Is pernicious garbage the new glib facsimile?

is pernicious garbage the new glib facsimile?

Attached: 83D5B223-18AF-49D3-969A-5D025B894C71.jpg (1242x461, 159K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rogerebert.com/reviews/joker-movie-review-2019
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_King_of_Comedy_(film)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>not pernicious nonsense
FAILED

Attached: j__frank_parnell__repoman_by_sagg-d3c43j9.jpg (550x850, 204K)

*puts down thesaurus*
Heh... pernicious. That's a good one.

He's right, the whole fucking plot is out there if you want to check his claims. For a site that criticizes bad writting on capeshit you sure were quick to defend this one despite not seeing it.

>RogerEbert.com
They should really have just let that web site become an archive of Ebert's reviews, not wear its skin after taking out its festering flesh like they're doing with it now.

The whole review doesn't make much sense.
>(the director got a lot of money from) those “Hangover” movies—which some believe have indeed contributed to the lack of civility in etc.—
What the fuck does that even mean?
He then claims it's not woke as Taxi Driver or The King of Comedy, therefore it's bad because it exploits similar themes merely for shock and violence.
It's like some kid dissing an artist's music as "commercial" without providing any sort of argument for it.
How any of this shit is "pernicious" I have no idea.
>rogerebert.com/reviews/joker-movie-review-2019

You know what, Matt? You are GLIB. You are GLIB.

Spoken like a true Perfidious Albion.

hey glenn

what does pernicious even mean, does anyone know?

Attached: 1520308569692.png (240x232, 51K)