The bringing of the African to America planted the first seed of disunion

IF IT IS NOT STRIFE AMONGST GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH BRIGHT SKINCOLOUR, AND GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH DARK SKINCOLOUR, IT IS BETWEEN GROUPS OF PEOPLE OF SIMILAR SKINCOLOUR, FOR DIVERSE CAUSES; «THE SEED OF DISUNION» IS INHERENT, AND IT IS CALLED: «RACISM», ALSO KNOWN AS: «ETHNOTRIBALISM», SO, NO, THE MESSAGE IN THAT TITLECARD IS NOT VALID; THE RACIST/ETHNOTRIBALIST WILL REMAIN SO, REGARDLESS OF HIS ENVIRONMENT, OR OF THE PRESENCE OF OTHERS IN HIS ENVIRONMENT.

Attached: 1540367777637.jpg (850x1100, 150K)

Based. We should have sent them all on a one way trip back to Africa.

>At last a film dares to tell hidden side of slavery that Americans often refuse to face

America did not need slaves , most Africans who were trafficked to the western hemisphere were taken elsewhere. Yet the libs want you to believe the USA was 100% responsible for all slavery. Its pure propaganda.

Attached: south4.gif (523x410, 130K)

stfu, dilate, have sex, and kys

if only 300000 slaves were brought to north america how come theyre 30 millions today
doesn't add up

>Yet the libs want you to believe the USA was 100% responsible for all slavery.
[citation needed]

America would be signficnatly better off without slaves.
They are a disgusting drain on the wealth of America, and never ending sink hole that transforms all areas infected with them into 3rd world shitholes in the vein of Africa.

>America would be better off without the people who built America
Nazi logic

niggers have kids you do realize

>everything is made out of cotton
lol

>niggers built america
nigger logic

weak b8

that type of demographic growth seems unrealistic

I'm really interested in this. Are there numbers on Jewish representation in Congress before the Civil War? Were Jewish legislators primarily the ones pushing pro-slavery laws?

I'm not into conspiracies but the fact that Jews wanted their own country and made themselves citizens while still having absurd levels of representation in foreign governments is fucked up beyond reason. Just fucked. You have your own country so go there.

Attached: wolfwood.png (640x480, 394K)

>entire region secedes to keep their slave economy
They were far more integral to its building than you goblino incels were.

Nubians were never African, that's new-speak.

I see pic related a lot, but it doesn't make much sense to me the more I thought about it.

According to the Jewish World Encyclopedia, there were only 5,000 Jews in the South in 1861. There were 5 million slaves at the same time, 78% of these would have been owned by Jews (3,900,000). Lets say the average Jewish household was 4 people, this would mean that every Jewish Household owned 3,120 slaves

Does this sound feasible?

Why do some cinephiles refuse to watch Birth of a Nation?

i dont know, disunion doesnt sound like a real word

"Jews did white supremacy" is a lousy meme

the first sneed

Slave breeding became more commonplace after the slave trade became abolished. 6 million came via slave ships, but how many millions were born to a life as slaves?

Neither of your """sources""" say anything about Jewish slave ownership
>muh slavery was a Southern institution, muh Lost Cause, muh States Rights
>oh but only JEWS owned slaves, whitey dindu nuffin
make up your mind faggot

Physically speaking, yes. They literally build the capital.

So the cotton seed was the seed?

Cinephiles are complete fucking idiots.

t. black nigger

The US was basically the last Western power to outlaw slavery and we had to fight a war against ourselves to do it because whiny Southerners bitched about muh free labor cotton and tobacco plantations.

Owning people is wrong, not matter where it happens. Just because it happened in greater effect elsewhere doesn't mean the US was still wrong for adopting slavery for the first 100 years of their existence.

I guess its right, bit of a weird way to start a Spiderman film though

American Southerners were the last bastion of Nigger loving pet owners, that's why you get the stigma

We gave the South, a collection of the world's stupidest and most infantile people, the task of civilizing the black race
Of course they fucked it up

Right, because the war wasn't fundamentally about ending slavery to save the poor downtrodden nigs; it was about Northern and Southern economies and cultures. Abraham Lincoln himself saw negroes as inferior but also saw the South's desire to do wtf the South was doing as inevitably leading to a schism in the US. He decided that they would either come back into the fold or be made to.

Sure, there were abolitionists and such, but they, too, mostly saw blacks as subhuman. Slavery as a concept was wrong, sure, but after it was ended most felt blacks should go back. The Civil War and Civil Rights are far, far apart for a reason.

>entire region secedes to keep their slave economy
niggers actually believe that

>Owning people is wrong,
I thought we were talking about owning niggers

I'll bet you felt so clever when you posted this

I always feel clever, I'm white