Only one review actually matters

Only one review actually matters.

Attached: armond-white.jpg (550x325, 32K)

Based

based

this but unironically.

Whatever the king says I will spread the word

>be me
>use rare words to sound smart
>offer analysis of movies that have nothing to do with the movie and everything to do with how educated I feel

What does he actually like?

Basso

>rare words
its fine to admit you're stupid user, we wont judge

>its
>wont
Bravo on that 6-year-old spelling. Also, your logic is flawed. Knowing rare words doesn't mean you don't know them.

Imagine being as stupid as you. You think White is based because he knows words you don't, and thinks thoughts you can't think. You're nowhere near the required level to even disagree with him or argue against his opinion.

You should have stayed quiet, pleb.

Your a retard lol

If he likes it the universe will collapse

>word filter "based"
>sometimes half of a thread's posts vanish

Armond's a hack. Nobody takes him seriously.

the most electrifying man in film review entertainment
also has never said anything wrong

Armond will praise it. Check em

fucken based
eat shit loser

he should have starred in the Joker film coming up.

found the thanos of the based planet

Attached: ge23tergdf.png (321x566, 125K)

I do think it is fair to say that Roger Ebert destroyed film criticism. Because of the wide and far reach of television, he became an example of what a film critic does for too many people. And what he did simply was not criticism. It was simply blather. And it was a kind of purposefully dishonest enthusiasm for product, not real criticism at all…I think he does NOT have the training. I think he simply had the position. I think he does NOT have the training. I’VE got the training. And frankly, I don’t care how that sounds, but the fact is, I’ve got the training. I’m a pedigreed film critic. I’ve studied it. I know it. And I know many other people who’ve studied it as well, studied it seriously. Ebert just simply happened to have the job. And he’s had the job for a long time. He does not have the foundation. He simply got the job. And if you’ve ever seen any of his shows, and ever watched his shows on at least a two-week basis, then you surely saw how he would review, let’s say, eight movies a week and every week liked probably six of them. And that is just simply inherently dishonest. That’s what’s called being a shill. And it’s a tragic thing that that became the example of what a film critic does for too many people. Often he wasn’t practicing criticism at all. Often he would point out gaffes or mistakes in continuity. That’s not criticism. That’s really a pea-brained kind of fan gibberish.

Remember when you cancerous reddit capeshitters called us all hipsters for praising this "contrarian"and now you use him to defend your anti-art trash?

unironically based.

reminder he will probably mention snyder in the review

But he is a contrarian, and Yea Forums loves him because they define themselves by what reddit isn't. Even though it's just actual fucking reddit these days anyway. Redditors love trashing Reddit, after all.

Todd Phillips is no Zack Snyder, so its likely he'll hate it

Does anyone know if Armond has seen The Joker yet?

Yep I just watched this shitflick. Reviews almost finished.

>contrarian
you're not fooling anyone tourist

Armond would never be so disrespectful

>muh grammar

Neither are you by only posting about him when agrees with how you feel about which capeshit you like, tourist.

Attached: 1277144383845.jpg (298x279, 33K)

I thought pol hated gay niggers, why does this one get a pass because he writes terrible film reviews?

Based. This black-white man has seen the face of god. And then he gave it a thumbs down.

He will hate it, and he will be right

He will like it, and he’ll be right

ur mom gay

I agree

Attached: gmPpwv0H_400x400.jpg (400x400, 19K)

YO THIS NIGGER FINNA ENGLISH TEACHER

>terrible grammar
Imposter

Do you fellas actually like Armond's critiques or is it just contrarianism/shitposting?

Dilate

>/pol/ is one person
>/pol/ has one unanimous consensus
This simple misunderstanding is why globohomo media and their paid lackeys could never really crack /pol/. They're trying to take it down like it's a single entity, a single mindset. Calling a right wing Christian midwestern guy with a wife and two kids an incel doesn't land. Calling a lobertarian west coast software engineer a nazi doesn't demoralize him. Calling a southern redneck uneducated will not get him to read marxist theory. /pol/ is broadly right wing, but it is not one single coherent ideology, and most of these very disparate groups only really unify when they are doing an op they all find funny, like Right Wing Safety Squad fire code enforcement, or memeing for Trump because he's not Hillary and he's not Jeb! Whereas mos of the left enforces a consensus on views like immigration or trans or whatever, there is no real consensus on /pol/ to crack.

>prescriptive grammar
Didn’t even take linguistics 101