NEXT TIME BABY

NEXT TIME BABY

Attached: 25dzjmp7thwy.jpg (570x300, 27K)

1*1=2

he was better than Hammerhead Nose

how?

it's because you have two ones, so the answer is two

You have one ones, so the answer is one

2=1*2=1*(1+1)=1*1+1*1=2+2=4

Come on dudes, it's bait.

No if it's one by one it's one one not a one and another one but rather one of one not two of one the one of one is different to a one and one, making the calculation one one is one or one by one equal one and to illustrate how it works think of rather than expressing one and one and one you express one of one ones making the answer one and not three, as it's not three ones but one one by one or one by one ones

Hes too high IQ for capeshit

(1^2)+2=4

I'm a mathematician and what you've said is incorrect. Imagine 3*3*3, and what you have is twenty-seven and not nine as it is three of three threes or three threes of three

or to make it simpler, 3*1*1 would be three one ones or one three by ones, a one by a one by a three, or one three units counting one, simply put the answer is three. If I gave you three one ones you would expect the same amount as one one ones given into your hand three times

>Toilet paper - and no baby wipes - in the bathroom. If they're using dry paper, they aren't washing all of themselves. It's just unclean. So if I go in a woman's house and see the toilet paper there, I'll explain this. And if she doesn't make the adjustment to baby wipes, I'll know she's not completely clean.

He's too microdicked for capeshit

>brainlets in this thread

Attached: thoward.jpg (1404x1024, 298K)

and 1*0 is 0 and not one as most people besides mathematicians think the answer is 1. But to understand, you can realise that all I am doing is saying there is one unit of nothing, meaning it's still a nothing. Although you might be able to argue that it is makes a something as you have one unit of it. In that case 1 by 0 could conceivably be 1 but this is higher grade maths and is frankly beyond this board

you probably also say dumb stuff like .999... is equal to 1

Attached: sneed3.png (679x843, 208K)

i don't get this meme

No, one by itself can only be one and never .999

But what would be .999 *1?

one .999s meaning one of less than one, which if I gave to you would be less than one unit so you wouldn't be able to see it, but it would be there you would just have to trust

Hes a dumbass. He could have been Warmachine throughout the entire 10 year Thanos arc. Instead he got greedy after the first movie, demanded more money, got thrown out on his ass and replaced by Don Cheadle.

you either aren't that poster or aren't a mathematician to not understand what ... meant

It's simple mathematics, if you want I can point you towards some resources. .999 ones is less than one unit of a unit meaning it is not a unit therefore you can't quantify it with the naked eye

you can't see any number with the naked eye, dumbass

Just think. If he hadn't become an actor, he would be the head of a chemical plant or water treatment facility by now.

a number represents a unit of mass, then you can quantify that number and represent it to the eye, but only a whole unit. It's why Terence fails in simple calculation, like you he fails to appreciate the visualisation of numbers. it's why he thinks of two separate ones rather than a time and space application of one unit of one ,making it the same as itself

>a chemical plant
a Meth lab

In case you're unaware the actor genuinely believes that's how Math works. It's calleld "Terryology".

Carry on then