dave Chapelle personally came to their house and shat on their front door
Leo Moore
Which joke?
Michael Ramirez
It objectively wasn't that funny, and then you faggots became his own personal ad agency because you so desperately want to own the libs.
Easton Gonzalez
No, I'm not talking about how objectively funny it is, I'm just surprised at rotten tomatoes response. I mean, it's not like Captain marvel where the negative press damaged the sales, and it's not like Netflix or Disney are trying to boycott it. So what's going on? Why are they so desperate to own the Nazis with bad reviews that they damage their own credibility and reputation as a company?
Caleb Gomez
Dilate and lubricate.
Joshua Wood
>defend a pedophile on stage and say so what, it doesn't even matter if he WAS guilty
>get on a soapbox and spew your personal political and ideological beliefs
>not be funny the entire time
BUT WHY THE BAD REVIEWS?
Alexander Baker
>pedophile
based redditor
Grayson Adams
>based redditor
Levi Wilson
Read this:
Carson Morales
>5 salty trannies
Whoa hes career is over
Luke Powell
>damage their own credibility
What credibility?
Asher Gray
>defend a pedophile
Then why are trannies so buthurt?
Hudson Sanders
>rotten tomatoes
>credibility and reputation as a company
u wat m8
Gavin Sanchez
RT is infested with socjus types; their go-to critics are faggots, trannies and feminists, and the collective rainbow reich cannot tolerate criticism in any way, shape or form. This is why woke films and shows get extra points tacked on, and why anything that goes against the grain gets shit upon. Credibility and objectivity doesn't even enter into the equation because the vast majority of "critics" writing these reviews are only in it for the agitprop.
Joshua Gomez
There is no such thing as "objectively funny". All humor is subjective.
Joshua Thomas
not true at all. there are an explicit set of rules that humor follows, and virtually all humor does in fact follow these rules. if humor were subjective, there wouldn't be people who are universally considered better at it than normal people.
Gavin Wood
Expect there are no comedians who are considered to be universally funny. There are comedians with a wider appeal, that is sure, but none of them are universally considered funny. For an example Seinfeld is almost entirely an American phenomena.
Charles Jenkins
Sure, the natural human response to silly faces or watching someone fall down in the street might be laughing, doesn't mean just about anyone can do good funny faces or fall funnily.
>universally considered better (comedians)
Except there are exceptions to every such appraisal (detractors), therefore it's impossible to call it universal or objective. Some hated Chaplin, Robbins, Mel Brooks, Monty Python, etc. The same can be said about pretty much every funny man or artists out there, because art is subjective. It's how if affects you, and you and me are different from other people.
Call me a sophistfag but your line of reasoning screams lack of culture.
Mason Wright
It's literally just 5 trannies hyperventilating. Wait until actual critics come in